|

|
Welcome to Call to Decision
While we are being distracted with the theatrics of these
long months of presidential canidates, the
grave issues in our nation (purposefully?) are
being ignored. The latest antics has
Michigan (in ecomomic free fall) ignored by the
party (Democratic) that once represented
the working man. This because of rules (?)
that punished Michigan for holding their primary
too early. Now they are told they cannot send
delegates to the National Convention. That's par
for the course - why would the voice of the
dispossessed be represented?
Jeffrey,
age 49, lost his auto plant job in Aug.
He has had to move in with his mother. Jeffrey
says, "I lost everything I worked for
all my life." John McCain's message was,
"The jobs aren't coming back".
I'm
not impressed with McCain (having never worked
in the real world) advising the hundreds of
thousands laid off (losing homes) to go back to
college. He tells these hundreds of thousands
from his removed affluence - "The jobs are
never coming back". This shows you
how detached those in Foggy Bottom are to the
working man/woman. The arguments in SC -
today say it's a race issue. Who loves
Blacks more? Huckabee is still doing his
hokum song fest (guitar) and promising a chicken
in every pot (Tyson that is). His newest
delusion is to change the constitution to line
it up with Scripture. On and on it
goes - while in the working man's
world millions are losing their homes. There's
an economic meltdown going on in the financial
markets. The canidates say it needs studied.
The REAL story has yet to be told to the
American public. The ONE Question that should
have been asked in these forever "Groundhog
Day" debates has yet to be asked? These
managed 'debates' (sniping contests) have yet to
touch our domestic carnival of errors.
You'd think we were electing a prom king
or queen. Citizens are being treated like pet
gerbils running round and round on a wheel
of partronizing dribble and lies.
Both parties have been complicit over
these past decades in the meltdown we're
witnessing. People need to climb down off their
elephants and donkeys. They need to
discard their red - white - and boo attire and
enter into the neutral zone. As long as people
can be kept in the arena of elephant dung and
donkey drippings they'll remain ignorant to the
facts that will vitally affect their lives and
their children.
REAL ESTATE: This problem began in the early
90s. This is when the Federal Reserve began
lowering the costs of funds and banks encouraged
people to borrow at low rates. Mortgage rates
were lowered in 1991. This is when credit lines
using home equity were created by your
friendly banker. That was when people began
going into debt up to their eyeballs using the
inflationary increases in the value of their
primary residence as a personal ATM machine!
People forgot that the only true value in real
property is the equity. Market estimates of home
values can drop 50% in one day.
Why
would the Federal Reserve do something so
harmful to the national economy? When a bank
makes a loan of $100,000, ninety per cent of
that amount ( or, $90,000) creates new money out
of thin air. This is called 'fractional -
reserve' banking. It is a system used in most
nations worldwide. Most nations have central
banks - the Federal Reserve is a central bank.
It is not a federal agency as most people have
been led to believe. It is a cartel of privately
owned bankers and other affluents - much like
OPEC is owned by people in oil producing
nations.
When Congress are over spending like
mindless idiots, when the cost of war is
approximately $245 million a day, one of the
best ways to create money to pay these costs is
to encourage American consumers to borrow. Every
time you borrow - ninety percent of that amount
creates new money from thin air. That money is
injected into the economy. As long as we all
borrow more and more and more money from banks
more money is created.
No
wonder borrowing was made so easy - it gave them
the cash they needed for all that spending.
Every good thing comes to an end. Expect an
economic upheaval when Washington's cash cow
quits giving milk.
"All of the perplexities, confusion, and
distress in America arises, not from the defects
of the Constitution or Confederation, not from
want of honor or virtue, so much as from
downright ignorance of the nature of coin,
credit, and circulation" John Adams,
Founding Father
Congressman Louis T. McFadden, (therefore
knowledgeable) was a banker.
He headed the Congressional Banking
Committee for 11 years. He stated the
following (in part) before Congress on June 10,
1932. "Mr. Chairman, we have in this
country one of the most corrupt institutions the
world has ever known. I refer to the Federal
Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The
Federal Board, has cheated the Government of the
United States and the people of the United
States out of enough money to pay the national
debt. This evil institution has impoverished and
ruined the people of the U.S.; has bankrupted
itself, and has practically bankrupted our
government. It has done this through the defects
of the law under which it operates, through the
maladministration of that law by the Federal
Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices
of the moneyed vultures who control it."
The
Depression was a severe crisis in banking
history. Between 1930 and 1933 more than 9000
banks close their doors and investments
decreased by 90%. Ninety per cent of small
community banks failed. By 1933 the banking
system was a wreck. Congressional hearings
in early 1933 revealed gross irresponsibility
on the part of major banks, which had used billions
of dollars of depositor's funds to acquire
stocks and bonds and had made unsound loans to
inflate the prices of these securities.
The Banking Act of 1933 (the Glass-Stegall
Act), was passed by Congress in the face of
vociferous opposition from the American
banking community. This act prohibited commercial
banks from using their own assets to invest in
securities (such as stocks and bonds).
In his 'Economic History of the Great
Depression', John Galbraith pointed out one of
the causes: "The large scale corporate
thimblerigging that was going on. This took
a variety of forms, of which by far the most
common was the organization of corporations to
hold stock in yet other corporations, which in
turn held stock in yet other corporations.
During 1929 one investment house, Goldman
Sachs and Company, organized and sold nearly a
billion dollars' worth of securities in three
interconnected investment trusts . All
eventually depreciated virtually to
nothing."
Progressive Historians - Nov 27, 2007, Ralph
Brauer
In 1971, in Investment Company v. Camp, no
less than the United States Supreme Court
would write what stands as the most cogent
summary for the Banking Act (Glass-Steagall).
"Congress was concerned that commercial
banks in general and member banks of the
Federal Reserve System in particular had both
aggravated and been damaged by stock market
decline partly because of their direct and
indirect involvement in the trading and
ownership of speculative securities."
Supreme Court No. 61 argued Dec 15-1970:
http://supreme.justia.com/us/401/617/case.html
FAST FORWARD: The chief aim of the money men
(assisted by both Republicans and Democrats)
for decades was to roll back FDR's New
Deal. Anti-government rhetoric ( distracting
labeling) has hidden this from public view.
The 'Banking Act' of the New Deal was a
priority by vested interests in being
repealed. The undoing of this Act took
decades and approximately $200 million in
lobbying funds to accomplish.
"Billionaire Sanford Weill made 'Citigroup'
into the most powerful financial institutions
since the House of Morgan a century ago. A
major trophy of Sanford's is the pen Bill
Clinton used to sign the REPEAL of FDR's
Banking Act - a move which allowed Weill to
create Citigroup. " Sanford Weill called
President Clinton to break the deadlock after
Senator Phil Gramm, chairman of the Banking
Committee, warned Citigroup LOBBYIST Roger
Levy that Weill has to get the White House
moving on the bill or he would shut down the
House-Senate Conference. A deal was
announced at 2:45 a.m. Just days after the
Clinton administration (including the Treasury
Department) agrees to support the REPEAL,
Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, the former
co-chairman of a major Wall Street investment
bank, Goldman Sachs, raises eyebrows by
accepting a top job at Citigroup as Weill's
chief lieutenant. The previous year, Weill had
called Rubin to give him advance notice
of the upcoming merger announcement. When
Weill told Rubin he had some important news,
the secretary reportedly quipped, "You're
buying the government." Progressive
Historian
With
the stroke of a pen, Bill Clinton ended the
long saga of Republicans and Democrats,
working in concert, for their puppet
masters (the bankers) with his signing of
the 'Financial Modernization Bill' (Nov 12,
1991). Clinton ended an era that
stretched back to William Jennings Bryan and
Woodrow Wilson and reached fruition with FDR
and Harry Truman. As he signed his name,
William Jefferson Clinton symbolically
signed the death warrant of a level playing
field that had guided the Democratic Party.
Clinton (both parties) knew better than FDR
and our Supreme Court. Nov 12-1999,
President Clinton stated, " Glass-
Stegal (FDR Banking Bill) is no longer
appropriate for our economy. This was good
for the industrial age. The (1999) Financial
Modernization Bill is the key to rising
paycheck and great security for ordinary
Americans". Tell this to Michigan - NH
- California - Georgia etc. The
public was distracted from one of the
most important pieces of legislation in this
nation's history being signed by Bill
Clinton, with round the clock coverage, of
the Monica debacle. Seeing how Clinton came
out of this shameful episode lauded as
heroic - super stud - and a
multi-millionaire, why one one would almost
think that the whole sordid affair was
contrived? Most especially with Lieberman
acting as the holier than thou apologist !
Missed was Clinton's reason for the undoing
of FDR's landmark bill Press release:
http://Treas.gov/press/releases/ls241.htm
What does this repeal mean? The hedge fund
industry and subprime mortgage market
is out of control. The New York
Times in a June 2007 profile of Goldman
Sachs: "While Wall Street still
mints money advising companies on mergers
and taking them public, real money -
staggering money - is made trading and
investing capital through a global array of
mind bending products and strategies
unimaginable a decade ago."
Goldman Sachs head Lloyd Blankfein paints
the perfect picture of what has happened:
"We've come full circle, because this
is exactly what the Rothschild's or J.P.
Morgan the banker were doing in their
heyday. What caused an aberration was
the Glass-Steagall Act (FDRs - Banking
Act)." Blankfein, like his
cohorts in corporate greed, sees the
New Deal as an aberration and
longs for a return to the Gilded Age.
Level
playing field? Notice how flat it was
before the REPEAL of FDR's Banking
Act. Those subprime loans amount
to nothing more than an organized
ripoff of millions of Americans with
the steepness of the graph illustrates
how far the playing field has titled.
Robert Kutter (Stanford University)
testified before Barney Frank's
Committee on Banking and Financial
Services in Oct 2007 " Since
repeal of Glass Stegall (FDR Banking
Act) in 1999, after more than a decade
of de facto inroads, super banks have
been able to re-enact the same kinds
of structual conflicts of interest
that were endemic in the 1920s -
tending to speculators, packaging and
securitizing credits and then selling
them off, wholesale or retail, and
extracting fees at every step along
the way. And, much of this paper is
even more opaque to bank examiners
than its counterparts were in the
1920s. Much of it isn't paper at all,
and the whole process is supercharged
and automated formulas."
To
the Victor goes the spoils - burp!
It's lonely at the top, but you eat
better!
2008
- Citigroup. The repeal (Clinton's
Financial Modernization Bill) of FDR's
Banking Act - was responsible for the creation
of Citigroup as an all-purpose
financial supermarket and too - big-
to fail banking marvel..(much like the
unsinkable Titanic?). Investment
bankers lobbied for thirty years to
repeal the Glass-Steagall Act, which
separated commercial banking from its
investment house cousins. Wall Street
hated the law but failed year after
year to win repeal. The problem was
always the Democrats (since
Republicans were supporters).
In enters a reincarnation of our old
carnival snake oil salesman. Bill
Clinton delivered his 'New Democrat
Party' with a lot of the usual
scripted rhetoric. Meaningless
made up words. The combination of
insurance, investment banking, and
old-line commercial banks, have
multiplied the conflicts of interest
within banks, despite so-called
'firewalls'. Much like Enron, placing
some deals in off-balance sheet
entries did not insulate Citigroup
from losses in its swollen subprime
housing lending. The bank (Citigroup)
has so far written off something like
$15 billion and there's more to come.
Ah - but meantime we're going to see
these presidential canidates argue
over who loves Blacks the most - or
the miracle of Hillary's tears !
It's interesting that in the
Neveda debates (Nov 15), when Hillary
was asked about Citigroup and the
subprime debacle she responded,
that that she was concerned over these
huge pools of money, and that
Congress and the Federal Reserve need
to ask questions. She went on to
remark on how mortgages (subprime and
conventional) were being bundled and
sold to foreign investors. THE 64,000
QUESTION (yet to be addressed in these
debates) was not asked: 'Senator
Clinton, its a known fact, that
Citigroup would not exist, except for
President Clinton's repeal of FDR's
'Banking Act'. Would you (other
canidates) not agree with the 1971
Supreme Court ruling, Goldman Sachs,
and testimony by economists, that we
have re-enacted the same conflicts of
interest that were in place before the
Great Depression and thus are
doing the very same things that the
Rothschild's and J.P Morgan were
guilty of?' This is the question
that has yet to be asked in any of
these 'debates' (Republican or
Democrat). The media and canidates
blame the victims or wander off into
some escoteric meaningless gibberish.
"Practices
of the unscrupulous money changers
stand indicted in the court of
public opinion, rejected by the
hearts and minds of men. They have
no vision and where there is no
vision the people perish".
FDR First Inaugural Address
View full size
Rest
assured we'll hear the same
sorry blame game - with
each party (both complicit in this
debacle) them) blaming the other.
Hillary is worried about
repairing the image of America. Nobody
is asking these candidates about
the disasterous REPEAL of the Banking
Act of 1933, which is leaving
millions (not them) foreclosed on and
losing jobs, investments, and
pensions etc! When people are
losing their jobs, homes, and
children's futures; like their
grandparents or great grandparents of
old, they don't give a damn
about 'image'. They are focused on
having a roof over their heads and
food to eat. The attention to the
export of jobs in the U.S. did not
develop until white - collar jobs
began to evaporate along with
manufacturing jobs with no replacement
jobs. A U.S. company can hire a
software developer in India for
$6.00 an hour according to the
McKinsey Global Institute. A data -
entry clerk earns $2.00 an hour in
India.
The
presidential - canidates (Jan
15-2008) report that we're spending
$10 billion a month on war. Ten
billion a month, as multitudes
lose their homes over medical costs
(hospitalization) and job losses
that bankrupt them. A $600 per day
hospital fee soon brings a family to
ruination. The working man doesn't
have the smörgåsbord of medical
coverage (tax payer subsidized) that
those in elected office have secured
for themselves (prescriptions
covered - dental - eyeglasses). Note
they promise that someday the
citizens may have affordable health
care. Meantime those promising
affordable health care, if elected,
are receiving bundles of campaign
money from the insurance companies
& pharmaceuticals. These
(lobbyists) are the
people that wrote the bills
that made the cost of prescriptions
prohibitive, and excused them
from liabilities, should
a vaccine kill you or render your
child brain damaged! Whose interests
do you think these canidates will be
serving? Today we see the promises
of the last election serving
OIL interests to the tune of obscene
billions in profits. Not mentioned
these past few days, is the
recent $4,100 raise (Jan -
2008) that Congress gave
itself. The Supreme Court and Dick
Cheney also got raises. The
President's salary stays at
$400,000. Nancy Pelosi will now be
making $217,000. This for working
Tue through Thur (not counting the
numerous recesses). These salaries
are for an approximate 151 days. The
excuse offered, is how much
they work when they go home. I've
yet to see this - except for some
convenient photo-op. The ordinary
guy misses work and he's fired. As
for paid vacations - those are a
rarity.
During
the Great Depression (not
taught in schools) millions
lost their farms and homes
(due to bankers greed). It's
hard to imagine (maybe
not with Clinton's repeal of
Banking Act ?) what it felt
like to walk through the door
of their bank and learn that
the dollars that had earned
had vanished. Every day
spent working and saving had
been for nothing. The people
believed (they were right)
that the bankers had stolen
their lives. To stave off
Banks selling farms at public
auction - farmers from the
area would gather at the farm
up for sale. They would start
bids at 15 cents which
rarely got above a $1.00.
Outsiders were kept from
attending. If someone made a
serious bid, a burly man would
put a hand on his shoulder and
say, "That bid's a little
high ain't it?" These
were known as Penny Auctions.
Fast
forward to 2008. The repeal
of FDR's Banking Act in
1999, with the
promise of
"increased wages and
security for workers"
sees auctions such as the
one above (California)
taking place from coast to
coast. These folks
(speculators) are
benefiting from the
hardships of others. The
Penny Auction to help one's
neighbor against the greed
of banks and lenders, has
been replaced with the
thought of getting a 'real
deal'.
2008
- The promise of Bill Clinton
(repeal of Banking Act) of
rising wages and
security for Americans is
being realized with
millions of layoffs and
foreclosures. Not reported on
the major news stations were
the 10,000 + people showing up
to apply for a job at Wal-Mart
in Atlanta Georgia.
Besides homeowners - renters
are being put out in the cold
with landlords being
foreclosed on. "Remember
you are just an extra in
everyone else's play".
FDR
View full size
Detroit
(no debates held here) has
been in a free fall for the
past seven years. Hundreds
of thousands in Michigan are
without work. The drop out
rate in schools is 70%. With
foreclosures the highest in
the nation (there's great
competition) funds needed
for local programs, schools,
etc, are unavailable. No tax
revenue. Per usual, you'll
hear the victims being
blamed, not
disreputable bankers.
If only they hadn't asked
for a living wage (to keep
up with inflation). If
only they (auto workers)
would work for Third World
wages they wouldn't be out
of work. Meantime the CEOs
(corporate) of these echoing
plants make 400X that of the
ordinary worker. Their
pensions aren't stolen. The
golden parachutes they
receive are in the multi -
millions (even if they have
brought their company to
ruination). Hotels, office
buildings, and thousands of
homes are boarded up in
Detroit. Meantime hundreds
of thousands are homeless or
forgotten in noxious
formaldehyde FEMA
trailers. Go figure?
McCain
has told those out of work -
"The jobs are never coming
back". John, whose wife's
trust, recently purchased
them a $5 million exclusive
condo in Phoenix, hasn't
got a clue of the suffering and
fear of these folks. His advice,
"Go back to school and get
that college degree - get some
job retraining".
John, busy trying to catch the
brass ring, neglected to tell
folks that President Bush has
cut funding for job re-training
by one billion dollars (amongst
many other domestic programs).
Bush Budget - AFL-CIO, Mike
Hall. Thankfully for John, after
divorcing his first wife, when
his salary was a mere $45,000,
he married an heiress. No
job retraining for him. What
John is oblivious to, is
the fact that thousands of
college graduates (with several
degrees) are looking for work.
Duh - like Wall Street. How one
secures a college degree living
in a shelter -tent - car
or FEMA trailer, miles
from nowhere (in cornfields)
beats me?
View full size
View full size
"Who
said the free? Not me?
Surely not me? The millions on relief
today?
The millions shot down when we strike?
The millions who have nothing for our
pay-
Except the dream that's almost dead
today."
"Sure, call me any ugly name you
choose-
The steel of freedom does not stain.
From those who live like leeches on
the people's lives,
We must take back our land again,
AMERICA!" Langston Hughes
(Great Depression)
jdthmoriarty@yahoo.com
|