GLOBAL
ELITE GATHER IN D.C.
Trilateral
Commission members want suffering U.S. taxpayers to shell out even
more money
The
Trilateral Commission—one of the three most powerful globalist
groups in the world—held closed-door meetings right here in
Washington, D.C. from April 25 to 28. True to form, those members of
the media who knew about the meeting—or were themselves
participants in the proceedings—refused to discuss what went on
inside or report on the attendees. Luckily, AFP’s own editor, Jim
Tucker, was on the scene to bust this clandestine confabulation wide
open.
By James P. Tucker Jr.
Luminaries at the Trilateral Commission
meeting in Washington expressed confidence that they own all three
major presidential candidates, who, despite political posturing,
will support sovereignty-surrendering measures such as NAFTA and the
“North American Union.”
“John has always supported free trade, even while campaigning
before union leaders,” said one. “Hil and Barack are pretending
to be unhappy about some things, but that’s merely political
posturing. They’re solidly in support.”
He was referring to Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.)
and Barack Obama (D-Ill.).
Mrs. Clinton, they noted, held strategy sessions as first lady on
how to get Congress to approve NAFTA “without changes.” As
president, they agreed, she would do no more than “dot an i or
cross a t.”
Candidate Obama has not denied news reports in Canada that his top
economic adviser, Austan Goolsbee, assured Canadian diplomats that
the senator would keep NAFTA intact and his anti-trade talk is just
“campaign rhetoric.”
PETRIFIED ABOUT PAUL
While they are confident they can deal with any “potential
president,” the Trilateralists paid huge tribute to Ron Paul in an
equally large twist of irony, by expressing alarm that he is causing
“significant future damage.”
They expressed concern that Paul’s
rallies have attracted multitudes of young people who are getting
“their political education.” They want Republicans to pressure
Paul to drop out now and stop his education rallies. This assignment
was given to Thomas Foley, former U.S. House speaker.
The reasons Paul’s “education campaign” strikes fear into
Trilateral hearts are obvious. Paul would refuse to surrender an
ounce of U.S. sovereignty to an international organization and TC
wants world government.
Paul would immediately bring U.S. troops home from Iraq, Afghanistan
and from 130 UN “peacekeeping” missions around the globe. TC
wants to enjoy war profiteering and global power. Paul would abolish
the federal income tax while the TC wants to pile on a global tax
payable to the UN.
The formal agenda was loaded with everything Paul and American
patriots detest: higher taxes, more foreign giveaways, more
immigration, both legal and illegal, into the United States and
“engaging Iran,” among others.
AMERICA NEEDS TO PAY HER FAIR SHARE?
The Trilaterals got down to real work on Saturday, April 26, with a
high-powered panel called “U.S. Foreign and Domestic Policy: Broad
Outlines for a New Administration.”
It was presided over by journalistic
pimp David Gergen, who will write nothing about TC in his magazine, U.S
News and World Report. Also participating were Kenneth
Duberstein, former White House chief of staff for President Ronald
Reagan; Strobe Talbot, president of the Brookings Institution and
former deputy secretary of state; and Joseph Nye, former assistant
secretary of defense. Henry Kissinger, former secretary of state and
long-time Bilderberg leader, was present and listed as a
participant. But a TC staff member crossed his name out. Some
speculated he had throat problems.
This panel had these orders for the next president: increase foreign
aid across the board because “America does not pay its fair
share,” pay up the arrears in UN dues, allow as many immigrants
into the United States as want to come and provide “amnesty” for
illegal aliens already here.
Little, if anything, was said about the fact that American taxpayers
pay one-fourth of the UN’s operating costs and one-third of the
cost of 130 “peacekeeping missions” or the fact that immigrants
from South America depress wages here and the average immigrant
family costs the government thousands of dollars a year in welfare,
health and other “benefits.”
Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank and another long-time
Bilderberg boy, largely echoed these views in a sweetheart
“interview” by another journalistic strumpet, Lionel Barber,
editor of The Financial Times, who will obediently report
nothing.
FIGHT WARMING; ALLOW IMMIGRANTS
There were “subgroup” meetings on “climate change,” “water
and sanitation” and “migration and development.” Every nation,
especially the U.S., should spend big bucks to fight “global
warming,” they agreed. The United States should spend more
“because Americans cause the most pollution,” one argued.
Americans should send more money to Africa so natives can drink
clean water and scrub themselves, they said.
Antonio Garrigues Walker, chairman of Garrigues Abogadas y Asesores
Tributarios, joined Peter Sutherland, the UN secretary-general’s
“special representative on migration and development,” to call
on the United States to not only allow unlimited immigration, but to
throw more money at Mexico and other impoverished Latin countries.
It was, somehow, their “right” to have more U.S. dollars.
Sutherland is chairman of British Petroleum and Goldman Sachs
International. He is also a long-time Bilderberg leader.
MEDIA BLACKOUT
Bill Emmott, another kept journalist, spoke on “the rise of
Asia” at a reception-dinner held at the Smithsonian American Art
Museum. Emmott, former editor of The Economist, will report
nothing.
Sunday morning, Robert Blackwill, former U.S. deputy national
security adviser for Iraq, led a panel discussion on “engaging
Iran and building peace in the Persian Gulf Region.” For the first
time, there was dissent. Blackwill tried to rationalize the invasion
of Iraq. Others doubted that Saddam Hussein was connected to the
9-11 terrorist attacks or was a nuclear threat. Blackwill said the
military option remains but he hopes diplomatic efforts succeed.
Other participants were Ray Takeyh of the Council on Foreign
Relations, which functions as the propaganda ministry for TC and
Bilderberg; Volker Perthes, head of the German Institute for
International and Security Affairs and Hitoshi Tanaka, former
Japanese deputy minister of Foreign Affairs.
MORE, MORE, MORE MONEY
More foreigners demanded more U.S. money at a lunch panel called
“European and Asian views on U.S. Foreign and Security Policy.”
Participants were Elisabeth Guigou, a member of the French National
Assembly and former minister for European affairs and Han Sung-joo,
former minister of foreign affairs for South Korea.
An afternoon session addressed “global health” with more calls
for American tax dollars. A major voice in this cause came from
Sylvia Mathews Burwell, president of Global Development Programs,
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Bill Gates has attended at
least one Bilderberg meeting.
EXCUSES FOR IRAQ; PLANS FOR IRAN
John Negroponte, U.S. deputy secretary of state, addressed the
evening dinner on “U.S. foreign policy perspectives.” Again, the
invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were rationalized and an invasion
of Iran held out as a possibility.
The Monday morning finale addressed the Global Financial Crisis
involving these luminaries: Robert Kimmitt, U.S. deputy secretary of
the treasury; Martin Feldstein, former chairman of the President’s
Council of Economic Advisers; David Rubenstein, managing director of
The Carlyle Group; Naoki Tanaka, president of the Center for
International Public Policy Studies and Sir Andrew Crockett,
president of JP Morgan Chase International.
Among them, there was much talk of the U.S. government’s
“duty” to “intervene” on behalf of “financial institutions
under stress.” Little or nothing was said of the hundreds of
thousands of Americans who are losing their homes because financial
institutions lured them into buying houses they could not afford.
Throughout the weekend, no American voices were heard objecting to
the demands on their country. Instead, there were smiles, nods and
applause