logo top

bubbles

logo bottom
 


 
dot


 

           Welcome to Call to Decision 

NAFTA Superhighway Memory Hole 1

—————— 1992 ——————

[Ed note: While EO#12803 does not mention “superhighways,”

a brief description is included because this

Order encourages the privatization of taxpayer-funded

U.S. assets, including roads designated as a part of

the international superhighway/supercorridor system.]

Executive Order #12803:

“Infrastructure Privatization”

Signed by President George H.W. Bush on

April 30, 1992, EO#12803 encourages

privatization of U.S. infrastructure assets that are

financed in whole or in part by the Federal

Government and needed for the functioning

of the economy.” The Order defines privatization

to mean “disposition or transfer of an infrastructure

asset, such as by sale or by long-term lease,

from a State or local government to a private

party.” Asset examples cited include “roads, tunnels,

bridges, electricity supply facilities, mass

transit, rail transportation, airports, ports. waterways,

water supply facilities, recycling and

wastewater treatment facilities, solid waste disposal

facilities, housing, schools, prisons, and

hospitals.”

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=23625&st=&st1=

—————— 1995 ——————

Legislation to Approve the National

Highway System (NHS) and Ancillary

Issues Relating to Highway and Transit

Programs (H.R. 842 Trust Funds Off-budget)

U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Surface

Transportation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,

Washington, DC., March 10, 1995

Excerpt from remarks by Mr. GEREN:

I think this NAFTA superhighway is a very

important step in the right direction.

If you look at the map over there, I think it is

self-evident what it means to the whole country,

not just to Texas. And if you look at the NAFTA

corridor as the trunk of a tree, one that hooks

up Mexico and all those markets down there with

the industrial heartland of our country, as well as

the most important economic centers in Canada.

I urge this committee to give careful consideration

to this concept. As this trade grows, the

current I–35 won't be able to handle it. It will deteriorate.

We won't take advantage of all the

imaginative opportunities that this superhighway

designation can give us. (p.687)

The designation of I–35 corridor as a superhighway

under NAFTA is extraordinarily important

to the successful implementation of that

agreement. (p.690)

Excerpt from remarks by Mr. CORNELIUS:

I really believe that the intelligent vehicle highway

system, the IVHS program, represents our

best opportunity to accomplish those goals, and

IH-35 represents not only the State's, but I believe

the Nation's most viable candidate for becoming

the first of these new generation of superhighways.

(p.699)

http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/Trans/hpw104-15.000/hpw104-15_5.HTM

“NAFTA Super-highway Promoted"

NAFTA & Inter-American Trade Monitor,

Vol. 2, No. 13, April 28,1995

Excerpt: A Texas coalition, the Interstate Highway

35 Corridor Coalition, is lobbying to get I-35,

which runs from Minneapolis, MN to Laredo, TX

extended into Mexico as the "NAFTA Superhighway.".

. .

The group calls for major road improvements

and new processes to speed up customs inspections,

tax collection,

and toll payments.

David Dean, head

of the Coalition, describes

the plan:

"The idea is that

a truck in Monterrey,

bound for Chicago

or Winnipeg or

wherever, goes into

the interior [customs]

station in

Monterrey. Customs

officials from all

three countries

could inspect the

A review of NAFTA Superhighway history

reveals that the marketing of this concept

began well over a decade ago. In that time,

a growing number of highways have been

designated as “high priority corridors”— a

rating that allows easier access to federal funds.

Lobbyist seeking to create an

international infrastructure have referred

to the U.S. National Highway System of

“high priority corridors” as an international

NAFTA Superhighway system.

The “NAFTA Superhighway” label

surfaced shortly after the signing of the

North American Free Trade Agreement

(NAFTA). Concepts and activity connected to

NAFTA Superhighway” exist today under

NASCO SuperCorridor” — this includes:

1) establishing an international highway/

corridor that incorporates an Information

Technology System (ITS)

2) privatizing U.S. infrastructure assets (which

opens the door to foreign ownership/management

of U.S. roads, bridges, ports. . .)

3) charging for use — taxes, tolls, and fees

4) increasing use of eminent domain to build

or widen corridors to accommodate toll

highways, rail, and/or utility corridors, etc.

5) promoting intermodal/multimodal concepts

6) using public-private partnerships

(government + business partnering helps

overcome obstacles like public dissent)

7) promoting “smart highways/corridors” —

which coincidentally requires the same

technologies as a continent-wide surveillance/

monitoring system would use:

surveillance equipment (electronic

readers, sensors, scanners, cameras...)

technology for transmitting data

(fiber optic cable networks, wireless

communications, etc.)

command and control centers along

corridors to collect, process, and share data

References to the above and other issues

are contained in excerpts herein.

Entries are arranged in chronological order,

generally according to publishing dates.

Most entries cite the NAFTA superhighway

by name, but a few that do not are included for

their relevance to the topic.

Note that all emphasis has been added.

© D. K. Niwa, Sept. 2007. All rights reserved. Permission

granted to photocopy, as well as post to web sites, if used in

its entirety and without charge.

Acknowledgements:

Thank you to Vicky Davis, Amanda Teegarden,

and Joan Masters for your invaluable help!

Credit: Federal Highway Administration. Office of Interstate and Border Planning, 9-7-2006 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep10/nhs/hipricorridors/hipri-big.pdf

(Continues next page)

NAFTA

Superhighway

Memory Hole

NAFTA Superhighway promotion started with the efforts of the Interstate Highway 35 Corridor

Coalition (est. 1994) which became North America's Superhighway Coalition, Inc. (NASCO)

in 1997.* Around 2005, the organization began using “SuperCorridor” in place of “Superhighway.”

* Articles of Incorporation for North America’s Superhighway Coalition were filed June 30, 1997 with the Office of the

Secretary of State of Texas. (See entry on page 3 of this document).

2 NAFTA Superhighway Memory Hole

cargo, seal the container, weigh the truck, check

emissions controls, immigration papers, insurance,

safety standards. The truck files a route

plan, a bar code is affixed to its side or a satellite

transmitter is put on top; all taxes, tariffs,

duties, overweight charges of every description

encountered along that route are pre-paid by the

trucking concern. A smart-card with a computer

chip is encrypted into the vehicle and the truck

then enters the Nafta superhighway system in

Mexico." . . .

http://www.etext.org/Politics/NAFTA.Monitor/Volume.3/nm-03.013

Congressional Record -- House

September 20, 1995

Re: National Highway System Designation Act of 1995

Excerpt from remarks by Mr. FROST:

. . .Running through the Nation's midsection,

I-35 links the entire United States with Canadian

and Mexican markets through rail, air and

truck links.

It is the hope of the multistate I-35 Corridor

Coalition that the designation of I-35 as a high

priority corridor is just a first step toward the eventual

designation of this vital transportation link

as the International NAFTA Superhighway. . .

.I-35 is currently the only fully constructed northsouth

Interstate link between Mexico and Canada

and its high priority designation will enhance efforts

to improve the road to accommodate the

increase in commercial traffic that has begun and

promises only to grow. (p.H9258)

Excerpt from remarks by Mr. PETE GEREN of Texas:

In 1993, our country ratified the North American

Free Trade Agreement. . . . The responsibility

of the Congress did not end with that historic vote.

We must now act collectively to make the most

of NAFTA by developing an infrastructure that

maximizes the benefits of this agreement.

One of the ways that we can accomplish this

is to create a NAFTA Superhighway System.. ...

The system that I and a number of my colleagues

envision as providing the greatest economic

benefit is one that uses I-35, from Laredo,

TX to Duluth, MN as the trunk of a NAFTA superhighway

system tree. From this trunk, the

system will reach out like branches to the North

and South, East and West. This option would tie

together the major economic centers of our Nation

with Canada and Mexico . . . (p.H9272)

Excerpt from remarks by Mr. DeLAY:

As cochairman of the I-69 caucus, I believe

that the development of the I-69 corridor will induce

regional development and begin a process

of uniting States and counties into a

trade/distribution market . . . (p.H9273)

Excerpt from remarks by Ms. JACKSON-LEE:

. . . I am very pleased that this bill begins the

process of funding Interstate Route 69, the Mid-

Continent Highway. This superhighway . . . will

run from Mexico to Michigan . . . . With the increasing

levels of commerce in North America

due to the North American Free-Trade Agreement,

a roadway that traverses the continent

would be essential to helping the agreement

reach its full potential. . . . (p.H9273)

Excerpt from remarks by Ms. McCARTHY:

The National Highway System [NHS] bill we

consider today . . . builds on the 90,000-mile Interstate

System by adding an additional 70,000

miles of roads to be included in the new highway

system. The idea behind the new NHS is to

connect the interstate system and other roads

of national significance with, airports, sea and

river ports, train depots, and commercial and

downtown areas.

. . . The measure includes the important designation

of Interstate 35, a superhighway for

trade connecting Canada, the United States, and

Mexico. In addition, the NHS bill includes such

roads as Jackson County Roadway, U.S. 50 and

Missouri 291. (p.H9304)

“High-Tech Highways”

Fiscal Notes, October 1995; Contributing to this article: Sandra

Martinez; Window on State Government, Susan Combs, Texas

Comptroller of Public Accounts

Excerpt: Smart highways in Texas . . . [are] hightech

transportation guidance systems . . . .

The new TransGuide system in San Antonio

includes road sensors embedded in the highway,

52 cameras and a high-speed computer.

Electronic equipment detects any highway incident

...and relays an alarm via fiber optic cable

to the operations control center. . . .

Excerpt: Federal Highway Administration funds

paid about 80 percent of TransGuide's $32 million

price tag; the state paid the remaining 20

percent. The first phase, covering 26 highway

miles in downtown San Antonio, began operating

July 26. Eventually the system will cover 191

miles of local freeways on Interstate Highways

10, 35 and 37 and on U.S. Highways 90 and 281.

TransGuide technology will be capable of supporting

'smart vehicle’ features expected to

come on line over the next decade, including invehicle

computers and map displays.

Excerpt: The I-35 Corridor Coalition envisions I-

35 as a high-tech superhighway from Mexico

to Canada. Efforts to fund high-tech improvements

to the highway are under way in Congress.

Supporters in Texas propose that a fiber optic

spine be installed along I-35 to track cargo from

origin to destination . . . The superhighway would

include international signs and would allow cargos

to be precleared by U.S. Customs at inland

ports. All tolls, taxes and fees could be prepaid

and transferred to appropriate states. Border inspections

could be cut to a minimum.

In May 1995, U.S. Transportation Secretary

Federico Pena announced two pilot projects . . .

The projects in Arizona and California are expected

to electronically identify the vehicle and

check the pertinent safety, customs and immigration

data before the shipment's arrival. Tests

on the project began in the spring of 1995 and

are expected to end in early 1997.

Pena also has announced a trinational transportation

science and technology agreement under

which the U.S., Canada and Mexico will collaborate

in advancing safe, economical, efficient

and environmentally sound transportation systems.

He said these efforts will smooth the transition

to full NAFTA implementation by speeding

cross-border clearance of commercial and

private traffic.

http://www.window.state.tx.us/comptrol/fnotes/oct95fn.html

—————— 1996 ——————

“Smart Highway”

NAFTA & Inter-American Trade Monitor,

Vol. 3, No. 6, March 22,1996

Excerpt: ...the I-35 Coalition continues to push

for development of a "smart highway" that would

eliminate the need for most truck inspections at

the border....

"Smart highway" planners, including Interdex,

the U.S. Treasury Department's new International

Trade Data Exchange, are exploring ways to use

existing technology to speed traffic between

Mexico City, Dallas, and Toronto. Railroads already

use electronically readable tags attached

to rail cars and read by trackside readers that

send the information along telephone or fiberoptic

lines. Similar technology could be applied

to trucks. Inspections, including weighing and

sealing of the contents, could take place at "inland

ports of compliance," such as Kansas City

or Toronto. A fiber-optic network of sensors laid

down the middle of the highway right-of-way

would assess tolls and fees along the way.

http://www.newsbulletin.org/getbulletin.CFM?SID=

“Cross-border Transportation Promoted, Delayed”

NAFTA & Inter-American Trade Monitor,

Vol. 3, No. 1, Sept. 6, 1996

Excerpt: The former I-35 Corridor Coalition, now

called North America's Superhighway Coalition,

met in Monterrey, Mexico, in early August

to promote designation of Interstate 35, which

runs 1,500 miles from Duluth, Minnesota to

Laredo, Texas, as the North American Free Trade

Agreement's principal trade corridor. Texas, Kansas,

Missouri, Oklahoma and Iowa back the designation,

and a marketing drive to locate or relocate

companies along the superhighway is

expected. Craig Schoenfeld, a research analyst

for Iowa House Republicans, called the coalition

"a marketing tool for industry and business" . . .

U.S. Assistant Deputy Secretary of the Treasury

John Simpson. . . urged Mexico to make full

use of the North American Trade Automation

Prototype (NATAP), which will provide electronic

pre-clearance for cargo, drivers, payment of duties

and verification of transport requirements,

beginning on a trial basis in September.

The Northern Plains I-29 Coalition is pushing for

a network of fiber optic cables along this highway

to track trucks and clear up congestion at

U.S. borders with both Canada and Mexico. . . .

http://www.newsbulletin.org/getbulletin.CFM?SID=

NAFTA Superhighway Memory Hole 3

“Need for Speed:

US-Mexico Trade Highway Sought”

James L. Tyson,

The Christian Science Monitor, Dec. 4, 1996

Excerpt: With federal support, Interstate 35 would

become the "NAFTA Superhighway," named after

the North American Free Trade Agreement,

enacted in 1994 by Canada, Mexico, and the US.

It would use technology like satellites or fiber

optics to track and hasten goods through customs

checkpoints.

http://www.csmonitor.com/1996/1204/120496.econ.econ.2.html

—————— 1997 ——————

About the NAFTA Superhighway Coalition

Excerpt: On July 23, 1997, The NAFTA Superhighway

Coalition was formed. It is a not-forprofit

corporation. Its mission is to team Federal

and Provincial authorities with private business

to promote a National Transportation Policy that

will include improvements to Highway 401 and

associated corridors for facilitating the movement

of people and goods to and from Canada, the

U.S. and Mexico under [NAFTA]. . . .

Excerpt: The Coalition is committed to making

the 401 a state of the art, . . . automated superhighway

. . . between Canada and the U.S. . . .

To make this goal . . . the NAFTA Superhighway

Coalition will:

• Bring together - as stakeholders - the cities and

communities along the 401 and associated corridors...

• Present a focused, persuasive, and compelling

case to governments at all levels so that

the proper legislation may be enacted and adequate

funding allocated to the superhighway

concept.

• Work closely with NAFTA Superhighway

counterparts and allies in the U.S. and Mexico.

Excerpt: Much will be accomplished if we can

work together as partners to enable communities

along the 401 and associated corridors to

impress upon the Federal and Provincial governments

the importance of designating Highway

401 and associated corridors as the NAFTA

Superhighway. . . .

http://www.ambassadorbridge.com/nafta_case.html

North America's Superhighway Coalition

To Meet In Tulsa

For Immediate Release: Feb. 4, 1997

Oklahoma State Senate, Communications Division

Excerpt: Members of North America's Superhighway

Coalition will meet with lawmakers and

Coalition officials in Tulsa later this week as they

prepare for the 1997 legislative sessions, both in

Oklahoma and Washington D.C.

The Coalition was formed in 1994 to work for

the designation of I-35 as a High Priority Corridor

and make the states through which it runs

eligible for a share of federal funding set aside

under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency

Act of 1991.

http://www.oklahomacorridorwatch.com/documentation/Senate%20Press%20Releases%201997%20NASCO%20Hearing.pdf

“The NAFTA Superhighway System Seen on

Track to Gain Support from Congress”

The Conde Report on U.S.-Mexico Relations, Vol. 1, Issue 15,

May 2, 1997, Editor: Francisco J. Conde

Excerpt: WASHINGTON --(TCR)- The U.S. Congress

is moving briskly toward action on the legislation

to determine the spending of the $175

billion in U.S. surface transportation spending for

1998-2004 and is paying increasing attention to

the case being made by The North America's

Superhighway Coalition, (NASCO), which has

been promoting creation of a NAFTA Superhighway

System along 1,500 miles of Interstate

Highway 35 from Texas to Minnesota.

The Dallas-based

NASCO, founded in early

1994 and comprised of officials

and citizens of cities,

counties, states and

private-sector backers

along I.H. 35, is seeking to

obtain up to $3.5 billion in

dedicated congressional funding for the I.H. 35

trade corridor project. The roadway plays a critical

role in supporting growing bilateral U.S.-

Mexico trade, the overwhelming majority of which

is moved by truck over highway, approximately

40 percent over I.H. 35 at Laredo, Texas.

NASCO has developed a plan to create the

first international, integrated, intermodal and

electronically 'intelligent' superhighway system

designed to employ advanced information

technology systems . . .while streamlining

the process of complying with local, state, federal

and international administrative and safety

regulations . . .

In 1995, Congress designated the 1,500

miles of I.H. 35 from Laredo, Texas to Duluth,

Minnesota as a "High Priority Corridor" in the

National Highways System (NHS) law, making

I.H. 35 one of 29 such corridors in the U.S.. The

designation is Congress' highest rating for

determining access to federal funding.

. . . NASCO officials are preparing to receive

a visit from U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure

Committee Chairman Thomas Shuster,

. . . who is playing a critical role in shaping the

debate and legislation on the reauthorization of

the $155 billion Intermodal Surface Transportation

and Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991, the

U.S. main federal highway funding law set to expire

on September 30, 1997. The Clinton Administration,

. . . appears to be leaning favorably toward

recognition of a need for dedicated funding

to Highway "Corridors of National and International

Significance," the terminology developed

to describe highway corridors supporting

trade with Canada and Mexico.

. . . More than 80 mayors of cities and towns

along I.H. 35 and its sister branch of Interstate

Highway 29 from Kansas City to Winnipeg,

Manitoba, Canada, attended the NASCO Mayor's

Summit in Monterrey, Mexico from April 2-4....The

Mayors signed an Agreement of Intention in

which they commited to establishing "a partnership

of North American communities linked

by an international trade corridor through a

commitment of resources and communication

for sustainable economic development.". . .

In recent weeks, the Coalition has received

financial support and contributions from CB Commercial.

. . The Laredo National Bank. . . Enserch;

Frozen Food Express ... Detroit Bridge Co. ... and

Love's Country Stores, Inc. ... The Coalition is

actively courting other potential financial supporters

for the final legislative push this summer

and fall to lock in major Congressional support

for the strategic infrastructure project.

http://web.archive.org/web/20060831194502/http://listserv.business.unisa.edu.au/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind9705&L=iern-l&F=l&P=62

Articles of Incorporation of

North America’s Superhighway Coalition

Filed in the Office of the Secretary of State of Texas

June 30, 1997

Excerpts:

ARTICLE I The name of the corporation is North America’s

Superhighway Coalition (“the Corporation”)

ARTICLE II The Corporation is a non-profit corporation.

ARTICLE III The period of the corporation is perpetual.

ARTICLE IV The Corporation is organized as a business

league within the meaning of section 501(c)(6) of the Internal

Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for

the purpose of preserving, protecting, enhancing, expanding,

and improving Interstate Highway 35 (“I-35”) as a national

and international highway through:

1. engaging in civic activities that enhance the economic

development of the states and provinces through which

I-35, or any Canadian or Mexican highway connecting

directly or indirectly to I-35, passes (the “Corridor States”)

by promoting the development of I-35 and other strategic

roadways that are essential to establishing a network capable

of supporting increased trade. . .;

2. engaging in activities that promote the common interest

of the Corporation’s members in assuring the development

of I-35 to enhance the development of interstate

and international trade within the Corridor States;

3. disseminating educational information to the public . . .;

4. serving as the communication link for I-35 development

among federal, state governments and local governments

and the private sector;

5. providing information and comments on the development

of I-35 to the executive branches of federal and state government,

federal and state legislative bodies and committees,

and administrative agencies;

6. creating a central repository of data regarding I-35;

7. improving communications with Mexican and Canadian

transportation officials;

8. studying and recommending specific actions; and

Subject to the foregoing, the Corporation is organized

for all lawful purposes within the meaning of, and as permitted

by, Article 1396-2.01 of the Texas Non-Profit Corporation

Act, as amended. The assets of the Corporation are

pledged to performing the functions and purposes of the

Corporation set forth above.

Information obtained through public record request by OK-SAFE

http://www.ok-safe.com/NASCO.html

4 NAFTA Superhighway Memory Hole

“Tour promotes Interstate 35

as `freight-friendly' corridor”

Margaret Allen, Dallas Business Journal. Aug. 22, 1997

Excerpt: Backers of a Nafta superhighway were

in the Metroplex this week to drum up support

for dubbing U.S. Interstate 35 an official "river of

trade."

North America's Superhighway Coalition

(Nasco) launched a nine-city tour through Texas

to promote federal funding for I-35...

http://dallas.bizjournals.com/dallas/stories/1997/08/25/newscolumn5.html

Trade and Transportation Corridor

Receives Assistance from WDA

COMMUNIQUE, Dec. 12, 1997

Information Services, Winnepeg, Manitoba, Canada

Excerpt: A three-year strategy to promote a multimodal

trade and transportation corridor extending

south to Mexico will be developed and

implemented with $600,000 in assistance from

the Winnipeg Development Agreement (WDA).

Excerpt: The strategy will promote the Highway

75-Interstate 29-Interstate 35 link, beginning in

Manitoba and ending in Mexico, as the North

American Superhighway. It will also guide development

of multi-modal transportation

routes, known as corridors. . .

Excerpt: As a major component of the corridor

strategy, the City of Winnipeg and the Province

of Manitoba have joined North America's Superhighway

Coalition (NASCO), a private-public

sector organization actively promoting the

development of a North American Superhighway

corridor linking all three NAFTA nations.

http://www.gov.mb.ca/chc/press/top/1997/12/1997-12-12-01.html

—————— 1998 ——————

“I-35: An Interstate

Becomes a Global Corridor”

From Minnesota’s tip to Mexico’s northern edge, “the NAFTA

Superhighway” has become a business expansion hotbed

Renee Haines Site Selection Magazine, Feb./Mar. 1998

Excerpt: NAFTA inspired the formation of North

America's Superhighway Coalition (NASCO),

which aims to ease trade flows and attract more

funding for I-35, dubbed by supporters "the

NAFTA Superhighway."

. . . NASCO wants I-35 and connecting trade

highways designated as an "International Trade

Corridor," a more global and "smarter" superhighway.

NASCO is proposing high-tech "international

trade processing centers" in major I-35

cities, says Tiffany Newsom, coalition executive

director. . . .

http://www.conway.com/i35/9802/

NASCO Coalition founded in Texas

By The Associated Press

The Shawnee News-Star, Web posted Sunday, Sept. 13, 1998

Excerpt: North America's Superhighway Coalition

was founded in 1994 by Judge Jeff Moseley, the

top official in Denton County, just north of Dallas.

Moseley and the judges of neighboring Texas

counties were looking at how to plan for an expected

NAFTA-spawned increase in traffic on I-

35 through Texas.

Moseley's I-35 Coalition became North

America's Superhighway Coalition, or NASCO,

when it grew to embrace other jurisdictions along

both I-35 and Interstate 29, which runs from Kansas

City to Winnipeg, Canada.

Excerpt: Chambers of commerce and trade-related

businesses have also joined the effort,

sending representatives to three summits so far

of the mayors of NASCO member cities.

http://www.news-star.com/stories/091398/bus_%20asck.html

“NAFTA Transportation Update”

NAFTA & Inter-American Trade Monitor, Vol. 5, No. 19, Oct. 9,1998

Excerpt: On September 22, Mexico took the final

step in its trucking dispute with the United States,

requesting appointment of a dispute resolution

panel under the provisions of NAFTA. The request

came after expiration of the 30-day period for consultations

among senior NAFTA officials.

NAFTA provides for the United States,

Canada and Mexico to open their borders to

commercial truck traffic in border states, beginning

December 18, 1995. The United States

refused to open its border, citing truck safety concerns,

and still has not agreed to comply with

the NAFTA provision, despite a lengthy series of

government to government meetings.

Though the border has not opened yet, Texas

is seeing growing truck traffic attributable to

NAFTA, and is experiencing deteriorating

roadways and bridges as a result. U.S. Senators

Phil Gramm and Kay Bailey Hutchinson from

Texas have succeeded in including a $700 million

appropriation for states along the Mexican

and Canadian borders and high-priority trade

corridors in the Transportation Equity Act for the

21st century. The appropriation, spread over five

years, will not compensate for all the increased

traffic, since the Act would distribute $140 million

per year over the whole country. The cost of

a concrete four-lane highway in Texas is $1.3

million per mile.

http://www.newsbulletin.org/getbulletin.cfm?bulletin_ID=8&issue_ID=1157&browse=1&SID=

NASCO Email Correspondence

Subj: TEA-21 Highway $200 Billion

Transportation Bill Signed Into Law

Date: 6/10/98 3:53:05 PM Central Daylight Time

[. . .]

Dear Fellow Former Colleagues at David A.

Dean & Associates/Dean International, Inc.

Founding Consultants to the North America's

Superhighway Coalition, formerly known as The

Interstate Highway 35 Corridor Coalition

[List of names has been removed.--Ed]

...am writing to Club David A. Dean & Associates

Alumni to give you some exciting news...

The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st

Century (TEA 21) has been signed into law

by President Clinton (in Washington, D.C. on

June 9, 1998).

This bill contains FOR THE FIRST TIME IN

HISTORY a category and funding for trade corridors

and border programs.

Specifically, the trade corridor program was

funded with $700 million in Contract Authority

(these are "real dollars" as opposed to a simple

authorization which must go through the appropriations

process).

The I-35 corridor is the strongest and most

organized of the corridor initiatives so, if we play

our cards right, we stand to get a part of the

$700 million.

In addition to the $700 million, $350 million

was authorized for "special projects" along the I-

35 corridor.

None of this would have been possible without

the "team " we had assembled at David A.

Dean & Associates, P.C./Dean International, Inc.

I want you to know that while North America's

Superhighway Coalition, Inc. (NASCO) celebrates

our victory, you are not forgotten.

[. . .]

. . . on behalf of the NASCO Board of Directors

. . . and myself, thank you all for making this

happen. You started this initiative - we just kept

it going.

Due to the great amount of support and success

we have had over the past two years in restructuring

NASCO and accomplishing our

goals, and in response to our northern states

members' requests for a more centrally located

headquarters, I am moving to Kansas City, MO,

at the end of this month.

This will be great for the project, as we shift

our focus from the intense lobbying effort to

trade and transportation policy issues (harmonization),

infrastructure development, environmental

issues ("Clean Corridor" concept),

intermodalism, technology (U.S. Customs

North American Trade Automation Prototype), developing

International Trade Processing Centers

and promoting economic development,

trade and tourism.

[. . .]

Ms. Tiffany Newsom

Executive Director

North America’s Superhighway Coalition

http://lists.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9806&L=cmplaw-l&P=3099

—————— 1999 ——————

“Trucking Under NAFTA”

NAFTA & Inter-American Trade Monitor,

Vol. 6, No. 6, June 11,1999

Excerpt: As NAFTA trade ministers approved

15 panelists for the roster hearing state-tostate

dispute settlements, sources indicated

that the cross-border truck and bus dispute between

the United States and Mexico could soon

come before a panel. . . .

U.S. House Representatives Merrill Cook (RUT)

and Collin Peterson (D-MN) recently introduced

legislation in the U.S. Congress to allow

truck weights to increase from 80,000 to

97,000. The amount of freight shipped by truck,

by weight, within the United States has increased

45 percent since 1990.

http://www.newsbulletin.org/getbulletin.cfm?bulletin_ID=8&issue_ID=1495&browse=1&SID=

NAFTA Superhighway Memory Hole 5

—————— 2001 ——————

North American International Trade Corridor

DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Comprehensive and Coordinated ITS/CVO Plan

for the North American International Trade Corridor

PHASE 3 REPORT [DECEMBER 2001]

Booz | Allen | Hamilton

In Association With ATA Foundation, TransCore, CTRE, Iowa

State University, C.J. Petersen & Associates. Kentucky

Transportation Center, University of Kentucky

Excerpt: Because of the Corridor’s critical importance

to the regional and national economies,

the eight corridor states..., the Province of

Manitoba, North America’s Superhighway

Coalition (NASCO), and the Ambassador Bridge

have established a formal agreement to support

the integration of freight services to reduce regulatory

and administrative burdens and support

carriers operating along the corridor. (p.1)

Development of the NAITC Comprehensive

and Coordinated Intelligent Transportation

Systems for Commercial Vehicle Operations

(ITS/CVO) Plan is a critical step toward achieving

the trade corridor vision. (p.1)

Excerpt: The NAITC vision and strategy are

based on operations improvements rather than

on traditional capital investments in road infrastructure,

allowing for rapid implementation and

results. Instead of depending on a road infrastructure,

these services and applications depend on

an information infrastructure, or "infostructure,"

to provide raw data and communication links.

The infostructure includes the technologies

and systems for collecting data, as well as

the devices for delivering information. Many

infostructure systems are already in place and

collecting valuable data along the corridor.

The challenge is in harnessing the information

collected to create valuable user services. At

present, data is collected through a series of disparate

systems and processes. The NAITC strategy

is to connect these systems and processes

to enable data integration. . . . (p.2)

Excerpt: It is necessary to coordinate and aggregate

various CVO data in order to achieve

integrated corridor user services and business

processes. Data is currently being gathered by

separate program centers that already exist in

sections of the corridor, such as regional ATIS

centers and regional service centers. These existing

data collection sources include credentialing,

special permitting, international border screening,

roadside screening, and other enforcement

actions. The sharing of corridor data to produce

integrated services is the focus of the business

processes contained in this section. Collectively,

they represent an information architecture

for corridor user services. This architecture

represents the ”end state” for corridor information

sharing processes. It is understood that

the architecture will be implemented over time

as governance and technology decisions are

made and concepts are proven per the project plans

and business models previously described. (p.59)

http://www.channelingreality.com/Documents/NAITC_ITS-CVO_PlanPhase-3-Final.pdf

5

Mike McConnell was sworn in as the nation's second Director of

National Intelligence on February 13, 2007. Before his nomination

as DNI, McConnell served as Senior Vice President and Director

of Booz Allen Hamilton’s Infrastructure Assurance Center

of Excellence. McConnell joined Booz Allen Hamilton in 1996.

“McConnell advises commercial and government clients on global

strategic security, cyber security, critical infrastructure assurance,

information operations and information assurance.” – V.L.D.

References: http://www.dni.gov/aboutODNI/bios/mcconnell_bio.htm

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,241844,00.html

Below: From page 1 of the Total Information Awareness Program

(TIA) System Description Document (SDD), Version 1.1, July 19, 2002

December 2001

6 NAFTA Superhighway Memory Hole

“NAFTA highway on hold”

By Kimberly Hefling, Associated Press Writer,

Dec. 1, 2002 | Laredo Morning Times

Excerpt: . . . It was dubbed the “NAFTA Superhighway,”

a new interstate that would span the

United States, linking Canada to Mexico. . .

Yet five years after Congress authorized Interstate

69, little pavement has been laid on the

project expected to cost at least $8.5 billion.

Many road-blocks have occurred at the state

level, where disputes have raged from Indiana

to Texas about where to locate sections

of the new highway. . . .

http://lmtonline.com/news/archive/120102/pagea1.pdf

—————— 2003 ——————

“Indiana officials pick

‘NAFTA Superhighway’ route”

By Kimberly Hefling - Associated Press Writer,

Jan. 10, 2003 | The Lawrence Journal-World

Excerpt: Evansville, Ind. — An ambitious project

approved by Congress five years ago to transform

Interstate 69 into a link between Canada

and Mexico may finally be on its way south.

After years of studies and debate, Gov. Frank

O'Bannon announced Thursday plans to build a

140-mile route through southwest Indiana's farming

communities that would allow the "NAFTA

Superhighway" to extend beyond Indianapolis

— where I-69's last leg was completed more than

two decades ago.

The highway would go through Michigan, Indiana,

Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi,

Louisiana and Texas. . . .

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2003/jan/10/indiana_officials_pick/

—————— 2004 ——————

Nasco gears up for growth in 2004

Ken Miller, Executive Director of

North America's Superhighway Coalition;

Logistics Today, January 2004

Excerpt: NASCO is proposing a solution to direct

more funding to multi-state trade corridors

with international termini. The “Corridors of

Economic Significance” proposal would redirect

funding from the existing National Corridor

Planning and Development program (which

NASCO was instrumental in forming) to three to

five key corridors with heavy domestic and international

freight movement. NASCO is working

with a newly created Congressional group — the

North American SuperCorridor Caucus — to

focus attention on this proposal as well as I-35,

I-29, I-80 and I-94.

Excerpt: . . .the Coalition is making strides in

building a network of inland ports . . .

Excerpt: Promoting Intelligent Transportation

System (ITS) applications along the Corridor is

a top NASCO priority. . . .

NASCO also played an integral role in securing

more than $400,000 from the U.S. Trade and

Development Agency to study ITS applications

in Mexico. Partnering with the Mexican Secretariat

of Communications and Transportation as

well as other non-profit organizations, NASCO

provided a blueprint for this study through its 2001

North American International Trade Corridor

study, which was led by the Missouri Department

of Transportation and paid for, in part, by NASCO.

http://www.logisticstoday.com/displayStory.asp?sNO=6310

Remarks for The Honorable Norman Y. Mineta

U.S. Secretary of Transportation

North America's Superhighway Coalition

Transportation Forum,

Fort Worth, Texas, April 30, 2004, 8:20 am

Excerpt: There are, . . . some things that we still

need to do in the United States to fulfill our obligations

under the NAFTA treaty. One of them is

to finally open the market between Mexico and

the United States for trucking and busing.

A lawsuit has blocked implementation of this

country’s commitment to allow truck travel across

our borders, despite our commitment to safety

and a level playing field.

Excerpt: . . . to our friends from Mexico who are

here today, I say, “Welcome, and get ready.” Opening

the border is of mutual benefit. . . .

Excerpt: . . . I want to congratulate NASCO President

Sandy Jacobs and the Superhighway Coalition

for your leadership. You recognized . . . that

the success of the NAFTA relationship depends

on mobility – on the movement of people, of

products, and of capital across borders.

Excerpt: . . .The Bush Administration’s reauthorization

bill – the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,

and Efficient Transportation Equity Act (or

SAFETEA) – makes fundamental changes in

the way America invests in its transportation

infrastructure, changes that can help you develop

your corridor.

We have strategic initiatives to develop and

support multi-state public and private partnerships

to improve freight flow, especially at international

gateways and along multi-state trade

transport corridors.

We split the Federal Highway Administration’s

Corridors and Borders Program and refocused

the new programs on planning. The Corridors

program is designed to encourage multi-state

and multi-modal planning. The Borders program

will encourage bi-national planning to enhance

improvements at our land border crossings.

Excerpt: SAFETEA places new focus on the

intermodal connections between our roads, ports,

railways, and airports – critically important links

in the international trade network.

Our bill will allow you to better leverage your

transportation dollars by taking advantage of innovative

financing and public-private partnership

options.

http://www.dot.gov/affairs/minetasp043004.htm

Annual Report to the President

Executive Order 13274: Environmental Stewardship

and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews

Submitted by: Interagency Transportation Infrastructure

Streamlining Task Force, December 2004

Excerpt: . . . EPA regional staff increased their

streamlining and environmental stewardship efforts

for other critical transportation projects. State

DOTs . . . [provided] funding for 10 positions . . .

to supplement EPA's small NEPA review program.

These personnel and their EPA-funded counterparts

are streamlining projects that range from

the 1,600-mile "NAFTA highway" to updating the

Merced County, California regional transportation

plan.

http://www.dot.gov/execorder/13274/annualreport04/index.htm

—————— 2007 ——————

Statement of Michael Replogle,

Transportation Director for Environmental Defense

Before the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure,

Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, May 24, 2007

Excerpt: In 2003, Texas enacted state legislation

(HB 3588) authorizing the Trans-Texas Corridor

(TTC) project, The TTC project is slated to be

the largest public works project in Texas history,

a proposed 1,200-foot wide, 4,000-mile long

network of planned and existing toll roads,

railways and utility corridors, to be developed

over the next 50 years. This network is designed

not to connect any existing cities and towns,

but to run almost entirely through what are now

non-urban Texas counties. To date, two TTC corridors

are advancing through the environmental

review process, the 560-mile TTC-35 running

north-south across central Texas, and TTC-69, a

planned 1600-mile corridor running from Larado

parallel to the Gulf Coast to northeast Texas. (p.8)

Excerpt: Without public notice or input, the Texas

Department of Transportation (TxDOT) signed a

pre-development agreement (or umbrella agreement)

with the Cintra-Zachry consortium in 2005,

authorizing the preparation of a master plan, nonbinding

master financial plan, project management

plan and quality management plan for TTC-

35. Under the Special Experimental Program

(SEP)-14 and the SEP-15 programs (under which

U.S. DOT has asserted authority to waive provisions

of federal transportation law), TxDOT selected

a private partner prior to completing the

NEPA review process and made this selection

earlier in the planning process than is typically

allowed under law. Almost two years after the

signing of the deal, more than 200 pages of the

300-page pre-development agreement remain

secret despite an order for their release by the

Texas Attorney General that was blocked by a lawsuit

filed by the concessionaire. (p.9)

http://Republicans.transportation.house.gov/Media/File/Testimony/Highways/5-24-07-Replogle.pdf

DOWNLOAD THIS 7-PG DOCUMENT FROM:

Vicky Davis’ Channeling Reality website:

http://www.channelingreality.com/NWO_WTO/total_bs_awareness.htm

Oklahomans for Sovereignty and Free Enterprise (OK-SAFE)

website: http://www.ok-safe.com

NAFTA Superhighway Memory Hole 7

What do superhighways and

supercorridors share in common?:

surveillance, tracking, and

information technology systems.

These elements are a part of “total

domain awareness” which

has been described as “an umbrella

spread over all government

information architectures.”2

What’s the problem? The

litany of high-tech gadgetry that surfaces will be

part of an international information superhighway

that is being built corridor by corridor — this grid

will support the best Big Brother surveillance,

data-mining, and information processing system

that public dollars can buy. We help fund planning,

construction, maintenance, and management

of the system through taxes, fees, and tolls.

Those who do not value freedom will feel at

home in this electronic police state. But for those

who appreciate and cherish liberty, read on.

Total domain awareness is linked to the publicly

scorned data-mining ideas that were in the

“Total Information Awareness (TIA) System” program

— a project overseen by the Pentagon’s

Defense Advanced Research Project Agency

(DARPA) (see inset by Vicky L. Davis).

Congress defunded TIA in 2003.3 However,

“It is no secret that some parts of TIA lived on behind

the veil of the classified intelligence budget,”

wrote reporter Shane Harris in “TIA Lives On.”4

In a 2007 article, “NASCO, Lockheed Martin,

& 'Total Domain Awareness': Lockheed

Martin's plan to tax and track all modes of transportation

in North America,” the author Nathan

M. Hansen answers the question: What is total

domain awareness?:

“It is an Orwellian nightmare involving: the

ability to ‘[a]utomatically gather, correlate, and interpret

fragments of multi-source (Radar, AIS, &

GPS tracks, Open Source, Intelligence, Watch

list & Law Enforcement Report, CCTV,

Bioterrorism sensors) data together into one collaborative

portal-based environment [sic].’”5

Superhighways & Supercorridors:

Supersurveillance

The technology of sensors

(including biometric), surveillance

cameras, fiber optic cable

networks, electronic readers,

scanners, and more, will allow

electronically tagged/detectable/

readable items — goods,

vehicles, student IDs, driver’s licenses,

passports, animals,

people — to be identified in the

detection vicinity of high-tech corridors and similarly

equipped areas. But that’s not all. . .

There is a technology integration and implementation

component — a global transportation

network — that includes command and control

centers. According to NASCO representative

Rachel Connell who spoke to the Travis County

Commissioners Court (Texas) on August 28,

2007: . . . command and control centers are located

along the corridor that are able to know

what’s going on . . . everywhere at all times. We

are hoping to have command and control centers

eventually with this project along our corridor...”6

The NAFTA Superhighway (aka NASCO

SuperCorridor) system will enable continent-wide

surveillance that—in addition to invading privacy

— defies country borders and national security

by establishing a North American transportation

infrastructure and security regulations. The United

States, Canada, and Mexico would merely exist

as pieces of a conglomerate that monitors all of

its “resources,” including the human variety.

So-called free trade, security, and sustainable

development are excuses for having a system

that tracks, regulates, and collects data on the

“flow of goods, people, services, and information.”

Questions that must be asked: Do we continue

allowing construction of this Big Brother

system? Do we continue to give tax dollars to

build it? Do we elect official who support it?

We must decide sooner than later. Once the

boot is stomping on our faces, it will be more difficult

to stop the machinery that blocks our ability

to live and thrive as free people.

© D.K. Niwa,12 Sept. 2007 Endnotes:

1 “The NAFTA Superhighway System Seen on Track to Gain Support from Congress,” The Conde Report on U.S.-

Mexico Relations, Vol. 1, Issue 15, May 2, 1997, Editor: Francisco J. Conde

http://web.archive.org/web/20060831194502/http://listserv.business.unisa.edu.au/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind9705&L=iern-l&F=l&P=62

2 Quote attributed to Adm. James M. Loy, USCG, commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard in the article “Warfare Changes

Its Stripes, But not Its Name,” Robert K. Ackerman & Beverly P. Mowery, Signal Magazine, April 2001.

http://www.afcea.org/signal/articles/templates/SIGNAL_Article_Template.asp?articleid=566&zoneid=115

3 Conference Report on H.R. 2658, Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2004 (House Report 108-283),

Congressional Record: September 24, 2003 (House), H8500-H8550. http://www.fas.org/sgp/congress/2003/tia.html

4 “TIA Lives On,” Shane Harris, National Journal. Feb. 23, 2006

http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0223nj1.htm

5 “NASCO, Lockheed Martin, & 'Total Domain Awareness': Lockheed Martin's plan to tax and track all modes of

transportation in North America,” Nathan M. Hansen, JonesReport, April 19, 2007.

http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/190407_lockheed_total_domain_awareness.html

6 Quote by Rachel Connell, Director of Membership & Events, North America's SuperCorridor Coalition, Inc. (NASCO).

from a closed caption transcript log for the August 28, 2007 Travis County Commissioners Court Meeting. Item 3.

http://www.co.travis.tx.us/commissioners_court/agendas/2007/08/text/vs070828_03.asp

Total BS

Awareness

By Vicky L. Davis

10 September 2007

The DOD – Defense Advanced Research

Project Agency (DARPA), Total Information

Awareness (TIA) project came

into public view about a year after 9-11.

The idea was as the title suggests, to have

full situational awareness of the battlefield.

It wasn’t until around 2002 that people began

to realize that the DOD battlefield was

the continental United States including everyone

and everything in it. In concept, ‘Total

Information Awareness’ is the ultimate

‘Big Brother’ Surveillance system for a Police

State.

In 2003, the Congress eliminated funding

for the TIA project but that didn’t stop

anything. DARPA’s project just metastasized.

Part of the project moved deeper into

the Intelligence agencies, part of it moved

to the Homescam Security Department

(DHS) under the name of ‘Homeland Security

Advanced Research Project Agency

(HSARPA). Part of it was already in the

Transportation Department and was funded

as “Smart Highways and Vehicles” with related

systems in legislation as early as 1991.

It’s almost amusing to watch Congressional

hearings with the professional Confidence

Men of the IT industry embedded

into our national security agencies discuss

integrating computer systems to fight ‘terrorism’

and the poodles in Congress praise

them for their efforts.

What Congress didn’t understand – and

apparently still doesn’t understand – is that

‘Total Information Awareness’ is just a concept

for the aggregation of access information

for networked systems. More simply,

it’s the component systems of TIA that comprise

the Big Brother surveillance systems

and they are still being funded, developed,

implemented and networked.

The IT Confidence Men just aren’t calling

it ‘Total Information Awareness’

anymore. Instead, they talk about breaking

down barriers and stovepipes so that information

can be shared.

Sharing and caring . . .makes you feel

all warm and fuzzy doesn't it?

Read more online:

http://www.channelingreality.com/NWO_WTO/total_bs_awareness.htm

—————————————————————————

Vicky L. Davis was a Computer Systems Analyst/Programmer

who spent 20 years designing and writing computer

systems for large corporations and state and local

governments. For 15 of those years, she worked as a

Contractor, which gave her exposure to a wide variety of

different businesses and their internal applications and

operations. She has traveled extensively and has lived

in nine states in the course of her life’s adventure.

——————————————————

“NASCO has developed a plan

to create the first international,

integrated, intermodal and

electronically 'intelligent'

superhighway system designed

to employ advanced information

technology systems . . .”

-- From “The NAFTA Superhighway System Seen on

Track to Gain Support from Congress,” May 2, 1997 1