| For nearly
two weeks, sitting on a roadside, in the heat of the Texas sun,
amid a growing, raucous circus of supporters, detractors, and
media mouthpieces, bereaved mother Cindy Sheehan has done
something many thought not possible in America anymore: she has
reminded us of shame.
She has
done this by asking a simple question: why did my son have to
die? And by asking that question, she has revealed something
that has come as a surprise to many Americans: the president has
no morally defensible answer.
As a
consequence, many Americans who have long believed President
Bush's chest thumping and bible thumping to be moral character
and moral righteousness can only stare with something close to
wide-eyed wonder and genuine humility at the real thing.
How do I
know Ms. Sheehan's moral character and moral righteousness are
the "real thing"?
Because,
unlike so many before her who dared to criticize the president
and his administration for their inglorious rush to war, Ms.
Sheehan has not been so easily dismissed as a caricature of the
radical left or dissuaded to speak by the Rovian-style outings
of family members' feelings or irrelevant personal matters.
Indeed, nothing said or done by President Bush or his political
chop shop machine to date has managed to snuff out Ms. Sheehan's
most brilliant light of honesty and truth in this dark age of
unreason. Her simple question reminds us that real moral
character and moral righteousness offer us a formidable high
ground, not so easily assailed.
Consider:
in response to Ms. Sheehan's simple question, and to her request
to meet and talk, the president claims he is mindful of Ms.
Sheehan's concerns, but declines to meet saying, "I've got
a life to live and will do so." But why not answer her
question about a war he believes is so just?
Bill
O'Reilly of Fox News says Ms. Sheehan "is associating with
the most radical elements in this country, " and that
Americans "don't have time for extremism." But what is
so extreme about asking a simple question and politely waiting
for an answer?
Matt
Drudge of the Drudge Report says Ms. Sheehan supports
Palestinians, won't pay her taxes, "gets support from her
son Andy," doesn't have the support of many family members,
and has "dramatically changed her story." But what has
any of this to do with her simple question?
Radio talk
show host Rush Limbaugh says of Ms. Sheehan's story,
"There's nothing about it that's real, including the
mainstream media's glomming onto it. It's not real...It's the
latest effort made by the coordinated left." But what is
not real about losing a son to war and asking why?
Because
Ms. Sheehan's simple question has such moral clarity, moral
authority, and moral certainty, these attacks only draw more
attention to Ms. Sheehan's moral character and moral
righteousness. And not surprisingly, not one of her attackers
wants to provide an answer to Ms. Sheehan's question. Not one
wants to address the truth. Because the truth is this: Ms.
Sheehan's son died for no morally defensible reason.
Ms.
Sheehan's question - and the yawning, silent absence of an
answer from the president - reminds us, so clearly, that those
who support this war have failed morally. And with that moral
failure comes guilt. And humiliation. And dishonor.
By asking
this simple question of the president - and by showing
extraordinary courage and grace under fire from the president
and his supporters while waiting for an answer - Ms. Sheehan
reminds us that young men and women should never die in war, but
when they do, the reasons for it must be morally defensible.
By asking
this simple question of the president, Ms. Sheehan is asking us
to remember shame.
Steven
Laffoley is the author of Mr.
Bush, Angus and Me: Notes of an American-Canadian in the Age of
Unreason. You may e-mail him at stevenlaffoley@yahoo.ca
or steven_laffoley@yahoo.com.
|