|

|
Welcome to Call to Decision
‘Common
Sense Gun Laws’: Obama’s Attack on the Second Amendment
Posted By AWR
Hawkins On March 24, 2009 @ 12:00 am
Throughout the
2008 election cycle, Barack Obama espoused support for the
Second Amendment. He said he agreed with the Supreme Court’s
decision in the [1] Heller
case against the D.C. gun ban, professed that “there is an
[2] individual
right to bear arms,” and appeared in campaign commercials
shaking hands with hunters in the field down here in Texas.
Yet he simultaneously espoused support for [3] stricter
gun control measures, because the truth is that he shares
the Brady Center’s conviction that the Second Amendment
“is not absolute.” This was evident to anyone who took the
time to investigate Obama’s voting record. Even the fruit-loopers
on democraticunderground.com
worried that Obama’s “[4] anti-gun
stand” would undo him.
But Obama won.
And now, as president, almost all the emphasis in his rhetoric
seems to have shifted from professing individual rights to
promoting “[5] common
sense gun laws” as the Trojan horse from which he and
his minions plan to launch a crippling attack on the Second
Amendment. This was evident during his inauguration, when he
put the handshakes with hunters in Texas behind him and posted
the following “[6] urban
policy” on his website:
Obama and Biden
… favor commonsense measures that respect the Second
Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from
children and from criminals. They support closing the gun show
loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also
support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban
permanent.
Throughout the
election campaign both the [7] NRA
and [8] Gun
Owners of America warned that Obama’s pro-gun talk was
all a sham, but Obama laughed off their concerns. Then, the
moment he was sworn into office he posted an urban policy that
proved them right and proved that those of us who love liberty
have a fight on our hands. Adding insult to injury, Obama
followed this up by appointing Eric Holder and Rahm Emmanuel
to his cabinet. Gun Owners of America strongly [9] opposed
Holder’s nomination, and [10] Emmanuel
shares Obama’s deep dislike of the Second Amendment right to
keep and bear arms.
How will Obama
use the “common sense gun laws” approach to undercut the
Second Amendment? If the past is any indication, he will use
tragedy to justify further regulation as he did in early 2008
in the wake of the deadly shootings on the campus of Northern
Illinois University. Just days after those shootings, the
president expressed support for California’s “common sense
gun law” that requires all semi-automatic handguns to be
manufactured with “[11] micro-stamping”
capability. This law, which goes into effect in California in
2010, mandates that every semi-automatic sold in the state be
equipped with a special firing mechanism that makes a
distinctive mark — a “fingerprint” — on every bullet
casing fired.
Lest we fall
prey to believing this really is “common sense,” consider
the following: In order for this to work, every gun will have
to be registered; otherwise, when law enforcement officials
find “fingerprints” on bullet casings at a crime scene
they’ll never know who owned the gun. Moreover, many
gun-owning Californians have already assumed that guns made
prior to the “micro-stamping” law will be outlawed in the
state once the law goes into effect. This seems logical if the
goal is to create a gun registry full of traceable
“fingerprints” on bullet-casings.
Another way
Obama can use the “common sense gun laws” approach to
cripple the Second Amendment is to allow his understudies,
like Holder, Emmanuel, or any other Democrat, to do his dirty
work. This way, he can continue to claim support for the
Constitution while simultaneously waging war against it via
his surrogates. The president is actually using this approach
as I type. On January 14, Illinois Congressman [12] Bobby
Rush introduced H.R. 45, known as the “Blair Holt’s
Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009.” Should
this act pass, it “will make it illegal to possess … any
firearm that takes an ammunition clip, without a [federal
gun-owner's] license.” According to WorldNetDaily.com’s
[13] Drew
Zahn, H.R. 45 would also order Attorney General Holder,
“to establish a database of every handgun sale, transfer,
and owner’s address in America.”
Have you noticed
that Obama’s “common sense gun laws” all seem to end in
the same way — with the registration of guns and gun owners,
as well as an increased number of steps law-abiding citizens
must go through to purchase a firearm? It’s just the same
old gun-grabbing song and dance, which is why Zahn points out
that, “H.R. 45 is a resurfacing of 2007’s H.R. 2666, which
contained much of the same language and was co-sponsored by 15
other representatives and Barack Obama’s current chief of
staff, Rahm Emmanuel.”
As Bill
Clinton’s deputy attorney general in 1999, Holder
described the outlawing of private gun sales as “[14] common
sense.” But we recognized the threat, cried foul, and
persuaded Congress to ignore Holder’s pleas. Now that
Holder, Obama, and Emmanuel are working in unison today, can
we do any less?
There is nothing
commonsensical about Obama’s “common sense gun laws”
approach. At best, it is a smoke and mirrors ploy to make it
harder to purchase firearms. At worst, it’s an outright
ending of the Second Amendment agenda. We cannot afford to sit
idly by to discover which is the case.
|
|