|

|
Welcome to Call to Decision
They're unable to combat us with
facts. Instead anyone who dares question the regime's fable is
labeled a terrorist. How covenient.
MG
Do you remember when Bush Jr. said, “either you
are with us, or you are with the terrorists”? Well, he meant it.
Homeland Security’s sub-committee on terrorism risk assessment
convened a hearing on 11-06-2007 to discuss “using the Web as a
weapon – the Internet as a tool for violent radicalization and
homegrown terrorism.” In a video
of this meeting, which was last aired by C-Span on 11-12-2007,
members of the sub-committee clearly pointed to Internet sites
that question the legitimacy of the official 9/11 story as tools
for recruiting terrorists.
During the course of the hearing, Mark Weitzman of
the Simon Wiesenthal Center displayed a Power Point Presentation
illustrating what his organization considers terrorist recruitment
sites. Here is his testimony:
To illustrate the trends described above, we have
put together a short PowerPoint demonstration. Without going
into deep detail in these written remarks, I would like to offer
some brief descriptions of the material that will be shown. The
presentation begins with a look at how 9/11 is viewed in some
eyes online, including those who applauded it as well as some
conspiracies sites. The presence of the conspiracy site is
significant, since so much of what passes as fact online is
actually based on some form of conspiracy...
Next is a series of sites of media portals which
show some of the varied methods that the Islamists use to get
their message out, including some based on United States
servers. These are followed by some looks at charts and other
manuals on how to use violence, along with a novel
interpretation of jihad that calls for an “electronic
jihad.”
One of these “media portals” displayed in the
Power Point presentation is Architects
and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. This site
is sandwiched between a Taliban training manual, and several
Taliban recruitment sites showing how to make bombs, take
captives, and blow buildings up.
Representative Jane Harmon posed the following
question to Bruce Hoffman regarding extremist groups using the
Internet to recruit potential terrorists: “So this movement
develops them into violent killers?” Bruce Hoffman, a Georgetown
University security studies professor, and Chairman of the Rand
Corporation in Counterterrorism and Counterinsurgency, stated that
“falsehoods and conspiracy theorists have become so ubiquitous
and believed that you almost have some sort of parallel truth, and
it has become a very effective tool for recruiting people.” The
“people” he is referring to are potential terrorists. Mark
Weitzman stated: “These people are constructing their own
version of reality, full of conspiracy theories, full of doctored
videos, that will recruit or inflame the emotions.” 9/11
“conspiracy theorist” groups are included in this
generalization.
By portraying sites such as Architects and
Engineers for 9/11 Truth as terrorist recruitment organizations,
the Department of Homeland Security has taken a dangerous step
towards punishing anyone who questions the government. If you go
to the A&E
Website, you will see that it is a group
of “
212 architectural and engineering
professionals and
518 other supporters including A/E
students who have joined...in demanding of Congress a truly
independent investigation of the collapse of the WTC buildings.”
Their mission statement is, “To research and to disseminate the
truth of the 9/11 “collapses” of all 3 WTC high-rise
buildings to every architect and engineer.” I cannot find any
indication that this site promotes terrorism, much less recruits
terrorists for the Taliban, yet the Department of Homeland
Security has taken the stance that the site is “intended to
recruit or inflame the emotions” (Weitzman, M.), and lumps it in
with sites disseminating the Taliban Training Manual, and
advocating suicide bombings.
Rita Katz, director of the SITE
Institute - The Search for International Terrorist Entities
went on to blame the Internet for Bush Jr.’s failed “war on
terror,” and Representative Charles Dent stated that one
possible way to help fight purported Internet terrorism would be
to “turn the Internet into a less reliable source of
information” by putting up phony Websites to collect information
on terrorists as well as disseminate false information. Parry
Aftab, Executive Director of Wiredsafety.org, also suggested that
the government should collect IP addresses of suspected terrorist
Websites to aid in the fight against terror on the Internet.
Websites such as Architects for 9/11 Truth for instance?
If all Websites that disagree with the official
government explanation of the collapse of the WTC towers is placed
on a list of suspected terrorist Websites, what is next? Like Bush
Jr. stated: “either you are with us, or you are with the
terrorists.”
Copyright 2007, Barbara H. Peterson
|