Subject: NORTH AMERICAN UNION TO REPLACE USA?
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:27:32 -0500
The blueprint's agenda for the North American Union was not
founded with this administration. Such plans take
scores of years to form and are of the stuff of the long view,
which then become a necessity at some designated point in time.
They are the secret, much discussed plans of policy makers, social
planners, demographers, futurists and change agents.
They take many years to come to fruition, for obvious reasons.
Intitially they are looked upon and frowned at as utopian fantasy,
which suits the planners dreams and hopes, for time to mature the
great hope and for the disensitization of the public to it.
But all the while, over the years, the utopian phantasy takes its
shape gradually as policy. It will then be implemented as an
"urgently" needed event. By that time, behavioral
scientists or change agents, believe most people would have been
conditioned sufficiently to accept it.
The concept for the North American Union, was discussed and
written about at length, in the Clinton Administration, also the
administration before his. And all the usual suspects in the
elitist thinktank world covered it. H.G. Wells discussed it
with insiders much much earlier, yet and in one of his non-fiction
works. Bush Jr.'s administration simply follows the
plan's methodology gradually, (another case which puts the lie to
the two-party system of constitutional government) so the slowly
cooking frogs, won't suddenly jump out of the pot and ride
roughshod over the scheme.
Joan Veon covered this agenda some years ago.
Joan, if you will, please forward your report on this.
The CFR and its sister organizations, Carnegie, Brookings, CSIS,
et al, insist the U.S. can no longer exist in harmony, in a
globalized world, where many nations are forming unions, and the
competition for trading markets will be VERY tight. An event
that could lead to serious conflagrations, if not wars. So,
if you look at this situation dispassionately, one may not like
the prospect of a North Ameican Union, but under the wholly now
changed system of trade and government that we, and really the
whole developed world now lives under, it is the demands of
globalization that would have to be changed before such unions
could, or would be, dropped.
That's simply the reality. ac
----- Original Message -----
From: Lou & Dr. Bob
Wynman
To: lou@wynman.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:00 AM
Subject: No mo' USA?!?
So, the US$, Can$ & the
Mex Peso will all be replaced by the "Amero"?
Apparently, our government is really planning to eliminate the
USA?!?
THAT should awaken even the dumbed-down, complacent, compliant
willing-slaves.
Maybe.
--Bob & Lou
www.wynman.com
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965
![[]]()
North American
Union to Replace USA?
by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted May 19, 2006
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North
American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico
and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush
administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand
NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union
designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush
administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of
people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North
American Union, a new economic and political entity which the
President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has
formed.
The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005
report entitled "Building a North American
Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush
administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the
drive to create the North American Union:
- At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005,
U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox,
and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their
governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We
welcome this important development and offer this report to
add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their
efforts.
What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is
contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of
North America" little noticed when President Bush and
President Fox created it in March 2005:
- In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the
United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership
of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level
working groups to address key security and economic issues
facing North America and setting a short deadline for
reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush
described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a
common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom
and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The
policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a
significant commitment that will benefit from broad
discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide
specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and
realized.
- To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010
of a North American community to enhance security,
prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on
the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of
the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are
mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries
will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer
security perimeter within which the movement of people,
products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its
goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and
prosperous North America.
The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President
Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public
relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President
Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech.
How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by
actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush
reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were
only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public
forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the
past.
The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every
reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for
the only border to be around the North American Union -- not
between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:
- The three governments should commit themselves to the
long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the
current intensity of the governments’ physical control of
cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North
America. A long-term goal for a North American border action
plan should be joint screening of travelers from third
countries at their first point of entry into North America
and the elimination of most controls over the temporary
movement of these travelers within North America.
Discovering connections like this between the CFR
recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to
the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open
borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most
likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman
Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in
response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting
with President Fox.
Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret
agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the
North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure
the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws.
Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs
President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on
our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going
to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush
protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the
Minuteman Project will have to do for him?
Copyright © 2006 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.![[]]()
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute
conversation with the
average voter." --Sir Winston Churchill
lou & dr. bob wynman, lake tahoe
Why did we graduate beyond dentistry to our even more rewarding
additional profession, Wellness Consultant? Why might YOU
want a "Plan B" too? In one word,
"freedom". Info at http://www.wellness-forever.com.
For details about Lou & Dr. Bob & ideas about dental
health, total wellness, politically incorrect philosophy, etc,
visit http://www.wynman.com.
NOTE: We respect your wishes. Please reply with
"Delete" in Subject or Message blanks if you'd prefer
we don't send email information to you! & if you
prefer only certain KINDS of info, we'll accommodate that
request too!
|
