|
The Devil's Bargain: Sweatshops and the
American Scheme
January 2, 2008
By John W. Whitehead
“They hit
you…They hit you in the head…To make you work
faster.”
—Nicaraguan Factory Worker
The so-called
season of giving is officially behind us. Even in
these sluggish economic times, Americans still managed
to spend more than $50 billion in gift-giving. Now
that all the gifts have been opened, all that is left
is for us to enjoy them.
Yet I can’t help
but wonder whether our pleasure would be dimmed were
we to truly understand what is involved in bringing
these gifts—at the bargain prices Americans
love—to our homes?
| |

John W. Whitehead’s weekly commentaries
are available
for publication to newspapers and web
publications at no charge. Please contact marketing@rutherford.org
to obtain reprint permission.
Click here
to download a
print quality image of
John W. Whitehead.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Writing for the Texas
Observer, Josh Rosenblatt notes in “Buy Some
Stuff, Enslave Somebody” that
“the expanding global economy demands that
corporations seek out the cheapest possible labor to
maximize profit, and stimulate growth and innovation.
With free trade has come an explosion of global
inequality that has left more than 2.8 billion people
living on less than $2 a day.”
This inequality
makes it possible for Americans to buy more and more
while paying less and less. But as the National Labor
Committee (NLC), an organization that investigates and
exposes human and labor rights abuses committed by
U.S. companies producing goods in the developing
world, points out, “The people who stitch together
our jeans and assemble our CD-players are mostly young
women in Central America, Mexico, Bangladesh, China
and other poor nations, many working 12 to 14-hour
days for pennies an hour.”
Some in the
business world insist that the business sector’s
efforts to tap into the vast pool of willing and cheap
labor in poorer countries are all about free market
economics. However, critics such as the NLC consider
the resulting dehumanization of this new global
workforce to be the overwhelming moral crisis of the
21st century.
Unfortunately,
this remains a moral crisis largely ignored by the
American people—except, of course, for the
occasional media blitz when a celebrity is found to be
peddling wares manufactured in sweatshop conditions.
For instance, who could forget the media circus
surrounding talk-show personality Kathie Lee
Gifford’s tearful 1996 confession that her clothing
line, which was being sold in Wal-Mart stores across
America, was indeed being produced in Honduran
sweatshops that employed young girls and pregnant
women to sew garments for 20 hours per day in extreme
heat for only 31 cents an hour?
Chain retailers
like Wal-Mart that sell low-cost goods manufactured
overseas by workers who are allegedly paid less than
the minimum wage, forced to work long hours, not given
overtime pay and even beaten in order to keep them
working grueling shifts have become easy targets for
human rights groups. The company that once urged
consumers to “Buy American” is currently the
largest importer of goods made in China, which is one
of the world’s worst labor abusers. Yet Wal-Mart was
not the first company to take advantage of cheap
global labor in order to achieve a bigger bottom line,
nor will it be the last to do so. Furthermore,
mega-retailers are not solely to blame.
We, the American
consumer, have perfected the art of indulgence and
avoidance. As Rosenblatt observes, “We in the
wealthy West, living and dining off the fruits of
their labor, can honestly say we are unaware of the
devil’s bargain we bought into. Or that if we do
know, the problem is simply too great to comprehend
and beyond our means to do anything about, save
changing our lifestyles entirely. Best, in other
words, not to think about it.”
However, we must
think about it. And in thinking about it, at some
point we must realize that there is a moral dimension
to our buying habits. As long as we are willing to
buy, buy, buy at lower and lower prices without a care
for how those goods were produced or where they came
from, corporations will continue to seek out cheap
labor, which invariably goes hand in hand with
inhumane working conditions.
Thus, change must
start with you. For starters, you can check out the
National Labor Committee’s website, www.nlcnet.org,
for a list of companies with questionable ties to
sweatshops and cheap labor. If you’re not willing to
stop doing business with those companies, then you can
at least urge them to change their practices.
Savitri Durkee and
William Talen, leaders of the Church of Stop Shopping,
star in a documentary making its way across the
country, What Would Jesus Buy? They believe
now is a good time to urge companies which have given
into pressure on climate concerns by becoming more
environmentally friendly to recognize human rights
concerns by committing to carry goods manufactured in
worker-protected environments.
You should also
encourage your local church or synagogue to take a
moral stand against sweatshop labor. Christ advocated
for the poor and urged his followers to reach out to
the less fortunate. Christian organizations that claim
to emulate Christ should speak out against slave
labor. If only large Christian ministries would
take a stand and urge their parishioners to boycott
large chains that foster inhumane labor practices and
working conditions, it could go a long way toward
changing conditions around the world.
Finally, the next
time you head out the door in search of another great
deal, remember that your bargain could be coming at
someone else’s expense. For instance, here’s what
a report on a Korean-owned factory had to say about
its working conditions:
Toilets and
canteens were unsanitary. Some managers screamed at
workers or pressured those who complained to resign.
And many women, who comprise 88% of the plant’s
workers, said they were denied time off for
doctors’ appointments. One pregnant worker who had
a note from her doctor about a high-risk pregnancy
was not allowed to leave until five hours after she
complained of pain. She lost the baby.
WC: 961
|