logo top

bubbles

logo bottom
 


 
dot


 

           Welcome to Call to Decision 

 

Constitutional Rights Explained

PUBLIC NOTICE

Austin Gary and Martha Cooper of “Cooper and Cooper-Law-Firm” “The Ten-

Foundation” and Bob Reed, Heather Wolffe and Karla Anderson have filed individually

and privately with the “The Colorado-State; In the Court of the County known as

Larimer” documentation entitled “Affidavit of Citizens-Arrest, and DEMAND Criminal

Prosecution Against Plaintiffs merchant-Judge C. Edward Stirman and merchant-D.A.

Fields, et al, and said other accused, but not limited to all involved with cases “Account-

No’s 03T201008 and 03T200131.”

Mr. Cooper hereby has 9 “Court”-sealed Subpoena’s which were lawfully served and

was maliciously (30A AmJur) quashed by merchant-Stirman, along with not allowing

Mr.Cooper’s witnesses to state their testimony and was repeatedly threatened if he

followed through with his right to have “Compulsory Process” which was repeatedly

denied him, an American Citizen. Charges: Thirty-one counts of treason and thirty-one

counts of conspiracy to commit treason. All the accused have not refuted the

aforementioned charges, nor objected to nor denied the charges. Charges forthwith are:

Fraud by witness tampering times twenty-six (26) counts; Fraud by jury tampering times

forty-five (45) counts; Fraud by evidence tampering times twenty-nine (29) counts.

Monday, March 8th, 2004 Sheriff , Jim Alderden, in the Coloradoan-Newspaper stated

“…The judiciary at all levels has been corrupted, usurping power from the people and

their representatives, making laws through judicial activism instead of interpreting laws

based on the original intent of the Founding Fathers. This amendment isn’t about

homosexuals. It’s about reining in out-of-step and out-of-control judges who have

hijacked our representative form of government.”

In the hearing dated 3-10-04, merchant-Stirman stated, “I do not have jurisdiction over

you Mr. Cooper, but I have come to the conclusion that the ‘Court’ does.”

In the above statement, merchant-Stirman committed FRAUD, abridging Cooper’s

freedom and usurped a power of a “building”, and not his “title” being under the First-

Branch of Government which IS: “We the People” the American Citizen-rights of

“domicile”. Justice has been obstructed repeatedly. 30A AmJur § 77, pg. 46 states: “A

judge acting without jurisdiction is but an individual falsely assuming an authority he

does not possess.” Glazar v Hubbard.

Stirman also changed the “charge” minutes before the (makeshift) “jury” deliberation,

of which Mr. Cooper was denied his right to object, by repeatedly being “overruled”.

30A AmJur§ 80, pg 50, states: [Titled:]“Effect of Negligence or Motive; Bad Faith,

Malice, or Corruption.”

Stirman also stated: “Colorado does not have Constitutional Law.” Treason: Black’s

Law 5th Edition states: pg. 1345 “The offense of attempting by overt acts to over through

the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance; (Takes Oath.) or of

betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power.”

Adherence to the enemy, and rendering him aid and comfort…A person can be

convicted of treason on the testimony of two Witnesses, or Confession in open Court.

Art. III, \Sec 3, U.S. Constitution.”

We have seven who has served Stirman with Treason. We have demanded a proper

grand jury. www.tenfoundation.com . Please call with any information: 936-443-8163 or

936-443-8775

Page 1 of 40

Austin Gary and Martha E. Cooper

And Taking Back America, a Pure-Trust

Without prejudice

c/o 295 E. 29th Street, Suite 240

Loveland, Colorado [80538]

*The Plaintiff’s-case is filed in the*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (a false conveyance of language)

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

*The Material Witnesses and Victim’s-case is filed*

In The Court of the District of the United States

For the District in Colorado

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a ) Civil Action-No. 03-B-1127(PAC)

Corporation; )

) Third Addendum and Amendment To:

Plaintiff ) Special Appearance;

)

v. ) Third

) Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal

AUSTIN GARY COOPER, individually ) and Constructive Notice; and,

and as founder of Taking Back America; )

MARTHA E. COOPER, individually and ) Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and

as founder of Taking Back America; ) an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand

TAKING BACK AMERICA, an ) Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Nonunincorporated

organization. ) British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association

) Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for

Austin Gary Cooper, a natural person; ) the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against

Martha E. Cooper, a natural person; ) the Accused

Taking Back America, a Pure-Trust )

) We hereby charge and support the crimes by the

Material witnesses and victims. ) Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy

) to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal

v. ) fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy

) to prosecute the American people through Bills

The UNITED STATES, a Corporation; ) of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights,

The Internal Revenue-Service, a ) Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering

Corporation; George W. Bush, President of ) through false conveyance of language, Felony

The Corporate UNITED STATES; Chief ) false conveyance of language, Continual

Justice-William Rehnquist; Attorney’s ) Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false

General-John Ashcroft; the Congress of the ) representation of Article I Tribunals as

United States, a Corporation; The British ) Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by

Accredited Registry [BAR] Association ) deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction

A Corporation, and its Attorney- ) of justice.

membership; merchant-judge Lewis T. )

Babcock; merchant-judge William M. ) Further, we hereby charge the Accused with

Hoeveler; the Commissioner of Internal ) additional charges of felony false conveyances

Revenue; merchant-Martin Shoemaker; ) of language, see Exhibit-L, witness tampering,

Merchant-Dennis Montgomery; the Federal ) and additional charges of Obstruction

Page 2 of 40

Reserve, a Corporation; Norbel Credit ) of Justice.

Union, its C.E.O. and Chris Crisman, Vice )

President in the Loveland-Branch; et al. )

)

Accused. )

For the Record:

Comes Now Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, Sui Juris, Appearing both Specially, Not

Generally Or Voluntarily, both In propria persona (our natural person), and for Taking Back America, a

Pure-Trust disputing and challenging both personal and subject-matter-jurisdiction of this tribunal, and filing

this “Third Addendum and Amendment To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages; and

Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a

Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry

[BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt

against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts,

Conspiracy to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to

prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud,

Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language,

Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III

Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby

charge the Accused with additional charges of felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-P, witness

tampering, and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice.” We termed this a corporate-case inasmuch as

from the appearance of the parties it would appear that a conglomerate of corporations have filed against us,

those being 1) the corporation known as the Federal Reserve, 2) the corporation known as the British

Accredited Registry [BAR] Association, 3) the corporation known as the UNITED STATES, and 4) the

corporation known as Internal Revenue. To date neither merchant-Shoemaker nor Babcock nor any other

federal merchant has proven either personal or subject-matter-jurisdiction over the Trust in which we are

Trustee’s or us. In support, we state the following:

This document is a Third Addendum and Amendment to the filed and proven thirty-one (31)

counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason by the federal, now, “quasijudiciary”

and its merchant-judges, i.e., Lewis T. Babcock, William M. Hoeveler, and the other Accused. It

is understood that Lewis T. Babcock, in accordance with English-grammar, a “United States District Court

Judge,” properly read as “United non-existent, non-existent, non-existent-Judge” admits he can receive up to

$25,000.00 [Twenty-five-Thousand] from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to protect the interests of

the corporation known as “Internal Revenue” declares that he, after charged with thirty-one (31) counts of

treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason, has ordered the serving upon us of an

Page 3 of 40

unintelligible document entitled “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” knowing said order is replete with false

conveyance of language in order to criminally usurp jurisdiction over us in an Admiralty-tribunal.

Merchant-Babcock did, willfully and knowingly, and with malevolence aforethought sign an alleged

“injunction” through a “United States’ Motion,” properly read as “United non-existent-Motion” filed by a

“Trial Attorney,” properly read as “non-existent-Attorney” working for a “Tax Division,” properly read as

“non-existent-Division” of the “United States Department of Justice,” properly read as “United non-existent-

Department of Justice” against us in favor of the Commissioner. Furthermore, this “United non-existent,

non-existent, non-existent-Judge” uses the format of “UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

DISTRICT OF COLORADO,” a false conveyance of language, as his vehicle of authority. In addition,

merchant-judge Lewis T. Babcock sent an “Order” allegedly dismissing crimes against him. We, on the

other hand, filed numerous criminal charges, none of which have been refuted, in the proper format, to wit:

“The Court of the District of the United States for the District in Colorado.” Merchant-judge Babcock

prefers to use the false conveyance of language in order to attempt to criminally usurp jurisdiction in a nonexistent

entity to continue his treason and conspiracy to commit treason.

Ten plus American Citizens served and filed into the “Court of the District of the United States for

the District in Colorado” an “Affidavit of Facts” charging the Accused with up to thirty-one (31) counts of

treason and up to thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. Each natural person had served the

President and Chief Justice of the corporation known as “United States,” the Governor and Chief Justice of

their respective States, the Commissioner of the corporation known as “Internal Revenue,” and the Board of

Directors of the corporation known as the “Federal Reserve” documentation proving treason, conspiracy to

commit treason, criminal fraud and many other crimes committed against the American People and the

American form of government. The Constitution for the United States of America only requires that two

People come forward as witnesses to the crimes of treason. The Accused, specifically the merchant-Clerk

and merchant-Babcock, have attempted to obstruct justice and tamper with witnesses against them by

misinforming the American Citizens that they do not have standing to file charges of treason and conspiracy

to commit treason, capital crimes, against the elitism-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Associationmerchant-

judges in America. The merchant-Clerk and Babcock having been officially charged cannot

dismiss the charges; they have already acquiesced to the charges.

It would appear that the Accused is attempting to establish a defense of being intellectually

challenged by filing and serving all of the documents having such gross English-grammar contents.

Numerous times I have pointed out the grammatical errors and inconsistencies, however, the Accused insist

on writing unintelligible language in unintelligible documents. Thus, the Accused is either attempting to

establish a defense of being intellectually challenged or is engaged in a grand, blatant conspiracy as charged,

Page 4 of 40

to overthrow the American form of government and the American People through false language, treason,

pirating of the America’s-properties under Admiralty-jurisdiction and racketeering.

Furthermore, On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M.

Shoemaker and merchant-John W. Suthers, filed several unintelligible documents having the titles

“UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO HOLD DEFENDANTS IN CONTEMPT,” “UNITED STATES’

MOTION FOR SHOW CAUSE ORDER,” “THIRD DECLARATION OF MARTIN M. SHOEMAKER,”

“MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES’ MOTIONS FOR SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND

TO HOLD DEFENDANTS IN CONTEMPT,” proposed “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE” and

“CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE,” which combined has one hundred-seventy five- (175) felony false

conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of law, and one hundred and fifty- (150) patently

fraudulent statements, see Exhibit-L. The merchant Accused, “merchants-Babcock, Shoemaker, Suthers

and the others,” were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of

conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts

enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is

attempting to obstruct justice and witness tampering.

Based on the foregoing facts, we, Austin Gary Cooper, Martha E. Cooper and The Ten-

Foundation have placed a “Public Notice – Legal Notice” in both the Denver Post Newspaper and the

Reporter – Herald-Newspaper on December 26, 27 and 28, 2003 C.E., stating, “Austin Gary Cooper and

Martha E. Cooper of “Cooper and Cooper-Law-Firm” and “The Ten-Foundation” have filed with the

“Court of the District of the United States for the District in Colorado” documentation entitled “Third

Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of

Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused

…” along with Addendum and Second Addendum, charging the corporate United States and the corporate

Internal Revenue and its officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries, including, but not limited to, the

merchant-judges of the aforementioned District with thirty counts of treason and thirty counts of

conspiracy to commit treason. The case-number is “Civil Action No. 03-B-1127 (PAC).” Given ample

time to refute the aforementioned charges, the merchant-judge nor the merchant-trial-attorney have

neither objected to nor denied the charges nor the Bill of Particulars incorporated within the charges. A

few of the charges may be printed (downloaded) and perused at www.tenfoundation.com under the title

“Treason Info.” We have demanded a proper grand jury to investigate the charges but have had justice

obstructed repeatedly.

Page 5 of 40

If anyone has any information regarding the aforementioned case please notify us in writing

sent to: The Ten-Foundation, without prejudice c/o 295 E. 29th Street, Suite 240, Loveland, Colorado

[80538],” see Exhibits-M and N.

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

For every criminal count we hereby adopt and incorporate the following paragraphsletters-

A through I as if fully set forth at length: Due to the conservation of our natural resources I

shall not include the filed documentation as Exhibits inasmuch as they have all been served to the

tribunal and to the interested parties, or the interested parties are active conspirators, thereby

already aware of their crimes.

A. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Special Appearance; Civil Complaint for damages; and

Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a

Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry

[BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt

against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason, Conspiracy to

commit Treason, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people

through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering

through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False

imprisonment, Assault and Battery, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing

false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Jury-Tampering on both the

grand and petit-juries, Bank fraud, Stalking, Fraud by deception, and willfully and knowingly exposing me

when naked to visitors when held in the federal concentration-camp,” previously filed into this case as if

fully set forth at length.

B. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Special Appearance; Second Civil Complaint for damages;

and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in

a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry

[BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt

against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason, Conspiracy to

commit Treason, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people

through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering

through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False

imprisonment, Assault and Battery, Simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing

false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Jury-Tampering on both the

grand and petit-juries, Bank fraud, Stalking, Fraud by deception, and willfully and knowingly exposing me

Page 6 of 40

when naked to visitors when held in the federal concentration-camp,” previously filed into this case as if

fully set forth at length.

C. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages;

and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in

a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry

[BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt

against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 27 Counts,

Conspiracy to commit Treason times 27 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to

prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud,

Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language,

Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III

Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice” [hereafter Third

Complaint] previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length.

D. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Addendum To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint

for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an

Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British

Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment

Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of:

Treason times 27 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 27 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to

commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties,

Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language,

Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false

representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness

tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with additional charges of felony

false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-I, witness tampering and additional charges of Obstruction of

Justice” previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length.

E. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance; Third Civil

Complaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of

Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a

Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt,

Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused

of: Treason times 27 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 27 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to

commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties,

Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language,

Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false

Page 7 of 40

representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness

tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with three- (3) additional charges

of treason, three- (3) additional charges of conspiracy to commit treason, felony false conveyances of

language, see Exhibits-J through O, witness tampering and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice.”

previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length.

F. We hereby adopt and incorporate Exhibits-A through H of the Third Complaint previously filed

into this case as if fully set forth at length.

G. We hereby adopt and incorporate Exhibit-I of the Addendum to the Third Complaint previously

filed into this case as if fully set forth at length.

H. We hereby adopt and incorporate Exhibits-J and K of the Second Addendum to the Third

Complaint previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length.

I. We hereby adopt and incorporate Exhibits-L through M attached hereto as if fully set forth at

length.

Counts I through LX.

Treason -Counts I, III, V, VII, IX, XI, XIII, XV, XVII, XIX, XXI, XXIII, XXV, XXVII, XXIX,

XXXI, XXXIII, XXXV, XXXVII, XXXIX, XLI, XLIII, XLV, XLVII, XLIX, LI, LIII, LV, LVII,

LIX and LXI. Conspiracy to commit Treason - Counts II, IV, VI, VIII, X, XII, XIV, XVI, XVIII,

XX, XXII, XXIV, XXVI, XXVIII, XXX, XXXII, XXXIV, XXXVI, XXXVIII, XL, XLII, XLIV,

XLVI, XLVIII, L, LII, LIV, LVI, LVIII, LX and LXII.

I and II - As written in my filed documents to the corporate chief officers, the tribunals display the

Federal military flag as its jurisdiction. Under “Title 4 U.S.C.S. Lawyers Edition, § 1 INTERPRETIVE

NOTES AND DECISIONS “Placing of fringe on national flag...within discretion of President as

Commander-In-Chief of Army and Navy. (1925) 34 Op Atty Gen 483.” In addition, “Pursuant to U.S.C.

Chapter 1, 2, and 3; Executive Order No. 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag

that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE, bordered on

three sides. The President of the United states designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive

order, and in his capacity as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Armed forces.” Moreover, the Congress

willfully and knowingly overstepped its power, to wit: in 1845 Congress passed an act saying Admiraltylaw

could come on land. The bill may be traced in Cong. Globe, 28th Cong., 2d. Sess. 43, 320, 328, 337,

345(1844-45), no opposition to the Act is reported. Congress held a committee on this subject in 1850

and they said: “The committee also alluded to ‘the great force’ of ‘the great constitutional question as to

the power of Congress to extend maritime jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption

of the Constitution....’” - H.R. Rep. No. 72 31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850).” Thus, this tribunal is an

Administrative court-martial and the British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association-Attorneys have

overthrown the American people and the American form of government by extirpating the civil authority

Page 8 of 40

and removing the Judiciary in favor of their military quasi-judiciary [Something that appears to be a

proper judiciary but is not.].

III and IV - The judges are members and swear allegiance to a private corporation known as the British

Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association. The BAR-Association is owned by the Templar BAR, which

Templar BAR is located and owned by “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. “The Crown”

a/k/a “The City” is owned by the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel and the Rothschild-family. Further, the

Rothschild’s are known to have the position of “Guardian of the Vatican’s-Treasury,” thus, the

Rothschild-family represents the interests of the Vatican. Hence, the judge is a foreign agent conspiring

with other merchant-Attorney-judges commandeering the judiciary of the United States of America and

the Colorado-State to overthrow the American people and the American form of government.

Furthermore, The word-Attorney is taken from the words:

Attorn / v. Me. [Origin French. atorner, aturner assign, appoint, f. a-torner turn v.] 1. v.t. Turn; change,

transform; deck out. 2. v.t. Turn over (goods, service, allegiance, etc.) to another; transfer, assign.

3. v.i. Transfer one’s tenancy, or (arch.) homage or allegiance, to another; formally acknowledge

such transfer. Attorn tenant (to) Law formally transfer one’s tenancy (to), make legal

acknowledgment of tenancy (to a new landlord). – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

Attorn, v.i. [Latin ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord

to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation or the estate. –

Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

Attornment, n. The act of a feudatory vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of an

estate, to receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service. – Webster’s

1828 Dictionary.

Attornment n. the transference of bailor status, tenancy, or (arch.) allegiance, service, etc., to another;

formal acknowledgment of such transfer: lme. – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

Thus, it is clear that an Attorney is one who transfers or assigns, within the BAR, another’s rights and

property, acting on behalf of the ruling crown (“The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England; in

other words this countries de facto government). In other words, when Attorneys call themselves officers

of the court, they are correct in that they are all government agents; however, they serve a foreign

government. The American people are deceived into believing that they [the BAR] are neutral and working

on behalf of justice, not serving their British Accredited Registry -Association.

Moreover, The “IRS” is not a United States-Government-Agency, it is an Agency of the International

Monetary Fund (IMF), Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE “U.S.D.C.D.I.,” Public

Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391. The

language “International Monetary Fund” is defined as, “Agency of the United Nations established to

Page 9 of 40

stabilize international exchange and promote balanced international trade,” Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth

Edition, page 733.

V and VI – The federal and State-tribunals use felony false conveyances of language as its vehicles of

jurisdiction over the American People. The British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association-Attorneys

have dubbed this tribunal the “United States District Court.” The phrase-“United States” is a noun-phrase

that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-District; the word-District is a noun that has

been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Court, there is no such place; therefore, this is a

false conveyance of language and a felony. Properly read according to English-grammar, this language

would be, “United non-existent Court.” Thus, in order to perform their dastardly deeds, the BARAssociation

has created non-existent Courts to pillage and plunder the wealth and rights of the American

people and to overthrow the American form of government.

In addition, the statutes are written in false conveyances of language in order to usurp

jurisdiction over the American People and trap the American People under a language that does not exist.

This falsification of language opens a Pandora’s-Box against the American People with the British

Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association and its principal, the Vatican and Rothschild-Bank-Cartel, as a

totalitarian government, rather like a sophisticated and contemporary Spanish-Inquisition. A false

language, where justice has no stronghold, where charges have no meaning according to the language;

thus, the corporate government assumes the authority to plunder and pillage the American People.

Through corruption and false language “We the People” are charged with the anti-law called statutes and

commanded to answer to the charges; however, it is difficult to answer when one does not understand the

question. Hence, the BAR-Association, through its opinions, have exercised the “Humpty-Dumpty”

methodology of control, wherein they have ruled the people under the now quasi-judiciary with the

dictates that “everything means exactly and precisely what I [the BAR-Attorneys] say it means at the

time.”

VII and VIII - The judge has everyone “rise” when proceeding to his/her thrown. History recognizes

that the judge would carry in the Bible with him and that the people would rise in reverence to the word

of the Heavenly Father-Yahuah, not the judge. Further, the Bible would render the hearing one under the

common law, said Bible containing the Law burned into stone by the Heavenly Father, wherein the

unalienable rights of the accused would naturally be protected. It was not known at the time that the

British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association was covertly planning and implementing its take over of

the American form of government. However, when the judge stopped carrying in the Bible the hearing

became a “Royal court” inasmuch as the judge is dubbed “Esquire,” an English title just under nobility

meaning “shield-bearer.” Now, the “common law”-Court of Law has been overthrown in favor of the

Page 10 of 40

British Accredited Registry-Association’s-sovereignty known as “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in

London, England and proceeding under the “Royal court” of “The Crown.” Thus, through this treason

and conspiracy to commit treason the American people have become subjects in their own country and

their own land.

IX and X - The Attorneys of the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association have willfully and

knowingly sold out their country to serve “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. Then, they

have, with treason in mind and deed, removed the Flag of the Republic in favor of their Admiralty-flag to

remove the “Courts of Law” and replace them with “Military tribunals” under an Admiralty-flag and a

foreign government. The corporate government through the BAR-Association then created a sub-status

citizenship found in the questionably ratified Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United

States of America and written as “citizen of the United States.” Further, they then quote cases stating

their jurisdiction is based on the American People being “United States citizens.” The phrase “United

States” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-citizen, there is no

such creature; therefore this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. When properly read, this

phrase would be “non-existent citizen.” Through this sub-status and/or non-existent citizenship the

“BAR” and its corporate government made the American Citizens property of the corporate state and

assumed a dictatorial position over the people and the American form of government.

XI and XII - Under their feudal-system, the BAR-Association has annexed the property and natural

persons of the American People through the reprehensible language known as “eminent domain.” In

addition, the following treasonous statement by the Senate, written in 1933 witnesses the coup against the

American form of government and the American People, to wit: “The ultimate ownership of all property

is in the state; individual so-called `ownership' is only by virtue of government, i.e., law, amounting to a

mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” -

Senate Document No. 43, “Contracts payable in Gold.” With this principal of feudal, nazi, fascist,

communist, dictatorship, totalitarian and other such governments the ruling elite control the people

through the threat that the corporate government can, and often times do, take the properties of the People

if they question or resist the tyranny. Thus, through this concept the Accused can maintain control over

any who would speak out against their tyranny.

XIII and XIV - With this principal of “eminent domain” well established in systems of government

known as feudal, nazi, fascist, communist, dictatorship, totalitarian and other such governments the ruling

elite control the people through the concept that if the people own nothing they have nothing to bargain

with and, therefore, have no legitimate position of voting-rights to elect a proper lawful government.

Page 11 of 40

Thus, the alleged right to vote becomes a privilege requiring an act of registration. Hence, the people are

no more than subjects presenting their wishes and granting the existing de facto government permission

by accepting and performing according to the privileges they, the American people, have been granted by

the now de facto government. Further, when the corporate government grants someone the privilege to

vote by exercising a control of registration, the corporate government becomes the parent-corporation,

which means that the human-person seeking permission becomes the child and through an unbeknownst

“tacit agreement” loses his/her rights and then agrees through implied-contract to be bound by the

corporation and/or foreign government, not by law. In addition, if one attempts to counter the tyranny of

the now de facto government he/she would be threatened with the loss of his/her property, or the

corporate government would simply take the humans property in order to frighten others into submission

for fear of losing their properties. Thus, the Accused through the BAR-Association has perpetrated

treason and conspired to commit treason through their deliberate actions aforementioned.

XV and XVI - The Seventh-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states, “In

Suits at common-law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trail by jury

shall be preserved, and no fact tried by jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United

States, than according to the rules of the common-law.” There is no place where a “jury trial” is

authorized in the Constitution, ibid. In the language “jury trial,” the word-jury is an adjective modifying

the noun-trial. Jury as an adjective means “makeshift.” Thus, “jury trial,” means a “makeshift trial.” The

sinister BAR-Association-Attorneys have overthrown the American form of government and the

American People by covertly replacing a lawful “trial by jury” in favor of the dictatorial “makeshift trial”

in order for them to systematically destroy the liberties of the American people through “Bills of Pains

and penalties” and make subjects of the American people.

XVII and XVIII – The present day quasi-Judiciary places on the jury-pools of the grand and petit juries,

agents working for the corporate government in order to tamper with the jury. The American People

when tried whether civilly or criminally do not get a jury of their peers. The corporate government stacks

the juries with “postal workers,” agents of the corporation known as “Internal Revenue,” police officers,

people receiving welfare-payments and, therefore, sensitive to the corporate demands. Hence, through

treason and conspiracy to commit treason the Accused tampers with the juries in order to overthrow the

American form of government and the American People.

XIX and XX – Statutes are an abrogation of the American “common-law,” see Uniform Commercial

Code § 1-103:6. The Unalienable Rights of the American People come from the Law. Since statutes

abrogate the law, they then, in turn, extirpate the rights of the American People. The British Accredited

Page 12 of 40

Registry [BAR]-Association-Attorneys do not allow law in “their” tribunals which they call courtrooms

and, thus, have commandeered the Article III Courts of the Constitution for the United States of America

in favor of their Admiralty-tribunals. Furthermore, all federal tribunals are Administrative tribunals,

Article I Section 8 [9], “To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;” under Admiraltyjurisdiction.

Congress through unconstitutional means extended maritime-jurisdiction onto the land in

order to overthrow the Constitution for the United States of America, “The committee also alluded to ‘the

great force’ of ‘the great constitutional question as to the power of Congress to extend maritime

jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption of the Constitution....’” - H.R. Rep. No. 72

31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850).” The judges, prosecutors and defense Attorneys know this but keep it a

secret in order to assume absolute power and control over the American People for their [BAR-Attorneys]

evil gain. Thus, the Accused has willfully and knowingly overthrown the American form of government

and the American People.

XXI and XXII - Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America states, “No

State shall …make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts…” The merchant-

Attorneys and other government officials send out documents demanding $, which is a symbol that

indicates, “no-silver,” from the American People. The now defunct S with two slightly separated parallelvertical-

lines at or near the center of the S means, “silver-bar.” I, on the other hand, file(d) for the money

of account and wrote/write, “I require the payment to be in the money of account; however, if the

Accused does not have the money of account, then payment may be made in Federal Reserve-Notes;

however, such payment will be ‘received without prejudice.’” Thus, a reservation of rights and the

“Doctrine of Estopple” is exercised inasmuch as “Federal Reserve Notes” are promissory notes and not

payment; and few, if any, have gold and silver-Coin in order to pay a debt. Furthermore, the language

“Federal Reserve Notes” not hyphenated is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the phrase

“Federal Reserve” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Notes;

according to English-grammar there is no such creature. When properly read, the language “Federal

Reserve Notes” would be, “Federal non-existent Notes.” However, “receiving” the notes “without

prejudice” converts the notes into money. Through treason and conspiracy, the Congress of the United

States removed our proper money, thereby conspiring to place each and every human person under the

regulations of bankruptcy and covertly seize their properties. Now monies and human persons acting for

the corporate State that accept these notes accept the debt attached to them; however, by receiving them I

do not agree to the unlawful obligation attached thereto. Since the corporate government uses the

symbol-$ and the Constitution for the United States of America commands that only gold or silver-Coin

is tender in payment of debts to the States, any “payment” demanded in the form of taxation, fines, etc.

using the symbol-$ to the corporate government could be made in wooden-nickels or grains of sand, etc.

Page 13 of 40

Hence, the corporate United States or State enforcing any “payment” for any alleged debt or debt in fact

in other than the money of account for its coffers, as it were, is an act of treason and an overthrow of the

American form of government and of the American people. The body-politic “We the People” can, on

the other hand, receive “Federal Reserve Notes” or Federal Reserve-Notes “without prejudice” and

protect our rights by so doing. The government controlled schools, however, do not teach the people to

protect their rights but instead forcibly teach them to surrender their rights to the de facto government

presently in control.

XXIII and XXIV - In order to rob the America people of their “Courts of Law” the British Accredited

Registry [BAR]-Association established a bogus “license” to practice law. This action monopolizes the

branch of government known as the judiciary and creates a quasi-judiciary taking its place. Through this

bogus licensing the BAR-Association regulates and controls any one who would enter its domain granting

it absolute despotism over the system of government it conspires to overtake. Moreover, since the

Attorneys say they are licensed, then they admit that they are merchants, Uniform Commercial Code § 2-

104(1). This position witnesses a monopoly inasmuch as the BAR-Association enforces that one has to

be licensed through its merchant-Attorney-Association in order to “practice law,” however, the truth be

known, they [the BAR-Attorneys] do not function or operate within the law, only the anti-law known as

statutes. The statistics support the tyranny of the BAR-Association-Attorneys in that one-out-of-everythirty

Americans are in prison, on probation or on parole presently in this country and many more have

their monies and properties stolen from them by the infamous British Accredited Registry [BAR]-

Association-Attorneys in the role of judges, prosecutors and defense-attorneys. This action places the

weasels in charge of the hen-house, as it were, and is patently treasonous in a land of “free-enterprise”

and liberty and justice for all. This “license to practice law” is nothing more than membership in the

private corporation known as the BAR-Association and its principal “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in

London, England. The Preamble and the first Ten Amendments sandwich in the three sub-branches of

government supporting that “We the People” are the collective sovereignty and the government, the

proper government that is, are public servants, not public masters.

XXV and XXVI - The corporate State and corporate state have its own religion and, through treason is

forcing its religion upon the children of America. The corporate state teaches the children evolution; that

humans evolved from apes, and so on and so forth. There has never been evidence proving such

nonsense, however, the corporate state demands that the children in their impressionable years go to the

corporate government-schools and influences them unduly anent this bunk. Since the evolutionhypothesis

has never been proven, which makes the hypothesis questionable at best, and, therefore, is

based on a science of conjecture and belief, it is a religion. Moreover, when presented the question of

Page 14 of 40

“Where then did our eyes come from(?),” the evolution worshipers are at a loss for words. The corporate

state then bastardized Amendment I of the Constitution for the United States of America wherein it states,

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise

thereof; …” to abolish the free exercise of religion in favor of their, the corporate, state-religion. The

purpose for this deception is to place humans in the category of the animals and, thereby, extirpate the

unalienable rights through the corporate hypothesis that if we came from one-celled animals we are no

different than any animal, with the exception that we are simply more advanced. Thus, we would not be

stewards on this planet as “The Scriptures” point out, just advanced and sophisticated animals and our

unalienable rights would be no more than privileges granted by other humans thinking they are the

superiors, as in “rule by the fittest,” that meaning the most evil as pointed out so eloquently by Lord

Acton wherein he stated, “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

XXVII and XXVIII – When “We the People” buy an automobile, truck, van, motorcycle or the like

[hereafter vehicle] we do not receive the “Manufacturers Certificate of Origin” [hereafter MCO]. The one

who has the MCO is the owner of the vehicle. The corporate state, a subsidiary of the federal

corporation, has ordered the dealerships to surrender the MCO’s to it and it issues a “Certificate of Title”

[hereafter CT]. Since the corporate state possesses the MCO it has annexed the vehicle and issues a CT in

order to commandeer ownership of the vehicle so that the corporate state may effectively lease the vehicle

to the human who thought he/she had bought it originally. Thus, the human purchasing the vehicle is not

told that the corporate state has unlawfully commandeered the vehicle and fraudulently and through

treason has stolen the vehicle that the human is paying for and that the corporate state now owns the

vehicle, consequently requiring registration for the human to use or travel in. Hence, through treason,

criminal fraud and racketeering the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association has unlawfully

commandeered the property of the American people in order to overthrow the American people and the

American form of government.

XXIX and XXX - The Fourth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,

“The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable

searches and seizures, shall not be violated…” In violation of the Constitution ibid, the corporation,

known as Internal Revenue and police of the State of: e.g., Colorado, search the American People’s

papers and effects minute by minute in this country. The agents of the false entity known as “Internal

Revenue Service” and police write unlawful summonses against the American People. The “IRS” file

notices of levies and liens without verification of any debt. The corporation known as Internal Revenue is

a private corporation working in conjunction with the Federal Reserve, a private corporation controlled

by the Vatican through the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel. The aforementioned private corporation [Internal

Page 15 of 40

Revenue] is protected under an auspices of authority usurped by another corporation owned by the

Vatican and the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel, which corporation is known as the BAR-Association. Then, the

corporation known as the Internal Revenue has its own tribunal, which it calls the “United States Tax

Court.” In addition, the corporate states rely on the “IRS” and serve the “IRS” anent their “State income

taxes.” The language “United States Tax Court” is false conveyance of language inasmuch as the phrase

“United States” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Tax; the

word-Tax is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Court, there is no such

language; therefore, when properly read it would be “United non-existent Court.” Moreover, it is a

common practice for the merchant federal and State “police officers” to search the American Peoples

person, houses, papers and effects without lawful authorization, and their co-conspirators, the quasijudiciary

British Accredited Registry-Association, support such action against the American People and

the American form of government on an hourly basis in violation of Amendment IV of the Constitution

for the United States of America.

XXXI and XXXII – The corporate United States and the corporate States commit Treason and conspire

to commit treason against the American People and the American form of government through the crime

of malicious prosecution. The facts of treason, conspiracy to commit treason, kidnapping for ransom,

murder, conspiracy to commit murder, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, jury tampering, criminal

fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, mail-fraud, false conveyance of language, grand theft, and so on and

so forth, have been filed and acquiesced to by the Chief Officers of the corporations aforementioned and

this tribunal. The Prosecutorial staff denied not a single fact filed against them articulating these charges;

therefore, the people of the corporate government admit their crimes but claim impunity. Instead of

denying with opposing facts, the prosecutor pleaded with his coconspirator, merchant-judge Lewis T.

Babcock, to order dismissed the legitimate complaint under a rule, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(f),

created and written by the British Accredited Registry Association to cover-up legitimate charges filed by

the American People against the judiciary and other sub-branches of government. It is hereby noted that

if merchant-judge Lewis T. Babcock was of proper moral and judicial character and a man of justice he

would have ordered a proper grand jury empanelled for presentment for indictment against the

corporations in question and the officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries of the said corporations.

When merchant-Shoemaker and the merchant “United States Attorney” did not deny and qualify a denial

with the law, the merchant-judge should have ordered the immediate arrest of Shoemaker and the “United

States Attorney;” however, he did not. Furthermore, the judge would have ordered the Internal Revenue

to cease and desist its unlawful actions against the American People. However, nothing has changed;

instead “United non-existent, non-existent, non-existent-Judge” Lewis T. Babcock continues his treason

and conspiracy to commit treason in a attempt to usurp jurisdiction using the fictitious entity known as the

Page 16 of 40

“United non-existent, non-existent-Court” as his vehicle with a “non-existent-Motion” filed by a “nonexistent-

Attorney” working for a “non-existent-Division” of the “United non-existent-Department of

Justice” with something called the “United States” as the “Plaintiff.” The moment merchant-judge Lewis

T. Babcock did not order the corporations to cease and desist the actions against the American People

Babcock proclaimed his active participation in the conspiracy against the American People and the

American form of government. Furthermore, merchant Shoemaker continues to file his documents in a

solicitation of a criminal conspiracy. Thus, through treason and conspiracy to commit treason the

corporate government engages in malicious prosecution in order to overthrow the American People and

the American form of government.

XXXIII and XXXIV - The Fifth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,

“…nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life,

liberty, or property, without due process of law; not shall private property be taken for public use, without

just compensation.” The corporations of the BAR-Association, the United States, the Federal Reserve,

the Internal Revenue and the States of: e.g., Colorado, seize the American Peoples property, for private

use under the auspices of authority granted under the Constitution for the United States of America, hour

by hour. In reality the corporations, supra have commandeered the courts through Admiralty-jurisdiction

and extirpated the Common Law; thus, the merchant-officers violated our rights and the rights of the

American People as a whole aforementioned written in the Fifth-Amendment to the Constitution for the

United States of America. Americans are deprived of their life, liberty and property without law, much

less due process of law. Furthermore, the American People are compelled to be witnesses against

themselves under the anti-law known as statutes by many organizations claiming to be legitimate

government agencies (e.g., FAA, FCC, IRS, State Highway Patrol, Sheriff, City Police, etc.). These

criminals are given their authority and protection from the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-

Association, the government behind the scenes. Many, if not all, situations aforementioned were/are done

while the corporate agents were/are armed and dangerous. This unlawful practice is conducted hourly by

the corporate security-guards called police, or agents of policing agencies, against the American People

and the American form of government, which witnesses the overthrow of the American government and

the American People. “We the People” are commanded and threatened to give information to the

corporate security-guards under threat of further charges and violence, which corporate security-guards

are protected by the BAR-Association-Attorney’s quasi-judiciary when these cases go before them. Thus,

the corporate de facto government has taken the American public’s properties without just compensation

and forced the American People to be a witness against himself or herself when being charged with antilaw

statutes. The People are deprived of their life, liberty and property and have now become prisoners,

Page 17 of 40

bankrupt [no gold and silver-coins to pay a debt], homeless [eminent domain] and debtors in their own

country.

XXXV and XXXVI - The First-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise

thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to

assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Since the corporate state, by and

through the British Accredited Registry-Association-Attorneys and their corporate security-guards

known as police and agents of policing agencies, declare they own the highways then they can and do

force the American People to get a document entitled “driver’s license.” The language-“driver’s license”

is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the word-driver’s is a possessive noun that has been

converted into an adjective modifying the noun-license; there is no such creature. When properly read

this language would be “non-existent license.”

Furthermore, the “Federal Aviation Administration” (FAA) has commandeered the public

transportation facilities where they require identification in the form of a “driver’s license” from a

corporate state in order for the American People to travel. Not only is the language-“driver’s license” a

felony-false conveyance of language but it also confers upon the person that status of being property of

the corporate government seeking a privilege. If the corporate government chooses not to grant the

permission one could and probably would be restricted from going to the assembly or church of his/her

choice and from congregating with people of his/her faith in order to counter the state’s-religion of

evolution for their children. If the corporate government owns the highway then there would be no

freedom of religion. One would have to satisfy the corporate government in order to be allowed access,

which would grant the corporate government the authority to determine which religions they consider

appropriate. In other words, one could and most likely be restricted to “Internal Revenue Code

501(c)(3)” government corporate churches.

In addition, one could not petition the Government for redress of grievances if one does not

have the right of locomotion and movement inasmuch as one could not, without permission from the

corporate state, get to a location where they could present the petition. Just getting to a place where one

could present his/her petition one would be in jeopardy of arrest and imprisonment for using the “public

highways” without permission. Thus, the corporate state controls the ability of any human to petition by

controlling their access to the thoroughfares. Hence, the corporate state has overthrown the Constitution

for the United States of America in favor of its totalitarian form of government.

XXXVII and XXXVIII - The Sixth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America

states, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an

Page 18 of 40

impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, … and informed of

the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have

compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his

defence [sic].” The Sixth-Amendment ibid, does not have in writing any thing about either an Attorney (a

merchant) or a license. The BAR-Association, serving a foreign nation, instead overthrew the

Constitution for the United States of America’s-Sixth Amendment in order to strip the American People

of Assistance of Counsel, impartial jury, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and

compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, wherein the British Accredited Registry

[BAR]-Association-Attorneys under Admiralty-authority would not have commandeered jurisdiction.

The “Royal Courts” controlled and owned by the BAR-Association have determined that one has to use

an Attorney or appear pro se (as your own Attorney) thus, granting jurisdiction to a merchant-tribunal

where no law or “rights” under law exist.

XXXIX and XL - The corporate United States and state’s-witnesses, the police and other government

agents, are protected from charges of perjury under the unlawful Supreme Tribunal’s-case “Briscoe Et. al.

v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Furthermore, the police and policing agencies have become corporate

security-guards working for the corporate government and no longer for the American People, and have a

vested interest to give false information as testimony. This unlawful protection has grown to encompass

virtually every government officer, agent, broker or intermediary the prosecutor calls to give testimony

against the American Public. Thus, the America’s-People’s-right to face their accuser has been stripped

from them so that the British Accredited Registry-Association and corporate merchant-police can mature

their conspiracy to overthrow the American People and the American form of government.

XLI and XLII – The American People are required to obtain a document called a “Driver’s License”

before they can use their own highway, thus, making the natural person a highway-merchant. As a

merchant, the natural person allegedly falls under the Uniform Commercial Code through commerce and

the corporate government presumes ownership and control of the natural person. Thus, the person is

annexed and unwittingly dragged into commerce wherein the corporate government usurps jurisdiction.

Since the natural person is not informed of this conspiracy and criminal act in order that he/she may make

a choice, and since the corporate government writes, prosecutes and enforces Common Law criminal

sanctions against the people for not complying with this anti-law (statutes), the BAR-Association and

corporate police not only commit the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit treason, an overthrow

of the American form of government and the American People, but also racketeering, criminal fraud,

conspiracy in Bills of Pains and penalties, theft, robbery while armed and dangerous, assault and battery,

false arrest, false imprisonment, and many other crimes against the America’s-People.

Page 19 of 40

XLIII and XLIV – The Banks, operating under the authority of the Federal Reserve, a principal of the

BAR-Association, are given permission to create monies out of thin air. Then interest is charged on the

use of the mere electronic entries, which would present a false debt and expand into a false national debt.

The Federal and state judges and their sibling-merchants in the British Accredited Registry-[BAR]-

Association, along with the other government officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries, support and

encourage this Bank-Fraud against the American People. The Congress is given permission to borrow on

the credit of the United States, whatever the United States is, not on the credit of the American People or

the States of the Union. Thus the Legislature cabal, joined by the Executive sub-branch and, since 1933,

this quasi-Judiciary, succeeded into bankrupting the American People in an attempt to overthrow the

American form of government and the American People. This conspiracy makes debtors of the American

People to a discreet cabal headed by the Vatican, and it’s Guardian of the Vatican’s Treasury: the

Rothschild-Bank-Cartel.

XLV and XLVI – The sub-branches of government known as the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary

[now quasi-judiciary] willfully and knowingly side track the Law and the Rights of the American People

in order to fulfill the agenda of a foreign nation and country, namely the Vatican and “The Crown” a/k/a

“The City” controlled by the “Guardians of the Vatican’s Treasury,” the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel.

Through criminal actions of the Attorneys, America is being taken into a one-world-government where

we will have lost our collective-sovereignty of “We the People” and will become world-subjects under a

political arena and force known for its cruelty and inhumanity, the Vatican. This creature murdered

between fifty and sixty million people in the dark-ages, had concentration-camps in Croatia where the

Serbs were tortured and many murdered heinously because they refused to join the Vatican “church”

before and during “World War II” (see “The Vatican’s Holocaust” written by Avro Manhattan.),

supported for election two of the most evil people in history, those being Hitler and Mussolini and has an

army of Jesuits whose job it is to seize the world for the “mother church.” This is not to say that

Catholics are cognizant of the agenda of the Vatican, nor, for that matter, that many people involved with

groups are necessarily cognizant of the agenda of the hierarchy of their organization or religion; however,

the facts are there and acquiesced to by the Chief Officers addressed herein. With eyes wide open the

British Accredited Registry-Association and its filial creations such as the “FAA,” “FCC,” “IRS,” etc.

are desperately manipulating the American People into a one-world-government so that they will have the

ultimate power and control for their principal. The borders of America are being methodically and

systematically shattered for one-world conquest, “The world will follow after the beast.”

Page 20 of 40

XLVII and XLVIII – The Constitution for the United States of America, Article I, Section 8 [3] states,

“The Congress shall have Power…To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several

States, and with the Indian Tribes;”. The corporate government has misused this authority to seize

absolute power in commerce over the nation. The intent of the founding-fathers was that the several

States would be regulated against tariffs, price-gouging, taxes and other such criminal actions against the

People from other States or within the same State selling their goods or attempting to sell their goods.

This was not intended to regulate the American People by extirpating their rights of locomotion and

movement. By requiring specific identification, that identification being a corporate government

identifying card such as a “Driver’s License” “Pilot’s Certificate” and licensing over watercrafts, the

corporate government has covertly crippled the rights of the American People. The Law, written in 11

Am Jur § 329, 2. Liberty states: “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go where

and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare

of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his

property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be

permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the

pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions,

travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an

orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected,

not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” Though this paragraph is not entirely accurate, inasmuch

as it addresses the noun-citizen and not the proper noun-Citizen as written in the Constitution for the

United States of America thirteen times before the infamous Amendment XIV, it still indicates a natural

right of locomotion and movement by the American People. The Federal Corporation and state-

Corporations are willfully and knowingly confining the American People to the will of the corporate state

by attempting to control the staple right of locomotion and movement, without such right no other rights

exist or can be exercised.

XLIX and L – Through prior information (a questionnaire sent to prospective jurors) the Prosecutors

know the socio-economic level and status of the Grand Jurors and petit jurors they empanel, and with that

information he/she impanels the Grand Jury and petit jurors which would be antagonistic to the people

whose cases are brought before them for consideration. The judiciary relies on the “voter registration,” a

false conveyance of language, in order to comprise their lists. It is understood that the “voter’s

registration” witnesses that the body politic “We the People” lost our right to vote long ago. The

requirement to register-to-vote demonstrates that voting has become a privilege one can only exercise if

he/she seeks permission through a process of registration. Furthermore, in order for a natural person to

register to vote the natural person has to declare themselves a “United States citizen” and a resident of the

Page 21 of 40

state. The word-resident is used to trap the American into a jurisdiction under the corporate state and not

as a free American.

To register means to get a license to vote. License: page 231, English Synonyms, Antonyms

and Prepositions copyright 1896: “A permission or privilege granted by an adequate authority, a

bounded liberty. In the wider sense, license is an ignoring and defiance of all that should restrain, and a

reckless doing of all that individual caprice or passion may choose to do - a base and dangerous

counterfeit of freedom.”

LI and LII – The Prosecutor directs and controls the purported investigation of the facts by the Grand

Jury in order to control the outcome and usurp jurisdiction over the accused. The Prosecutor embraces

the Grand Jury, presents his/her government witnesses and cordons off the Grand Jury so that any

investigation is limited to the alleged facts the Prosecutor and his/her witnesses testify to. As shown

earlier, the prosecutor’s-witnesses are protected from charges of perjury under the unlawful case Briscoe

Et. al. v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Furthermore, the Prosecutor does not inform the Grand Jury

that he/she is acting as a judicial officer; officer of the court, and, therefore, the case would be a judicial

self-initiating case, which is un-Constitutional. In other words, the judiciary, through the Prosecutor,

could indict a hamburger. This is an overthrow of the American form of government and of the American

People.

LIII and LIV – In the case “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AUSTIN GARY COOPER, 89-109-

Cr-Hoeveler the judge and prosecutor declared that we have dual Citizenship, those being “American

Citizen” and “citizen of the United States.” The prosecutor in her final argument to the jury declared that

“He pays Social Security, he uses the Postal Service; therefore, Mr. Cooper is a United States citizen.” I

filed lawful documentation to President-George Bush, to Chief Justice William Rehnquist, to the

Governor and Chief Justice of Colorado, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue proving the specified

contracts to be fraudulent. No one denied the facts enumerated and articulated therein. Further, I proved

that the corporate United States and the corporate States use felony-false conveyances of language to gain

jurisdiction over the American People unlawfully. I was imprisoned for not paying protection monies to

the corporations usurping jurisdiction. Now, this tribunal working for the corporate United States is

attempting to disregard its own declaration in order to usurp jurisdiction where none exist. After the

corporate officers were served and upon the declaration by the officers of sub-status citizenship, that

being “citizen of the United States” being contracts trapping the American Citizens under Admiraltyjurisdiction,

the officers, through their own declarations, proclaimed knowledge of their overthrow and

conspiracy to overthrow the American form of government and the American People.

Page 22 of 40

LV and LVI – Amendment II of the Constitution for the United States of America states, “A well

regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear

arms, shall not be infringed.” The corporate United States, Federal Reserve, BAR-Association, Internal

Revenue and sub-corporations known as the “States of: e.g., Colorado” have written, prosecuted and

enforced statutes, the abrogation of law, restricting and licensing the keeping and bearing of arms. The

corporate security-guards do, however, keep and bear arms, and through their possession of arms do rob

and pillage the American People. The unalienable Right to keep and bear arms was and is intended to

create security and a threat to invasion from within the country or abroad. The four corporations and

numerous sub-corporations have overthrown and conspired to overthrow the American form of

government and the American People by willfully and knowingly and with malice aforethought

prosecuting the American People for exercising their unalienable Rights such as Amendment II, ibid.

LVII and LVIII – The human persons of the corporate state are abducting our children under the guise

of protection and the auspices of statutes, the anti-law, and engaging in the business of selling human

persons for their own gain. The gain the corporate state is receiving is to charge the “taxpayer” for taking

the child and placing the child in a state-institution or under foster care. Then the state charges the parent

for the care, double dipping. The business is augmented by the anti-laws wherein the parent is charged

with child-abuse if he/she/they discipline(s) his/her/their child and child-neglect if he/she/they do(es) not

discipline his/her/their child. The child has been annexed at birth whereat the humans of the corporate

state force a contract known as a birth-certificate under the authority of the corporate state and the

nefarious “Social Security Administration” requiring the child to have a “Social Security Number” with

are both felonies-false conveyances of language in and of themselves. In hearings the judge espouses that

the child is his/hers, thus, witnessing that the child has been annexed. Further, the corporate state

conditions the human People that they have to have a “marriage license” before getting married, and that

a proper marriage under the law is either not recognized or frowned upon. The language-“marriage

license” is defined in “Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition” as, “A license or permission granted by

public authority to persons who intend to intermarry usually addressed to the minister or magistrate who

is to perform the ceremony, or, in general terms, to any one authorized to solemnize marriages. By statute

in most jurisdictions, it is made an essential prerequisite to the lawful solemnization of the marriage.”

The word-intermarry is defined as “see Miscegenation.” The word-miscegenation is defined as, “Mixture

of races; marriage between persons of different races, as between a white person and a Negro.” Liberty

informs us that we have the right to marry. It is an established condition of equity and law that if

someone has to seek a license that the alleged entity granting the “license” presumes the authority and

parent-ownership over the licensed venture or action. Thus, the corporate state assumes ownership over

any human seeking a “marriage license” as a corporate “Parens patriæ” a/k/a corporate “Surrogate

Page 23 of 40

parent,” which standing is used to deprive a human person of liberty and freedom guaranteed under the

law and in the Constitution for the United States of America. This would then perpetuate a belief and

authority that any one seeking a “marriage license” would then grant ownership of the fruits of their

marriage, e.g., their children, to the corporate state; hence, this is treason and a conspiracy to commit

treason against the American People and the America form of government.

LIX and LX – The corporate government forces the introduction of fluoride, a dangerous nerve-poison,

into the water-systems supplying water to hundreds of millions of American People. Fluoride is a severe

nerve-poison, it kills nerve-cells as it proceeds to release to the next cell. Further, the intensely small

negative fluoride-ion coordinates with iron and destroys hemoglobin. There are hundreds of documented

studies proving that fluoride is of great harm to individual health and of no use in dentistry. Fluoride has

a de-scaling action; it removes fungus spot, rust, and every other contaminant that has been collecting for

decades in the pipes. It doubles the rate of corrosion in iron-pipes. The Nuremberg-court, set to try Naziwar-

criminals, executed many of the criminals for experimenting on single or multiple human-subjects

without their permission. The Attorneys and other government officers, agents, brokers and

intermediaries, past and present, along with our chemical industry, have been and are implementing

human-experimentation in the place known as the body-politic called these United States of America

minute by minute. The corporate government strives to, amongst other heinous activities, diminish the

health of the American People so that the one-world-government-regime can more easily overpower the

American People and force same under its tyrannical regime.

LXI and LXII – It has recently come to our attention that another way the corporate tribunals usurp

jurisdiction over the American People is through the Supreme Tribunal-case entitled Davis vs. Elmira

Savings, 161 U.S. 275 (1896), wherein it was declared that banks are instrumentalities of the Congress.

In other words, the interstate system of banks is the private property of the corporate United States acting

as King over the American People in an attempt to overthrow the American People and the American

form of government. The documentation the bank presents to be signed generally has the language, “The

undersigned hereby agrees to abide by all of the Rules of this Bank.” In the banks-rules rules it has

language that contracts a natural person that he/she/they agree to abide by all of the administrative rulings

of the Secretary of the Treasury, among other things, thus, attempting to create a contract between “We

the People” and the banks alleged principal, the corporate United States. The Supreme Tribunal

committed treason and conspired to commit treason in the case herein referenced, inasmuch as the

Congress is a product of “We the People,” just as the Executive and Judicial Branches are. These are subbranches

of government, which is why the natural persons filling the positions of government are called

“public servants.” This means that the banks are only instrumentalities of Congress in relation to the

Page 24 of 40

other two sub-branches of the sub-government, not in relation to the principal [We the People, a

collective sovereignty] of the three sub-branches. Hence, for the Supreme Tribunal to take the

government of “We the People” and nefariously claim that their [We the People] creation [Congress] can

covertly create a sub-creation [banks], which sub-creation could and has bound “We the People” under

the creation [Congress] by contract with the sub-creation [banks] and into the jurisdiction of the

Executive branch under the Secretary of the Treasury is patently treasonous and criminal fraud.

Furthermore, when the corporate state tribunal addressing itself as “Larimer County Court” sent us back

the “bond monies” it was attempting to usurp jurisdiction inasmuch as the state-tribunals are subsidiaries

of the federal tribunals and not “Courts of Law,” but court-martials demonstrative of the federal military

flag and the state-military flag prominently displayed next to the merchant-judges-throne. It is

understood, based upon this new information, that this was a conspiracy to grant jurisdiction to the

tribunal aforementioned by the signing of the cards and/or checks without the reservation of rights, which

the merchant-judge then uses to usurp jurisdiction without disclosure. Therefore, this is not only a

situation of the commission of treason and conspiracy to commit treason, but is also criminal fraud and

conspiracy to commit fraud.

Counts LXIII through LXXI.

LXIII – On November 20, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed a

document entitled “PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER,” which has forty-seven- (47) felony false

conveyances of language, thirty-one (31) conclusions of statute, and forty-four- (44) patently fraudulent

statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31)

counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has

not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves, see

Exhibit-J, which the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is filing false language multiplied times fortyseven-

(47) in order to criminally usurp jurisdiction over us by fraudulently representing that the Accused

has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let

the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and

John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and

conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

LXIX - On November 20, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed a

document entitled “PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER,” which has forty-seven- (47) felony false

conveyances of language, thirty-one (31) conclusions of statute, and forty-four- (44) patently fraudulent

statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31)

counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has

Page 25 of 40

not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the

Accused, through merchant-Babcock, has and is engaging in the crime of witness tampering by

fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and

conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his

cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either

denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and

substantiated into this case.

LXX - On November 20, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed a

document entitled “PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER,” which has forty-seven- (47) felony false

conveyances of language, thirty-one (31) conclusions of statute, and forty-four- (44) patently fraudulent

statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31)

counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has

not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the

Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is attempting to obstruct justice by fraudulently representing that

the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason.

Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M.

Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts

of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

LXXI - On November 20, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed a

document entitled “PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER,” which has forty-seven- (47) felony false

conveyances of language, thirty-one (31) conclusions of statute, and forty-four- (44) patently fraudulent

statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31)

counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has

not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the

Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is conspiring to commit criminal fraud by fraudulently representing

that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason.

Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M.

Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts

of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

Counts LXXII through LXXV.

LXXII – On November 18, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,

filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has a total of eighteen- (18) felony false

Page 26 of 40

conveyances of language, seven- (7) conclusions of statute, and sixteen- (16) patently fraudulent

statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31)

counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has

not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves, see

Exhibit-K, which the Accused, through merchant-Shoemaker, is filing false language multiplied times

fifty-one- (51) in order to criminally usurp jurisdiction over us by fraudulently representing that the

Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason.

Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M.

Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts

of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

LXXIII - On November 18, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,

filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has fifty-one- (51) felony false conveyances

of language, twenty-three- (23) conclusions of statute, and twenty-seven- (27) patently fraudulent

statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31)

counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has

not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the

Accused, through merchant-Babcock, has and is engaging in the crime of witness tampering by

fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and

conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his

cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either

denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and

substantiated into this case.

LXXIV - On November 18, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,

filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has fifty-one- (51) felony false conveyances

of language, twenty-three- (23) conclusions of statute, and twenty-seven- (27) patently fraudulent

statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31)

counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has

not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the

Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is attempting to obstruct justice by fraudulently representing that

the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason.

Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M.

Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts

of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

Page 27 of 40

LXXV - On November 18, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,

filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has fifty-one- (51) felony false conveyances

of language, twenty-three- (23) conclusions of statute, and twenty-seven- (27) patently fraudulent

statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31)

counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has

not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the

Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is conspiring to commit criminal fraud by fraudulently representing

that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason.

Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M.

Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts

of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

Counts LXXVI through LXXIX.

LXXVI – On December 15, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed a

document entitled “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” which has sixteen- (16) felony false conveyances of

language, five- (5) conclusions of statute, and nine- (9) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant

Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirtyone

(31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected

to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves, see Exhibit-J, which the Accused,

through merchant-Babcock, is filing false language multiplied times sixteen- (16) in order to criminally

usurp jurisdiction over us by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override

proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that

merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor

any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit

treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

LXXVII - On December 15, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed a

document entitled “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” which has sixteen- (16) felony false conveyances of

language, five- (5) conclusions of statute, and nine- (9) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant

Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirtyone

(31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected

to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-

Babcock, has and is engaging in the crime of witness tampering by fraudulently representing that the

Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason.

Page 28 of 40

Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M.

Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts

of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

LXXVIII - On December 15, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed

a document entitled “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” which has sixteen- (16) felony false conveyances of

language, five- (5) conclusions of statute, and nine- (9) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant

Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirtyone

(31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected

to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-

Babcock, is attempting to obstruct justice by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to

override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that

merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor

any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit

treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

LXXIX - On December 15, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed a

document entitled “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” which has sixteen- (16) felony false conveyances of

language, five- (5) conclusions of statute, and nine- (9) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant

Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirtyone

(31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected

to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-

Babcock, is conspiring to commit criminal fraud by fraudulently representing that the Accused has

jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the

record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John

W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and

conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

Counts LXXX through LXXXIII.

LXXX – On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,

filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has a total of One hundred and seventy five-

(175) felony false conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of statute, and one hundred

and fifty- (150) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the

others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to

commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and

Page 29 of 40

articulated therein. The evidence proves, see Exhibit-K, which the Accused, through merchant-

Shoemaker, is filing false language multiplied times One hundred and seventy five- (175) in order to

criminally usurp jurisdiction over us by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to

override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that

merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor

any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit

treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

LXXXI - On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,

filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has One hundred and seventy five- (175)

felony false conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of statute, and one hundred and

fifty- (150) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others,

were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit

treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated

therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, has and is engaging in the

crime of witness tampering by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override

proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that

merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor

any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit

treason previously filed and substantiated into this case.

LXXXII - On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,

filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has One hundred and seventy five- (175)

felony false conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of statute, and one hundred and

fifty- (150) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others,

were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit

treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated

therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is attempting to obstruct

justice by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of

treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T.

Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other

Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason

previously filed and substantiated into this case.

Page 30 of 40

LXXXIII - On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,

filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has One hundred and seventy five- (175)

felony false conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of statute, and one hundred and

fifty- (150) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others,

were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit

treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated

therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is conspiring to commit

criminal fraud by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges

of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T.

Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other

Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason

previously filed and substantiated into this case.

The record supports and proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock and merchant-

Shoemaker, recites Attorney rhetorical sophistry in their documents; however, they neither deny the charges

nor the proof enumerated and articulated therein. In addition, not a single one of the Accused has denied a

single fact enumerated and articulated in our Complaint. Thus, merchants-Babcock and Shoemaker, the

representatives for the Accused, admit to, for the Accused, the crimes of: Treason times twenty-sevencounts,

Conspiracy to commit Treason times twenty-seven-counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit

fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy

against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony

false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False imprisonment, Assault and Battery, simple

Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as

Article III Courts, Conversion, Jury-Tampering on both the grand and petit-juries, Bank fraud, Stalking,

Fraud by deception, and willfully and knowingly exposing me when naked to visitors when held in the

federal concentration-camp, amongst other crimes against the American people.

For the crimes committed against us and for additional conspiracies, in addition to a demand for

criminal prosecution, we hereby serve this Third Amended “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt”

on the parties listed as the Interested Parties infra to be paid jointly or severally, forthwith:

Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt

Itemized-Bill for Third Complaint Addendum

(1st notice)

Page 31 of 40

Item

Cost

Jointly and

severally

Interest at

1.5 % /

Month

after First

Month Sub-Total Total

Treason

$100,000.00

per count

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00

x 27 Counts $2,700,000.00

Conspiracy to

commit treason

$100,000.00

per count

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00

x 27 Counts $2,700,000.00

Witness tampering

$100,000.00

per natural

person per

action

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00

x 6 actions $600,000.00

Continual criminal

enterprise

$100,000.00

per action

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00

x 6 $600,000.00

Fraud by deception $10,000.00

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Bank-fraud $100,000.00

No Interest

Applied $100,000.00 $100,000.00

Felony falseconveyance

of

language

$10,000.00

per each one

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 105 (see

Exhibits-A

through D $1,050,000.00

Racketeering

through falseconveyance

of

language

$10,000.00

per each one

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 105 (see

Exhibits-A

through D $1,050,000.00

Obstruction of justice

$50,000.00

per document

No Interest

Applied

$50,000.00

x 6 $300,000.00

Sub-Total - - - $9,110,000.00

Addendum

Additional Felony

false-conveyance of

language, see

Exhibit-I

$10,000.00

per each one

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 125 (see

Exhibits-I $1,250,000.00

Addendum

Additional

Racketeering

through falseconveyance

of

language, see

Exhibit-I

$10,000.00

per each one

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 125 (see

Exhibits-I $1,250,000.00

Addendum

Additional charges

of Witness

tampering

$100,000.00

per natural

person per

action

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00

x 3 actions $300,000.00

Addendum

Additional charges

$100,000.00

per natural

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 3 actions $30,000.00

Page 32 of 40

of Criminal Fraud person per

action

Sub-Total - - - $11,940,000.00

Second Addendum

Additional charges

of Treason

$100,000.00

per charge

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00

x 3 $300,000.00

Second Addendum

Additional charges

of conspiracy to

commit Treason

$100,000.00

per charge

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00

x 3 $300,000.00

Second Addendum

Additional Felony

false conveyances of

language, see

Exhibits-J and K

$10,000.00

per each one

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 226 (see

Exhibits-J

and K $2,260,000.00

Second Addendum

Additional

Racketeering

through false

conveyances of

language, see

Exhibits-J and K

$10,000.00

per each one

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 226 (see

Exhibits-J

and K $2,260,000.00

Second Addendum

Additional charges

of Witness

tampering, see

Exhibits-J and K

$100,000.00

per natural

person per

action

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00

x 3 actions $300,000.00

Second Addendum

Additional charges

of Criminal Fraud,

see Exhibits-J and K

$100,000.00

per natural

person per

action

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 3 actions $30,000.00

Sub-Total - - - $17,390,000.00

Third Addendum

and Amendment

with Additional

Felony false

conveyances of

language, see

Exhibits-J and K

$10,000.00

per each one

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 175 (see

Exhibits-J

and K $1,750,000.00

Third Addendum

and Amendment

with Additional

Racketeering

through false

conveyances of

language, see

Exhibits-J and K

$10,000.00

per each one

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 175 (see

Exhibits-L $1,750,000.00

Third Addendum

and Amendment

$100,000.00

per natural

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00

x 3 actions $300,000.00

Page 33 of 40

with Additional

charges of Witness

tampering, see

Exhibits-J and K

person per

action

Third Addendum

and Amendment

with Additional

charges of Criminal

Fraud, see Exhibits-

J and K

$100,000.00

per natural

person per

action

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00

x 3 actions $30,000.00

Sub-Total - - - $21,220,000.00

Punitive Damage

$500,000.00

/ natural

person

No Interest

Applied

$500,000.00

x 2 $1,000,000.00

Additional Punitive

Damage

As of this

date =

$500,000.00

/ natural

person

No Interest

Applied

$500,000.00

x 2 $1,000,000.00

Second Addendum

Additional Punitive

Damage

As of this

date =

$500,000.00

/ natural

person

No Interest

Applied

$500,000.00

x 2 $1,000,000.00

Third Addendum

and Amendment

with Additional

Punitive Damage

As of this

date =

$500,000.00

/ natural

person

No Interest

Applied

$500,000.00

x 2 $1,000,000.00

Total - - - $25,220,000.00

Monthly Late Fee

1.5% Interest

As of this

date =0

No Interest

Applied 0 0

Grand Total - - - $25,220,000.00

To Avoid Collection Enforcement Actions, You Must Immediately:

Pay $25,220,000.00 within 30 days.

This money is to be paid in the money of account, gold or silver coin; however, if paid in

promissory notes [e.g., Federal Reserve-Notes] it is understood that I receive said payment

“without prejudice.”

Return this bill with your certified check or money order.

If You Do Not Respond To This Bill:

Enforcement-actions will be taken against you for the total amount due and owing, plus

penalty and/or interest due.

Page 34 of 40

A lien can be filed against you. This would affect your credit rating. This lien could be

placed against your real property and be a matter of public record.

All future Bills will be sent by regular mail.

Be Advised:

Interest and other incurred costs shall be added to future billings. Interest shall be added to the

balance due until full payment is received. The interest will be charged at 1.5% per month until full

payment is received. Any future billings regarding this account will be sent regular mail.

Thanks for your immediate attention regarding this matter.

______________________________ _______________________________

Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper

In Summary

It is an axiom of law and American justice that a natural person is innocent until proven guilty. In

a Court-of-Law, we would not have to prove that we were not exceeding our natural and unalienable rights;

the burden of proof would be upon the Plaintiff. Moreover, in a Court-of-Law, the complainant and his/its

cohorts would be liable for their criminal actions if frivolous and fraudulent.

When an overzealous corporation and its officers arbitrarily decide to deny all the Substantive

Rights fought and died for in our great Republic, such tyranny must be disciplined. We suggest that by

statutory construction and complacency, a conditioned reflexology has manifested the observation of our

fellow human beings as corporate chattel and not free-living human beings. Thus, the corporate government

finds itself consumed in a web that demands the property and Rights of the people as a tribute for its

leadership. History recognizes that, with noble conviction, the law community assumed a role to champion

the Rights of the people, but in the process, Unalienable Rights were lost to contractual (civil/statute) rights

granted by man. Hence, instead of profound Rights from the Heavenly Father-Yahuah, secured by

Amendments 1-10 of the Constitution for the United States of America, we now have arbitrary rights from

man. Instead of a Constitutional "Republic1," protecting the Rights of each human being, we now have a

creditor (Federal Reserve) democracy promulgating "the good of our (international bankers) majority outweighs

the good of humanity."

This beloved country called America now has the largest prison, probation, and parole population

in the world. Since the BAR Association took over our government, and their avalanche of anti-law-statutes

swept over our liberty and justice, burying it under the well over sixty-million (60,000,000 ++) statutes, the

once great patriotic and noble collective sovereignty known as “We the People” has now become a nation of

slaves. The BAR Association’s International Criminal Court is the crescendo to the take-over of the world

1 Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution for the United States, "The United States shall guarantee to Every State

in the Union a Republican Form of government."

Page 35 of 40

by the Banking-Cartel into a one-world-government, and completes the final extirpation of the Rights,

Liberty and Freedom “We the People” once held sacrosanct.

Please remember, however noble the gestures, personal bias and prejudice still cloud human

judgment.

Wherefore,

a. We, Austin Gary Cooper, Martha E. Cooper and/or Taking Back America, a Pure-Trust, do

not grant jurisdiction of our natural person, person and/or res to this tribunal or the corporate entities known

as the “BAR Association,” the “UNITED STATES,” the “FEDERAL RESERVE” or the “Internal

Revenue.” If you are unaware of this conspiracy, and these crimes perpetrated against us this Notice will

serve to illuminate the facts.

b. That this tribunal-order the Accused to cease and desist their unlawful actions.

c. If this tribunal causes us or any one of us further injury, this “Third Addendum and

Amendment To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive

Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and

Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association

Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused.

We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy to

commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the

American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering,

Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual

Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts,

Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the

Accused with additional charges of felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-L, witness tampering,

and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice.” shall serve as evidence that all have been forewarned

and, therefore, have assumed the posture of accessories after the fact. Further, that willfully and knowingly

this tribunal and judges have conspired with the Plaintiff to injure me.

d. We demand our Right to appear before a proper grand jury to present this evidence

enumerated and articulated herein against the Accused. It should be understood that thus far we have been

denied the information needed to address a grand jury on this issue.

Additionally, notwithstanding the treason, the BAR Association’s officers of the court secretly

impanel grand juries and plead their causes for indictment. Such embracery is published as felonies in the

Federal statutes, itself a false conveyance of language (see Title 18 “United States Code Annotated” §

1503 [Tampering with a juror generally] and § 1504 [Tampering with a juror by writing]), yet your officers

of the court are not prosecuted (selective prosecution, racketeering, conspiracy). Further, there is nothing

Page 36 of 40

published stating that an American Citizen or “citizen of the United States” cannot appear personally,

without interference or accompaniment by the BAR Association’s officer of the court, before a grand jury,

but information regarding this course of action is unavailable to the general public.

e. That this tribunal-order the Accused, the people that they do have jurisdiction over, to pay the

amount specified in the Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt section afore shown in the money of

account or, if tendered in “Federal Reserve Notes” we shall “receive” the notes “without prejudice.”

f. This “Third Addendum and Amendment To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for

damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an

Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British

Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment

Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of:

Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to

commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties,

Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language,

Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false

representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness

tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with additional charges of felony

false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-L, witness tampering, and additional charges of Obstruction of

Justice.” is to be filed into “Account number”: 03-B-1127(PAC)

_________________________________ __________________________________

Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper

Affirmation

I, Austin Gary Cooper, and I, Martha E. Cooper, do hereby affirm that the foregoing “Third

Addendum and Amendment To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal and

Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal

Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR]

Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the

Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts,

Conspiracy to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to

prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud,

Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language,

Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III

Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby

charge the Accused with additional charges of felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-L, witness

tampering, and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice.” is true, accurate and correct to the best of our

knowledge, information and belief.

Page 37 of 40

_________________________________ __________________________________

Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper

Colorado-State :

Larimer-County : ss/asv

Loveland-City :

Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of January 2004 C.E.

My Commission Expires: _____________________________________

Notary-Public

Seal

Certificate of Service and Interested Parties

We Hereby Certify that the foregoing “Third Addendum and Amendment To: Special

Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal

Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal

Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and

Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge

and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 31

Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through

Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false

conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and

knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception,

Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with additional charges of

felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-L, witness tampering, and additional charges of

Obstruction of Justice” was served by hand to be filed into the account-number supra to the following on

this the ____ day of January, 2004 C.E.:

1. Clerk, Gregory C. Langham

C/o Clerk's Office

Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse Room A-105

901 19th Street

Denver, Colorado 80294-3589 Cert.-Mail-#7003 1010 0002 5773 1450.

Page 38 of 40

2. Lewis T. Babcock, Chief Judge

C/o Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse

901 19th Street

Denver, Colorado 80294-3589 Cert.-Mail-#7003 1010 0002 5773 1467.

3. William M. Hoeveler, merchant-judge

c/o 301 N. Miami Ave., 9th Floor

Miami, FL 33128 Cert.-Mail-#7003 1010 0002 5773 1474.

and by regular mail to the following on this the ____ day of January, 2004 C.E., to:

4. Chief Executive Officer of the Norbel Credit Union

c/o Norbel Credit Union, Attn: Ms. Chris Crisman

1531 N. Lincoln, D

Loveland, Colorado 80538 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3113.

5. Chris Crisman, Vice President

c/o 1531 N. Lincoln, D

Loveland, Colorado 80538 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3120.

6. George W. Bush

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20500 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3137.

7. “Attorney’s General” John Ashcroft

“U.S. Department of Justice”

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20530-0001 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3182.

8. The Congress through their principal the BAR Association and the Federal Reserve. Notice to

principal is notice to agent.

9. Chief Justice Rehnquist, Supreme Tribunal/court of the United States

c/o U. S. Supreme Court Building

1 First Street N.E.

Washington D.C. 20543 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3144.

10. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

C/o 1111 Constitution Ave. N.W.

Washington D.C., 20224 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3151.

11. Merchant Dennis Montgomery

c/o 208 N. 5th Street, Suite B

Norfolk, NE 68701 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3168.

12. The BAR ASSOCIATION

a subsidiary of the Templar BAR

c/o 740 15th Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005-1019 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3175.

Page 39 of 40

13. Merchant-Martin Shoemaker

P.-O.-Box 7238

555 4th Street, N.W., Room 8921

Washington, DC 20044 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3199.

________________________________ __________________________________

Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper

Page 1 of 55

Austin Gary and Martha E. Cooper

Without prejudice

c/o 861 W CR 66 E

Fort Collins, Colorado [80524]

*The Plaintiffs file its case in:*

THE STATE OF COLORADO

LARIMER COUNTY COURT

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LARIMER

*The Accusers file their case in:*

The Colorado-State

In the Court of the County known as Larimer

STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; ) Account-No’s 03T201008 and 03T200131

COUNTY OF LARIMER, a Corporation; ) and other numbers randomly or with purpose

CITY OF LOVELAND, a Corporation; ) included in this action and numerous (alleged)

BAR ASSOCIATION; Police Chief Tom ) “arrest warrants”

Wagoner; Officer Hofkamp; et al. )

) Special-Appearance;

Plaintiffs, )

) Civil Complaint for Damages; Formal and

v. ) Constructive Notice; and,

)

AUSTIN G. COOPER, a fiction ) Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and

) an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand

Austin Gary Cooper, a natural person; ) Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-

Martha E. Cooper, a natural person ) British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association

) Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the

Accusers ) Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the

) Accused herein listed.

v. )

) We hereby charge and support the crimes by the

State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of ) Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit

Larimer, a Corporation; City of Loveland, ) treason each times thirty-one (31) counts,

a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart ) Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud,

VanMeveren and his deputies; merchant- ) Conspiracy to prosecute the American people

judges-Christine A. Carney, James H. Hiatt, ) through Bills of Pains and Penalties, Conspiracy

Terence A. Gilmore, Dave Williams, Daniel J. ) against rights, Mail- fraud, Racketeering,

Kaup, Jolene C.Blair, Peter E. Schoon Jr., ) Racketeering through false conveyances of

Ronald I. Schultz, C. Edward Stirman; unknown ) language, Felony false conveyances of language,

Magistrates 1-5; Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; ) Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five

unknown deputy-clerks of tribunal 1-5; Sheriff- ) counts, False imprisonment times five counts,

James A. Alderden and 20, some known and ) Assault and Battery times five counts,

some unknown, Sheriff’s-deputies; Loveland- ) Kidnapping for ransom times five counts,

Police-Chief-Tom Wagoner and 15, Some known ) simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise,

and some unknown Loveland “Police Officers”; ) Willful and knowing false representation of

Fort Collins-Police-Chief Dennis V. Harrison ) Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts,

and Officer Jeff O’Brien; et al. ) Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and

) Fraud by deception.

Accused. )

For the Record:

Page 2 of 55

Comes Now Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, Sui Juris, Appearing both Specially,

NOT Generally OR Voluntarily, both In propria persona (our natural person), disputing jurisdiction of this

tribunal, and filing this “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice,

and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand

Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR]

Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all of

the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason and

conspiracy to commit treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud,

Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights,

Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of

language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five counts, False imprisonment times five counts, Assault

and Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for ransom times five counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal

Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion,

Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception” In support, we state the following:

I appeared Specially, not generally or voluntarily, at the merchant-tribunal known as the

“Larimer County Court” in Fort Collins-City and in Loveland-City “under protest, menace and

duress” as a co-Accuser with my wife, Martha E. Cooper, through documentation or in my natural

person, and that I have been the victim of flagrant obstruction of justice, witness tampering, treason,

conspiracy to commit treason and conspiracy against my rights by the merchant-judges, merchantprosecutors

and merchant-police. That on December 11, 2003 C.E. at the merchant-tribunal in

Loveland-City merchant-Kimberly A. Robbins declared that the “DUR” charges were dropped and

merchant-Christine A. Carney then announced that the “DUR” charges had been dropped, and

continuing she then set a date for a “Court Trial” on January 20, 2004 C.E. That I had addressed the

flag being a military flag and, therefore, the hearing was a court-martial. No one denied the charge.

That I filed a notarized affidavit supporting these facts on January 6, 2004C.E. to this tribunal and the

parties listed as Accused supra. That I lawfully served the parties addressed herein; and, that no

denial or objection addressing the issues has ever been filed. That, to my surprise, on January 20,

2004 C.E. at the merchant-tribunal in Loveland-City I was the victim of a Kangaroo-Court conducted

by merchant-Carney wherein no prosecutor was present and she, again, obstructed justice, tampered

with a witness, committed treason, denied me my right to assistance of counsel, conspired to commit

treason and conspired against my rights with flagrant indifference to the law and the Constitution for

the United States of America. That when I addressed that a “jury trial” meant “makeshift trial”

merchant-Carney concurred but continued her treason.

Page 3 of 55

Merchant-Stirman, wrote a proposed order “ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENTS/

PLEADINGS” writing, “In essence, these documents constitute unintelligible gobbledygook and

should be stricken from the record and Court file.” The reason I use the word proposed is that none

of the documents ever sent out by the fictitious entity called “Larimer County Court” or the

merchant-judges, prosecutors, clerk or deputy-clerks have had the “Court-Seal” on them. Through

experience I have learned that the corporate government requires a seal on documentation in order to

make it official, therefore, I concluded that having no seal, none of the documents are official. Further,

the language-“Court file” is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the word-Court is a noun that

has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-file, there is no such language. Further, in

merchant-Striman’s “ORDER” he has thirty- (30) felony false conveyances of language and nine- (9)

conclusions of statute. In addition, merchant-Stirman had filed other documents entitled: 1 –

AMENDED PRE-TRIAL ORDER REGARDING JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 10,

2004,” 2 - “CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL PROCEDURES FOR DEFENDANTS NOT REPRESENTED

BY ATTORNEYS COURTROOM 3B”, and 3 - “ORDER GRANTING THE PEOPLE’S MOTION

TO ENDORSE ADDITIONAL CHARGES IN PART AND DENYING THE MOTION IN PART.”

These documents have, combined, One hundred nineteen- (119) felony false conveyances of language

and forty five- (45) conclusions of statute in an attempt to usurp jurisdiction into this court-martial.

Merchant-Stirman also avers that I “pleaded not guilty,” and that he is acting as my Attorney and

pleading and accepting a plea of not guilty for the new “charges” by he and his cohorts. I am sure

that merchant-Stirman can prove that I pleaded not guilty to anything and I hereby demand that he

do or be charged with criminal fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Furthermore, I demand to see

any contract or agreement whereby he was hired as my attorney in order to enter any plea for me.

In merchant-Stirman’s document entitled “ORDER GRANTING THE PEOPLE’S MOTION

TO ENDORSE ADDITIONAL CHARGES IN PART AND DENYING THE MOTION IN PART,” he

writes, “The Defendant has not filed any response or objection to the motion,” meaning that the

opposing party is required to respond or object when something is filed. The merchant-“District

Attorney” has never responded of objected to any facts and charges we have filed; yet no action was

taken to protect our rights. Instead, merchants-Carney and Stirman placed on the hat of senior

“Prosecutor” and obstructed justice many times.

Perusing merchant-Stirman’s-documents I noticed that the words-merchant-Stirman used

are, “unintelligible gobbledygook.” The word “gobbledygook” was coined in 1944. Defined in

“Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition” this phraseology is, unintelligible – “un” –

the reverse of, and the word “intelligible” is 1: apprehensible by the intellect only, 2: capable of being

understood or comprehended.” The word “gobbledygook” is defined as, “wordy and generally

unintelligible jargon.” Thus, when used together it would be, “unintelligible unintelligible jargon.”

Page 4 of 55

Hence, the language “unintelligible gobbledygook” is redundant jargon and a double negative;

therefore, the word unintelligible cancels itself out. Thus, “unintelligible gobbledygook” actually

means “intelligible jargon.” Therefore, merchant-Stirman admits, in his carefully and cleverly and

cleverly chosen language used to attempt to deceive, that our facts, charges and Bill of Particulars

have merit. I also noticed that neither merchants-Stirman, Carney, VanMeveren, Robbins, nor any

other merchant-judges, prosecutors and police have denied or objected to the facts and charges served

upon them, therefore, they admit them to be true. In addition, Merchant-Stirman’s-statements are

demonstrative that either he lacks the basic understanding and precepts of law, justice and simple

English-grammar, or he is willfully and knowingly obstructing justice and tampering with witnesses

to his acts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. The law requires two witnesses to the capital

crime of treason, four witnesses and me have filed their charges and a demand for a proper grand

jury is in effect. A proper grand jury is one that has not been stacked by the Accused, merchant-

Stirman, et al. Moreover, in merchant-Stirman’s proposed document entitled “AMENDED PRETRIAL

ORDER REGARDING JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 10, 2004” he wrote in

#8, “DEADLINE FOR PLEA AGREEMENTS. On or before the Pretrial Conference, the parties are

Ordered to notify the Clerk of Courtroom 3B whether the case has been resolved by a plea agreement

or will proceed to jury trial. If the Clerk is not so notified, then the parties should be prepared to

proceed to jury trial. In the absence of good cause shown, no plea agreement will be accepted on the

morning of trial. See People v. Jasper, 17 P.3rd 807 (Colo. 2001). Either the Defendant will then plead

guilty or the District Attorney will dismiss the case. In the event a plea is accepted, then both the

District Attorney and Defendant’s counsel (or Defendant) will meet with the Court and the jury panel

to explain why a plea agreement was not reached earlier. If a plea agreement is reached by the

deadline set forth in this paragraph, then the matter will be set for a disposition hearing as soon as

possible.” By merchant-judge-Stirman’s own declaration “Either the Defendant will then plead guilty

or the District Attorney will dismiss the case;” therefore, merchant-Stirman admits he, his siblingmerchant-

Attorney-judges, the “District Attorney,” his sibling-merchant-Attorney-prosecutors and

the police have no case. This entire façade is geared towards terrorizing me into pleading guilty in

their court-martial, see Title 4 “United States Code Services, Lawyers Edition,” § 1 INTERPRETIVE

NOTES AND DECISIONS “Placing of fringe on national flag...within discretion of President as

Commander-In-Chief of Army and Navy. (1925) 34 Op Atty Gen 483,” by threatening me with jail if I

do not appear in order to attempt to gain jurisdiction over me and make moot the lawful treason,

conspiracy to commit treason and the extraordinary number of felonies committed against my wife,

me, the American People and the American form of government.

Moreover, the documentation we previously filed that merchant-Stirman addresses as

“unintelligible gobbledygook” has listed verbatim, in part: the Constitution for the United States of

Page 5 of 55

America; the Law, 11 AmJur §329, 52 AmJur Treason; the corporate State of Colorado’s-anti-law

known as statutes, though the statutes are, in fact, gobbledygook; the corporate United States-anti-law

known as statues; Congressional quotes and bills; direct quotes from “Shorter’s Oxford English

American Dictionary, Fifth Edition;” clear and precise criminal charges each with a Bill of

Particulars; Affidavits that were written in simple English-language and notarized; documentation

sent me by the fictitious entity addressed by the Accused as the “LARIMER COUNTY COURT”; the

facts of the case written in simple English-language and notarized, which facts have never been denied

or objected to; and, clarification of the false conveyances of language (legalese) used by merchant-

Stirman and his cronies and merchant-VanMeveren and his cronies, with the description of precisely

why the language is false conveyance. False conveyance of language used to injure someone is itself a

felony under the law, fraud, and the anti-law, see Title 18 “United States Code” § 1001, Statements or

entries generally.” We used simple English-language in the Affidavits, criminal charges and Bill of

Particulars so that even though the present quasi-judiciary portrays that they are intellectually

handicapped there is no reason why they could not understand the language used.

The corporate State of Colorado’s-anti-law known as statutes, other than the ones we

previously filed, merchant-Stirman asserts, are not gobbledygook; anyone can understand them, that

is why one has to “hire” a statute-merchant a/k/a Attorney, who purportedly understands the legalese,

to represent him or her. In other words, “law for hire.” However, given the opportunity, I can prove

that the merchant-Attorneys have no idea what the anti-law states. They have to look each statute up

every time they imprison, place on probation or parole, steal the property or monies or murder the

American People. The powers that be, merchant-judges and merchant-prosecutors, have to search

the charges and language of the anti-law consistently, never remembering what the statutes say, yet

they dole out prison-sentences and steal the American People’s-wealth daily for not knowing and

obeying these statutes. “We the People” are required to memorize the well-over Sixty million

(60,000,000 ++) statutes and the very “Inquisitors” do not know them at all. It is noted here that the

main reason the merchant-judges will not inform the Accused of the “nature and cause of the

accusation” is because they do not understand the statutes themselves, they just bluff, insult and

threaten with contempt the American People when “We” do not understand this unlawful legalese.

That Merchant-Stirman, in his proposed “ORDER GRANTING THE PEOPLE’S MOTION

TO ENDORSE ADDITIONAL CHARGES IN PART AND DENYING THE MOTION IN PART”

has thirty six- (36) felony false conveyances of language, sixteen- (16) conclusion of anti-law [statute],

and forty five- (45) patently fraudulent statements. Yet he purports, that is if one did not know

English-grammar, meaning that his use of a double negative would not create a positive, that his

documentation is “intelligible jargon.”

I have discovered that the 2003 C.E.-edition of the “Colorado Revised Statutes” has: 14

Page 6 of 55

Volumes identified as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7A, 7B, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13; 43 titles; 1 volume entitled “Court

Rules” (A false conveyance of language.); and, 1 volume entitled “Index.” The aforementioned books

have 19,077 pages (excluding the index-volume and certain introductory pages); 22,914 statutes; 757

rules; and 192 forms, which statutes, rules and forms are replete with false conveyances of language.

Mind you that this list does not include the County, City and Municipality statutes, ordinances,

regulations, rules and customs. The corporate State-statutes also allow the merchant-judge to amend

the “Court rules” as he or she sees fit, see merchant-Stirman’s “Amended Pre-Trial Order Regarding

Jury Trial Scheduled for March 10, 2004”; therefore, there could be myriad rules espoused by any

judge permitting any degree of chaos against any one brought before these merchant-judges.

Additionally, included in Volume 12 of the “Colorado Revised Statutes” is “Appendix To Chapter 24,

Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct” Canon 3, which states, “A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE

DUTIES OF HIS OR HER OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY. The judicial duties of a

judge take precedence over all his or her other activities. A judge’s judicial duties include all the

duties of his or her office prescribed by law. In the performance of these duties, the following

standards apply: A. Adjudicative Responsibilities. (1) A judge should be faithful to the law and

maintain professional competence in it. A judge should be unswayed by partisan interest, public

clamor, or fear of criticism.” (Emphasis added.) I hereby challenge and can prove that not a single

Attorney, whether he or she is a judge, prosecutor, legislator, executive officer, in private practice or

an educator has even a minimal knowledge of these statutes; thus, this evinces incompetency by the

present quasi-judiciary governing this country.

Now we come to the real reason merchant-Stirman purports that he can dismiss charges of

treason and conspiracy to commit treason filed against him and his comrades; we have been passing

out a “Public Notice” informing the American People that we have filed thirty- (30) (now thirty-one)

counts of treason and thirty- (30) (now thirty-one) counts of conspiracy to commit treason with the

account-numbers of the cases, and merchant-Stirman, et al. are afraid the people will discover the

truth. Then, merchant-Stirman, et al. will be looking at life in prison or death for their crimes.

Hence, merchant-Stirman purports to have the power to obstruct justice in an attempt to thwart

attention away from himself and his Attorney-siblings. Further, the merchant-judges get a pay-off, in

that, a percentage of the traffic-fines (blood-money) go to their retirement funds.

Merchant-Carney declared in the court-martial on January 20, 2004 C.E. that merchant-

Hofkamp had placed the wrong statute on the ticket declaring that merchant-Hofkamp had used the

section for a “75 m.p.h. zone.” Merchant-Carney was reading directly from a book that appeared to

be a volume of the “Colorado Revised Statutes.” Neither merchant-VanMeveren nor any of his

cronies titled “Deputy District Attorneys” were there, meaning that merchant-Carney was

Page 7 of 55

representing the opposing side and the merchant-judge at the time. Furthermore, merchant-Carney

declared that the hearing was a “Civil case” yet no contract was presented nor declared supporting

that I had granted jurisdiction. The fact of merchant-Hofkamp using the wrong section of the statute

should have been recognized by merchant-Hofkamp’s-superiors and by the merchant-“district

attorney,” the alleged law-professionals. Thus, this entire vicious criminal charade was and is a

product of malicious prosecution by the “Loveland Police Department,” the “Larimer County

Sheriff’s Department,” the “Larimer County District Attorney’s Office,” the “Eighth (8th) Judicial

District,” the corporate “City of Loveland,” the corporate “County of Larimer,” the corporate “State

of Colorado,” and the natural persons who constitute and bear the titles known as the officers, agents,

brokers and intermediaries of the aforementioned. In addition, the charge of “DUR” is a result of

having an alleged driving privilege suspended, revoked or whatever, assuming the corporations had

that authority to have annexed me and mine, due to my having challenged jurisdiction, which

jurisdiction was never proven. This is an act of malicious prosecution, conspiracy in malicious

prosecution, treason and conspiracy to commit treason.

Furthermore, knowing that the original unlawful summons was in error bringing about this

vicious criminal charade, merchant-Stuart VanMeveren by and through his sibling-merchant-

Attorney and crony-Kimberly A. Robbins conspires to continue this vicious criminal charade

inasmuch as he has filed a document entitled “MOTION TO ENDORSE 3 ADDITIONAL COUNTS

TO SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT.” All “bond papers” I have signed were signed with the

language “Under protest, menace and duress.” No jurisdiction has ever been granted to this courtmartial,

the merchant-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association-judges, prosecutors, and their

corporate-security-guards known as police usurped jurisdiction through terrorist tactics. I did not

physically attend your treasonous court-martial because jurisdiction was challenged and never

proven. Moreover, the “bond papers” are replete with false conveyances of language, a condition of

felonious activity by the Attorneys and their cronies, the police. The language-“bond papers” is a false

conveyance of language inasmuch as the word-bond is a noun that has been converted into an

adjective modifying the noun-papers, there is no such language. Properly read according to Englishgrammar,

the language “bond papers” would be “non-existent papers.”

The British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association, by their own decree and arrogance have

declared that they have overthrown the American People as a collective sovereignty and the American form

of government by enforcing the anti-law that one needs a “license to practice law” to be a judge or

prosecuting attorney in the legal arena. The requirement of a license makes the Attorneys merchants defined

under the Uniform Commercial Code § 1-103:6, and, thereby makes the judiciary a business and not a subbranch

of government under “We the People.” The prosecutor is an alleged “judicial officer” making the

Page 8 of 55

judiciary self-initiating and is the basis for the extirpation of the lawful judiciary into the unlawful Admiralty

quasi-judiciary now enforced by the British Accredited Registry and their corporate security-guards known as

police. The following will witness the overthrow of the American People and the American form of

government through the act of treason and conspiracy to commit treason by the Accused and the Legislative,

Executive and Judicial sub-branches of government as written in the Constitution for the United States of

America. The Preamble and the first Ten-Amendments sandwich in the three sub-branches of government

supporting that “We the People” are the collective-sovereignty and the government, the proper government

that is, are public servants, not public masters.

The following are the written Facts of this Case.

Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper

See the Criminal Complaint supra with its list of included documentation and accompanying

Affidavits.

Criminal Complaint

For every criminal count we hereby adopt and incorporate the following paragraphsletters-

A through J as if fully set forth at length: Due to the conservation of our natural resources I

shall not include the filed documentation as Exhibits inasmuch as they have all been served to the

tribunal and to the interested parties.

A. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO; COUNTY OF LARIMER; TOWN

OF WELLINGTON / TIMNATH; the BAR ASSOCIATION; SHERIFF JAMES A. ALDERDEN;

OFFICER SANDERSON; et al. v. Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, Account number:

02R101815 and summons disguised as a traffic ticket no. 24156 with its attachments sent registered-mailnumber

RR579291133US, as if fully set forth at length.

B. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO; COUNTY OF LARIMER; CITY OF

LOVELAND; the BAR ASSOCIATION; POLICE CHIEF TOM WAGONER; OFFICER C.J. HOFKAMP;

et al. v. Austin Gary Cooper, Martha E. Cooper and :Paul-Robert: Kappel, Account number: No account

number available (later discovered to be 03-77635) and summons disguised as a traffic-ticket-no. 212906

sent registered-mail-number RR579207524US, as if fully set forth at length.

C. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO; COUNTY OF LARIMER; CITY OF

LOVELAND; the BAR ASSOCIATION; POLICE CHIEF TOM WAGONER; OFFICER C.J. HOFKAMP;

et al. v. Austin Gary Cooper, Martha E. Cooper and :Paul-Robert: Kappel, Account number: No account

number available and summons disguised as a traffic-ticket-no. 212906, Addendum To: Special-

Appearance; and, Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an

Information in a Criminal Case; and, Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British

Page 9 of 55

Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member. with its attachments sent registeredmail-

number RR579207665US, as if fully set forth at length.

D. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO; COUNTY OF LARIMER; CITY

OF FORT COLLINS; the BAR ASSOCIATION; POLICE CHIEF Dennis V. Harrison; OFFICER Jeff

O’Brien; et al. v. Martha E. Cooper and Austin Gary Cooper, Account number: P0350407 sent registeredmail-

number RR579207895US, as if fully set forth at length.

E. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; COUNTY OF

LARIMER, a Corporation; the BAR ASSOCIATION; SHERIFF James A. Alderden; OFFICER Sanderson;

OFFICER Brian Thomas; et al. v. Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, Account number:

Undisclosed, summons disguised as a traffic ticket #78575, entitled, “Special-Appearance; and, Formal and

Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal

Case; and, Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR]

Association Judicial Sibling and Member” as if fully set forth at length.

F. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; COUNTY OF

LARIMER, a Corporation; CITY OF LOVELAND, a Corporation; the BAR ASSOCIATION; POLICE

CHIEF Tom Wagoner; OFFICER Hofkamp; et al. v. AUSTIN G. COOPER, a fiction / Austin Gary Cooper,

a natural person; Martha E. Cooper, a natural person v. State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of Larimer,

a Corporation; City of Loveland, a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren; Police-Chief-Tom

Wagoner; Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; Merchants: officer-sergeant-Rabson; Chisum and Mendoza; unknown

judges 1-5; unknown merchant-police-officers 1-5; unknown Prosecuting-Attorneys 1-5; et al., the Accused,

“Account number”: 03-3181, “warrant number” C0352003T and “summons disguised as a traffic ticket” no.

212906, “Special-Appearance; and, Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill

of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and, Demand Criminal Prosecution Against

Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A

Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused,” as if fully set forth at length.

G. We hereby adopt and incorporate “Professional Finance Company, Inc. v. TBA FOUNDATION

AKA AUSTIN AUSTIN GARY COOPER / Austin Gary Cooper; Austin Gary Cooper, Trustee v.

Professional Finance Company, Inc; PROFESSIONAL FINANCE COMPANY, INC.; John Mauro; et al /

Austin Gary Cooper; Austin Gary Cooper, Trustee v. merchant-judges-Christine A. Carney, James H.

Hiatt, Terence A. Gilmore, Dave Williams, Daniel J. Kaup, Jolene C. Blair, Peter E. Schoon Jr, Ronald I.

Schultz, C. Edward Stirman; unknown magistrates 1-5; Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; unknown deputyclerks

of tribunal 1-5; Sheriff Alderden and 20, some known and some unknown, Sheriff’s-deputies; et

al., Account-No. 2002C201925,” "Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and

Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand

Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR]

Page 10 of 55

Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all

of the Accused herein listed. I hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason,

Conspiracy to commit Treason, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the

American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud,

Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language,

Collusion, Menace, False imprisonment, Assault and Battery, Kidnapping for ransom, simple Assault,

Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article

III Courts, Conversion, and Fraud by deception” as if fully set forth at length. It is noted here that the

merchant-Accused have never denied or objected to the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit

enumerated and articulated therein.

H. We hereby adopt and incorporate “STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; COUNTY OF

LARIMER, a Corporation; CITY OF LOVELAND, a Corporation; BAR ASSOCIATION; Police Chief

Tom Wagoner; Officer Hofkamp; et al. v. AUSTIN G. COOPER, a fiction / Austin Gary Cooper, a natural

person; Martha E. Cooper, a natural person v. State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of Larimer, a

Corporation; City of Loveland, a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren and his deputies;

merchant-judges-Christine A. Carney, James H. Hiatt, Terence A. Gilmore, Dave Williams, Daniel J.

Kaup, Jolene C.Blair, Peter E. Schoon Jr., Ronald I. Schultz,C. Edward Stirman; unknown Magistrates 1-

5;Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; unknown deputy-clerks of tribunal 1-5; Sheriff-James A. Alderden and 20,

some known and some unknown, Sheriff’s-deputies; Loveland-Police-Chief-Tom Wagoner and 5, Some

known and some unknown Loveland “Police Officers”; Fort Collins-Police-Chief Dennis V. Harrison and

Officer Jeff O’Brien; et al., Account-No’s 03T201008 and 03T200131,” “Special Appearance, and Formal

and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a

Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British

Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment

Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. I hereby charge and support the crimes by the

Accused of: Treason times eighteen counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times eighteen counts,

Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills

of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false

conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times

three counts, False imprisonment times three counts, Assault and Battery times three counts, Kidnapping

for ransom times three counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false

representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and

Fraud by deception” as if fully set forth at length. It is noted here that the merchant-Accused have never

denied or objected to the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit enumerated and articulated therein.

Page 11 of 55

I. We hereby adopt and incorporate “STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; COUNTY OF

LARIMER, a Corporation; CITY OF LOVELAND, a Corporation; BAR ASSOCIATION; Police Chief

Tom Wagoner; Officer Hofkamp; et al. v. AUSTIN G. COOPER, a fiction / Austin Gary Cooper, a natural

person; Martha E. Cooper, a natural person v. State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of Larimer, a

Corporation; City of Loveland, a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren and his deputies;

merchant-judges-Christine A. Carney, James H. Hiatt, Terence A. Gilmore, Dave Williams, Daniel J.

Kaup, Jolene C.Blair, Peter E. Schoon Jr., Ronald I. Schultz,C. Edward Stirman; unknown Magistrates 1-

5;Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; unknown deputy-clerks of tribunal 1-5; Sheriff-James A. Alderden and 20,

some known and some unknown, Sheriff’s-deputies; Loveland-Police-Chief-Tom Wagoner and 5, Some

known and some unknown Loveland “Police Officers”; Fort Collins-Police-Chief Dennis V. Harrison and

Officer Jeff O’Brien; et al., Account-No’s 03T201008 and 03T200131,” “Special-Appearance; Civil

Complaint for Damages; Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of

Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs

by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for

the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support

the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times thirty counts, Conspiracy to commit treason times thirty

counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people

through Bills of Pains and Penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering

through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False

arrest times three counts, False imprisonment times three counts, Assault and Battery times three counts,

Kidnapping for ransom times three counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and

knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times

three counts, and Fraud by deception” as if fully set forth at length. It is noted here that the merchant-

Accused have never denied or objected to the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit enumerated and

articulated therein.

J. 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, page 1135, § 329 2. Liberty, which states,

“Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go where and when one pleases – only so

far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right

of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn

carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a

common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this

constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the

public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner,

neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in

his safe conduct.”

Page 12 of 55

K. We hereby adopt and incorporate the Judicial, Executive and Legislative Notice, supra, as if

fully set forth at length.

L. We hereby adopt and incorporate the facts, supra, articulated and enumerated herein as if fully

set forth at length.

M. We hereby adopt and incorporate all documentation I have previously filed into this case and

the Affidavits accompanying this complaint as if fully set forth at length.

Counts I through LXII.

Treason - Counts I, III, V, VII, IX, XI, XIII, XV, XVII, XIX, XXI, XXIII, XXV, XXVII, XXIX,

XXXI, XXXIII, XXXV, XXXVII, XXXIX, XLI, XLIII, XLV, XLVII, XLIX, LI, LIII, LV, LVII,

LIX and LXI. And Conspiracy to commit Treason - Counts II, IV, VI, VIII, X, XII, XIV, XVI,

XVIII, XX, XXII, XXIV, XXVI, XXVIII, XXX, XXXII, XXXIV, XXXVI, XXXVIII, XL, XLII,

XLIV, XLVI, XLVIII, L, LII, LIV, LVI, LVIII, LX and LXII.

I and II - As written in my filed documents to the corporate chief officers, the tribunals display the

Federal military flag as its jurisdiction. Under “Title 4 U.S.C.S. Lawyers Edition, § 1 INTERPRETIVE

NOTES AND DECISIONS “Placing of fringe on national flag...within discretion of President as

Commander-In-Chief of Army and Navy. (1925) 34 Op Atty Gen 483.” In addition, “Pursuant to U.S.C.

Chapter 1, 2, and 3; Executive Order No. 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag

that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE, bordered on

three sides. The President of the United states designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive

order, and in his capacity as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Armed forces.” Moreover, the Congress

willfully and knowingly overstepped its power, to wit: in 1845 Congress passed an act saying Admiraltylaw

could come on land. The bill may be traced in Cong. Globe, 28th Cong., 2d. Sess. 43, 320, 328, 337,

345(1844-45), no opposition to the Act is reported. Congress held a committee on this subject in 1850

and they said: “The committee also alluded to ‘the great force’ of ‘the great constitutional question as to

the power of Congress to extend maritime jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption

of the Constitution....’” - H.R. Rep. No. 72 31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850).” Thus, this tribunal is an

Administrative court-martial and the British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association-Attorneys have

overthrown the American people and the American form of government by extirpating the civil authority

and removing the Judiciary in favor of their military quasi-judiciary [Something that appears to be a

proper judiciary but is not.].

III and IV - The judges are members and swear allegiance to a private corporation known as the British

Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association. The BAR-Association is owned by the Templar BAR, which

Templar BAR is located and owned by “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. “The Crown”

a/k/a “The City” is owned by the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel and the Rothschild-family. Further, the

Page 13 of 55

Rothschild’s are known to have the position of “Guardian of the Vatican’s-Treasury,” thus, the

Rothschild-family represents the interests of the Vatican. Hence, the judge is a foreign agent conspiring

with other merchant-Attorney-judges commandeering the judiciary of the United States of America and

the Colorado-State to overthrow the American people and the American form of government.

Furthermore, The word-Attorney is taken from the words:

Attorn / v. Me. [Origin French. atorner, aturner assign, appoint, f. a-torner turn v.] 1. v.t. Turn; change,

transform; deck out. 2. v.t. Turn over (goods, service, allegiance, etc.) to another; transfer, assign.

3. v.i. Transfer one’s tenancy, or (arch.) homage or allegiance, to another; formally acknowledge

such transfer. Attorn tenant (to) Law formally transfer one’s tenancy (to), make legal

acknowledgment of tenancy (to a new landlord). – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

Attorn, v.i. [Latin ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord

to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation or the estate. –

Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

Attornment, n. The act of a feudatory vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of an

estate, to receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service. – Webster’s

1828 Dictionary.

Attornment n. the transference of bailor status, tenancy, or (arch.) allegiance, service, etc., to another;

formal acknowledgment of such transfer: lme. – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

Thus, it is clear that an Attorney is one who transfers or assigns, within the BAR, another’s rights and

property, acting on behalf of the ruling crown (“The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England; in

other words this countries de facto government). In other words, when Attorneys call themselves officers

of the court, they are correct in that they are all government agents; however, they serve a foreign

government. The American people are deceived into believing that they [the BAR] are neutral and working

on behalf of justice, not serving their British Accredited Registry -Association.

Moreover, The “IRS” is not a United States-Government-Agency, it is an Agency of the International

Monetary Fund (IMF), Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE “U.S.D.C.D.I.,” Public

Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391. The

language “International Monetary Fund” is defined as, “Agency of the United Nations established to

stabilize international exchange and promote balanced international trade,” Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth

Edition, page 733.

V and VI – The federal and State-tribunals use felony false conveyances of language as its vehicles of

jurisdiction over the American People. The British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association-Attorneys

have dubbed this tribunal the “Larimer County Court.” The word-Larimer is a noun that has been

converted into an adjective modifying the noun-County; the word-County is a noun that has been

Page 14 of 55

converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Court, there is no such place; therefore, this is a false

conveyance of language and a felony. Properly read according to English-grammar, this language would

be, “non-existent Court.” Thus, in order to perform their dastardly deeds, the BAR-Association has

created non-existent Courts to pillage and plunder the wealth and rights of the American people and to

overthrow the American form of government.

In addition, the statutes are written in false conveyances of language in order to usurp

jurisdiction over the American People and trap the American People under a language that does not exist.

This falsification of language opens a Pandora’s-Box against the American People with the British

Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association and its principal, the Vatican and Rothschild-Bank-Cartel, as a

totalitarian government, rather like a sophisticated and contemporary Spanish-Inquisition. A false

language, where justice has no stronghold, where charges have no meaning according to the language;

thus, the corporate government assumes the authority to plunder and pillage the American People.

Through corruption and false language “We the People” are charged with the anti-law called statutes and

commanded to answer to the charges; however, it is difficult to answer when one does not understand the

question. Hence, the BAR-Association, through its opinions, have exercised the “Humpty-Dumpty”

methodology of control, wherein they have ruled the people under the now quasi-judiciary with the

dictates that “everything means exactly and precisely what I [the BAR-Attorneys] say it means at the

time.”

VII and VIII - The judge has everyone “rise” when proceeding to his/her thrown. History recognizes

that the judge would carry in the Bible with him and that the people would rise in reverence to the word

of the Heavenly Father-Yahuah, not the judge. Further, the Bible would render the hearing one under the

common law, said Bible containing the Law burned into stone by the Heavenly Father, wherein the

unalienable rights of the accused would naturally be protected. It was not known at the time that the

British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association was covertly planning and implementing its take over of

the American form of government. However, when the judge stopped carrying in the Bible the hearing

became a “Royal court” inasmuch as the judge is dubbed “Esquire,” an English title just under nobility

meaning “shield-bearer.” Now, the “common law”-Court of Law has been overthrown in favor of the

British Accredited Registry-Association’s-sovereignty known as “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in

London, England and proceeding under the “Royal court” of “The Crown.” Thus, through this treason

and conspiracy to commit treason the American people have become subjects in their own country and

their own land.

IX and X - The Attorneys of the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association have willfully and

knowingly sold out their country to serve “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. Then, they

Page 15 of 55

have, with treason in mind and deed, removed the Flag of the Republic in favor of their Admiralty-flag to

remove the “Courts of Law” and replace them with “Military tribunals” under an Admiralty-flag and a

foreign government. The corporate government through the BAR-Association then created a sub-status

citizenship found in the questionably ratified Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United

States of America and written as “citizen of the United States.” Further, they then quote cases stating

their jurisdiction is based on the American People being “United States citizens.” The phrase “United

States” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-citizen, there is no

such creature; therefore this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. When properly read, this

phrase would be “non-existent citizen.” Through this sub-status and/or non-existent citizenship the

“BAR” and its corporate government made the American Citizens property of the corporate state and

assumed a dictatorial position over the people and the American form of government.

XI and XII - Under their feudal-system, the BAR-Association has annexed the property and natural

persons of the American People through the reprehensible language known as “eminent domain.” In

addition, the following treasonous statement by the Senate, written in 1933 witnesses the coup against the

American form of government and the American People, to wit: “The ultimate ownership of all property

is in the state; individual so-called `ownership' is only by virtue of government, i.e., law, amounting to a

mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” -

Senate Document No. 43, “Contracts payable in Gold.” With this principal of feudal, nazi, fascist,

communist, dictatorship, totalitarian and other such governments the ruling elite control the people

through the threat that the corporate government can, and often times do, take the properties of the People

if they question or resist the tyranny. Thus, through this concept the Accused can maintain control over

any who would speak out against their tyranny.

XIII and XIV - With this principal of “eminent domain” well established in systems of government

known as feudal, nazi, fascist, communist, dictatorship, totalitarian and other such governments the ruling

elite control the people through the concept that if the people own nothing they have nothing to bargain

with and, therefore, have no legitimate position of voting-rights to elect a proper lawful government.

Thus, the alleged right to vote becomes a privilege requiring an act of registration. Hence, the people are

no more than subjects presenting their wishes and granting the existing de facto government permission

by accepting and performing according to the privileges they, the American people, have been granted by

the now de facto government. Further, when the corporate government grants someone the privilege to

vote by exercising a control of registration, the corporate government becomes the parent-corporation,

which means that the human-person seeking permission becomes the child and through an unbeknownst

“tacit agreement” loses his/her rights and then agrees through implied-contract to be bound by the

Page 16 of 55

corporation and/or foreign government, not by law. In addition, if one attempts to counter the tyranny of

the now de facto government he/she would be threatened with the loss of his/her property, or the

corporate government would simply take the humans property in order to frighten others into submission

for fear of losing their properties. Thus, the Accused through the BAR-Association has perpetrated

treason and conspired to commit treason through their deliberate actions aforementioned.

XV and XVI - The Seventh-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states, “In

Suits at common-law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trail by jury

shall be preserved, and no fact tried by jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United

States, than according to the rules of the common-law.” There is no place where a “jury trial” is

authorized in the Constitution, ibid. In the language “jury trial,” the word-jury is an adjective modifying

the noun-trial. Jury as an adjective means “makeshift.” Thus, “jury trial,” means a “makeshift trial.” The

sinister BAR-Association-Attorneys have overthrown the American form of government and the

American People by covertly replacing a lawful “trial by jury” in favor of the dictatorial “makeshift trial”

in order for them to systematically destroy the liberties of the American people through “Bills of Pains

and penalties” and make subjects of the American people.

XVII and XVIII – The present day quasi-Judiciary places on the jury-pools of the grand and petit juries,

agents working for the corporate government in order to tamper with the jury. The American People

when tried whether civilly or criminally do not get a jury of their peers. The corporate government stacks

the juries with “postal workers,” agents of the corporation known as “Internal Revenue,” police officers,

people receiving welfare-payments and, therefore, sensitive to the corporate demands. Hence, through

treason and conspiracy to commit treason the Accused tampers with the juries in order to overthrow the

American form of government and the American People.

XIX and XX – Statutes are an abrogation of the American “common-law,” see Uniform Commercial

Code § 1-103:6. The Unalienable Rights of the American People come from the Law. Since statutes

abrogate the law, they then, in turn, extirpate the rights of the American People. The British Accredited

Registry [BAR]-Association-Attorneys do not allow law in “their” tribunals which they call courtrooms

and, thus, have commandeered the Article III Courts of the Constitution for the United States of America

in favor of their Admiralty-tribunals. Furthermore, all federal tribunals are Administrative tribunals,

Article I Section 8 [9], “To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;” under Admiraltyjurisdiction.

Congress through unconstitutional means extended maritime-jurisdiction onto the land in

order to overthrow the Constitution for the United States of America, “The committee also alluded to ‘the

great force’ of ‘the great constitutional question as to the power of Congress to extend maritime

Page 17 of 55

jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption of the Constitution....’” - H.R. Rep. No. 72

31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850).” The judges, prosecutors and defense Attorneys know this but keep it a

secret in order to assume absolute power and control over the American People for their [BAR-Attorneys]

evil gain. Thus, the Accused has willfully and knowingly overthrown the American form of government

and the American People.

XXI and XXII - Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America states, “No

State shall …make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts…” The merchant-

Attorneys and other government officials send out documents demanding $, which is a symbol that

indicates, “no-silver,” from the American People. The now defunct S with two slightly separated parallelvertical-

lines at or near the center of the S means, “silver-bar.” I, on the other hand, file(d) for the money

of account and wrote/write, “I require the payment to be in the money of account; however, if the

Accused does not have the money of account, then payment may be made in Federal Reserve-Notes;

however, such payment will be ‘received without prejudice.’” Thus, a reservation of rights and the

“Doctrine of Estopple” is exercised inasmuch as “Federal Reserve Notes” are promissory notes and not

payment; and few, if any, have gold and silver-Coin in order to pay a debt. Furthermore, the language

“Federal Reserve Notes” not hyphenated is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the phrase

“Federal Reserve” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Notes;

according to English-grammar there is no such creature. When properly read, the language “Federal

Reserve Notes” would be, “Federal non-existent Notes.” However, “receiving” the notes “without

prejudice” converts the notes into money. Through treason and conspiracy, the Congress of the United

States removed our proper money, thereby conspiring to place each and every human person under the

regulations of bankruptcy and covertly seize their properties. Now monies and human persons acting for

the corporate State that accept these notes accept the debt attached to them; however, by receiving them I

do not agree to the unlawful obligation attached thereto. Since the corporate government uses the

symbol-$ and the Constitution for the United States of America commands that only gold or silver-Coin

is tender in payment of debts to the States, any “payment” demanded in the form of taxation, fines, etc.

using the symbol-$ to the corporate government could be made in wooden-nickels or grains of sand, etc.

Hence, the corporate United States or State enforcing any “payment” for any alleged debt or debt in fact

in other than the money of account for its coffers, as it were, is an act of treason and an overthrow of the

American form of government and of the American people. The body-politic “We the People” can, on

the other hand, receive “Federal Reserve Notes” or Federal Reserve-Notes “without prejudice” and

protect our rights by so doing. The government controlled schools, however, do not teach the people to

protect their rights but instead forcibly teach them to surrender their rights to the de facto government

presently in control.

Page 18 of 55

XXIII and XXIV - In order to rob the America people of their “Courts of Law” the British Accredited

Registry [BAR]-Association established a bogus “license” to practice law. This action monopolizes the

branch of government known as the judiciary and creates a quasi-judiciary taking its place. Through this

bogus licensing the BAR-Association regulates and controls any one who would enter its domain granting

it absolute despotism over the system of government it conspires to overtake. Moreover, since the

Attorneys say they are licensed, then they admit that they are merchants, Uniform Commercial Code § 2-

104(1). This position witnesses a monopoly inasmuch as the BAR-Association enforces that one has to

be licensed through its merchant-Attorney-Association in order to “practice law,” however, the truth be

known, they [the BAR-Attorneys] do not function or operate within the law, only the anti-law known as

statutes. The statistics support the tyranny of the BAR-Association-Attorneys in that one-out-of-everythirty

Americans are in prison, on probation or on parole presently in this country and many more have

their monies and properties stolen from them by the infamous British Accredited Registry [BAR]-

Association-Attorneys in the role of judges, prosecutors and defense-attorneys. This action places the

weasels in charge of the hen-house, as it were, and is patently treasonous in a land of “free-enterprise”

and liberty and justice for all. This “license to practice law” is nothing more than membership in the

private corporation known as the BAR-Association and its principal “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in

London, England. The Preamble and the first Ten Amendments sandwich in the three sub-branches of

government supporting that “We the People” are the collective sovereignty and the government, the

proper government that is, are public servants, not public masters.

XXV and XXVI - The corporate State and corporate state have its own religion and, through treason is

forcing its religion upon the children of America. The corporate state teaches the children evolution; that

humans evolved from apes, and so on and so forth. There has never been evidence proving such

nonsense, however, the corporate state demands that the children in their impressionable years go to the

corporate government-schools and influences them unduly anent this bunk. Since the evolutionhypothesis

has never been proven, which makes the hypothesis questionable at best, and, therefore, is

based on a science of conjecture and belief, it is a religion. Moreover, when presented the question of

“Where then did our eyes come from(?),” the evolution worshipers are at a loss for words. The corporate

state then bastardized Amendment I of the Constitution for the United States of America wherein it states,

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise

thereof; …” to abolish the free exercise of religion in favor of their, the corporate, state-religion. The

purpose for this deception is to place humans in the category of the animals and, thereby, extirpate the

unalienable rights through the corporate hypothesis that if we came from one-celled animals we are no

different than any animal, with the exception that we are simply more advanced. Thus, we would not be

Page 19 of 55

stewards on this planet as “The Scriptures” point out, just advanced and sophisticated animals and our

unalienable rights would be no more than privileges granted by other humans thinking they are the

superiors, as in “rule by the fittest,” that meaning the most evil as pointed out so eloquently by Lord

Acton wherein he stated, “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

XXVII and XXVIII – When “We the People” buy an automobile, truck, van, motorcycle or the like

[hereafter vehicle] we do not receive the “Manufacturers Certificate of Origin” [hereafter MCO]. The one

who has the MCO is the owner of the vehicle. The corporate state, a subsidiary of the federal

corporation, has ordered the dealerships to surrender the MCO’s to it and it issues a “Certificate of Title”

[hereafter CT]. Since the corporate state possesses the MCO it has annexed the vehicle and issues a CT in

order to commandeer ownership of the vehicle so that the corporate state may effectively lease the vehicle

to the human who thought he/she had bought it originally. Thus, the human purchasing the vehicle is not

told that the corporate state has unlawfully commandeered the vehicle and fraudulently and through

treason has stolen the vehicle that the human is paying for and that the corporate state now owns the

vehicle, consequently requiring registration for the human to use or travel in. Hence, through treason,

criminal fraud and racketeering the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association has unlawfully

commandeered the property of the American people in order to overthrow the American people and the

American form of government.

XXIX and XXX - The Fourth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,

“The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable

searches and seizures, shall not be violated…” In violation of the Constitution ibid, the corporation,

known as Internal Revenue and police of the State of: e.g., Colorado, search the American People’s

papers and effects minute by minute in this country. The agents of the false entity known as “Internal

Revenue Service” and police write unlawful summonses against the American People. The “IRS” file

notices of levies and liens without verification of any debt. The corporation known as Internal Revenue is

a private corporation working in conjunction with the Federal Reserve, a private corporation controlled

by the Vatican through the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel. The aforementioned private corporation [Internal

Revenue] is protected under an auspices of authority usurped by another corporation owned by the

Vatican and the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel, which corporation is known as the BAR-Association. Then, the

corporation known as the Internal Revenue has its own tribunal, which it calls the “United States Tax

Court.” In addition, the corporate states rely on the “IRS” and serve the “IRS” anent their “State income

taxes.” The language “United States Tax Court” is false conveyance of language inasmuch as the phrase

“United States” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Tax; the

word-Tax is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Court, there is no such

Page 20 of 55

language; therefore, when properly read it would be “United non-existent Court.” Moreover, it is a

common practice for the merchant federal and State “police officers” to search the American Peoples

person, houses, papers and effects without lawful authorization, and their co-conspirators, the quasijudiciary

British Accredited Registry-Association, support such action against the American People and

the American form of government on an hourly basis in violation of Amendment IV of the Constitution

for the United States of America.

XXXI and XXXII – The corporate United States and the corporate States commit Treason and conspire

to commit treason against the American People and the American form of government through the crime

of malicious prosecution. The facts of treason, conspiracy to commit treason, kidnapping for ransom,

murder, conspiracy to commit murder, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, jury tampering, criminal

fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, mail-fraud, false conveyance of language, grand theft, and so on and

so forth, have been filed and acquiesced to by the Chief Officers of the corporations aforementioned and

this tribunal. The Prosecutorial staff denied not a single fact filed against them articulating these charges;

therefore, the people of the corporate government admit their crimes but claim impunity. Instead of

denying with opposing facts, the prosecutor remains silent and the merchant-judges proceed playing the

role of chief merchant-prosecutor and merchant-judge to continue their ruse and cover-up legitimate

charges filed by the American People against the judiciary and other sub-branches of government. It is

hereby noted that if merchants-judges-Christine A. Carney and C. Edward Stirman, et al. were of proper

moral and judicial character and people of justice they would have ordered a proper grand jury

empanelled for presentment for indictment against the criminal parties. When merchant-VanMeveren and

the merchant-police did not deny and qualify a denial with the “law,” the merchant-judge should have

ordered the immediate arrest of merchant-VanMeveren and the police;” however, they did not.

Furthermore, the judge would have ordered the corporate state to cease and desist its unlawful actions

against the American People. However, nothing has changed; instead the merchant-judges continue their

treason and conspiracy to commit treason in an attempt to usurp jurisdiction using the fictitious entity

known as the “Larimer County Court” as their vehicle. The moment the merchant-judges did not order

the corporations [State of Colorado, County of Larimer, City of Loveland] to cease and desist the actions

against us and the American People, they proclaimed their active participation in the conspiracy against

us, the American People and the American form of government. Furthermore, merchant-Stirman wrote in

his “AMENDED PRE-TRIAL ORDER REGARDING JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR MARCH

10,2004” he wrote in #8, “DEADLINE FOR PLEA AGREEMENTS.” That, “Either the Defendant will

then plead guilty or the District Attorney will dismiss the case.” This evinces that there is no case and

that the corporate states and its officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries are harassing and threatening

me in order to usurp jurisdiction through malicious prosecution over me. Thus, through treason and

Page 21 of 55

conspiracy to commit treason the corporate government engages in malicious prosecution in order to

overthrow the American People and the American form of government.

XXXIII and XXXIV - The Fifth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,

“…nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life,

liberty, or property, without due process of law; not shall private property be taken for public use, without

just compensation.” The corporations of the BAR-Association, the United States, the Federal Reserve,

the Internal Revenue and the States of: e.g., Colorado, seize the American Peoples property, for private

use under the auspices of authority granted under the Constitution for the United States of America, hour

by hour. In reality the corporations, supra have commandeered the courts through Admiralty-jurisdiction

and extirpated the Common Law; thus, the merchant-officers violated our rights and the rights of the

American People as a whole aforementioned written in the Fifth-Amendment to the Constitution for the

United States of America. Americans are deprived of their life, liberty and property without law, much

less due process of law. Furthermore, the American People are compelled to be witnesses against

themselves under the anti-law known as statutes by many organizations claiming to be legitimate

government agencies (e.g., FAA, FCC, IRS, State Highway Patrol, Sheriff, City Police, etc.). These

criminals are given their authority and protection from the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-

Association, the government behind the scenes. Many, if not all, situations aforementioned were/are done

while the corporate agents were/are armed and dangerous. This unlawful practice is conducted hourly by

the corporate security-guards called police, or agents of policing agencies, against the American People

and the American form of government, which witnesses the overthrow of the American government and

the American People. “We the People” are commanded and threatened to give information to the

corporate security-guards under threat of further charges and violence, which corporate security-guards

are protected by the BAR-Association-Attorney’s quasi-judiciary when these cases go before them. Thus,

the corporate de facto government has taken the American public’s properties without just compensation

and forced the American People to be a witness against himself or herself when being charged with antilaw

statutes. The People are deprived of their life, liberty and property and have now become prisoners,

bankrupt [no gold and silver-coins to pay a debt], homeless [eminent domain] and debtors in their own

country.

XXXV and XXXVI - The First-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise

thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to

assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Since the corporate state, by and

through the British Accredited Registry-Association-Attorneys and their corporate security-guards

Page 22 of 55

known as police and agents of policing agencies, declare they own the highways then they can and do

force the American People to get a document entitled “driver’s license.” The language-“driver’s license”

is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the word-driver’s is a possessive noun that has been

converted into an adjective modifying the noun-license; there is no such creature. When properly read

this language would be “non-existent license.”

Furthermore, the “Federal Aviation Administration” (FAA) has commandeered the public

transportation facilities where they require identification in the form of a “driver’s license” from a

corporate state in order for the American People to travel. Not only is the language-“driver’s license” a

felony-false conveyance of language but it also confers upon the person that status of being property of

the corporate government seeking a privilege. If the corporate government chooses not to grant the

permission one could and probably would be restricted from going to the assembly or church of his/her

choice and from congregating with people of his/her faith in order to counter the state’s-religion of

evolution for their children. If the corporate government owns the highway then there would be no

freedom of religion. One would have to satisfy the corporate government in order to be allowed access,

which would grant the corporate government the authority to determine which religions they consider

appropriate. In other words, one could and most likely be restricted to “Internal Revenue Code

501(c)(3)” government corporate churches.

In addition, one could not petition the Government for redress of grievances if one does not

have the right of locomotion and movement inasmuch as one could not, without permission from the

corporate state, get to a location where they could present the petition. Just getting to a place where one

could present his/her petition one would be in jeopardy of arrest and imprisonment for using the “public

highways” without permission. Thus, the corporate state controls the ability of any human to petition by

controlling their access to the thoroughfares. Hence, the corporate state has overthrown the Constitution

for the United States of America in favor of its totalitarian form of government.

XXXVII and XXXVIII - The Sixth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America

states, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an

impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, … and informed of

the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have

compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his

defence [sic].” The Sixth-Amendment ibid, does not have in writing any thing about either an Attorney (a

merchant) or a license. The BAR-Association, serving a foreign nation, instead overthrew the

Constitution for the United States of America’s-Sixth Amendment in order to strip the American People

of Assistance of Counsel, impartial jury, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and

compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, wherein the British Accredited Registry

Page 23 of 55

[BAR]-Association-Attorneys under Admiralty-authority would not have commandeered jurisdiction.

The “Royal Courts” controlled and owned by the BAR-Association have determined that one has to use

an Attorney or appear pro se (as your own Attorney) thus, granting jurisdiction to a merchant-tribunal

where no law or “rights” under law exist.

XXXIX and XL - The corporate United States and state’s-witnesses, the police and other government

agents, are protected from charges of perjury under the unlawful Supreme Tribunal’s-case “Briscoe Et. al.

v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Furthermore, the police and policing agencies have become corporate

security-guards working for the corporate government and no longer for the American People, and have a

vested interest to give false information as testimony. This unlawful protection has grown to encompass

virtually every government officer, agent, broker or intermediary the prosecutor calls to give testimony

against the American Public. Thus, the America’s-People’s-right to face their accuser has been stripped

from them so that the British Accredited Registry-Association and corporate merchant-police can mature

their conspiracy to overthrow the American People and the American form of government.

XLI and XLII – The American People are required to obtain a document called a “Driver’s License”

before they can use their own highway, thus, making the natural person a highway-merchant. As a

merchant, the natural person allegedly falls under the Uniform Commercial Code through commerce and

the corporate government presumes ownership and control of the natural person. Thus, the person is

annexed and unwittingly dragged into commerce wherein the corporate government usurps jurisdiction.

Since the natural person is not informed of this conspiracy and criminal act in order that he/she may make

a choice, and since the corporate government writes, prosecutes and enforces Common Law criminal

sanctions against the people for not complying with this anti-law (statutes), the BAR-Association and

corporate police not only commit the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit treason, an overthrow

of the American form of government and the American People, but also racketeering, criminal fraud,

conspiracy in Bills of Pains and penalties, theft, robbery while armed and dangerous, assault and battery,

false arrest, false imprisonment, and many other crimes against the America’s-People.

XLIII and XLIV – The Banks, operating under the authority of the Federal Reserve, a principal of the

BAR-Association, are given permission to create monies out of thin air. Then interest is charged on the

use of the mere electronic entries, which would present a false debt and expand into a false national debt.

The Federal and state judges and their sibling-merchants in the British Accredited Registry-[BAR]-

Association, along with the other government officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries, support and

encourage this Bank-Fraud against the American People. The Congress is given permission to borrow on

the credit of the United States, whatever the United States is, not on the credit of the American People or

Page 24 of 55

the States of the Union. Thus the Legislature cabal, joined by the Executive sub-branch and, since 1933,

this quasi-Judiciary, succeeded into bankrupting the American People in an attempt to overthrow the

American form of government and the American People. This conspiracy makes debtors of the American

People to a discreet cabal headed by the Vatican, and it’s Guardian of the Vatican’s Treasury: the

Rothschild-Bank-Cartel.

XLV and XLVI – The sub-branches of government known as the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary

[now quasi-judiciary] willfully and knowingly side track the Law and the Rights of the American People

in order to fulfill the agenda of a foreign nation and country, namely the Vatican and “The Crown” a/k/a

“The City” controlled by the “Guardians of the Vatican’s Treasury,” the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel.

Through criminal actions of the Attorneys, America is being taken into a one-world-government where

we will have lost our collective-sovereignty of “We the People” and will become world-subjects under a

political arena and force known for its cruelty and inhumanity, the Vatican. This creature murdered

between fifty and sixty million people in the dark-ages, had concentration-camps in Croatia where the

Serbs were tortured and many murdered heinously because they refused to join the Vatican “church”

before and during “World War II” (see “The Vatican’s Holocaust” written by Avro Manhattan.),

supported for election two of the most evil people in history, those being Hitler and Mussolini and has an

army of Jesuits whose job it is to seize the world for the “mother church.” This is not to say that

Catholics are cognizant of the agenda of the Vatican, nor, for that matter, that many people involved with

groups are necessarily cognizant of the agenda of the hierarchy of their organization or religion; however,

the facts are there and acquiesced to by the Chief Officers addressed herein. With eyes wide open the

British Accredited Registry-Association and its filial creations such as the “FAA,” “FCC,” “IRS,” etc.

are desperately manipulating the American People into a one-world-government so that they will have the

ultimate power and control for their principal. The borders of America are being methodically and

systematically shattered for one-world conquest, “The world will follow after the beast.”

XLVII and XLVIII – The Constitution for the United States of America, Article I, Section 8 [3] states,

“The Congress shall have Power…To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several

States, and with the Indian Tribes;”. The corporate government has misused this authority to seize

absolute power in commerce over the nation. The intent of the founding-fathers was that the several

States would be regulated against tariffs, price-gouging, taxes and other such criminal actions against the

People from other States or within the same State selling their goods or attempting to sell their goods.

This was not intended to regulate the American People by extirpating their rights of locomotion and

movement. By requiring specific identification, that identification being a corporate government

identifying card such as a “Driver’s License” “Pilot’s Certificate” and licensing over watercrafts, the

Page 25 of 55

corporate government has covertly crippled the rights of the American People. The Law, written in 11

Am Jur § 329, 2. Liberty states: “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go where

and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare

of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his

property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be

permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the

pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions,

travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an

orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected,

not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” Though this paragraph is not entirely accurate, inasmuch

as it addresses the noun-citizen and not the proper noun-Citizen as written in the Constitution for the

United States of America thirteen times before the infamous Amendment XIV, it still indicates a natural

right of locomotion and movement by the American People. The Federal Corporation and state-

Corporations are willfully and knowingly confining the American People to the will of the corporate state

by attempting to control the staple right of locomotion and movement, without such right no other rights

exist or can be exercised.

XLIX and L – Through prior information (a questionnaire sent to prospective jurors) the Prosecutors

know the socio-economic level and status of the Grand Jurors and petit jurors they empanel, and with that

information he/she impanels the Grand Jury and petit jurors which would be antagonistic to the people

whose cases are brought before them for consideration. The judiciary relies on the “voter registration,” a

false conveyance of language, in order to comprise their lists. It is understood that the “voter’s

registration” witnesses that the body politic “We the People” lost our right to vote long ago. The

requirement to register-to-vote demonstrates that voting has become a privilege one can only exercise if

he/she seeks permission through a process of registration. Furthermore, in order for a natural person to

register to vote the natural person has to declare themselves a “United States citizen” and a resident of the

state. The word-resident is used to trap the American into a jurisdiction under the corporate state and not

as a free American.

To register means to get a license to vote. License: page 231, English Synonyms, Antonyms

and Prepositions copyright 1896: “A permission or privilege granted by an adequate authority, a

bounded liberty. In the wider sense, license is an ignoring and defiance of all that should restrain, and a

reckless doing of all that individual caprice or passion may choose to do - a base and dangerous

counterfeit of freedom.”

Page 26 of 55

LI and LII – The Prosecutor directs and controls the purported investigation of the facts by the Grand

Jury in order to control the outcome and usurp jurisdiction over the accused. The Prosecutor embraces

the Grand Jury, presents his/her government witnesses and cordons off the Grand Jury so that any

investigation is limited to the alleged facts the Prosecutor and his/her witnesses testify to. As shown

earlier, the prosecutor’s-witnesses are protected from charges of perjury under the unlawful case Briscoe

Et. al. v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Furthermore, the Prosecutor does not inform the Grand Jury

that he/she is acting as a judicial officer; officer of the court, and, therefore, the case would be a judicial

self-initiating case, which is un-Constitutional. In other words, the judiciary, through the Prosecutor,

could indict a hamburger. This is an overthrow of the American form of government and of the American

People.

LIII and LIV – In the case “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AUSTIN GARY COOPER, 89-109-

Cr-Hoeveler the judge and prosecutor declared that we have dual Citizenship, those being “American

Citizen” and “citizen of the United States.” The prosecutor in her final argument to the jury declared that

“He pays Social Security, he uses the Postal Service; therefore, Mr. Cooper is a United States citizen.” I

filed lawful documentation to President-George Bush, to Chief Justice William Rehnquist, to the

Governor and Chief Justice of Colorado, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue proving the specified

contracts to be fraudulent. No one denied the facts enumerated and articulated therein. Further, I proved

that the corporate United States and the corporate States use felony-false conveyances of language to gain

jurisdiction over the American People unlawfully. I was imprisoned for not paying protection monies to

the corporations usurping jurisdiction. Now, this tribunal working for the corporate United States is

attempting to disregard its own declaration in order to usurp jurisdiction where none exist. After the

corporate officers were served and upon the declaration by the officers of sub-status citizenship, that

being “citizen of the United States” being contracts trapping the American Citizens under Admiraltyjurisdiction,

the officers, through their own declarations, proclaimed knowledge of their overthrow and

conspiracy to overthrow the American form of government and the American People.

LV and LVI – Amendment II of the Constitution for the United States of America states, “A well

regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear

arms, shall not be infringed.” The corporate United States, Federal Reserve, BAR-Association, Internal

Revenue and sub-corporations known as the “States of: e.g., Colorado” have written, prosecuted and

enforced statutes, the abrogation of law, restricting and licensing the keeping and bearing of arms. The

corporate security-guards do, however, keep and bear arms, and through their possession of arms do rob

and pillage the American People. The unalienable Right to keep and bear arms was and is intended to

create security and a threat to invasion from within the country or abroad. The four corporations and

Page 27 of 55

numerous sub-corporations have overthrown and conspired to overthrow the American form of

government and the American People by willfully and knowingly and with malice aforethought

prosecuting the American People for exercising their unalienable Rights such as Amendment II, ibid.

LVII and LVIII – The human persons of the corporate state are abducting our children under the guise

of protection and the auspices of statutes, the anti-law, and engaging in the business of selling human

persons for their own gain. The gain the corporate state is receiving is to charge the “taxpayer” for taking

the child and placing the child in a state-institution or under foster care. Then the state charges the parent

for the care, double dipping. The business is augmented by the anti-laws wherein the parent is charged

with child-abuse if he/she/they discipline(s) his/her/their child and child-neglect if he/she/they do(es) not

discipline his/her/their child. The child has been annexed at birth whereat the humans of the corporate

state force a contract known as a birth-certificate under the authority of the corporate state and the

nefarious “Social Security Administration” requiring the child to have a “Social Security Number” with

are both felonies-false conveyances of language in and of themselves. In hearings the judge espouses that

the child is his/hers, thus, witnessing that the child has been annexed. Further, the corporate state

conditions the human People that they have to have a “marriage license” before getting married, and that

a proper marriage under the law is either not recognized or frowned upon. The language-“marriage

license” is defined in “Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition” as, “A license or permission granted by

public authority to persons who intend to intermarry usually addressed to the minister or magistrate who

is to perform the ceremony, or, in general terms, to any one authorized to solemnize marriages. By statute

in most jurisdictions, it is made an essential prerequisite to the lawful solemnization of the marriage.”

The word-intermarry is defined as “see Miscegenation.” The word-miscegenation is defined as, “Mixture

of races; marriage between persons of different races, as between a white person and a Negro.” Liberty

informs us that we have the right to marry. It is an established condition of equity and law that if

someone has to seek a license that the alleged entity granting the “license” presumes the authority and

parent-ownership over the licensed venture or action. Thus, the corporate state assumes ownership over

any human seeking a “marriage license” as a corporate “Parens patriæ” a/k/a corporate “Surrogate

parent,” which standing is used to deprive a human person of liberty and freedom guaranteed under the

law and in the Constitution for the United States of America. This would then perpetuate a belief and

authority that any one seeking a “marriage license” would then grant ownership of the fruits of their

marriage, e.g., their children, to the corporate state; hence, this is treason and a conspiracy to commit

treason against the American People and the America form of government.

LIX and LX – The corporate government forces the introduction of fluoride, a dangerous nerve-poison,

into the water-systems supplying water to hundreds of millions of American People. Fluoride is a severe

Page 28 of 55

nerve-poison, it kills nerve-cells as it proceeds to release to the next cell. Further, the intensely small

negative fluoride-ion coordinates with iron and destroys hemoglobin. There are hundreds of documented

studies proving that fluoride is of great harm to individual health and of no use in dentistry. Fluoride has

a de-scaling action; it removes fungus spot, rust, and every other contaminant that has been collecting for

decades in the pipes. It doubles the rate of corrosion in iron-pipes. The Nuremberg-court, set to try Naziwar-

criminals, executed many of the criminals for experimenting on single or multiple human-subjects

without their permission. The Attorneys and other government officers, agents, brokers and

intermediaries, past and present, along with our chemical industry, have been and are implementing

human-experimentation in the place known as the body-politic called these United States of America

minute by minute. The corporate government strives to, amongst other heinous activities, diminish the

health of the American People so that the one-world-government-regime can more easily overpower the

American People and force same under its tyrannical regime.

LXI and LXII – It has recently come to our attention that another way the corporate tribunals usurp

jurisdiction over the American People is through the Supreme Tribunal-case entitled Davis vs. Elmira

Savings, 161 U.S. 275 (1896), wherein it was declared that banks are instrumentalities of the Congress.

In other words, the interstate system of banks is the private property of the corporate United States acting

as King over the American People in an attempt to overthrow the American People and the American

form of government. The documentation the bank presents to be signed generally has the language, “The

undersigned hereby agrees to abide by all of the Rules of this Bank.” In the banks-rules rules it has

language that contracts a natural person that he/she/they agree to abide by all of the administrative rulings

of the Secretary of the Treasury, among other things, thus, attempting to create a contract between “We

the People” and the banks alleged principal, the corporate United States. The Supreme Tribunal

committed treason and conspired to commit treason in the case herein referenced, inasmuch as the

Congress is a product of “We the People,” just as the Executive and Judicial Branches are. These are subbranches

of government, which is why the natural persons filling the positions of government are called

“public servants.” This means that the banks are only instrumentalities of Congress in relation to the

other two sub-branches of the sub-government, not in relation to the principal [We the People, a

collective sovereignty] of the three sub-branches. Hence, for the Supreme Tribunal to take the

government of “We the People” and nefariously claim that their [We the People] creation [Congress] can

covertly create a sub-creation [banks], which sub-creation could and has bound “We the People” under

the creation [Congress] by contract with the sub-creation [banks] and into the jurisdiction of the

Executive branch under the Secretary of the Treasury is patently treasonous and criminal fraud.

Furthermore, when the corporate state tribunal addressing itself as “Larimer County Court” sent us back

the “bond monies” it was attempting to usurp jurisdiction inasmuch as the state-tribunals are subsidiaries

Page 29 of 55

of the federal tribunals and not “Courts of Law,” but court-martials demonstrative of the federal military

flag and the state-military flag prominently displayed next to the merchant-judges-throne. It is

understood, based upon this new information, that this was a conspiracy to grant jurisdiction to the

tribunal aforementioned by the signing of the cards and/or checks without the reservation of rights, which

the merchant-judge then uses to usurp jurisdiction without disclosure. Therefore, this is not only a

situation of the commission of treason and conspiracy to commit treason, but is also criminal fraud and

conspiracy to commit fraud.

Counts LXIII and LXIV

Count LXIII A, B, C and D. Assault and Battery times 4; Count LXIV A, B, C and D. Criminal

negligence times 4

A. On April 25, 2003 C.E., merchant Chief of Police of Loveland’s-officers pulled me over,

assaulted and battered me, committed criminal negligence against me, kidnapped me for ransom under the

auspices of authority of a “arrest warrant” that was not signed by a judge or magistrate. These facts have

been lawfully filed and no oppositional argument has ever been filed. Furthermore, the officers charged

me with “Failure to Appear” for a hearing for the alleged crime of “speeding.” The officers then charged

me with something known as “DUR” and wrote me another summons disguised as a “traffic ticket” for

“DUR.” I was held for ransom of $300.00. I had, in fact, appeared for the hearings by paper challenging

jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and, in the documentation I had filed referenced the law under 11

American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law. Thus, the merchant-police-officers had no probable cause

for the violence and other criminal actions.

B. On June 1, 2003 C.E. merchant-deputies of the “Larimer County Sheriff’s Office” came to my

property, entered said property and said they had a warrant for my arrest. We, Martha and I, asked to see

the alleged “arrest warrant” and was told, “No.” I was acting in good-faith when talking to the deputies.

The merchant-deputies then proceeded to grab me and twist my arms in an awkward position causing

great pain and held me there while one of the deputies placed handcuffs around my wrists. In spite of the

fact that the deputies had no valid “arrest warrant” I did not resist, therefore, the deputies had no cause for

their sadism in twisting my arms and wrist in an unnatural position causing me great pain in my wrist and

shoulders. After many threats of violence I was taken to the “Larimer County Detention Center” where

more threats were espoused against me. I was “booked” for alleged “Failure to Appear” anent and

unlawful “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “Speeding” and for another “traffic ticket”

issued through the alleged action of “DUR.” I was held for ransom of $1,500.00. I had, in fact, appeared

by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and no oppositional argument was ever filed.

Thus, through “tacit agreement” the Accused concurred that their jurisdiction was unlawful and through

Admiralty, not the Common-Law. In good faith, I had supported my position by informing the Accused

Page 30 of 55

of the Law, to wit: “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law. Thus, the merchant-police-officers

had no probable cause for the violence and other criminal actions.

C. On August 7, 2003 C.E. merchant-deputies of the “Larimer County Sheriff’s Office” came to

my property, entered said property and said they had a warrant for my arrest. Again, like the past, We,

Martha and I, asked to see the alleged “arrest warrant” and was told, “No.” I was acting in good-faith

when talking to the deputies. Merchant-deputy Harrison and I had a discussion and after approximately

ten to fifteen minutes of us, my wife and me, demanding to see the alleged “arrest warrant” he suggested

that if he went and got the signed “arrest warrant” would I go with him peaceably. I said, “Yes.” The

deputies then left the premises. Then approximately one and one/half (1½) hours later they came back in

greater force. Deputy Harrison told us, my wife and me, that they could not find a judge that was awake

to sign the “arrest warrant,” but that he had seen a copy of the signed “arrest warrant,” a contradiction,

and, therefore, was placing me under arrest. Thus, he admitted there was no signed arrest warrant and

then said he saw a copy. History supports that several documents entitled “arrest warrants” have been

enforced upon me and not a single one has been signed. The merchant-deputies then proceeded to grab

me and twist my arms in an awkward position causing great pain and held me there while one of the

deputies placed handcuffs around my wrists. In spite of the fact that the deputies had no valid “arrest

warrant” I did not resist, therefore, the deputies had no cause for their sadism in twisting my arms and

wrist in an unnatural position causing me great pain in my wrist and shoulders. After many threats of

violence I was taken to the “Larimer County Detention Center” where more threats were espoused against

me. I was “booked” for alleged “Failure to Appear” anent an unlawful “traffic ticket” issued through the

alleged action of “Speeding,” and for another “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “DUR,”

and FTA/Civil. I was held for ransom of $2,000.00 with a “PR”-bond for $1,500.00. I had, in fact,

appeared by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and no oppositional argument was

ever filed. Thus, through “tacit agreement” the Accused concurred that their jurisdiction was unlawful

and through Admiralty, not the Common-Law. In good faith, I had supported my position by informing

the Accused of the Law, to wit: “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law. Thus, the merchantpolice-

officers had no probable cause for the violence and other criminal actions. I was held in the

concentration-camp known as the “Larimer County Detention Center” for five days.

It is public record that Martha and I have filed criminal complaints against the Accused and that

considering that there are no courts of law in this Country a “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon

Receipt” [hereafter BOD] was served on the principal officers listed herein. Only after the criminal

charges were filed and the BOD was served upon the Accused did the Accused appear at my home and

complete their dastardly deeds.

D. See accompanying Affidavits.

Page 31 of 55

Counts LXV and LXVIII.

Count LXV. Falsification of legal documents; Count LXVI. Tampering with a witness and victim;

Count LXVII. Criminal trespass; Count LXVIII. Commission of crimes while armed and dangerous.

Through the other Accused, merchant-police-officers did willfully and knowingly assault and

batter me, engaged in criminal negligence, ransacked my vehicle, kidnapped me for ransom, falsely arrest

me and falsely imprison me in violation of the law using as their authority a document they called an

“arrest warrant” which was fatally flawed and substantially defective. Through the other Accused,

merchant-deputies did, on two separate occasions, willfully and knowingly trespass upon my property

while armed and dangerous and assaulted and battered me, assaulted me verbally, and did kidnap me for

ransom using as their authority documents they called “arrest warrants” which was fatally flawed and

substantially defective. The Accused did verbally falsify that the document they referred to as an “arrest

warrant” was in fact a legitimate “arrest warrant;” however, at the time of the assault upon me they

purposefully refused Martha or me a visual inspection of the documentation. We later discovered that

the “arrest warrants” were not issued by a judge or magistrate as required. It is public record that

Martha and I have filed criminal complaints against the Accused and that considering that there are no

courts of law in this Country a “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt” [hereafter BOD] was

served on the principal officers listed herein. Only after the criminal charges were filed and the BOD was

served upon the Accused did the Accused appear at my home and complete their dastardly deeds.

Merchant-officers and deputies did willfully and knowingly and with malice aforethought place

excessive pressure upon my shin while engaging in the crime of kidnapping for ransom. Furthermore,

merchant-deputies did threaten me that he would break my legs if I did not do the impossible by turning

my body to face the front of the cruiser when it is physically impossible for me at 6”8” tall and 300

pounds to do so.

Further, the merchant-deputies did willfully and knowingly threaten me that if I did not

“cooperate” with them by giving them personal information they would place me back in solitary

confinement in the small cold-cell they had locked me in. The merchant-deputies knew that the “arrest

warrant” was not signed and, therefore, not a lawful document. When I asked them if the “arrest warrant”

was signed merchant-Sims and another merchant-officer said “No.” Then the other merchant-officer said,

“It does not have to be signed by a judge, they will sign it over there.” In other words, the merchantofficers

make an arrest on a fatally flawed and substantially defective warrant and then send it to the

judge or magistrate to sign it.

Counts LXIX and LXXI.

Count LXIX. Conspiracy against rights; Count LXX. Unlawful search; Count LXXI. Conspiracy

against rights while armed and dangerous.

Page 32 of 55

The Accused, State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of Larimer, a Corporation; City of

Loveland, a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren; Police-Chief-Tom Wagoner; Clerk-Sherlyn

K. Sampson; Merchants: officer-sergeant-Rabson; Chisum and Mendoza; unknown judges 1-5; unknown

merchant-police-officers 1-5; unknown Prosecuting-Attorneys 1-5; et al., had first-hand-knowledge that I

had appeared, inasmuch as they were served either by process-server or by certified mail the complaint

sent in for filing entitled, “Special-Appearance; and, Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal

Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and, Demand Criminal

Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling

and Member.” Therefore, both parties did willfully and knowingly conspired to commit fraud, assault

and batter me, commit criminal negligence against me, unlawfully search and ransack my automobile, a

truck, and kidnap me for a ransom of $300.00, and did violate my rights by executing a substantially

defective and fatally flawed document entitled “WARRANT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR.” The

Accused committed these crimes while armed with handguns and dangerous. The parties knew or should

have known that the anti-law known as the “Colorado Revised Statutes,” in § “16-1-104. Definitions” it

states, “(18) A "warrant" is a written order issued by a judge of a court of record directed to any

peace officer commanding the arrest of the person named or described in the order.” Moreover, the

language “peace officer” is a false conveyance of language, inasmuch as the word-peace is a noun that

has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-officer, there is no such creature; therefore this

is a false conveyance of language and a felony. When properly read according to English-grammar this

language would be, “non-existent-officer.”

It is public record that Martha and I have filed criminal complaints against the Accused and that

considering that there are no courts of law in this Country a “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon

Receipt” [hereafter BOD] was served on the principal officers listed herein. Only after the criminal

charges were filed and the BOD was served upon the Accused did the Accused appear at my home and

complete their dastardly deeds.

Since the Sheriff is the Chief Peace-Officer in the County, when his agent was served, namely

Police-Chief Tom Wagoner, he was served, inasmuch as “Notice to principal is notice to agent and notice

to agent is notice to principal.” The Accused, Sheriff James A. Alderden, should have arrested the parties

involved, instead he acted in concert and through conspiracy considering that he had already been

charged criminally by both Martha and me and has not refuted the charges.

While I was held by the Accused-Shellhaas and Alderden by and through Alderden’s other

deputies and agents I was searched twice, delving into my pockets under a fatally flawed and substantially

defective “arrest warrant,” which “fatally flawed and substantially defective” “arrest warrant” was

enforced through a treasonous violation of Constitutional Law under 11 AmJur § 329 and other cases

where I have the right of locomotion and movement.

Page 33 of 55

See accompanying affidavits.

Counts LXXII through LXXIV.

Count LXXII. Theft; Count LXXIII. Conspiracy to commit theft; Count LXXIV. Malfeasance of

office by the governing officials.

Physically and through written threats, the Accused did willfully and knowingly conspire to deny

our unalienable Right of locomotion and movement, protection against government assault and battery and

criminal negligence perpetrated by the governmental authorities. Through diligent research we have

unearthed the facts wherein the corporate BAR Association, U.S., STATE, COUNTY, CITY and/or TOWN

enforces its statutes and ordinances, which are abrogation’s of the law, on the American Citizens use of their

own and collective properties; the public highways. Fraudulently we are informed that we have to register

our automobiles and apply for a “driver’s license,” This phraseology is a false conveyance of language,

before we can travel on the highways to exercise our rights. We have grown to understand that through the

infamous BAR Association’s Attorneys at law, that all of our rights have become privileges called civil

rights. Information is withheld that if we do submit to the statutes we give the governing entity permission

to annex our property and lease it back to us in the form of “vehicle registration,” another false conveyance

of language. Evidence of fraud anent the usurpations of our natural-rights has been served upon Governor

Owens and Chief Justice Mullarkey of the corporate State of Colorado and they have acquiesced to the facts

enumerated and articulated therein. Thus, we have irrefutable evidence of treason, conspiracy to commit

treason, criminal fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy against our rights, and deprivation of rights

under color of law, malfeasance of office by the governing officials, criminal trespass and unlawful seizure.

Furthermore, since ignorance of the law is no excuse, the merchants herein were fully aware of their criminal

behavior before and during their actions.

Counts LXXV and LXXVI.

Count LXXV. Willfully and knowingly making false statements and misrepresentations, “Statements

or entries generally” Title 18, U.S.C.A. § 1001; Count LXXVI. Fictitious plaintiff (contempt of court).

The BAR Association, UNITED STATES, STATE, COUNTY, CITY and TOWN have

represented no one as an injured party. It has, however, represented itself as a principal. This tribunal, judge

and prosecutor have represented themselves as a Court-of-Law. The judge and prosecutor are Attorneys at

law. The word Attorney is taken from the words:

Attorn / v. Me. [Origin French. atorner, aturner assign, appoint, f. a-torner turn v.] 1. v.t. Turn; change, transform; deck

out. 2. v.t. Turn over (goods, service, allegiance, etc.) to another; transfer, assign. 3. v.i. Transfer one’s tenancy,

or (arch.) homage or allegiance, to another; formally acknowledge such transfer. Attorn tenant (to) Law

formally transfer one’s tenancy (to), make legal acknowledgment of tenancy (to a new landlord). – Oxford

English Dictionary 1999.

Attorn, v.i. [Latin ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another.

This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation or the estate. – Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

Page 34 of 55

Attornment, n. The act of a feudatory vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of an estate, to

receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service. – Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

Attornment n. the transference of bailor status, tenancy, or (arch.) allegiance, service, etc., to another; formal

acknowledgment of such transfer: lme. – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

Thus, it is clear that an Attorney is one who transfers or assigns, within the BAR, another’s

rights and property, acting on behalf of the ruling crown (“The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London,

England). In other words, when Attorneys call themselves officers of the court, they are correct in that they

are all government agents; however, they serve a foreign government. The American people are deceived

into believing that they are neutral and working on behalf of justice, not serving their BAR Association.

Moreover, in Law (common-law) the accused has the right to face his/her/their accuser to

determine the relationship of responsibility and, if responsibility exist, the extent of injury. There has been

no publication stating precisely who the injured party is in this cause. Hence, under the common-law, UCC

§ 1-103:6 and Colorado CRS 1973 § 4-1-103 (The Code cannot be read to preclude a common-law action.),

we demand publication of the specific name and title of the alleged injured party initiating this cause, and

documentation of the alleged injury suffered by this alleged injured party.

Count LXXVII. Conspiracy in a Bill of Pains and Penalties and criminal fraud.

Clearly, the law supports the Right of natural-persons to locomotion and movement without

interference from government, as long as these people do not injure another's: person, property, or rights.

Even more so, the natural right to venture out on one’s own property, such as the public highways, without

interference from government agents bent on breaking the laws. Amendment V of the Constitution for the

United States of America, securing unalienable rights for the American Citizens, states that “…nor be

deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for

public use, without just compensation.” When the corporate BAR Associations, TOWNS, CITIES,

COUNTIES or STATE unlawfully annexed our property (our automobile) and us, we neither agreed nor did

we receive just compensation. For this tribunal to demand compliance to government statutes anent private

property, in the form of property tax (vehicle registration), etc., our property would have had to be annexed

for government use in the form of leased property. These statutes are then by construction and in practice

“Bills of Pains and Penalties” and, furthermore, this tribunal is an Administrative hearing.

The facts bear out that this Administrative (proprietary) hearing would not have jurisdiction

because it is not a Court-of-Law. Therefore, the colorable law this administrative hearing enforces is a Bill

of Pains and Penalties.

Count LXXVIII. Racketeering

Through a threat of imprisonment and/or fines, the BAR Association, TOWN, CITY, COUNTY

and STATE attempts to force us, specifically Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, and collectively,

Page 35 of 55

the American public, into submission in order to use our collective, personal, and private property. Since we

have the Right to use our collective property and to protection under the law, any interference of these

natural rights is a violation of the law. The corporate government makes a practice of the unlawful actions

demonstrated in this case in order to press upon the people their colorable law written and enforced by BAR

Attorneys to feed their pocketbooks and secure their dominion over the unsuspecting and the innocent. The

BAR Association, and its soldiers, the corporate TOWN, CITY, COUNTY and STATE have embarked on

missions that are both criminal conspiracies to racketeer and active racketeering against “We the People.”

Count LXXIX. Admiralty quasi-judicial merchant tribunal and/or Star Chamber (court) fraudulently

being represented as a Court of Law.

This LARIMER COUNTY court, Larimer, Colorado is proceeding as an Administrative

(proprietary) Admiralty quasi-judicial tribunal and/or Star Chamber hearing. Points of fact:

a. There is no injured party presented to give evidence to determine the extent of injury. Fraudulently,

the CITY, COUNTY and STATE are appearing as an injured party, however, they can not appear, they

are fictions;

b. Merchants: BAR Association, (e.g., judge, prosecutor) TOWN, COUNTY and STATE, et al.,

without evidence, have made conclusions of law that we had either contracted, or made an agreement

with the BAR Association, STATE and/or LARIMER to give up our Rights: 1. governing freedom

from extortion; 2. freedom in enjoyment and use of all of one’s powers, faculties and property; 3. our

right to use property according to owner’s will; 4. to contract or not to contract; 5. to locomotion and

movement; 6. of freedom of religion; 7. to earn a livelihood in any lawful calling; 8. against self

incrimination; 9. to face our accuser; 10. to protection from Bill's of Pains and Penalties;

c. This tribunal displays the Federal military flag. The flag of the union is not displayed in this tribunal,

therefore, Admiralty jurisdiction governs, NOT Law;

d. The BAR Association, TOWN, COUNTY, STATE, and, their officers, employees, elected officials,

and certain agents, brokers and intermediaries have vested interests in this cause, inasmuch as they

collect considerable revenue through fines levied upon the people;

e. The "witness" is protected from charges of perjury under Briscoe Et. al. v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S.

325 (1983). In other words, the unconstitutional Supreme Tribunal of the UNITED STATES has

opened the door for government agents to lie at their leisure and will, in order to unlawfully imprison,

fine or otherwise punish the American Citizens; and,

f. Alleged jurisdiction was/is usurped over us through fraud perpetrated by the BAR Association,

TOWN, COUNTY and STATE obstructing our Unalienable/Substantive Rights.

Counts LXXX through LXXXIV.

Count LXXX. Treason, Count LXXXI. Conspiracy to commit fraud; Count LXXXII. Criminal

Fraud; Count LXXXIII. Conflict of interest; Count LXXXIV. Collusion.

This tribunal is a self-initiating business entity servicing its esoteric soldiers, to wit:

Page 36 of 55

a. Attorneys at law are considered by statute and the judiciary to be "officers of the court." Both

the Judge and Prosecutor are Attorneys at law. The Prosecutor initiated this proceeding. The Prosecutors

are suppose to be executive-officers, but as evidence supports, are in fact judicial officers.

Moreover, agents of the BAR Association (judges, prosecutors, tribunal, Plaintiffs, STATE, and

LARIMER) conspire to force the accused to appear with an Attorney or Pro se (as one's own attorney). As

an Attorney (officer of the court), one would unwittingly be declaring a status of statute merchant [UCC §

2-104(1); Colorado CRS 1973 § 4-1-201], and jurisdiction is thereby granted in an action between

merchants [UCC § 2-104(3)]. Thus, one's unalienable Rights are seriously compromised.

b. Attorneys at law are statute "merchants," as defined in the Federal and STATE corporate

business codes [code means secret], supra. They hold membership and swear allegiance to corporate

business entities known as BAR Associations (e.g., American BAR Association) while representing that

they are working on behalf of the American public (fraud; conflict of interest). Disclosure of these facts is

not published for the general public (treason).

Counts LXXXV through LXXXVII.

Count LXXXV. Conspiracy to commit fraud; Count LXXXVI. Criminal Fraud; Count LXXXVII.

Bills of: Attainder; Pains and Penalties

The law (common-law), supra, secures our referenced unalienable Rights. Your tribunals,

represented as “Courts of Law,” only service statutes, ordinances, regulations, etc. Statutes are not law,

UCC § 1-103:6, Colorado CRS 1973 § 4-1-103, but "A statute should be construed in harmony with the

common-law unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the common-law." An abrogation of the

law would mean that the statutes are written and enforced out-side of the law by outlaws. Statutes do not

secure unalienable Rights, but create civil rights/remedies. Civil rights/remedies are merely a condition of

politics and are at best whimsical, abstruse, ambiguous and abstract. Further, there are over 3 million-

(3,000,000) Statute and law-books in the Library of Congress and well-over 60 million-(60,000,000) statutes

written therein.

Moreover, statutes are written by the BAR Association and are both ambiguous and abstruse in

construction. To attempt an understanding of this colorable law, one has to employ one of the BAR

Association’s officers of the court (Attorneys at law). The judicial prerequisites for Attorneys at law on the

Federal level and in most States are: to earn a baccalaureate degree from an approved university; take and

pass an entrance exam to an approved law school; pass the scrutiny of the admissions officer; attend and

graduate from the approved law school; take and pass the BAR Association exam proffered and graded by

law professionals; join the BAR Association (a private corporation); and, serve an informal internship.

Mind you, after all that, most Attorneys lose more than half their cases. Thus, the "experts" do not

understand the statutes. Yet the responsibility and punishment doled out by the judiciary burdens solely

Page 37 of 55

the natural person and res of the public. Therefore, if it takes such education to attempt an understanding

of the statutes, then it is reasonable that neither the average American Citizen nor corporate U.S. citizens

could comprehend such ambiguities and complexities. These facts support that in most cases, as applied

to the American public, statutes, and their filial relations, are Bills of: Attainder; and Pains and penalties

supported by fraud (constructive and actual); menace; duress; and undue influence.

Logically, neither “American Citizens” nor “citizens of the United States” are informed as to the

“Nature and cause of the accusations;” a prerequisite under Amendment VI, Constitution for the United

States of America. These facts bear that even the majority of the officers of the court do not understand

these colorable laws, yet hourly, many Americans and U.S. citizens are murdered, assaulted, imprisoned,

fined, and have their property seized/ impounded/stolen through enforcement of this colorable law

(statutes). Furthermore, the land of the free and home of the brave now has the largest prison, probation

and parole population in the world.

Count LXXXVIII. The STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF LARIMER, CITY OF FORT

COLLINS, CITY OF LOVELAND being represented as the Plaintiff.

As a collective sovereignty the body politic (American Citizens) known as the Colorado-State,

exercising its jurisdiction as a member of the Republic of the several States, enjoys immunity from

prosecution. The State of Colorado, as its name implies, is a corporation called STATE within the Colorado-

State and found in the geographical area known as Colorado. To our knowledge, other than beguiled

through fraud and undue influence, we have engaged in NO contracts or agreements with the corporations

known as the BAR Association or its franchisee’s (State of Colorado, County of Larimer, City of Fort

Collins, City of Loveland, etc.) relinquishing our natural Rights.

Moreover, as the officers of the court know, it is a published fact that to move in the name of a

fiction is a contempt of court. The BAR Association, STATE, COUNTY and CITY are fictitious plaintiffs.

Therefore, in a Court-of-Law, the moving party (BAR Association), through its agents the Prosecutor and

judge, and its co-conspirators (e.g., State of Colorado, County of Larimer) initiating this case would be

charged with contempt of court.

Count LXXXIX. Criminal impersonation of peace-officer.

To reiterate, the U.S., STATE, COUNTY and CITY police officers have become glorified

corporate security-guards impersonating peace-officers. Once we had a proper government of “We the

People;” however, when the corporate governments took over and voluntarily became sub-status

subsidiary corporations under the Federal corporation through bankruptcy, their function as government

was lost. The aforementioned became corporate businesses devouring (annexing) property and people,

leaving in their wake subjects and denizens bound by corporate tyranny. These corporations nefariously

embraced the Uniform Commercial Code and codified it into their own contractual tyranny based

Page 38 of 55

totalitarian governments usurping power and authority over the American people. The corporate interest

was then proliferated and the natural Rights of the people were extirpated. These conspiracies evinced

the birth of the corporate “law enforcement officer,” or corporate security-guard. The corporations supra

did not inform the American people that they had fraudulently usurped authority and that the American

people had lost their police powers under the individual and several Constitutions; and, that the new job

of the corporate security-guards was to process people and feed the socialistic behemoth totalitarian

government through colorable law a/k/a statutes. Law enforcement officers do not enforce law but

enforce colorable law, which in turn leaves the American people with no police-power to offset the

tyranny of the corporate government, the BAR Association and the corporate security-guards, and to

protect the interest, person and res of the body politic “We the People.”

Count XC and Count XCII.

Count XC. Criminal Impersonation of a Judicial Officer; Count XCI. Criminal Conspiracy to

impersonate a judicial officer; Count XCII. Conspiracy against rights Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 241.

Merchant-officers-Chisum, Mendoza and Rabson and merchant-deputies-Shellhaas, Anderson,

Harrison and many others did willfully and knowingly each impersonate a judicial officer by representing

that an “arrest warrant” had been lawfully issued; however, since a judge or magistrate had not signed the

“arrest warrant” merchants-Chisum, Mendoza, Rabson, Shellhaas, Anderson, Harrison and many others, by

and through their principals did represent that they then were judicial officers and qualified to create and

execute an “arrest warrant.” Only a judge or magistrate can issue an “arrest warrant,” and merchants-

Chisum, Mendoza, Rabson, Shellhaas, Anderson, Harrison and many others, if they were a “peace-officers,”

would be under the Executive branch of government. However, since they are not “peace-officers,” but “law

enforcement officers” one questions precisely what position merchants- Chisum, Mendoza, Rabson,

Shellhaas, Anderson, Harrison and many others play in the corporate government.

Merchant-deputies-Sims and Cory Huff did willfully and knowingly threaten me ordering me to

give personal information based on a fatally flawed and substantially defective arrest warrant, knowing that

the “arrest warrant” was not signed and, therefore, not enforceable.

In addition, the Prosecutor and the judiciary have conspired with merchants- Chisum, Mendoza,

Rabson, Shellhaas, Anderson, Harrison and many others, inasmuch as the foregoing have supported the

mega-myriad “Statute Enforcement Officers” in their obvious disguise on the highway with is a violation of

Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 241, Conspiracy against rights.

Count XCIII. Racketeering through false conveyance of language.

The corporation known as the State of Colorado operates under the “Uniform Commercial Code §

10-103,” wherein it states that any act or part of an act inconsistent with this act is hereby repealed. Thus,

Page 39 of 55

the rights of the American people have been repealed. This language opened the door for the corporate

State, County and City to write statutes replete with false conveyances of language in order to over throw the

American form of government. The statutes referenced by the defective warrant are 42-4-1101(1) and 42-2-

101(1). These statutes are replete with false language and are thus felonious under the law and the anti-law

known as “Title 18 United States Code § 1001, Statements or entries generally.” For clarification see the

Addendum referenced supra.

Through willful and knowing deception the British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association and

Rothschild Bank-Cartel [hereafter Bank-Cartel] United States totalitarian government has usurped all

rights and powers over the American people through felonious false conveyance of language, herein

listing but a few:

Adjective~Noun Adjective~Noun Adjective~Noun

Driver’s License Sales Tax District Attorney

Marriage License Income Tax Police Officer

Business License Vehicle Registration Court Clerk

Occupational License Building Permit Case Number

Property Tax Attorney General County Sheriff

Adjective~Adjective~Noun

Social Security Number District Court Judge Larimer County Court

Municipal Court Judge Circuit Court Judge Colorado Driver License

As the professionals, the legislative, executive and judicial branch-people, well know, these phrases begin

with a noun and end with a noun in their proper sense. However, when placed together the first noun

modifies the second noun, which thereby converts the first noun into an adjective. Thus, Driver,

Marriage, Business, Occupational, Property, Sales, Income, Vehicle, Building, Attorney, District, Police,

Court, Case and County have all been relegated to the role of adjective used to modify the nouns:

License, Tax, Registration, Permit, General, Attorney, Officer, Clerk, Number and Sheriff, respectively.

Additionally, the language Social, Municipal, District, Circuit, Larimer and Colorado become adjectives

inasmuch as they modify the nouns Security, Court, County and Driver; and, Security, Court, County and

Driver become adjectives inasmuch as they modify the nouns Number, Judge, Court and License,

respectively.

The corporate government has placed one out of every thirty Americans in prison, on probation or

parole. Large sums of funds are taken in hourly through these false conveyances of language to the

destruction of the American people and the feed the socialistic behemoth totalitarian government created

through these usurpations of power and authority perpetrated by the BAR and its cohorts. While calling top

officials of the STATE, the COUNTY, the CITY and the TOWN we have supported that the officials do not

know their own statutes and ordinances, yet they imprison, place on probation or parole, steal the monies or

murder the American people minute-by-minute.

Page 40 of 55

Counts XCIV and XCV.

Count XCIV. Obstruction of justice; Count XCV. Denial of due process of law.

We have filed facts of treason, conspiracy to commit treason, assault and battery, criminal

negligence, falsification of legal documents, criminal fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, false arrest, the

commission of crimes while armed and dangerous, armed robbery, theft by armed robbery, conspiracy in

enforcing Bills of Pains and penalties, collusion, criminal impersonation of a peace-officer, criminal

impersonation of a judicial officer, racketeering, racketeering through false conveyance of language, and

other crimes perpetrated against us and demanded the impaneling of a proper grand jury against the Accused

listed in the documents we filed listed supra. However, no action is taken with the exception that we are

tampered with to attempt to terrify us into not proceeding against the nefarious entities perpetrating these

crimes. The judiciary and executive department’s-officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries are attempting

every thing in their power to obstruct justice for their own evil gain.

Counts XCVI and C.

Count XCVI. Obstruction of justice; Count XCVII. Tampering with a witness, victim; Count XCVIII.

Conspiracy against rights; Count XCIX. Assault and battery; Count C. Criminal negligence.

I, Martha E. Cooper, along with Austin filed criminal charges against the Accused for shooting us

with radar, lidar and laser and we have proven the crimes of assault and battery, criminal negligence,

conspiracy against our rights, treason, conspiracy to commit treason, conspiracy in a Bill of Pains and

penalties, criminal fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, obstruction of justice, armed robbery, and other crimes

against us. No one has disputed the facts enumerated or articulated therein. However, two times the County

merchant-police have kidnapped for ransom my husband without a properly issued “arrest warrant.” The

facts bear that the County and State ‘storm-troopers’ are attempting to frighten us into submission of their

tyranny.

Count CI. Tampering with a witness, victim.

The unknown merchant-deputy with the blond-Marine-Corps-haircut threatened me that if I do not

appear at the “court” that my wife Martha would be arrested because she signed the bond-papers.

Counts CII, CIV and CVI False arrest, Counts CIII, CV and CVII false imprisonment.

CII and CIII – On April 25, 2003 C.E., merchant Chief of Police of Loveland’s-officers pulled me over,

assaulted and battered me, committed criminal negligence against me, kidnapped me for ransom under the

auspices of authority of a “arrest warrant” that was not signed by a judge or magistrate. Furthermore, the

officers charged me with “Failure to Appear” for a hearing for the alleged crime of “speeding.” The

Page 41 of 55

officers then charged me with something known as “DUR.” I was held for ransom of $300.00. I had, in

fact, appeared for the hearings by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and, in the

documentation I had filed referenced the law under “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law,”

page 1135, “§ 329 2. Liberty,” which states, “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion –

to go where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary

for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to

transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege

which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life,

liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal

conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting

himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will

be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.”

CIV and CV – On June 1, 2003 C.E. merchant-deputies of the “Larimer County Sheriff’s Office” came to

my property, entered said property and said they had a warrant for my arrest. We, Martha and I, asked to

see the alleged “arrest warrant” and was told, “No.” I was acting in good-faith when talking to the

deputies. The merchant-deputies then proceeded to grab me and twist my arms in an awkward position

causing great pain and held me there while one of the deputies placed handcuffs around my wrists. In

spite of the fact that the deputies had no valid “arrest warrant” I did not resist, therefore, the deputies had

no cause for their sadism in twisting my arms and wrist in an unnatural position causing me great pain in

my wrist and shoulders. After many threats of violence I was taken to the “Larimer County Detention

Center” where more threats were espoused against me. I was “booked” for alleged “Failure to Appear”

anent and unlawful “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “Speeding” and for another

“traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “DUR.” I was held for ransom of $1,500.00. I had, in

fact, appeared by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and no oppositional argument

was ever filed. Thus, through “tacit agreement” the Accused concurred that their jurisdiction was

unlawful and through Admiralty, not the Common-Law. In good faith, I had supported my position by

informing the Accused of the Law, to wit: “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law,” page 1135,

“§ 329 2. Liberty,” which states, “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go

where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the

welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his

property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be

permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the

pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions,

travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an

Page 42 of 55

orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected,

not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” Thus, the Accused had no probable cause for their willful

and knowing criminal acts perpetrated against me and us.

CVI and CVII – On August 7, 2003 C.E. merchant-deputies of the “Larimer County Sheriff’s Office”

came to my property, entered said property and said they had a warrant for my arrest. Again, like the

past, We, Martha and I, asked to see the alleged “arrest warrant” and was told, “No.” I was acting in

good-faith when talking to the deputies. Merchant-deputy Harrison and I had a discussion and after

approximately ten to fifteen minutes of us, my wife and me, demanding to see the alleged “arrest warrant”

he suggested that if he went and got the signed “arrest warrant” would I go with him peaceably. I said,

“Yes.” The deputies then left the premises. Then approximately one and one/half (1½) hours later they

came back in greater force. Deputy Harrison told us, my wife and me, that they could not find a judge

that was awake to sign the “arrest warrant,” but that he had seen a copy of the signed “arrest warrant,” a

contradiction, and, therefore, was placing me under arrest. Thus, he admitted there was no signed arrest

warrant and then said he saw a copy. History supports that several documents entitled “arrest warrants”

have been enforced upon me and not a single one has been signed. The merchant-deputies then

proceeded to grab me and twist my arms in an awkward position causing great pain and held me there

while one of the deputies placed handcuffs around my wrists. In spite of the fact that the deputies had no

valid “arrest warrant” I did not resist, therefore, the deputies had no cause for their sadism in twisting my

arms and wrist in an unnatural position causing me great pain in my wrist and shoulders. After many

threats of violence I was taken to the “Larimer County Detention Center” where more threats were

espoused against me. I was “booked” for alleged “Failure to Appear” anent an unlawful “traffic ticket”

issued through the alleged action of “Speeding,” and for another “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged

action of “DUR,” and FTA/Civil. I was held for ransom of $2,000.00 with a “PR”-bond for $1,500.00. I

had, in fact, appeared by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and no oppositional

argument was ever filed. Thus, through “tacit agreement” the Accused concurred that their jurisdiction

was unlawful and through Admiralty, not the Common-Law. In good faith, I had supported my position

by informing the Accused of the Law, to wit: “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law,” page

1135, “§ 329 2. Liberty,” which states, “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to

go where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for

the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport

his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may

be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the

pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions,

travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an

Page 43 of 55

orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected,

not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” I was held in the concentration-camp known as the

“Larimer County Detention Center” for five days. Thus, the Accused had no probable cause for their

willful and knowing criminal acts perpetrated against me and us.

Count CVIII. Theft of ransomed monies.

The Accused did, willfully and knowingly, take ransom monies from me, to wit: 1. $300.00, 2.

$1,500.00 and 3. $2,000.00 and have held onto the ransomed monies in spite of the fact that under

Constitution Law as stated in 11 AmJur § 329 I have the right to travel in my automobile on the public

highways.

For the crimes committed against us, in addition to a demand for criminal prosecution, we hereby serve

this “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt” on the parties listed as the Interested Parties infra, listed

numbers 1 through 27, to be paid jointly or severally, forthwith:

Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt

Itemized Bill

(1st notice)

Item

Cost

Jointly and

severally

Interest at

1.5 % /

Month

after first

month Sub-total Total

Treason

$100,000.00

per count

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00 x

31 =

$3,100,000.00 $3,100,000.00

Conspiracy to

commit treason

$100,000.00

per count

No Interest

Applied

$100,000.00 x

31 =

$3,100,000.00 $3,100,000.00

Assault and Battery

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

3 =

$30,000.00 $30,000.00

Extortion

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

3 =

$30,000.00 $30,000.00

Criminal negligence

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

3 =

$30,000.00 $30,000.00

Falsification of

documents

$10,000.00 per

warrant

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

3 =

$30,000.00 $30,000.00

Criminal trespass

while armed and

dangerous

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

2 =

$20,000.00 $20,000.00

Page 44 of 55

Commission of

crimes while armed

and dangerous

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

16 =

$160,000.00 $160,000.00

Obstruction of justice

$20,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$20,000.00 x

8 =

$160,000.00 $160,000.00

Criminal fraud

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

6 =

$60,000.00 $60,000.00

Conspiracy to

commit fraud

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

6 =

$60,000.00 $60,000.00

Racketeering

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Racketeering

through false

conveyance of

language $10,000.00

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Witness and victim

tampering

$20,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$20,000.00 x

10 =

$200,000.00 $200,000.00

Willful and

knowingly making

false statement or

entries

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

8 =

$80,000.00 $80,000.00

Fictitious Plaintiff

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Conspiracy to

commit fraud

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

7 =

$20,000.00 $140,000.00

Kidnapping for

ransom

$50,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$50,000.00 x

3 =

$150,000.00 $150,000.00

Conspiracy against

our rights

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

14 =

$140,000.00 $140,000.00

Criminal

impersonation of a

peace-officer

$10,000.00 per

person

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

29 =

$290,000.00 $290,000.00

Criminal

impersonation of a

judicial officer $10,000.00

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

15 =

$150,000.00 $150,000.00

Unlawful search $10,000.00

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Enforcement of a

Bill of Pains and

penalties $10,000.00

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

8 =

$80,000.00 $80,000.00

Conspiracy in a Bill

of Pains and $10,000.00

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

8 = $80,000.00

Page 45 of 55

penalties $80,000.00

Theft of ransomed

monies

$300.00 +

$1,500.00 +

$2,000.00

No Interest

Applied at

this time $3,800.00 $3,800.00

Wear and Tear on

Automobile

As of this date

= 350.00

No Interest

Applied $350.00 $350.00

Photocopying

2,326 pages @ .25 /

pg

As of this date

= $581.50

No Interest

Applied $581.50 $581.50

Gasoline for

Automobile

As of this date

= $500.00

No Interest

Applied $500.00 $500.00

Research Material

Anderson on UCC

Black’s Law

Dictionary

$687.00

$120.00

No Interest

Applied

$687.00

$120.00

$687.00

$120.00

SUB-TOTAL - - - $8,136,038.50

Addendum -

Kidnapping

$50,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $50,000.00 $50,000.00

Addendum - Assault

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Addendum – Witness

and victim tampering

$20,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$20,000.00 x

1 count $20,000.00

Addendum –

Criminal negligence

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Addendum – Cruel

and unusual

punishment

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Addendum –

Obstruction of justice

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Addendum –

Conspiracy against

our rights

$10,000.00 per

count per

person

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

6 =

$60,000.00 $60,000.00

Addendum –

Criminal trespass

while armed and

dangerous

$10,000.00 per

count per

merchantdeputy

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

2 =

$20,000.00 $20,000.00

Addendum –

Commission of

crimes while armed

and dangerous

$10,000.00 per

count per

merchantdeputy

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

2 =

$20,000.00 $20,000.00

Additional Wear and

Tear on Automobile

As of this date

= 50.00

No Interest

Applied $50.00 $50.00

Additional

Photocopying

1,015 pages @ .25 /

pg

As of this date

= $253.75

No Interest

Applied $253.75 $253.75

Additional Gasoline As of this date No Interest $40.00 $40.00

Page 46 of 55

for Automobile = $40.00 Applied

SUB-TOTAL - - - $8,346,382.25

Second Addendum –

Kidnapping

$50,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $50,000.00 $50,000.00

Second Addendum –

Assault

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Second Addendum –

Witness and victim

tampering

$20,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied

$20,000.00 x

1 count $20,000.00

Second Addendum –

Cruel and unusual

punishment

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Second Addendum –

Obstruction of justice

$10,000.00 per

count

No Interest

Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00

Second Addendum –

Conspiracy against

our rights

$10,000.00 per

count per

person

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

3 =

$30,000.00 $30,000.00

Second Addendum –

Commission of

crimes while armed

and dangerous

$10,000.00 per

count per

merchantofficer

No Interest

Applied

$10,000.00 x

5 =

$50,000.00 $50,000.00

Second Additional

Wear and Tear on

Automobile 50.00

No Interest

Applied $50.00 $50.00

Additional

Photocopying

3,610 pages @ .25 /

pg

As of this date

= $902.50

No Interest

Applied $902.50 $902.50

Additional Gasoline

for Automobile

As of this date

= $40.00

No Interest

Applied $40.00 $40.00

SUB-TOTAL - - - $8,527,374.75

Punitive Damage $1,000,000.00

No Interest

Applied

$1,000,000.00

$1,000,000.00

Addendum –

Punitive Damage

As of this date

=

$1,000,000.00

No Interest

Applied

$1,000,000.00

$1,000,000.00

Second Addendum –

Punitive Damage

As of this date

=

$1,000,000.00

No Interest

Applied

$1,000,000.00

$1,000,000.00

TOTAL - - - $11,527,374.75

Monthly Late Fee

1.5% Interest

As of this date

=0

No Interest

Applied 0 0

GRAND TOTAL - - - $11,527,374.75

To Avoid Collection Enforcement Actions, You Must Immediately:

Pay $11,527,374.75 within 30 days.

Page 47 of 55

This money is to be paid in the money of account, gold or silver-coin; however, if the Accused

does not have the money of account the debt can be paid in promissory notes [e.g., Federal

Reserve-Notes], by check or money-order, and it is understood that we “receive” said

payment “without prejudice.”

Return this bill with your certified check or money-order.

If You Do Not Respond To This Bill:

Enforcement-actions will be taken against you for the total amount due and owing, plus penalty

and/or interest due.

A lien can be filed against you. This would affect your credit-rating. This lien could be placed

against your real property and be a matter of public record.

All future Bills will be sent by regular mail.

Be Advised:

Interest and other incurred costs shall be added to future billings.

Interest shall be added to the balance due until full payment is received.

The interest will be charged at 1.5% per month until full payment is received.

Thanks for your immediate attention regarding this matter.

______________________________ _______________________________

Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper

In Summary

It is an axiom of law and American justice that a natural person is innocent until proven guilty. In

a Court-of-Law, we would not have to prove that we were not exceeding our natural and unalienable rights;

the burden of proof would be upon the Plaintiff. Moreover, in a Court-of-Law, the complainant and his/its

cohorts would be liable for their criminal actions if frivolous and fraudulent.

When an overzealous corporation and its officers arbitrarily decide to deny all the Substantive

Rights fought and died for in our great Republic, such tyranny must be disciplined. We suggest that by

statutory construction and complacency, a conditioned reflexology has manifested the observation of our

fellow human beings as corporate chattel and not free-living human beings. Thus, the corporate government

finds itself consumed in a web that demands the property and Rights of the people as a tribute for its

leadership. History recognizes that, with noble conviction, the law community assumed a role to champion

the Rights of the people, but in the process, Unalienable Rights were lost to contractual (civil/statute) rights

granted by man. Hence, instead of profound Rights from the Heavenly Father-Yahuah, secured by

Amendments 1-10 of the Constitution for the United States of America, we now have arbitrary rights from

man. Instead of a Constitutional "Republic1," protecting the Rights of each human being, we now have a

1 Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution for the United States, "The United States shall guarantee to Every State

in the Union a Republican Form of government."

Page 48 of 55

creditor (Federal Reserve) democracy promulgating "the good of our (international bankers) majority outweighs

the good of humanity."

This beloved country called America now has the largest prison, probation, and parole population

in the world. Since the BAR Association took over our government, and their avalanche of anti-law-statutes

swept over our liberty and justice, burying it under the well over 60,000,000 statutes, the once great patriotic

and noble collective sovereignty known as “We the People” has now become a nation of slaves. The BAR

Association’s International Criminal Court is the crescendo to the take-over of the world by the Banking-

Cartel into a one-world-government; and completes the final extirpation of the Rights, Liberty and Freedom

“We the People” once held sacrosanct.

Please remember, however noble the gestures, personal bias and prejudice still cloud human

judgment.

Wherefore,

a. We do not grant jurisdiction of our natural person and/or res to this tribunal or the corporate

entities known as the “BAR-Association,” the “County of Larimer,” the “State of Colorado,” the “City of

Loveland,” nor the “City of Fort Collins.”

b. We demand that the Accused pay compensatory damage for the crimes committed against

me, Austin Gary Cooper, and me, Martha E. Cooper, of Eight-million five hundred twenty seventhousand-

three hundred seventy four-dollars and seventy five cents ($8,527,374.75), jointly or severally,

in the money of account, see Article I, Section 10 in the Constitution for the United States of America,

which, if not tendered in the money of account, that being gold or silver-coin, but paid in “Federal

Reserve Notes” or bank-draft, will be received by us without prejudice.

c. We demand that the Accused pay punitive damage for the crimes committed against us,

Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, of Three-million-dollars ($3,000,000.00) jointly or severally,

in the money of account, see Article I, Section 10 in the Constitution for the United States of America,

which, if not tendered in the money of account, that being gold or silver-coin, but paid in “Federal

Reserve Notes” or bank-draft, will be received by us without prejudice.

d. If this tribunal causes us further injury, this “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance, and

Formal and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a

Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British

Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment

Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by

the Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal

fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains

and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false

Page 49 of 55

conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five

counts, False imprisonment times five counts, Assault and Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for

ransom times five counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false

representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and

Fraud by deception” shall serve as evidence that all have been forewarned and, therefore, have assumed the

posture of accessories after the fact. Further, that willfully and knowingly this tribunal and judges have

conspired with the Plaintiff to injure me.

e. We demand our Right to appear before a grand jury to present this evidence enumerated

and articulated herein against the Accused. It should be understood that thus far we have been denied the

information needed to address a grand jury on this issue.

Additionally, notwithstanding the treason, the BAR Association’s officers of the court secretly

impanel grand juries and plead their causes for indictment. Such embracery is published as felonies in the

Federal statutes (see Title 18 United States Code Annotated § 1503 [Tampering with a juror generally] and

§ 1504 [Tampering with a juror by writing]), yet your officers of the court are not prosecuted (selective

prosecution, racketeering, conspiracy). Further, there is nothing published stating that an American Citizen

or U.S. citizen cannot appear personally, without interference or accompaniment by the BAR Association’s

officer of the court, before a grand jury, but information regarding this course of action is unavailable to the

general public.

f. This “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and

Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand

Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR]

Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all

of the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason and

conspiracy to commit treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit

fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy

against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony

false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five counts, False imprisonment

times five counts, Assault and Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for ransom times five counts, simple

Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as

Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception, “Account number”:

03T201008 and 03T200131, and other numbers randomly or with purpose included in this action, and

numerous alleged “arrest warrants.”

_________________________________ __________________________________

Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper

Page 50 of 55

Affirmation

I, Austin Gary Cooper, and I, Martha E. Cooper, do hereby affirm that the foregoing “Second

Addendum To: Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with

Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against

Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and

Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. We

hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit treason each

times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the

American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud,

Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language,

Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five counts, False imprisonment times five counts, Assault and

Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for ransom times five counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal

Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts,

Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception” is true, accurate and correct to the best

of our knowledge, information and belief.

_________________________________ __________________________________

Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper

Colorado-State :

: ss/asv

Larimer-County :

Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of February 2004 C.E.

My Commission Expires: _____________________________________

Notary-Public

Seal

Certificate of Service and Interested Parties

We Hereby Certify that the foregoing “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance, and Formal

and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a

Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British

Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment

Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by

the Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal

Page 51 of 55

fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains

and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false

conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five

counts, False imprisonment times five counts, Assault and Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for

ransom times five counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false

representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and

Fraud by deception” was presented to a process server for service to the following and certified mail, return

receipt requested where designated, to be filed into the account-number supra, on this the ____ day of

February, 2004 C.E., to:

1. Merchant Sherlyn K. Sampson, Clerk

Larimer County Justice Center

c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2431 5146.

2. Bill Owens

Governor of the State of Colorado

c/o 136 State Capitol

Denver, CO 80203-1792 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8140.

3. Merchant-Judge Mary Mullarkey

Chief Justice of the Supreme Tribunal/court of the State of Colorado

c/o 435 Judicial Building

Denver, CO 80203 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8157.

4. Merchant-Judge Christine A. Carney

Larimer County (Loveland)

c/o 810 East 10th Street, Suite 110

Loveland, CO 80537-4942 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8164.

5. Merchant-Judge James H. Hiatt

Larimer County Justice Center

c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8171.

6. Merchant-Judge Terence A. Gilmore

Larimer County Justice Center

c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8188.

7. Merchant-Judge Dave Williams

Larimer County Justice Center

c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8195.

Page 52 of 55

8. Merchant-Judge Daniel J. Kaup

Larimer County Justice Center

c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8201.

9. Merchant-Judge Jolene C. Blair

Larimer County Justice Center

c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8218.

10. Merchant-Judge Peter E. Schoon, Jr.

Larimer County Justice Center

c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8225.

11. Merchant-Judge Ronald I. Schultz

Larimer County Justice Center

c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8232.

12. Merchant-Judge C. Edward Stirman

Larimer County Justice Center

c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8249.

13. Merchant-District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren

201 La Porte Avenue #200

Fort Collins, CO 80521-2763 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8256.

14. Merchant-Sheriff Alderden

c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive

Fort Collins, CO 80525 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8263.

15. Merchant-Police Chief-Tom Wagoner

c/o 810 E. 10th Street

Loveland, Colorado 80537 Cert.-mail-number 7002 0510 0001 8675 1108.

16. Merchant-Police Chief-Dennis V. Harrison

c/o 300 LaPorte Avenue

Fort Collins, CO 80521 Cert.-mail-number 7002 0510 0001 8675 1115.

17. Merchant-Deputy Sanderson

c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive

Fort Collins, CO 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden.

18. Merchant-Deputy Harrison

c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive

Fort Collins, CO 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden.

Page 53 of 55

19. Merchant-Sergeant Rabson

c/o 810 E. 10th Street

Loveland, Colorado 80537 Served through his principle, merchant-Wagoner.

20. Merchant-Officer Chisum

c/o 810 E. 10th Street

Loveland, Colorado 80537 Served through his principle, merchant- Wagoner.

21. Merchant-Officer Albert Mendoza

c/o 810 E. 10th Street

Loveland, Colorado 80537 Served through his principle, merchant- Wagoner.

22. Merchant-Corporal-Shellhaas

c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive

Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden.

23. Merchant-Deputy Anderson

c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive

Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden.

24. Merchant-Deputy Sims, badge-# 0138

c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive

Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden.

25. Merchant-Deputy Cory Huff

c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive

Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden.

26. Merchant-Officer Hofkamp

c/o 810 E. 10th Street

Loveland, Colorado 80537 Served through his principle, merchant-Wagoner.

27. Merchant-Officer Jeff O’Brien

c/o 300 LaPorte Avenue

Fort Collins, CO 80521 Served through his principle, merchant- Harrison.

________________________________ __________________________________

Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper