logo top

bubbles

logo bottom
 


 
dot


 

           Welcome to Call to Decision 

 

Food Crisis May Threaten Your Portfolio
by Sean Brodrick

Dear David,




Sean Brodrick

The United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) said that world cereal production may jump a record 2.6% this year as farmers boost plantings.

In other words, supply is fine.

Except ... wait a minute ... what's that other report I read last month? The one that said world cereal demand is growing at 3% a year.

Today, I'll explain why this seemingly insignificant gap between supply and demand scares the bejeezus out of me, and how you can protect yourself.

The gap is only four-tenths of a percent. What could possibly go wrong, you ask?

Well, for starters ....

The World's Food Supplies Have Collapsed ...

Worldwide stockpiles of cereals (wheat, corn, etc.) are expected to fall to a 25-year-low of 405 million tonnes in 2008. That's down 21 million tonnes, or 5%, from their already reduced level last year.

U.S. wheat stockpiles are at a 62-year low, even though farmers are planting from fence-to-fence. And with the U.S. dollar falling fast, foreign buyers are lining up to scoop up as much of Uncle Sam's grain as they can carry away. Wheat recently soared to the highest price in 28 years.




Food Prices

Meanwhile rice, a staple food for three billion people, is becoming increasingly scarce. World stores of rice have shrunk from 130 million tons eight years ago to today's stockpile of 72 million tons — enough for only 17% of annual global demand. Result — the price of rice is up 70% in the past year.

And as for corn — well, more and more of that is used for ethanol. The price of corn is up over 70% in the past year and has more than doubled in the past two years.

So to summarize — stockpiles are at record lows. The supply on hand can be measured in days! And growth in production can't keep up with growth demand.

Now, let me ask you this question ...

What If Something Goes Wrong?

What if the increasingly freaky weather the world has been enduring causes droughts on one side of the world and floods on the other? What if there's blight or some other major crop failure?




Rising Food Prices

You can see why I believe we are one bad harvest away from a serious global food crisis!

People will put up with a lot, but they won't put up with going hungry ... not when they have guns. In fact, blood is already being spilled over food ...

Arrow Egypt — food riots! In the time of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra, Egypt was the bread basket of the Mediterranean. Boy, how times have changed. Food inflation is so bad in Egypt that people are rioting over sky-high prices. The government-owned Egyptian Gazette newspaper says that seven people have died since the beginning of the year in brawls in bread lines.

And it's not just Egypt. The World Bank says 33 countries from Mexico to Yemen have already experienced unrest because of spiraling food costs, and 37 countries may face more social upheavals if food prices continue to rise.

Arrow China says "no" to hungry Filipinos. The Philippine government recently asked China to provide 200,000 metric tons of milling wheat, equivalent to about 10% of annual consumption. Beijing declined, leaving the Philippines scrambling to find more wheat.




Internal Sponsorship



Surging Natural Resource Prices
Mean Monumental Profits for
Latin American Companies


You've seen oil zoom past $100 per barrel. You know that metals like copper and iron are going through the roof. And you've seen the price explosion in wheat, soybeans, and corn.

Even water — the most basic commodity known to man — is rapidly gaining value as developing nations struggle to provide their populations with potable supplies.

And in my opinion, no region is better positioned to capitalize on soaring commodity prices than Latin America ...

Click here for more information ...


 

Arrow Trouble in Uncle Sam's breadbasket. Cold weather is chilling the fields in the Midwest, and too much rain is sending rivers near their flood levels.. Farmers who try to till or plant in soils that are too wet will risk compacting their crops and other problems that result in lower yields. On my blog last week, I published a note from a farmer who complained that he STILL can't get a crop in the ground:


"In 2006, we finished planting my crops on April 23. In 2007, we were done on April 18. I don't want to be the first guy planting, but I don't like being third, either. Early (timely) planting won't happen this year if the weather forecast for the coming weekend proves accurate. Soils are completely saturated to the point of that erosion has already occurred and will get worse with additional heavy rains, and are COLD. I can't tell you how cold because I've not even checked temps yet. If planting is not done by May 1, there will be some nervous farmers in LaSalle County and I'll be one of them."

Now sure, that's a local story, but it's not the only one. In fact, just this week, the USDA reported that corn and rice plantings are being delayed by excessive rain. A hungry world is depending on a good U.S. crop — if we don't get one, those 37 countries the World Bank is talking about could erupt in food riots.

How We Got Here ...

Global food prices surged 57% last month from a year earlier, according to the FAO. There are a number of forces driving that price explosion ...

Weather: Part of it is weather. Too much rain in the U.S. in 2007, flooding in Indonesia and Bangladesh and drought in Canada and Australia curbed world stockpiles. As a result, the poorest countries may spend 56% more on grains this year than a year ago. Global warming will affect crop yields, and mostly not in a good way.

Food or fuel? Ethanol production is on course to account for some 30% of the U.S. corn crop by 2010. The International Monetary Fund estimates that corn ethanol production in the U.S. fueled at least half the rise in world corn demand in each of the past three years. As corn prices go up, animal feed goes up, and prices of other crops rise as farmers switch their fields over to government-supported corn.




As the economic boom in China raises the standard of living, 1.3 billion people have drastically increased their consumption of meat.


As the economic boom in China raises the standard of living, 1.3 billion people have drastically increased their consumption of meat.

Rising Demand: World Bank President Robert Zoellick recently told a conference: "As the Indian commerce minister said to me, going from one meal a day to two meals a day for 300 million people increases demand a lot."

And he's only talking about the poorest of the poor. There are 1.1 billion people in India, and they're all improving their diets and eating more Western foods. Meanwhile, 1.3 billion people in China are eating a lot better and eating a lot more meat — and it takes 7 pounds of grain to make one pound of meat! It's no wonder why food prices in China jumped 28% in February.

Political pressures: China isn't the only large, populous country that is curbing exports to ease prices — and internal unrest — at home.


  • Vietnam, one of the world's three biggest rice exporters, will reduce shipments by a million tons this year to 3..5 million tons to ensure supplies domestically and curb its highest inflation in more than a decade (20% year over year — ouch!). The government also said it's considering a tax on rice exports. Egypt, Cambodia and Guyana have all also put export bans on rice in place.


  • Kazakhstan just suspended its wheat exports to tame domestic inflation. Kazakhstan is the breadbasket of Central Asia, and the only state in the region that exports grain, about 50% of the 21 million tons it says it harvested last year.




External Sponsorship



"It was so easy ..."


That's what 32-year-old Erin Herrera — a graphic designer from Chicago — told the Chicago Tribune after staking a small $200 investment. Since then, she's had the chance to collect 20 dividend checks boosting her tiny stake to an estimated $5,099.24.

How did she do it?

Herrera is among the thousands of smart Americans who have been collecting surprisingly large sums of income because of a unique British Gov't initiative my colleagues and I call "Commonwealth Shares."

Click here to read my full report ...


 


  • Ukraine stopped wheat exports this month and reduced barley exports.


  • Argentina — the world's fourth largest wheat exporter — has effectively pushed back the date that new shipments can leave the country.


  • India has already put restrictions on its rice imports. And its wheat output, second only to that of China, may drop 1 million tons to 74..81 million tons in the March-April harvest because of a drop in acreage.

Coming Next — Hoarding!




Food Prices

What's more, India may import up to two million tons to build stockpiles — up from imports of 1.8 million tons in 2007 — with an eye on creating a strategic reserve of five million tons of wheat and rice to meet emergencies. Pakistan is also talking about doubling its wheat imports this year.

If other countries start building strategic reserves, it could send prices skyrocketing. And that raises the specter of countries fighting each other over food reserves.

Speaking of reserves, since China reportedly has as much as 200 million tons of grain reserves, you have to wonder why they turned down the Philippines' request for wheat exports ... unless, maybe, they don't have as much as they say they have.

Why would they lie? How about a powder keg with 1.3 billion hungry people sitting on it!

Or maybe the Chinese can see the way that forces in the agriculture market are falling into place and they believe that no stockpile can be big enough!

How You Can Protect Your Portfolio ...

No one wants to get rich off hunger. But you do want to protect your portfolio from market turmoil, and the profits on agriculture could cushion the blow for other sectors you own that might be getting hurt.

One way to do it is with the PowerShares DB Agriculture ETF (DBA). It tracks an index composed of futures contracts on corn, wheat, soybeans and sugar. It's up 17% year-to-date — pretty good compared to the 9.5% loss for the S&P 500.

Yours for trading profits,

Sean







About Money and Markets

For more information and archived issues, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com

Money and Markets (MaM) is published by Weiss Research, Inc. and written by Martin D. Weiss along with Tony Sagami, Nilus Mattive, Sean Brodrick, Larry Edelson, Michael Larson and Jack Crooks. To avoid conflicts of interest, Weiss Research and its staff do not hold positions in companies recommended in MaM, nor do we accept any compensation for such recommendations. The comments, graphs, forecasts, and indices published in MaM are based upon data whose accuracy is deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Performance returns cited are derived from our best estimates but must be considered hypothetical in as much as we do not track the actual prices investors pay or receive. Regular contributors and staff include Kristen Adams, Andrea Baumwald, John Burke, Amber Dakar, Dinesh Kalera, Mathias Korzan, Red Morgan, Maryellen Murphy, Jennifer Newman-Amos, Adam Shafer, Julie Trudeau and Leslie Underwoo! d.

Attention editors and publishers! Money and Markets issues can be republished. Republished issues MUST include attribution of the author(s) and the following short paragraph:

This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com.

From time to time, Money and Markets may have information from select third-party advertisers known as "external sponsorships." We cannot guarantee the accuracy of these ads. In addition, these ads do not necessarily express the viewpoints of Money and Markets or its editors. For more information, see our terms and conditions..

View our Privacy Policy.

Would you like to unsubscribe from our mailing list?

To make sure you don't miss our urgent updates, add Weiss Research to your address book. Just follow these simple steps.




Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:50:43 -0700
From: comlar58@yahoo.com
Subject: Bush Replaced REX84 With New Martial Law EO
To: com4@winco.net

Bush Replaced REX84 With
New Martial Law EO
Once In Control - Martial Law Will Stay
By Ted Twietmeyer
4-14-8
 
In May 2007, Bush signed executive new orders NSDP51 and HSDP20 to replace REX84. The older order REX84 was an older directive to establish martial law in the event of a national emergency. Everything done in government is done for a reason, and these two new orders are no exception.
 
These new directives surprised and alarmed many real conservatives and true patriots at the time. These two orders established that the White House administration would take over all local governments under a national state of emergency, instead of Homeland Security.
 
In May 2007, The Washington Post apparently saw nothing wrong with it and placed the story back on page 13 (a fitting unlucky number for it), according to a CSPAN television interview with well known author and writer Jerome Corsi:
 
 
 
 
Page 13 of Washington Post from May 2007 reports that Bush claims he will
run the "Shadow Government"
 
 
 
Close-up of page 13
 
 
A contradiction appears to exist here. It cites a nuclear attack or a decapitating event in Washington as the reason for this, according to security analysts. If all the leaders and the administration in Washington are dead from a nuclear attack, who will be left to take over leading the nation under executive orders NSDP51 and HSPD20?Who would be left to sign the martial law orders? This implies that martial law must be activated BEFORE an attack takes place while the administration is out of town, which clearly implies a false-flag operation by traitors of the worst kind. The administration was in Florida on 9-11, too.
 
As of this writing in April 2008, we are coming up on a year since these two directives was written and signed. There have been many rumors of false-flag attacks being prepared for 2008. Are these repeated rumors designed to destroy the credibility of whistle blowers, so when the real event is announced by a whistle-blower no one will listen? This question doesn't appear to have been asked by anyone, but it must be. This many not be unlike the proverbial story of the boy who cried wolf. But in this case the wolf isn't coming - he's already inside. Now it's a question of when the wolf will make his move.
 
Hitler took power through completely legal means. Laws were previously established in plain view of the German people before he made his dictatorial power grab.. We appear are witnessing the very same thing happening today some seventy years later. Apparently no one on Capitol Hill has learned a thing from history as it repeats itself. They also have clearly forgotten Bush's words in December 1999 - "This job would be a heck of a lot easier if this were a dictatorship...just so long as I'm the dictator." He meant what he said, he's acting exactly like one and it's happening right now.
 
America's case for a repeat of a Hitler type power grab is clearly underway. First there was the infamous 1200 page Patriot Act that appeared a few days after 9-11 but almost no one on Capitol Hill took time to read, but almost everyone signed off on it anyway. Some on Capitol Hill have said that soldiers with machine guns were in the hallways on Capitol Hill the night the Patriot Act was signed, and many felt intimidated they must sign it without reading it. If true, then it implies that martial law may have already been declared in secret. Soldiers in hallways have no place on Capitol Hill in civilian government. Again, another sign of a dictatorship IN ACTION.
 
Technically, Congress could nullify the Patriot Act overnight by claiming it was signed under duress.
 
There have been other draconian follow-on homeland security type acts which simply were given less intimidating names. All are good examples of political BS at work.
 
Are NSDP51 and HSPD20 the last of them all? Most likely they are not. We have no idea how many other orders have been signed in secret, such as the torture orders which were leaked to the media. When confronted about the torture order, Bush simply has shrugged his shoulders about in total disregard and boldly claimed he signed off on it.
 
Like paving stones, all the pieces have come together in plain sight to pave the highway to a completely legal totalitarian police state, with all of America to be controlled by the White House. But is this legal? Bush has abused his executive order powers countless times like previous presidents. Executive orders were originally created by Congress to establish relatively harmless laws without the need for Congressional approval, such as new legal holidays. Congress can revoke that privilege at any time ­ that is, up until the time when martial law is declared. Military troops will send Congress home making them powerless. At that point we shall have passed the point of no return. That is, if we haven't already.
 
A look at the history of numerous third world countries around the globe proves one common thread exists ­ once the military takes control of its home country, it usually doesn't return control to civilian authorities once a war or threat to security is over. And today America has been reduced to the status of a third world country as well. American manufacturing is now almost totally defense industry-driven, which makes the return of government to civlian hands after war ends even less likely in the foreseeable future.
 
With a 100 year war boldly proclaimed by the administration, civilian control will never be returned to Congress - for at least FIVE GENERATIONS.
 
Martial law will require the full support of US military personnel to enforce it. Foreign troops are called into enforce martial law will still require both direct and indirect support from US military personnel, or a military-military civil war could ensue. But in the end, that may be what's needed to end the madness.
 
Here is the REAL acid test - will military personnel voluntarily turn America into a police state virtually overnight? Will these same military personnel do nothing while they watch their friends and loved ones crushed under absolute law and absolute terror? Bread lines and soup kitchens will return, but most likely only within the confines of American POW camps on American soil. This will force people to voluntarily turn themselves in to eat. Perhaps a "guns-for-food" type program will be established to encourage the American people to disarm themselves, even though the door kickers will be sent out anyway.
 
In military history it's well known that if you control the food supply, you control the people. Few people know that a secure area inside Wal-Mart headquarters in Bentonville, AR has a sign declaring that secured area belongs to Homeland Security. Wal-Mart will become the food distributor for America under a rationing program. There is no other larger food store chain that can provide the required logistics that store can. In the 1990's, the military quietly did walk-throughs of all the major food store chains around the country taking notes. Somewhere there is a document detailing what the plans are. Certainly at the very least, it will entail securing ALL the grocery stores of any size. Small corner grocery stores will be cleaned out in a day or two, and would be of no interest to the military.
 
To believe such horrors could never happen in America, when it's now down on its knees already economically would be pure stupidity at the very least. Those in real estate swore for decades that real estate prices would always go up, too. Now these same people are panicking and on they are on their knees, too. So much for greed, as they have earned their reward. But what about innocent, hard working people that have always lived within their incomes? Do they deserve to suffer as well?
 
We live in a time when absolutely anything is possible. A military coup is now required to prevent declaration of martial law, kick the foreign troops out of America and restore true civilian government. Dangerous centralized dictatorship laws must also be nullified and this time, the lesson learned once and for all.
 
No civilian militia can restore American law at this point. They would only be labeled as terrorists and dealt with under new laws already in place. We have reached the point where restoration to civilian law and government checks/balances can only come from the inside.
 
But time is quickly running out.
 
Ted Twietmeyer
tedtw@frontiernet.net
www.data4science.net


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:31:28 -0700
From: comlar58@yahoo.com
Subject: BEING A RICH NATION IS NO PROTECTION AGAINST HUNGER: DIRE WARNING
To: com4@winco.net

Subject: BEING A RICH NATION IS NO PROTECTION AGAINST HUNGER: DIRE WARNING

In modern times, Japan, especially Japan, one would think, after the WWII U.S. blockade of its land locked nation and the terrible consequences it suffered, would take more pains to be self sufficient.   Instead, its position is just as precarious and urgent.  Talk about not learning from history, although Japan is certainly not alone.  In an updated report yesterday from the U.S. food banks, about the growing shortage of food due to price increase pressures, as the growing ranks of the hungry needing food bank assistance grows alarmingly, our food situation is something to be quite concerned about too. ac


A 130% rise in the global cost of wheat in the past year, caused partly by surging demand from China and India and a huge injection of speculative funds into wheat futures, has forced the Government to hit flour millers with three rounds of stiff mark-ups. The latest ­ a 30% increase this month ­ has given rise to speculation that Japan, which relies on imports for 90% of its annual wheat consumption, is no longer on the brink of a food crisis, but has fallen off the cliff.

According to one government poll, 80% of Japanese are frightened about what the future holds for their food supply.

Japan's biggest concern, however, is its weakening ability to sustain its population with domestic produce. In 2006 the country's self-sufficiency rate fell to 39%, according to the Agriculture Ministry. It was only the second time since the ministry began keeping records in 1960 that the population derived less than 40% of its daily calorie intake from domestically grown food.



Japan's hunger becomes a dire warning for other nations

28ac89.jpg

 

 




Food fears: Being a rich nation is no protection for Japan, which faces the fallout of relying too heavily on foreign food to supply domestic needs.

  • Justin Norrie, Tokyo
  • April 21, 2008
MARIKO Watanabe admits she could have chosen a better time to take up baking. This week, when the Tokyo housewife visited her local Ito-Yokado supermarket to buy butter to make a cake, she found the shelves bare.

"I went to another supermarket, and then another, and there was no butter at those either. Everywhere I went there were notices saying Japan has run out of butter. I couldn't believe it ­ this is the first time in my life I've wanted to try baking cakes and I can't get any butter," said the frustrated cook.

Japan's acute butter shortage, which has confounded bakeries, restaurants and now families across the country, is the latest unforeseen result of the global agricultural commodities crisis.

A sharp increase in the cost of imported cattle feed and a decline in milk imports, both of which are typically provided in large part by Australia, have prevented dairy farmers from keeping pace with demand.

While soaring food prices have triggered rioting among the starving millions of the third world, in wealthy Japan they have forced a pampered population to contemplate the shocking possibility of a long-term ­ perhaps permanent ­ reduction in the quality and quantity of its food.

A 130% rise in the global cost of wheat in the past year, caused partly by surging demand from China and India and a huge injection of speculative funds into wheat futures, has forced the Government to hit flour millers with three rounds of stiff mark-ups. The latest ­ a 30% increase this month ­ has given rise to speculation that Japan, which relies on imports for 90% of its annual wheat consumption, is no longer on the brink of a food crisis, but has fallen off the cliff.

According to one government poll, 80% of Japanese are frightened about what the future holds for their food supply.

Last week, as the prices of wheat and barley continued their relentless climb, the Japanese Government discovered it had exhausted its ¥230 billion ($A2.37 billion) budget for the grains with two months remaining. It was forced to call on an emergency ¥55 billion reserve to ensure it could continue feeding the nation.

"This was the first time the Government has had to take such drastic action since the war," said Akio Shibata, an expert on food imports, who warned the Agriculture Ministry two years ago that Japan would have to cut back drastically on its sophisticated diet if it did not become more self-sufficient.

In the wake of the decision this week by Kazakhstan, the world's fifth biggest wheat exporter, to join Russia, Ukraine and Argentina in stopping exports to satisfy domestic demand, the situation in Japan is expected to worsen.

Bakeries, forced to increase prices by up to 30% in the past year, are warning that the trend will continue. Manufacturers of miso, a culinary staple, are preparing to pass on the bump in costs caused by the rising price of soybeans and cooking oil. And the nation's largest brewer, Kirin, is lifting beer prices for the first time in almost two decades to account for the soaring cost of barley.

"In the past, Japan was a rich country with a powerful yen that could easily buy cheap imports such as wheat, corn and soybeans," said Mr Shibata, who directs the Marubeni Research Institute in Tokyo. "But with enormous competition from the booming Chinese and Indian economies, that's changed forever. You also need to take into account recent developments, including the damage to crops caused by drought and other disasters in exporting countries like Australia," where the value of wheat exports has tumbled from $3.49 billion to $2.77 billion in the past three years.

The situation has been compounded by a surge in demand for bio-fuels such as ethanol, made from maize, encouraging farmers around the world to divert their efforts away from wheat and barley and into maize, further driving up prices.

Arguably Japan's biggest concern, however, is its weakening ability to sustain its population with domestic produce. In 2006 the country's self-sufficiency rate fell to 39%, according to the Agriculture Ministry. It was only the second time since the ministry began keeping records in 1960 that the population derived less than 40% of its daily calorie intake from domestically grown food.

Shinichi Shogenji, dean of the University of Tokyo's graduate school of agricultural and life sciences, said Japan's meat consumption had increased by 900% since 1955, in part because expanding incomes had enabled families to supplement the sparse national diet of rice, fish and miso soup with more Western-style food.

This trend, combined with rapid ageing and declining rural populations, had placed the country's self-sufficiency at a perilously low level, Professor Shogenji said.

In view of recent predictions by Goldman Sachs analysts that commodities could experience "explosive rallies" in the next two years, many are wondering if Japan could become an example to other rich nations that have relied too much on foreign supplies to put food on their tables.

Last week, as the prices of wheat and barley continued their relentless climb, the Japanese Government discovered it had exhausted its ¥230 billion ($A2.37 billion) budget for the grains with two months remaining. It was forced to call on an emergency ¥55 billion reserve to ensure it could continue feeding the nation.

"This was the first time the Government has had to take such drastic action since the war," said Akio Shibata, an expert on food imports, who warned the Agriculture Ministry two years ago that Japan would have to cut back drastically on its sophisticated diet if it did not become more self-sufficient.

In the wake of the decision this week by Kazakhstan, the world's fifth biggest wheat exporter, to join Russia, Ukraine and Argentina in stopping exports to satisfy domestic demand, the situation in Japan is expected to worsen.

Bakeries, forced to increase prices by up to 30% in the past year, are warning that the trend will continue. Manufacturers of miso, a culinary staple, are preparing to pass on the bump in costs caused by the rising price of soybeans and cooking oil. And the nation's largest brewer, Kirin, is lifting beer prices for the first time in almost two decades to account for the soaring cost of barley.

"In the past, Japan was a rich country with a powerful yen that could easily buy cheap imports such as wheat, corn and soybeans," said Mr Shibata, who directs the Marubeni Research Institute in Tokyo. "But with enormous competition from the booming Chinese and Indian economies, that's changed forever. You also need to take into account recent developments, including the damage to crops caused by drought and other disasters in exporting countries like Australia," where the value of wheat exports has tumbled from $3.49 billion to $2.77 billion in the past three years.

The situation has been compounded by a surge in demand for bio-fuels such as ethanol, made from maize, encouraging farmers around the world to divert their efforts away from wheat and barley and into maize, further driving up prices.

Arguably Japan's biggest concern, however, is its weakening ability to sustain its population with domestic produce. In 2006 the country's self-sufficiency rate fell to 39%, according to the Agriculture Ministry. It was only the second time since the ministry began keeping records in 1960 that the population derived less than 40% of its daily calorie intake from domestically grown food.

Shinichi Shogenji, dean of the University of Tokyo's graduate school of agricultural and life sciences, said Japan's meat consumption had increased by 900% since 1955, in part because expanding incomes had enabled families to supplement the sparse national diet of rice, fish and miso soup with more Western-style food.

This trend, combined with rapid ageing and declining rural populations, had placed the country's self-sufficiency at a perilously low level, Professor Shogenji said.

In view of recent predictions by Goldman Sachs analysts that commodities could experience "explosive rallies" in the next two years, many are wondering if Japan could become an example to other rich nations that have relied too much on foreign supplies to put food on their tables.





Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:28:42 -0700
From: comlar58@yahoo.com
Subject: Food Rationing Confronts Breadbasket of the World
To: com4@winco.net

Food Rationing Confronts Breadbasket of the World

By

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Many parts of America, long considered the breadbasket of the world, are now confronting a once unthinkable phenomenon: food rationing.

Rice is stored at a National Food Authority warehouse at Manila, the Philippines, on April 17.
ROMEO GACAD/AFP/Getty
Rice is stored at a National Food Authority warehouse at Manila, the Philippines, on April 17.
Major retailers in New York, in areas of New England, and on the West Coast are limiting purchases of flour, rice, and cooking oil as demand outstrips supply. There are also anecdotal reports that some consumers are hoarding grain stocks.
At a Costco Warehouse in Mountain View, Calif., yesterday, shoppers grew frustrated and occasionally uttered expletives as they searched in vain for the large sacks of rice they usually buy.
“Where’s the rice?” an engineer from Palo Alto, Calif., Yajun Liu, said. “You should be able to buy something like rice. This is ridiculous.”
The bustling store in the heart of Silicon Valley usually sells four or five varieties of rice to a clientele largely of Asian immigrants, but only about half a pallet of Indian-grown Basmati rice was left in stock. A 20-pound bag was selling for $15.99.
“You can’t eat this every day. It’s too heavy,” a health care executive from Palo Alto, Sharad Patel, grumbled as his son loaded two sacks of the Basmati into a shopping cart. “We only need one bag but I’m getting two in case a neighbor or a friend needs it,” the elder man said.
The Patels seemed headed for disappointment, as most Costco members were being allowed to buy only one bag. Moments earlier, a clerk dropped two sacks back on the stack after taking them from another customer who tried to exceed the one-bag cap.
“Due to the limited availability of rice, we are limiting rice purchases based on your prior purchasing history,” a sign above the dwindling supply said.
Shoppers said the limits had been in place for a few days, and that rice supplies had been spotty for a few weeks. A store manager referred questions to officials at Costco headquarters near Seattle, who did not return calls or e-mail messages yesterday.
An employee at the Costco store in Queens said there were no restrictions on rice buying, but limits were being imposed on purchases of oil and flour. Internet postings attributed some of the shortage at the retail level to bakery owners who flocked to warehouse stores when the price of flour from commercial suppliers doubled.
The curbs and shortages are being tracked with concern by survivalists who view the phenomenon as a harbinger of more serious trouble to come.
“It’s sporadic. It’s not every store, but it’s becoming more commonplace,” the editor of SurvivalBlog.com, James Rawles, said. “The number of reports I’ve been getting from readers who have seen signs posted with limits has increased almost exponentially, I’d say in the last three to five weeks.”
Spiking food prices have led to riots in recent weeks in Haiti, Indonesia, and several African nations. India recently banned export of all but the highest quality rice, and Vietnam blocked the signing of new contract for foreign rice sales.
“I’m surprised the Bush administration hasn’t slapped export controls on wheat,” Mr. Rawles said. “The Asian countries are here buying every kind of wheat.”
Mr. Rawles said it is hard to know how much of the shortages are due to lagging supply and how much is caused by consumers hedging against future price hikes or a total lack of product.
“There have been so many stories about worldwide shortages that it encourages people to stock up. What most people don’t realize is that supply chains have changed, so inventories are very short,” Mr. Rawles, a former Army intelligence officer, said. “Even if people increased their purchasing by 20%, all the store shelves would be wiped out.”
At the moment, large chain retailers seem more prone to shortages and limits than do smaller chains and mom-and-pop stores, perhaps because store managers at the larger companies have less discretion to increase prices locally.
Mr. Rawles said the spot shortages seemed to be most frequent in the Northeast and all the way along the West Coast. He said he had heard reports of buying limits at Sam’s Club warehouses, which are owned by Wal-Mart Stores, but a spokesman for the company, Kory Lundberg, said he was not aware of any shortages or limits.
An anonymous high-tech professional writing on an investment Web site, Seeking Alpha, said he recently bought 10 50-pound bags of rice at Costco. “I am concerned that when the news of rice shortage spreads, there will be panic buying and the shelves will be empty in no time. I do not intend to cause a panic, and I am not speculating on rice to make profit. I am just hoarding some for my own consumption,” he wrote.
For now, rice is available at Asian markets in California, though consumers have fewer choices when buying the largest bags. “At our neighborhood store, it’s very expensive, more than $30” for a 25-pound bag, a housewife from Mountain View, Theresa Esquerra, said. “I’m not going to pay $30. Maybe we’ll just eat bread.”

 



Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:55:48 -0700
From: comlar58@yahoo.com
Subject: They're Going to Sell Your Food
To: com4@winco.net

They're Going to Sell Your Food
J. Michael Stevens Group
April 15, 2008

By Steve Shenk
The UN World Food Program is asking for $1 billion - $500 million of which they want paid by May 1st. This is to come from developed nations, including the United States, to help with the starvation in under-developed countries. Surely, no one would argue with the humanitarian need to feed the starving Third World countries.
Every country in the world is experiencing food shortages and runaway food prices. So you have to ask yourself, "Where are they going to get the $1 billion worth of food to buy?"
Remember, we are entering the third year of this worldwide famine. The UN has declared a world-wide food emergency.
Third World starvation is terrible, but it's not just "them." Unfortunately, the United States itself has started to starve. We have rationing and ridiculous cost increases of wheat flour (the source for spaghetti, noodles, macaroni, etc.- the basic food of the poor among us). With the bees disappearing in the United States, pollination of fruits, vegetables and nuts isn't happening. Corn shortages will cause severe rationing before the next crop comes in. This means livestock feed will be in very short supply effecting meat, poultry and dairy products.
The United States has been importing 30% to 40% of its food. Countries we are importing from have shut down exports to us to save the food for their own people.
Remember, every country in the world is experiencing food shortages and runaway food prices. So again you have to ask yourself, "Where are they going to get the $1 billion worth of food to buy?"
There is only one developed country that will not shut down exports of food to protect its people. That's the United States. The reason is that our food supply is controlled by international agri-corps. These multi-national food companies will gladly sell our American food to the UN (paid for with your American dollars.)
The bottom line is this - you must realize that the United States of America has 30% less food than what it takes to feed our own population on any given day. Please understand that in all probability these global food organizations will use America's money to buy what's left of your food.
Our middle and upper income families will enter a never before imagined terror for their own ability to survive when food in the next few months becomes tremendously expensive and ultimately a black marketed commodity. It will make no difference how prosperous or poor an individual is. In the near future the measure of wealth will not be the mansion on the hill with a basement vault full of guns and gold. True wealth will be a supply of food to last three to five years.
Your job is to do your research and decide what the worldwide, and particularly the United States, famine means to you. Check on world and American food availability. When the UN declares an emergency, you have to believe that the famine is no longer recoverable.
When the mass media is forced to report the famine, you can be sure of two things:
  1. They will first point to problems outside the United States to distract us from our own rising levels of food shortages.
  2. You will shortly see heart-wrenching examples of world organization planes and trucks feeding the starving people of these undeveloped countries. But be more concerned with what you aren't shown. You won't see the other people in those countries left to starve (they weren't fortunate enough to be "selected" for the photo op.)
But even more important is the fact that those of you who can still just barely afford food (clean or not), will never be told how fast food is disappearing in America until the riots break out.
But then, of course, this all could be the ravings of a paranoid, overheated, foolish brain.
The genetically altered crops could be eliminated worldwide and those remaining could be required to carry pharmaceutical disclaimers. (For example: immune deficiency diseases, cancer, diabetes, heart failure, impotence, Alzheimer's, Morgellon's Disease, hypertension, etc.)
The bees could miraculously regenerate and pollinate this year's crop bringing back two thirds of the food we eat every day.
The thousands of farmers paid not to grow crops could instantaneously bypass the three to five years, and the hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of equipment costs, needed to get immediately back into production. (Of course, the last generation of farm kids would have to be pulled back from their city jobs because grandma and grandpa are too old to ride the tractors.)
Fuel prices could be dropped to an "honest" profit over cost. Then truckers could make a decent living hauling our food and farmers could afford to plant.
The worldwide famine where the planet didn't produce as much food as the population ate the last two years is now entering its third growing season with less water and fewer crops planted. We could hope to see media headlines in a month or two declaring, "We were just kidding about all this food scarcity stuff. We just wanted to scare you."
The countries that we import food from could apologize for shutting off exports and, even though they don't have enough food for themselves, they could share with us just because they like Americans.
Investors could sell back water rights in land over aquifers to return them to public rather than private use and control.
The Doomsday Seeds Vault in Norway could be permanently sealed. It wouldn't be needed if farmers worldwide were given back (heritage) seeds to plant year after year, never having to buy seed again.
Yes, this whole mess could get miraculously turned around in the next couple of months. Food prices could drop to where even the poor in the US could afford their spaghetti. And it could be that we will never see a food riot or a bread line with no bread on American soil.
Do your research and place your bet on what you think will happen.
Is it better to have what you don't need or need what you don't have?

What's in Your Cupboard?



Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:55:18 -0700
From: comlar58@yahoo.com
Subject: Riots, Strikes & Protests - The Great Global Grain Wars
To: com4@winco.net

Riots, Strikes & Protests - The Great Global Grain Wars
The Sovereign Society Offshore - A Letter
April 5, 2008

By Erika Nolan, Executive Director In the past year, riots broke out in 12 different countries. We've also seen street protests in Jakarta. Strikes in Italy. Unprecedented government controls in 20 different countries.
And over what? Oppressive government? Long work hours? Inequality?
No. It's much more basic than that. They're rioting and protesting because they can no longer afford to eat with these skyrocketing food costs.
And it's no wonder. In the last six months alone, the basics people live on have surged dramatically in price. Corn prices have jumped 51%. Barley has soared 38%. Oats, 53%. Wheat, 56%. And rice - the mainstay of diets in emerging countries home to over 3 billion - shot up a devastating 67%!
You may not have heard the hungry protesters or seen the riots - yet - but I'm guessing you've felt this uncomfortable inflationary squeeze in your grocery bills.
Here in the U.S., you now have to fork over another 32% more for a loaf of bread than you did just three years ago. A carton of eggs costs you 50% more since this time last year. And overall your food bills have climbed 5% since 2007, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:49:45 -0700
From: comlar58@yahoo.com
Subject: UN chief warns world must urgently increase food production
To: com4@winco.net

UN chief warns world must urgently increase food production


Associated Press | United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon will put together a special task force to help deal with the problem and call on the international community to help.

In lean times, biotech grains are less taboo


International Herald Tribune | Soaring food prices and global grain shortages are bringing new pressures on governments, food companies and consumers to relax their longstanding resistance to genetically engineered crops.


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:48:53 -0700
From: comlar58@yahoo.com
Subject: Food Rationing Begins in America
To: com4@winco.net

Food Rationing Begins in America


Fox KPTM 42 News | Major retailers on both coasts are limiting customersʼ purchases of flour, rice and cooking oil.

Lenders Swamped By Foreclosures Let Homeowners Stay






Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.