![]() |
|||
|
|
Welcome to Call to Decision
|
|
|
Constitutional Rights Explained PUBLIC NOTICE Austin Gary and Martha Cooper of “Cooper and Cooper-Law-Firm” “The Ten- Foundation” and Bob Reed, Heather Wolffe and Karla Anderson have filed individually and privately with the “The Colorado-State; In the Court of the County known as Larimer” documentation entitled “Affidavit of Citizens-Arrest, and DEMAND Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs merchant-Judge C. Edward Stirman and merchant-D.A. Fields, et al, and said other accused, but not limited to all involved with cases “Account- No’s 03T201008 and 03T200131.” Mr. Cooper hereby has 9 “Court”-sealed Subpoena’s which were lawfully served and was maliciously (30A AmJur) quashed by merchant-Stirman, along with not allowing Mr.Cooper’s witnesses to state their testimony and was repeatedly threatened if he followed through with his right to have “Compulsory Process” which was repeatedly denied him, an American Citizen. Charges: Thirty-one counts of treason and thirty-one counts of conspiracy to commit treason. All the accused have not refuted the aforementioned charges, nor objected to nor denied the charges. Charges forthwith are: Fraud by witness tampering times twenty-six (26) counts; Fraud by jury tampering times forty-five (45) counts; Fraud by evidence tampering times twenty-nine (29) counts. Monday, March 8 th, 2004 Sheriff , Jim Alderden, in the Coloradoan-Newspaper stated“…The judiciary at all levels has been corrupted, usurping power from the people and their representatives, making laws through judicial activism instead of interpreting laws based on the original intent of the Founding Fathers. This amendment isn’t about homosexuals. It’s about reining in out-of-step and out-of-control judges who have hijacked our representative form of government.” In the hearing dated 3-10-04, merchant-Stirman stated, “I do not have jurisdiction over you Mr. Cooper, but I have come to the conclusion that the ‘Court’ does.” In the above statement, merchant-Stirman committed FRAUD, abridging Cooper’s freedom and usurped a power of a “building”, and not his “title” being under the First- Branch of Government which IS: “We the People” the American Citizen-rights of “domicile”. Justice has been obstructed repeatedly. 30A AmJur § 77, pg. 46 states: “A judge acting without jurisdiction is but an individual falsely assuming an authority hedoes not possess.” Glazar v Hubbard. Stirman also changed the “charge” minutes before the (makeshift) “jury” deliberation, of which Mr. Cooper was denied his right to object, by repeatedly being “overruled”. 30A AmJur§ 80, pg 50, states: [Titled:]“Effect of Negligence or Motive; Bad Faith, Malice, or Corruption.” Stirman also stated: “Colorado does not have Constitutional Law.” Treason: Black’s Law 5 th Edition states: pg. 1345 “The offense of attempting by overt acts to over throughthe government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance; (Takes Oath.) or of betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power.” Adherence to the enemy, and rendering him aid and comfort…A person can be convicted of treason on the testimony of two Witnesses, or Confession in open Court.Art. III, \Sec 3, U.S. Constitution.” We have seven who has served Stirman with Treason. We have demanded a proper grand jury. www.tenfoundation.com . Please call with any information: 936-443-8163 or936-443-8775 Page 1 of 40 Austin Gary and Martha E. Cooper And Taking Back America, a Pure-Trust Without prejudice c/o 295 E. 29 th Street, Suite 240Loveland, Colorado [80538] *The Plaintiff’s-case is filed in the* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (a false conveyance of language)FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO *The Material Witnesses and Victim’s-case is filed* In The Court of the District of the United States For the District in Colorado UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a ) Civil Action-No. 03-B-1127(PAC) Corporation; ) ) Third Addendum and Amendment To:Plaintiff ) Special Appearance;) v. ) Third) Civil Complaint for damages; and FormalAUSTIN GARY COOPER, individually ) and Constructive Notice; and,and as founder of Taking Back America; ) MARTHA E. COOPER, individually and ) Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, andas founder of Taking Back America; ) an Information in a Criminal Case; and DemandTAKING BACK AMERICA, an ) Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Nonunincorporatedorganization. ) British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association) Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill forAustin Gary Cooper, a natural person; ) the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt againstMartha E. Cooper, a natural person; ) the AccusedTaking Back America, a Pure-Trust ) ) We hereby charge and support the crimes by theMaterial witnesses and victims. ) Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy) to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminalv. ) fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy) to prosecute the American people through BillsThe UNITED STATES, a Corporation; ) of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights,The Internal Revenue-Service, a ) Mail-fraud, Racketeering, RacketeeringCorporation; George W. Bush, President of ) through false conveyance of language, FelonyThe Corporate UNITED STATES; Chief ) false conveyance of language, ContinualJustice-William Rehnquist; Attorney’s ) Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing falseGeneral-John Ashcroft; the Congress of the ) representation of Article I Tribunals asUnited States, a Corporation; The British ) Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud byAccredited Registry [BAR] Association ) deception, Witness tampering, ObstructionA Corporation, and its Attorney- ) of justice.membership; merchant-judge Lewis T. ) Babcock; merchant-judge William M. ) Further, we hereby charge the Accused withHoeveler; the Commissioner of Internal ) additional charges of felony false conveyancesRevenue; merchant-Martin Shoemaker; ) of language, see Exhibit-L, witness tampering,Merchant-Dennis Montgomery; the Federal ) and additional charges of ObstructionPage 2 of 40 Reserve, a Corporation; Norbel Credit ) of Justice.Union, its C.E.O. and Chris Crisman, Vice ) President in the Loveland-Branch; et al. ) ) Accused. ) For the Record :Comes Now Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, Sui Juris, Appearing both Specially, Not Generally Or Voluntarily, both In propria persona (our natural person), and for Taking Back America, aPure-Trust disputing and challenging both personal and subject-matter-jurisdiction of this tribunal, and filing this “Third Addendum and Amendment To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages; andFormal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with additional charges of felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-P, witness tampering, and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice.” We termed this a corporate-case inasmuch as from the appearance of the parties it would appear that a conglomerate of corporations have filed against us, those being 1) the corporation known as the Federal Reserve, 2) the corporation known as the British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association, 3) the corporation known as the UNITED STATES, and 4) the corporation known as Internal Revenue. To date neither merchant-Shoemaker nor Babcock nor any other federal merchant has proven either personal or subject-matter-jurisdiction over the Trust in which we are Trustee’s or us. In support, we state the following: This document is a Third Addendum and Amendment to the filed and proven thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason by the federal, now, “quasijudiciary” and its merchant-judges, i.e., Lewis T. Babcock, William M. Hoeveler, and the other Accused. It is understood that Lewis T. Babcock, in accordance with English-grammar, a “United States District Court Judge,” properly read as “United non-existent, non-existent, non-existent-Judge” admits he can receive up to $25,000.00 [Twenty-five-Thousand] from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to protect the interests of the corporation known as “Internal Revenue” declares that he, after charged with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason, has ordered the serving upon us of an Page 3 of 40 unintelligible document entitled “ ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” knowing said order is replete with falseconveyance of language in order to criminally usurp jurisdiction over us in an Admiralty-tribunal. Merchant-Babcock did, willfully and knowingly, and with malevolence aforethought sign an alleged “injunction” through a “United States’ Motion,” properly read as “United non-existent-Motion” filed by a “Trial Attorney,” properly read as “non-existent-Attorney” working for a “Tax Division,” properly read as “non-existent-Division” of the “United States Department of Justice,” properly read as “United non-existent- Department of Justice” against us in favor of the Commissioner. Furthermore, this “United non-existent, non-existent, non-existent-Judge” uses the format of “UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO,” a false conveyance of language, as his vehicle of authority. In addition, merchant-judge Lewis T. Babcock sent an “Order” allegedly dismissing crimes against him. We, on the other hand, filed numerous criminal charges, none of which have been refuted, in the proper format, to wit: “The Court of the District of the United States for the District in Colorado.” Merchant-judge Babcock prefers to use the false conveyance of language in order to attempt to criminally usurp jurisdiction in a nonexistent entity to continue his treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Ten plus American Citizens served and filed into the “Court of the District of the United States for the District in Colorado” an “Affidavit of Facts” charging the Accused with up to thirty-one (31) counts of treason and up to thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. Each natural person had served the President and Chief Justice of the corporation known as “United States,” the Governor and Chief Justice of their respective States, the Commissioner of the corporation known as “Internal Revenue,” and the Board of Directors of the corporation known as the “Federal Reserve” documentation proving treason, conspiracy to commit treason, criminal fraud and many other crimes committed against the American People and the American form of government. The Constitution for the United States of America only requires that two People come forward as witnesses to the crimes of treason. The Accused, specifically the merchant-Clerk and merchant-Babcock, have attempted to obstruct justice and tamper with witnesses against them by misinforming the American Citizens that they do not have standing to file charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason, capital crimes, against the elitism-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Associationmerchant- judges in America. The merchant-Clerk and Babcock having been officially charged cannot dismiss the charges; they have already acquiesced to the charges. It would appear that the Accused is attempting to establish a defense of being intellectually challenged by filing and serving all of the documents having such gross English-grammar contents. Numerous times I have pointed out the grammatical errors and inconsistencies, however, the Accused insist on writing unintelligible language in unintelligible documents. Thus, the Accused is either attempting to establish a defense of being intellectually challenged or is engaged in a grand, blatant conspiracy as charged, Page 4 of 40 to overthrow the American form of government and the American People through false language, treason, pirating of the America’s-properties under Admiralty-jurisdiction and racketeering. Furthermore, On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker and merchant-John W. Suthers, filed several unintelligible documents having the titles “UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO HOLD DEFENDANTS IN CONTEMPT,” “UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR SHOW CAUSE ORDER,” “THIRD DECLARATION OF MARTIN M. SHOEMAKER,” “MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES’ MOTIONS FOR SHOW CAUSE ORDER AND TO HOLD DEFENDANTS IN CONTEMPT,” proposed “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE” and “CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE,” which combined has one hundred-seventy five- (175) felony false conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of law, and one hundred and fifty- (150) patently fraudulent statements, see Exhibit-L. The merchant Accused, “merchants-Babcock, Shoemaker, Suthers and the others,” were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is attempting to obstruct justice and witness tampering. Based on the foregoing facts, we, Austin Gary Cooper, Martha E. Cooper and The Ten- Foundation have placed a “Public Notice – Legal Notice” in both the Denver Post Newspaper and the Reporter – Herald-Newspaper on December 26, 27 and 28, 2003 C.E., stating, “Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper of “Cooper and Cooper-Law-Firm” and “The Ten-Foundation” have filed with the “Court of the District of the United States for the District in Colorado” documentation entitled “Third Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused …” along with Addendum and Second Addendum, charging the corporate United States and the corporate Internal Revenue and its officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries, including, but not limited to, the merchant-judges of the aforementioned District with thirty counts of treason and thirty counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The case-number is “Civil Action No. 03-B-1127 (PAC).” Given ample time to refute the aforementioned charges, the merchant-judge nor the merchant-trial-attorney have neither objected to nor denied the charges nor the Bill of Particulars incorporated within the charges. A few of the charges may be printed (downloaded) and perused at www.tenfoundation.com under the title“Treason Info.” We have demanded a proper grand jury to investigate the charges but have had justice obstructed repeatedly. Page 5 of 40 If anyone has any information regarding the aforementioned case please notify us in writing sent to: The Ten-Foundation, without prejudice c/o 295 E. 29 th Street, Suite 240, Loveland, Colorado[80538],” see Exhibits-M and N. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT For every criminal count we hereby adopt and incorporate the following paragraphsletters- A through I as if fully set forth at length: Due to the conservation of our natural resources I shall not include the filed documentation as Exhibits inasmuch as they have all been served to the tribunal and to the interested parties, or the interested parties are active conspirators, thereby already aware of their crimes. A. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Special Appearance; Civil Complaint for damages; andFormal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason, Conspiracy to commit Treason, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False imprisonment, Assault and Battery, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Jury-Tampering on both the grand and petit-juries, Bank fraud, Stalking, Fraud by deception, and willfully and knowingly exposing me when naked to visitors when held in the federal concentration-camp,” previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length. B. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Special Appearance; Second Civil Complaint for damages;and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason, Conspiracy to commit Treason, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False imprisonment, Assault and Battery, Simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Jury-Tampering on both the grand and petit-juries, Bank fraud, Stalking, Fraud by deception, and willfully and knowingly exposing me Page 6 of 40 when naked to visitors when held in the federal concentration-camp,” previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length. C. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages;and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 27 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 27 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice” [hereafter Third Complaint] previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length. D. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Addendum To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaintfor damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 27 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 27 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with additional charges of felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-I, witness tampering and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice” previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length. E. We hereby adopt and incorporate the “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance; Third CivilComplaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 27 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 27 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false Page 7 of 40 representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with three- (3) additional charges of treason, three- (3) additional charges of conspiracy to commit treason, felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibits-J through O, witness tampering and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice.” previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length. F. We hereby adopt and incorporate Exhibits-A through H of the Third Complaint previously filedinto this case as if fully set forth at length. G. We hereby adopt and incorporate Exhibit-I of the Addendum to the Third Complaint previouslyfiled into this case as if fully set forth at length. H. We hereby adopt and incorporate Exhibits-J and K of the Second Addendum to the ThirdComplaint previously filed into this case as if fully set forth at length. I. We hereby adopt and incorporate Exhibits-L through M attached hereto as if fully set forth atlength. Counts I through LX. Treason -Counts I, III, V, VII, IX, XI, XIII, XV, XVII, XIX, XXI, XXIII, XXV, XXVII, XXIX, XXXI, XXXIII, XXXV, XXXVII, XXXIX, XLI, XLIII, XLV, XLVII, XLIX, LI, LIII, LV, LVII, LIX and LXI. Conspiracy to commit Treason - Counts II, IV, VI, VIII, X, XII, XIV, XVI, XVIII, XX, XXII, XXIV, XXVI, XXVIII, XXX, XXXII, XXXIV, XXXVI, XXXVIII, XL, XLII, XLIV, XLVI, XLVIII, L, LII, LIV, LVI, LVIII, LX and LXII. I and II - As written in my filed documents to the corporate chief officers, the tribunals display theFederal military flag as its jurisdiction. Under “Title 4 U.S.C.S. Lawyers Edition, § 1 INTERPRETIVE NOTES AND DECISIONS “Placing of fringe on national flag...within discretion of President as Commander-In-Chief of Army and Navy. (1925) 34 Op Atty Gen 483.” In addition, “Pursuant to U.S.C. Chapter 1, 2, and 3; Executive Order No. 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE, bordered on three sides. The President of the United states designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Armed forces.” Moreover, the Congress willfully and knowingly overstepped its power, to wit: in 1845 Congress passed an act saying Admiraltylaw could come on land. The bill may be traced in Cong. Globe, 28th Cong., 2d. Sess. 43, 320, 328, 337, 345(1844-45), no opposition to the Act is reported. Congress held a committee on this subject in 1850 and they said: “The committee also alluded to ‘the great force’ of ‘the great constitutional question as to the power of Congress to extend maritime jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption of the Constitution....’” - H.R. Rep. No. 72 31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850).” Thus, this tribunal is an Administrative court-martial and the British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association-Attorneys haveoverthrown the American people and the American form of government by extirpating the civil authority Page 8 of 40 and removing the Judiciary in favor of their military quasi-judiciary [Something that appears to be a proper judiciary but is not.]. III and IV - The judges are members and swear allegiance to a private corporation known as the BritishAccredited Registry [BAR]-Association. The BAR-Association is owned by the Templar BAR, whichTemplar BAR is located and owned by “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” is owned by the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel and the Rothschild-family. Further, the Rothschild’s are known to have the position of “Guardian of the Vatican’s-Treasury,” thus, the Rothschild-family represents the interests of the Vatican. Hence, the judge is a foreign agent conspiring with other merchant-Attorney-judges commandeering the judiciary of the United States of America and the Colorado-State to overthrow the American people and the American form of government. Furthermore, The word-Attorney is taken from the words: Attorn / v. Me. [Origin French. atorner, aturner assign, appoint, f. a-torner turn v.] 1. v.t. Turn; change,transform; deck out. 2. v.t. Turn over (goods, service, allegiance, etc.) to another; transfer, assign. 3. v.i. Transfer one’s tenancy, or (arch.) homage or allegiance, to another; formally acknowledge such transfer. Attorn tenant (to) Law formally transfer one’s tenancy (to), make legal acknowledgment of tenancy (to a new landlord). – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.Attorn , v.i. [Latin ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lordto another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation or the estate. – Webster’s 1828 Dictionary .Attornment , n. The act of a feudatory vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of anestate, to receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service. – Webster’s1828 Dictionary .Attornment n. the transference of bailor status, tenancy, or (arch.) allegiance, service, etc., to another;formal acknowledgment of such transfer: lme. – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.Thus, it is clear that an Attorney is one who transfers or assigns, within the BAR, another’s rights andproperty, acting on behalf of the ruling crown (“The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England; in other words this countries de facto government). In other words, when Attorneys call themselves officersof the court, they are correct in that they are all government agents; however, they serve a foreign government. The American people are deceived into believing that they [the BAR] are neutral and working on behalf of justice, not serving their British Accredited Registry -Association.Moreover, The “IRS” is not a United States-Government-Agency, it is an Agency of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE “U.S.D.C.D.I.,” Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391. The language “International Monetary Fund” is defined as, “Agency of the United Nations established to Page 9 of 40 stabilize international exchange and promote balanced international trade,” Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 733. V and VI – The federal and State-tribunals use felony false conveyances of language as its vehicles ofjurisdiction over the American People. The British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association-Attorneyshave dubbed this tribunal the “United States District Court.” The phrase-“United States” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-District; the word-District is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Court, there is no such place; therefore, this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. Properly read according to English-grammar, this language would be, “United non-existent Court.” Thus, in order to perform their dastardly deeds, the BARAssociation has created non-existent Courts to pillage and plunder the wealth and rights of the American people and to overthrow the American form of government. In addition, the statutes are written in false conveyances of language in order to usurp jurisdiction over the American People and trap the American People under a language that does not exist. This falsification of language opens a Pandora’s-Box against the American People with the BritishAccredited Registry [BAR]-Association and its principal, the Vatican and Rothschild-Bank-Cartel, as atotalitarian government, rather like a sophisticated and contemporary Spanish-Inquisition. A false language, where justice has no stronghold, where charges have no meaning according to the language; thus, the corporate government assumes the authority to plunder and pillage the American People. Through corruption and false language “We the People” are charged with the anti-law called statutes and commanded to answer to the charges; however, it is difficult to answer when one does not understand the question. Hence, the BAR-Association, through its opinions, have exercised the “Humpty-Dumpty” methodology of control, wherein they have ruled the people under the now quasi-judiciary with the dictates that “everything means exactly and precisely what I [the BAR-Attorneys] say it means at the time.” VII and VIII - The judge has everyone “rise” when proceeding to his/her thrown. History recognizesthat the judge would carry in the Bible with him and that the people would rise in reverence to the word of the Heavenly Father-Yahuah, not the judge. Further, the Bible would render the hearing one under the common law, said Bible containing the Law burned into stone by the Heavenly Father, wherein the unalienable rights of the accused would naturally be protected. It was not known at the time that the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association was covertly planning and implementing its take over ofthe American form of government. However, when the judge stopped carrying in the Bible the hearing became a “Royal court” inasmuch as the judge is dubbed “Esquire,” an English title just under nobility meaning “shield-bearer.” Now, the “common law”-Court of Law has been overthrown in favor of the Page 10 of 40 British Accredited Registry- Association’s-sovereignty known as “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” inLondon, England and proceeding under the “Royal court” of “The Crown.” Thus, through this treason and conspiracy to commit treason the American people have become subjects in their own country and their own land. IX and X - The Attorneys of the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association have willfully andknowingly sold out their country to serve “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. Then, they have, with treason in mind and deed, removed the Flag of the Republic in favor of their Admiralty-flag to remove the “Courts of Law” and replace them with “Military tribunals” under an Admiralty-flag and a foreign government. The corporate government through the BAR-Association then created a sub-status citizenship found in the questionably ratified Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America and written as “citizen of the United States.” Further, they then quote cases stating their jurisdiction is based on the American People being “United States citizens.” The phrase “United States” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-citizen, there is no such creature; therefore this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. When properly read, this phrase would be “non-existent citizen.” Through this sub-status and/or non-existent citizenship the “BAR” and its corporate government made the American Citizens property of the corporate state and assumed a dictatorial position over the people and the American form of government. XI and XII - Under their feudal-system, the BAR-Association has annexed the property and naturalpersons of the American People through the reprehensible language known as “eminent domain.” In addition, the following treasonous statement by the Senate, written in 1933 witnesses the coup against the American form of government and the American People, to wit: “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the state; individual so-called `ownership' is only by virtue of government, i.e., law, amounting to a mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” - Senate Document No. 43, “Contracts payable in Gold.” With this principal of feudal, nazi, fascist, communist, dictatorship, totalitarian and other such governments the ruling elite control the people through the threat that the corporate government can, and often times do, take the properties of the People if they question or resist the tyranny. Thus, through this concept the Accused can maintain control over any who would speak out against their tyranny. XIII and XIV - With this principal of “eminent domain” well established in systems of governmentknown as feudal, nazi, fascist, communist, dictatorship, totalitarian and other such governments the ruling elite control the people through the concept that if the people own nothing they have nothing to bargain with and, therefore, have no legitimate position of voting-rights to elect a proper lawful government. Page 11 of 40 Thus, the alleged right to vote becomes a privilege requiring an act of registration. Hence, the people are no more than subjects presenting their wishes and granting the existing de facto government permission by accepting and performing according to the privileges they, the American people, have been granted by the now de facto government. Further, when the corporate government grants someone the privilege to vote by exercising a control of registration, the corporate government becomes the parent-corporation, which means that the human-person seeking permission becomes the child and through an unbeknownst “tacit agreement” loses his/her rights and then agrees through implied-contract to be bound by the corporation and/or foreign government, not by law. In addition, if one attempts to counter the tyranny of the now de facto government he/she would be threatened with the loss of his/her property, or the corporate government would simply take the humans property in order to frighten others into submissionfor fear of losing their properties. Thus, the Accused through the BAR-Association has perpetrated treason and conspired to commit treason through their deliberate actions aforementioned. XV and XVI - The Seventh-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states, “InSuits at common-law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trail by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common-law.” There is no place where a “jury trial” is authorized in the Constitution, ibid. In the language “jury trial,” the word-jury is an adjective modifying the noun-trial. Jury as an adjective means “makeshift.” Thus, “jury trial,” means a “makeshift trial.” The sinister BAR-Association-Attorneys have overthrown the American form of government and the American People by covertly replacing a lawful “trial by jury” in favor of the dictatorial “makeshift trial” in order for them to systematically destroy the liberties of the American people through “Bills of Pains and penalties” and make subjects of the American people. XVII and XVIII – The present day quasi-Judiciary places on the jury-pools of the grand and petit juries,agents working for the corporate government in order to tamper with the jury. The American People when tried whether civilly or criminally do not get a jury of their peers. The corporate government stacks the juries with “postal workers,” agents of the corporation known as “Internal Revenue,” police officers, people receiving welfare-payments and, therefore, sensitive to the corporate demands. Hence, through treason and conspiracy to commit treason the Accused tampers with the juries in order to overthrow the American form of government and the American People. XIX and XX – Statutes are an abrogation of the American “common-law,” see Uniform CommercialCode § 1-103:6. The Unalienable Rights of the American People come from the Law. Since statutes abrogate the law, they then, in turn, extirpate the rights of the American People. The British AccreditedPage 12 of 40 Registry [BAR]-Association-Attorneys do not allow law in “their” tribunals which they call courtroomsand, thus, have commandeered the Article III Courts of the Constitution for the United States of America in favor of their Admiralty-tribunals. Furthermore, all federal tribunals are Administrative tribunals, Article I Section 8 [9], “To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;” under Admiraltyjurisdiction. Congress through unconstitutional means extended maritime-jurisdiction onto the land in order to overthrow the Constitution for the United States of America, “The committee also alluded to ‘the great force’ of ‘the great constitutional question as to the power of Congress to extend maritime jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption of the Constitution....’” - H.R. Rep. No. 72 31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850).” The judges, prosecutors and defense Attorneys know this but keep it a secret in order to assume absolute power and control over the American People for their [BAR-Attorneys] evil gain. Thus, the Accused has willfully and knowingly overthrown the American form of government and the American People. XXI and XXII - Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America states, “NoState shall …make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts…” The merchant- Attorneys and other government officials send out documents demanding $, which is a symbol that indicates, “no-silver,” from the American People. The now defunct S with two slightly separated parallelvertical- lines at or near the center of the S means, “silver-bar.” I, on the other hand, file(d) for the money of account and wrote/write, “I require the payment to be in the money of account; however, if the Accused does not have the money of account, then payment may be made in Federal Reserve-Notes; however, such payment will be ‘received without prejudice.’” Thus, a reservation of rights and the “Doctrine of Estopple” is exercised inasmuch as “Federal Reserve Notes” are promissory notes and not payment; and few, if any, have gold and silver-Coin in order to pay a debt. Furthermore, the language “Federal Reserve Notes” not hyphenated is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the phrase “Federal Reserve” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Notes; according to English-grammar there is no such creature. When properly read, the language “Federal Reserve Notes” would be, “Federal non-existent Notes.” However, “receiving” the notes “without prejudice” converts the notes into money. Through treason and conspiracy, the Congress of the United States removed our proper money, thereby conspiring to place each and every human person under the regulations of bankruptcy and covertly seize their properties. Now monies and human persons acting for the corporate State that accept these notes accept the debt attached to them; however, by receiving them I do not agree to the unlawful obligation attached thereto. Since the corporate government uses the symbol-$ and the Constitution for the United States of America commands that only gold or silver-Coin is tender in payment of debts to the States, any “payment” demanded in the form of taxation, fines, etc. using the symbol-$ to the corporate government could be made in wooden-nickels or grains of sand, etc. Page 13 of 40 Hence, the corporate United States or State enforcing any “payment” for any alleged debt or debt in fact in other than the money of account for its coffers, as it were, is an act of treason and an overthrow of the American form of government and of the American people. The body-politic “We the People” can, on the other hand, receive “Federal Reserve Notes” or Federal Reserve-Notes “without prejudice” and protect our rights by so doing. The government controlled schools, however, do not teach the people to protect their rights but instead forcibly teach them to surrender their rights to the de facto government presently in control. XXIII and XXIV - In order to rob the America people of their “Courts of Law” the British AccreditedRegistry [BAR]-Association established a bogus “license” to practice law. This action monopolizes thebranch of government known as the judiciary and creates a quasi-judiciary taking its place. Through this bogus licensing the BAR-Association regulates and controls any one who would enter its domain granting it absolute despotism over the system of government it conspires to overtake. Moreover, since the Attorneys say they are licensed, then they admit that they are merchants, Uniform Commercial Code § 2- 104(1). This position witnesses a monopoly inasmuch as the BAR-Association enforces that one has to be licensed through its merchant-Attorney-Association in order to “practice law,” however, the truth be known, they [the BAR-Attorneys] do not function or operate within the law, only the anti-law known as statutes. The statistics support the tyranny of the BAR-Association-Attorneys in that one-out-of-everythirty Americans are in prison, on probation or on parole presently in this country and many more have their monies and properties stolen from them by the infamous British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association-Attorneys in the role of judges, prosecutors and defense-attorneys. This action places the weasels in charge of the hen-house, as it were, and is patently treasonous in a land of “free-enterprise” and liberty and justice for all. This “license to practice law” is nothing more than membership in the private corporation known as the BAR-Association and its principal “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. The Preamble and the first Ten Amendments sandwich in the three sub-branches of government supporting that “We the People” are the collective sovereignty and the government, the proper government that is, are public servants, not public masters. XXV and XXVI - The corporate State and corporate state have its own religion and, through treason isforcing its religion upon the children of America. The corporate state teaches the children evolution; that humans evolved from apes, and so on and so forth. There has never been evidence proving such nonsense, however, the corporate state demands that the children in their impressionable years go to the corporate government-schools and influences them unduly anent this bunk. Since the evolutionhypothesis has never been proven, which makes the hypothesis questionable at best, and, therefore, is based on a science of conjecture and belief, it is a religion. Moreover, when presented the question of Page 14 of 40 “Where then did our eyes come from(?),” the evolution worshipers are at a loss for words. The corporate state then bastardized Amendment I of the Constitution for the United States of America wherein it states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; …” to abolish the free exercise of religion in favor of their, the corporate, state-religion. The purpose for this deception is to place humans in the category of the animals and, thereby, extirpate the unalienable rights through the corporate hypothesis that if we came from one-celled animals we are no different than any animal, with the exception that we are simply more advanced. Thus, we would not be stewards on this planet as “The Scriptures” point out, just advanced and sophisticated animals and our unalienable rights would be no more than privileges granted by other humans thinking they are the superiors, as in “rule by the fittest,” that meaning the most evil as pointed out so eloquently by Lord Acton wherein he stated, “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.”XXVII and XXVIII – When “We the People” buy an automobile, truck, van, motorcycle or the like[hereafter vehicle] we do not receive the “Manufacturers Certificate of Origin” [hereafter MCO]. The one who has the MCO is the owner of the vehicle. The corporate state, a subsidiary of the federal corporation, has ordered the dealerships to surrender the MCO’s to it and it issues a “Certificate of Title” [hereafter CT]. Since the corporate state possesses the MCO it has annexed the vehicle and issues a CT in order to commandeer ownership of the vehicle so that the corporate state may effectively lease the vehicle to the human who thought he/she had bought it originally. Thus, the human purchasing the vehicle is not told that the corporate state has unlawfully commandeered the vehicle and fraudulently and through treason has stolen the vehicle that the human is paying for and that the corporate state now owns the vehicle, consequently requiring registration for the human to use or travel in. Hence, through treason, criminal fraud and racketeering the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association has unlawfullycommandeered the property of the American people in order to overthrow the American people and the American form of government. XXIX and XXX - The Fourth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,“The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…” In violation of the Constitution ibid, the corporation, known as Internal Revenue and police of the State of: e.g., Colorado, search the American People’s papers and effects minute by minute in this country. The agents of the false entity known as “Internal Revenue Service” and police write unlawful summonses against the American People. The “IRS” file notices of levies and liens without verification of any debt. The corporation known as Internal Revenue is a private corporation working in conjunction with the Federal Reserve, a private corporation controlled by the Vatican through the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel. The aforementioned private corporation [Internal Page 15 of 40 Revenue] is protected under an auspices of authority usurped by another corporation owned by the Vatican and the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel, which corporation is known as the BAR-Association. Then, the corporation known as the Internal Revenue has its own tribunal, which it calls the “United States Tax Court.” In addition, the corporate states rely on the “IRS” and serve the “IRS” anent their “State income taxes.” The language “United States Tax Court” is false conveyance of language inasmuch as the phrase “United States” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Tax; the word-Tax is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Court, there is no such language; therefore, when properly read it would be “United non-existent Court.” Moreover, it is a common practice for the merchant federal and State “police officers” to search the American Peoples person, houses, papers and effects without lawful authorization, and their co-conspirators, the quasijudiciary British Accredited Registry- Association, support such action against the American People andthe American form of government on an hourly basis in violation of Amendment IV of the Constitution for the United States of America. XXXI and XXXII – The corporate United States and the corporate States commit Treason and conspireto commit treason against the American People and the American form of government through the crime of malicious prosecution. The facts of treason, conspiracy to commit treason, kidnapping for ransom, murder, conspiracy to commit murder, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, jury tampering, criminal fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, mail-fraud, false conveyance of language, grand theft, and so on and so forth, have been filed and acquiesced to by the Chief Officers of the corporations aforementioned and this tribunal. The Prosecutorial staff denied not a single fact filed against them articulating these charges; therefore, the people of the corporate government admit their crimes but claim impunity. Instead of denying with opposing facts, the prosecutor pleaded with his coconspirator, merchant-judge Lewis T. Babcock, to order dismissed the legitimate complaint under a rule, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(f), created and written by the British Accredited Registry Association to cover-up legitimate charges filed by the American People against the judiciary and other sub-branches of government. It is hereby noted that if merchant-judge Lewis T. Babcock was of proper moral and judicial character and a man of justice he would have ordered a proper grand jury empanelled for presentment for indictment against the corporations in question and the officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries of the said corporations. When merchant-Shoemaker and the merchant “United States Attorney” did not deny and qualify a denial with the law, the merchant-judge should have ordered the immediate arrest of Shoemaker and the “United States Attorney;” however, he did not. Furthermore, the judge would have ordered the Internal Revenue to cease and desist its unlawful actions against the American People. However, nothing has changed; instead “United non-existent, non-existent, non-existent-Judge” Lewis T. Babcock continues his treason and conspiracy to commit treason in a attempt to usurp jurisdiction using the fictitious entity known as the Page 16 of 40 “United non-existent, non-existent-Court” as his vehicle with a “non-existent-Motion” filed by a “nonexistent- Attorney” working for a “non-existent-Division” of the “United non-existent-Department of Justice” with something called the “United States” as the “Plaintiff.” The moment merchant-judge Lewis T. Babcock did not order the corporations to cease and desist the actions against the American People Babcock proclaimed his active participation in the conspiracy against the American People and the American form of government. Furthermore, merchant Shoemaker continues to file his documents in a solicitation of a criminal conspiracy. Thus, through treason and conspiracy to commit treason the corporate government engages in malicious prosecution in order to overthrow the American People and the American form of government. XXXIII and XXXIV - The Fifth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,“…nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; not shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” The corporations of the BAR-Association, the United States, the Federal Reserve, the Internal Revenue and the States of: e.g., Colorado, seize the American Peoples property, for private use under the auspices of authority granted under the Constitution for the United States of America, hour by hour. In reality the corporations, supra have commandeered the courts through Admiralty-jurisdiction and extirpated the Common Law; thus, the merchant-officers violated our rights and the rights of the American People as a whole aforementioned written in the Fifth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America. Americans are deprived of their life, liberty and property without law, much less due process of law. Furthermore, the American People are compelled to be witnesses against themselves under the anti-law known as statutes by many organizations claiming to be legitimate government agencies (e.g., FAA, FCC, IRS, State Highway Patrol, Sheriff, City Police, etc.). These criminals are given their authority and protection from the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association, the government behind the scenes. Many, if not all, situations aforementioned were/are done while the corporate agents were/are armed and dangerous. This unlawful practice is conducted hourly by the corporate security-guards called police, or agents of policing agencies, against the American People and the American form of government, which witnesses the overthrow of the American government and the American People. “We the People” are commanded and threatened to give information to the corporate security-guards under threat of further charges and violence, which corporate security-guards are protected by the BAR-Association-Attorney’s quasi-judiciary when these cases go before them. Thus, the corporate de facto government has taken the American public’s properties without just compensation and forced the American People to be a witness against himself or herself when being charged with antilaw statutes. The People are deprived of their life, liberty and property and have now become prisoners, Page 17 of 40 bankrupt [no gold and silver-coins to pay a debt], homeless [eminent domain] and debtors in their own country. XXXV and XXXVI - The First-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Since the corporate state, by and through the British Accredited Registry-Association-Attorneys and their corporate security-guardsknown as police and agents of policing agencies, declare they own the highways then they can and do force the American People to get a document entitled “driver’s license.” The language-“driver’s license” is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the word-driver’s is a possessive noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-license; there is no such creature. When properly read this language would be “non-existent license.” Furthermore, the “Federal Aviation Administration” (FAA) has commandeered the public transportation facilities where they require identification in the form of a “driver’s license” from a corporate state in order for the American People to travel. Not only is the language-“driver’s license” a felony-false conveyance of language but it also confers upon the person that status of being property of the corporate government seeking a privilege. If the corporate government chooses not to grant the permission one could and probably would be restricted from going to the assembly or church of his/her choice and from congregating with people of his/her faith in order to counter the state’s-religion of evolution for their children. If the corporate government owns the highway then there would be no freedom of religion. One would have to satisfy the corporate government in order to be allowed access, which would grant the corporate government the authority to determine which religions they consider appropriate. In other words, one could and most likely be restricted to “Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3)” government corporate churches. In addition, one could not petition the Government for redress of grievances if one does not have the right of locomotion and movement inasmuch as one could not, without permission from the corporate state, get to a location where they could present the petition. Just getting to a place where one could present his/her petition one would be in jeopardy of arrest and imprisonment for using the “public highways” without permission. Thus, the corporate state controls the ability of any human to petition by controlling their access to the thoroughfares. Hence, the corporate state has overthrown the Constitution for the United States of America in favor of its totalitarian form of government. XXXVII and XXXVIII - The Sixth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of Americastates, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an Page 18 of 40 impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, … and informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence [sic].” The Sixth-Amendment ibid, does not have in writing any thing about either an Attorney (a merchant) or a license. The BAR-Association, serving a foreign nation, instead overthrew the Constitution for the United States of America’s-Sixth Amendment in order to strip the American People of Assistance of Counsel, impartial jury, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, wherein the British Accredited Registry[BAR]-Association-Attorneys under Admiralty-authority would not have commandeered jurisdiction. The “Royal Courts” controlled and owned by the BAR-Association have determined that one has to use an Attorney or appear pro se (as your own Attorney) thus, granting jurisdiction to a merchant-tribunal where no law or “rights” under law exist. XXXIX and XL - The corporate United States and state’s-witnesses, the police and other governmentagents, are protected from charges of perjury under the unlawful Supreme Tribunal’s-case “Briscoe Et. al. v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Furthermore, the police and policing agencies have become corporate security-guards working for the corporate government and no longer for the American People, and have a vested interest to give false information as testimony. This unlawful protection has grown to encompass virtually every government officer, agent, broker or intermediary the prosecutor calls to give testimony against the American Public. Thus, the America’s-People’s-right to face their accuser has been stripped from them so that the British Accredited Registry-Association and corporate merchant-police can maturetheir conspiracy to overthrow the American People and the American form of government. XLI and XLII – The American People are required to obtain a document called a “Driver’s License”before they can use their own highway, thus, making the natural person a highway-merchant. As a merchant, the natural person allegedly falls under the Uniform Commercial Code through commerce and the corporate government presumes ownership and control of the natural person. Thus, the person is annexed and unwittingly dragged into commerce wherein the corporate government usurps jurisdiction. Since the natural person is not informed of this conspiracy and criminal act in order that he/she may make a choice, and since the corporate government writes, prosecutes and enforces Common Law criminal sanctions against the people for not complying with this anti-law (statutes), the BAR-Association and corporate police not only commit the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit treason, an overthrow of the American form of government and the American People, but also racketeering, criminal fraud, conspiracy in Bills of Pains and penalties, theft, robbery while armed and dangerous, assault and battery, false arrest, false imprisonment, and many other crimes against the America’s-People. Page 19 of 40 XLIII and XLIV – The Banks, operating under the authority of the Federal Reserve, a principal of theBAR-Association, are given permission to create monies out of thin air. Then interest is charged on the use of the mere electronic entries, which would present a false debt and expand into a false national debt. The Federal and state judges and their sibling-merchants in the British Accredited Registry-[BAR]-Association, along with the other government officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries, support and encourage this Bank-Fraud against the American People. The Congress is given permission to borrow on the credit of the United States, whatever the United States is, not on the credit of the American People or the States of the Union. Thus the Legislature cabal, joined by the Executive sub-branch and, since 1933, this quasi-Judiciary, succeeded into bankrupting the American People in an attempt to overthrow the American form of government and the American People. This conspiracy makes debtors of the American People to a discreet cabal headed by the Vatican, and it’s Guardian of the Vatican’s Treasury: the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel. XLV and XLVI – The sub-branches of government known as the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary[now quasi-judiciary] willfully and knowingly side track the Law and the Rights of the American People in order to fulfill the agenda of a foreign nation and country, namely the Vatican and “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” controlled by the “Guardians of the Vatican’s Treasury,” the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel. Through criminal actions of the Attorneys, America is being taken into a one-world-government where we will have lost our collective-sovereignty of “We the People” and will become world-subjects under a political arena and force known for its cruelty and inhumanity, the Vatican. This creature murdered between fifty and sixty million people in the dark-ages, had concentration-camps in Croatia where the Serbs were tortured and many murdered heinously because they refused to join the Vatican “church” before and during “World War II” (see “The Vatican’s Holocaust” written by Avro Manhattan.), supported for election two of the most evil people in history, those being Hitler and Mussolini and has an army of Jesuits whose job it is to seize the world for the “mother church.” This is not to say that Catholics are cognizant of the agenda of the Vatican, nor, for that matter, that many people involved with groups are necessarily cognizant of the agenda of the hierarchy of their organization or religion; however, the facts are there and acquiesced to by the Chief Officers addressed herein. With eyes wide open the British Accredited Registry- Association and its filial creations such as the “FAA,” “FCC,” “IRS,” etc.are desperately manipulating the American People into a one-world-government so that they will have the ultimate power and control for their principal. The borders of America are being methodically and systematically shattered for one-world conquest, “The world will follow after the beast.” Page 20 of 40 XLVII and XLVIII – The Constitution for the United States of America, Article I, Section 8 [3] states,“The Congress shall have Power…To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;”. The corporate government has misused this authority to seize absolute power in commerce over the nation. The intent of the founding-fathers was that the several States would be regulated against tariffs, price-gouging, taxes and other such criminal actions against the People from other States or within the same State selling their goods or attempting to sell their goods. This was not intended to regulate the American People by extirpating their rights of locomotion and movement. By requiring specific identification, that identification being a corporate government identifying card such as a “Driver’s License” “Pilot’s Certificate” and licensing over watercrafts, the corporate government has covertly crippled the rights of the American People. The Law, written in 11 Am Jur § 329, 2. Liberty states: “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” Though this paragraph is not entirely accurate, inasmuch as it addresses the noun-citizen and not the proper noun-Citizen as written in the Constitution for the United States of America thirteen times before the infamous Amendment XIV, it still indicates a natural right of locomotion and movement by the American People. The Federal Corporation and state- Corporations are willfully and knowingly confining the American People to the will of the corporate state by attempting to control the staple right of locomotion and movement, without such right no other rights exist or can be exercised. XLIX and L – Through prior information (a questionnaire sent to prospective jurors) the Prosecutorsknow the socio-economic level and status of the Grand Jurors and petit jurors they empanel, and with that information he/she impanels the Grand Jury and petit jurors which would be antagonistic to the people whose cases are brought before them for consideration. The judiciary relies on the “voter registration,” a false conveyance of language, in order to comprise their lists. It is understood that the “voter’s registration” witnesses that the body politic “ We the People” lost our right to vote long ago. Therequirement to register-to-vote demonstrates that voting has become a privilege one can only exercise if he/she seeks permission through a process of registration. Furthermore, in order for a natural person to register to vote the natural person has to declare themselves a “United States citizen” and a resident of the Page 21 of 40 state. The word-resident is used to trap the American into a jurisdiction under the corporate state and not as a free American. To register means to get a license to vote. License: page 231, English Synonyms, Antonymsand Prepositions copyright 1896: “A permission or privilege granted by an adequate authority, abounded liberty. In the wider sense, license is an ignoring and defiance of all that should restrain, and a reckless doing of all that individual caprice or passion may choose to do - a base and dangerous counterfeit of freedom.” LI and LII – The Prosecutor directs and controls the purported investigation of the facts by the GrandJury in order to control the outcome and usurp jurisdiction over the accused. The Prosecutor embraces the Grand Jury, presents his/her government witnesses and cordons off the Grand Jury so that any investigation is limited to the alleged facts the Prosecutor and his/her witnesses testify to. As shown earlier, the prosecutor’s-witnesses are protected from charges of perjury under the unlawful case Briscoe Et. al. v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Furthermore, the Prosecutor does not inform the Grand Jury that he/she is acting as a judicial officer; officer of the court, and, therefore, the case would be a judicial self-initiating case, which is un-Constitutional. In other words, the judiciary, through the Prosecutor, could indict a hamburger. This is an overthrow of the American form of government and of the American People. LIII and LIV – In the case “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AUSTIN GARY COOPER, 89-109-Cr-Hoeveler the judge and prosecutor declared that we have dual Citizenship, those being “American Citizen” and “citizen of the United States.” The prosecutor in her final argument to the jury declared that “He pays Social Security, he uses the Postal Service; therefore, Mr. Cooper is a United States citizen.” I filed lawful documentation to President-George Bush, to Chief Justice William Rehnquist, to the Governor and Chief Justice of Colorado, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue proving the specified contracts to be fraudulent. No one denied the facts enumerated and articulated therein. Further, I proved that the corporate United States and the corporate States use felony-false conveyances of language to gain jurisdiction over the American People unlawfully. I was imprisoned for not paying protection monies to the corporations usurping jurisdiction. Now, this tribunal working for the corporate United States is attempting to disregard its own declaration in order to usurp jurisdiction where none exist. After the corporate officers were served and upon the declaration by the officers of sub-status citizenship, that being “citizen of the United States” being contracts trapping the American Citizens under Admiraltyjurisdiction, the officers, through their own declarations, proclaimed knowledge of their overthrow and conspiracy to overthrow the American form of government and the American People. Page 22 of 40 LV and LVI – Amendment II of the Constitution for the United States of America states, “A wellregulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The corporate United States, Federal Reserve, BAR-Association, Internal Revenue and sub-corporations known as the “States of: e.g., Colorado” have written, prosecuted and enforced statutes, the abrogation of law, restricting and licensing the keeping and bearing of arms. The corporate security-guards do, however, keep and bear arms, and through their possession of arms do rob and pillage the American People. The unalienable Right to keep and bear arms was and is intended to create security and a threat to invasion from within the country or abroad. The four corporations and numerous sub-corporations have overthrown and conspired to overthrow the American form of government and the American People by willfully and knowingly and with malice aforethought prosecuting the American People for exercising their unalienable Rights such as Amendment II, ibid. LVII and LVIII – The human persons of the corporate state are abducting our children under the guiseof protection and the auspices of statutes, the anti-law, and engaging in the business of selling human persons for their own gain. The gain the corporate state is receiving is to charge the “taxpayer” for taking the child and placing the child in a state-institution or under foster care. Then the state charges the parent for the care, double dipping. The business is augmented by the anti-laws wherein the parent is charged with child-abuse if he/she/they discipline(s) his/her/their child and child-neglect if he/she/they do(es) not discipline his/her/their child. The child has been annexed at birth whereat the humans of the corporate state force a contract known as a birth-certificate under the authority of the corporate state and the nefarious “Social Security Administration” requiring the child to have a “Social Security Number” with are both felonies-false conveyances of language in and of themselves. In hearings the judge espouses that the child is his/hers, thus, witnessing that the child has been annexed. Further, the corporate state conditions the human People that they have to have a “marriage license” before getting married, and that a proper marriage under the law is either not recognized or frowned upon. The language-“marriage license” is defined in “Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition” as, “A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry usually addressed to the minister or magistrate who is to perform the ceremony, or, in general terms, to any one authorized to solemnize marriages. By statute in most jurisdictions, it is made an essential prerequisite to the lawful solemnization of the marriage.” The word-intermarry is defined as “see Miscegenation.” The word-miscegenation is defined as, “Mixture of races; marriage between persons of different races, as between a white person and a Negro.” Liberty informs us that we have the right to marry. It is an established condition of equity and law that if someone has to seek a license that the alleged entity granting the “license” presumes the authority and parent-ownership over the licensed venture or action. Thus, the corporate state assumes ownership over any human seeking a “marriage license” as a corporate “Parens patriæ” a/k/a corporate “Surrogate Page 23 of 40 parent,” which standing is used to deprive a human person of liberty and freedom guaranteed under the law and in the Constitution for the United States of America. This would then perpetuate a belief and authority that any one seeking a “marriage license” would then grant ownership of the fruits of their marriage, e.g., their children, to the corporate state; hence, this is treason and a conspiracy to commit treason against the American People and the America form of government. LIX and LX – The corporate government forces the introduction of fluoride, a dangerous nerve-poison,into the water-systems supplying water to hundreds of millions of American People. Fluoride is a severe nerve-poison, it kills nerve-cells as it proceeds to release to the next cell. Further, the intensely small negative fluoride-ion coordinates with iron and destroys hemoglobin. There are hundreds of documented studies proving that fluoride is of great harm to individual health and of no use in dentistry. Fluoride has a de-scaling action; it removes fungus spot, rust, and every other contaminant that has been collecting for decades in the pipes. It doubles the rate of corrosion in iron-pipes. The Nuremberg-court, set to try Naziwar- criminals, executed many of the criminals for experimenting on single or multiple human-subjects without their permission. The Attorneys and other government officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries, past and present, along with our chemical industry, have been and are implementing human-experimentation in the place known as the body-politic called these United States of America minute by minute. The corporate government strives to, amongst other heinous activities, diminish the health of the American People so that the one-world-government-regime can more easily overpower the American People and force same under its tyrannical regime. LXI and LXII – It has recently come to our attention that another way the corporate tribunals usurpjurisdiction over the American People is through the Supreme Tribunal-case entitled Davis vs. Elmira Savings, 161 U.S. 275 (1896), wherein it was declared that banks are instrumentalities of the Congress. In other words, the interstate system of banks is the private property of the corporate United States acting as King over the American People in an attempt to overthrow the American People and the American form of government. The documentation the bank presents to be signed generally has the language, “The undersigned hereby agrees to abide by all of the Rules of this Bank.” In the banks-rules rules it has language that contracts a natural person that he/she/they agree to abide by all of the administrative rulings of the Secretary of the Treasury, among other things, thus, attempting to create a contract between “We the People” and the banks alleged principal, the corporate United States. The Supreme Tribunal committed treason and conspired to commit treason in the case herein referenced, inasmuch as the Congress is a product of “We the People,” just as the Executive and Judicial Branches are. These are subbranches of government, which is why the natural persons filling the positions of government are called “public servants.” This means that the banks are only instrumentalities of Congress in relation to the Page 24 of 40 other two sub-branches of the sub-government, not in relation to the principal [We the People, a collective sovereignty] of the three sub-branches. Hence, for the Supreme Tribunal to take the government of “We the People” and nefariously claim that their [We the People] creation [Congress] can covertly create a sub-creation [banks], which sub-creation could and has bound “We the People” under the creation [Congress] by contract with the sub-creation [banks] and into the jurisdiction of the Executive branch under the Secretary of the Treasury is patently treasonous and criminal fraud. Furthermore, when the corporate state tribunal addressing itself as “Larimer County Court” sent us back the “bond monies” it was attempting to usurp jurisdiction inasmuch as the state-tribunals are subsidiaries of the federal tribunals and not “Courts of Law,” but court-martials demonstrative of the federal military flag and the state-military flag prominently displayed next to the merchant-judges-throne. It is understood, based upon this new information, that this was a conspiracy to grant jurisdiction to the tribunal aforementioned by the signing of the cards and/or checks without the reservation of rights, which the merchant-judge then uses to usurp jurisdiction without disclosure. Therefore, this is not only a situation of the commission of treason and conspiracy to commit treason, but is also criminal fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Counts LXIII through LXXI. LXIII – On November 20, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed adocument entitled “PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER,” which has forty-seven- (47) felony false conveyances of language, thirty-one (31) conclusions of statute, and forty-four- (44) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves, see Exhibit-J, which the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is filing false language multiplied times fortyseven- (47) in order to criminally usurp jurisdiction over us by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXIX - On November 20, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed adocument entitled “PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER,” which has forty-seven- (47) felony false conveyances of language, thirty-one (31) conclusions of statute, and forty-four- (44) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has Page 25 of 40 not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, has and is engaging in the crime of witness tampering by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXX - On November 20, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed adocument entitled “PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER,” which has forty-seven- (47) felony false conveyances of language, thirty-one (31) conclusions of statute, and forty-four- (44) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is attempting to obstruct justice by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXXI - On November 20, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed adocument entitled “PERMANENT INJUNCTION ORDER,” which has forty-seven- (47) felony false conveyances of language, thirty-one (31) conclusions of statute, and forty-four- (44) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is conspiring to commit criminal fraud by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. Counts LXXII through LXXV. LXXII – On November 18, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has a total of eighteen- (18) felony false Page 26 of 40 conveyances of language, seven- (7) conclusions of statute, and sixteen- (16) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves, see Exhibit-K, which the Accused, through merchant-Shoemaker, is filing false language multiplied times fifty-one- (51) in order to criminally usurp jurisdiction over us by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXXIII - On November 18, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has fifty-one- (51) felony false conveyances of language, twenty-three- (23) conclusions of statute, and twenty-seven- (27) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, has and is engaging in the crime of witness tampering by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXXIV - On November 18, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has fifty-one- (51) felony false conveyances of language, twenty-three- (23) conclusions of statute, and twenty-seven- (27) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is attempting to obstruct justice by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. Page 27 of 40 LXXV - On November 18, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has fifty-one- (51) felony false conveyances of language, twenty-three- (23) conclusions of statute, and twenty-seven- (27) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is conspiring to commit criminal fraud by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. Counts LXXVI through LXXIX. LXXVI – On December 15, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed adocument entitled “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” which has sixteen- (16) felony false conveyances of language, five- (5) conclusions of statute, and nine- (9) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirtyone (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves, see Exhibit-J, which the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is filing false language multiplied times sixteen- (16) in order to criminally usurp jurisdiction over us by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXXVII - On December 15, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed adocument entitled “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” which has sixteen- (16) felony false conveyances of language, five- (5) conclusions of statute, and nine- (9) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirtyone (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant- Babcock, has and is engaging in the crime of witness tampering by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Page 28 of 40 Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXXVIII - On December 15, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, fileda document entitled “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” which has sixteen- (16) felony false conveyances of language, five- (5) conclusions of statute, and nine- (9) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirtyone (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant- Babcock, is attempting to obstruct justice by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXXIX - On December 15, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Lewis T. Babcock, filed adocument entitled “ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE,” which has sixteen- (16) felony false conveyances of language, five- (5) conclusions of statute, and nine- (9) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirtyone (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant- Babcock, is conspiring to commit criminal fraud by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. Counts LXXX through LXXXIII. LXXX – On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has a total of One hundred and seventy five- (175) felony false conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of statute, and one hundred and fifty- (150) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and Page 29 of 40 articulated therein. The evidence proves, see Exhibit-K, which the Accused, through merchant- Shoemaker, is filing false language multiplied times One hundred and seventy five- (175) in order to criminally usurp jurisdiction over us by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXXXI - On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has One hundred and seventy five- (175) felony false conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of statute, and one hundred and fifty- (150) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, has and is engaging in the crime of witness tampering by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. LXXXII - On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has One hundred and seventy five- (175) felony false conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of statute, and one hundred and fifty- (150) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is attempting to obstruct justice by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. Page 30 of 40 LXXXIII - On December 10, 2003 C.E., the Accused, by and through merchant-Martin M. Shoemaker,filed several documents attached hereto as Exhibit-K, which has One hundred and seventy five- (175) felony false conveyances of language, ninety three- (93) conclusions of statute, and one hundred and fifty- (150) patently fraudulent statements. The merchant Accused, merchant-Babcock and the others, were served with thirty-one (31) counts of treason and thirty-one (31) counts of conspiracy to commit treason. The merchant-Accused has not denied to nor objected to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. The evidence proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock, is conspiring to commit criminal fraud by fraudulently representing that the Accused has jurisdiction to override proven charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Moreover, let the record reflect that merchant-Lewis T. Babcock nor his cohorts, merchants-Martin M. Shoemaker and John W. Suthers nor any of the other Accused have either denied or objected to the facts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason previously filed and substantiated into this case. The record supports and proves that the Accused, through merchant-Babcock and merchant- Shoemaker, recites Attorney rhetorical sophistry in their documents; however, they neither deny the charges nor the proof enumerated and articulated therein. In addition, not a single one of the Accused has denied a single fact enumerated and articulated in our Complaint. Thus, merchants-Babcock and Shoemaker, the representatives for the Accused, admit to, for the Accused, the crimes of: Treason times twenty-sevencounts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times twenty-seven-counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False imprisonment, Assault and Battery, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Jury-Tampering on both the grand and petit-juries, Bank fraud, Stalking, Fraud by deception, and willfully and knowingly exposing me when naked to visitors when held in the federal concentration-camp, amongst other crimes against the American people. For the crimes committed against us and for additional conspiracies, in addition to a demand for criminal prosecution, we hereby serve this Third Amended “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt” on the parties listed as the Interested Parties infra to be paid jointly or severally, forthwith: Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt Itemized-Bill for Third Complaint Addendum (1 st notice)Page 31 of 40 Item Cost Jointly and severally Interest at 1.5 % / Month after First Month Sub-Total Total Treason $100,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 27 Counts $2,700,000.00 Conspiracy to commit treason $100,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 27 Counts $2,700,000.00 Witness tampering $100,000.00 per natural person per action No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 6 actions $600,000.00 Continual criminal enterprise $100,000.00 per action No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 6 $600,000.00 Fraud by deception $10,000.00No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Bank-fraud $100,000.00No Interest Applied $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Felony falseconveyance of language $10,000.00 per each one No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 105 (see Exhibits-A through D $1,050,000.00 Racketeering through falseconveyance of language $10,000.00 per each one No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 105 (see Exhibits-A through D $1,050,000.00 Obstruction of justice $50,000.00 per document No Interest Applied $50,000.00 x 6 $300,000.00 Sub-Total - - - $9,110,000.00Addendum Additional Felony false-conveyance of language, see Exhibit-I $10,000.00 per each one No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 125 (see Exhibits-I $1,250,000.00 Addendum Additional Racketeering through falseconveyance of language, see Exhibit-I $10,000.00 per each one No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 125 (see Exhibits-I $1,250,000.00 Addendum Additional charges of Witness tampering $100,000.00 per natural person per action No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 3 actions $300,000.00 Addendum Additional charges $100,000.00 per natural No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 3 actions $30,000.00 Page 32 of 40 of Criminal Fraud person peraction Sub-Total - - - $11,940,000.00Second Addendum Additional charges of Treason $100,000.00 per charge No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 3 $300,000.00 Second Addendum Additional charges of conspiracy to commit Treason $100,000.00 per charge No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 3 $300,000.00 Second Addendum Additional Felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibits-J and K $10,000.00 per each one No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 226 (see Exhibits-J and K $2,260,000.00 Second Addendum Additional Racketeering through false conveyances of language, see Exhibits-J and K $10,000.00 per each one No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 226 (see Exhibits-J and K $2,260,000.00 Second Addendum Additional charges of Witness tampering, see Exhibits-J and K $100,000.00 per natural person per action No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 3 actions $300,000.00 Second Addendum Additional charges of Criminal Fraud, see Exhibits-J and K $100,000.00 per natural person per action No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 3 actions $30,000.00 Sub-Total - - - $17,390,000.00Third Addendum and Amendment with Additional Felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibits-J and K $10,000.00 per each one No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 175 (see Exhibits-J and K $1,750,000.00 Third Addendum and Amendment with Additional Racketeering through false conveyances of language, see Exhibits-J and K $10,000.00 per each one No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 175 (see Exhibits-L $1,750,000.00 Third Addendum and Amendment $100,000.00 per natural No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 3 actions $300,000.00 Page 33 of 40 with Additional charges of Witness tampering, see Exhibits-J and K person per action Third Addendum and Amendment with Additional charges of Criminal Fraud, see Exhibits- J and K $100,000.00 per natural person per action No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 3 actions $30,000.00 Sub-Total - - - $21,220,000.00Punitive Damage $500,000.00 / natural person No Interest Applied $500,000.00 x 2 $1,000,000.00 Additional Punitive Damage As of this date = $500,000.00 / natural person No Interest Applied $500,000.00 x 2 $1,000,000.00 Second Addendum Additional Punitive Damage As of this date = $500,000.00 / natural person No Interest Applied $500,000.00 x 2 $1,000,000.00 Third Addendum and Amendment with Additional Punitive Damage As of this date = $500,000.00 / natural person No Interest Applied $500,000.00 x 2 $1,000,000.00 Total - - - $25,220,000.00Monthly Late Fee 1.5% Interest As of this date =0 No Interest Applied 0 0 Grand Total - - - $25,220,000.00To Avoid Collection Enforcement Actions, You Must Immediately :• Pay $25,220,000.00 within 30 days.• This money is to be paid in the money of account, gold or silver coin; however, if paid inpromissory notes [e.g., Federal Reserve-Notes] it is understood that I receive said payment “without prejudice.” • Return this bill with your certified check or money order.If You Do Not Respond To This Bill :• Enforcement-actions will be taken against you for the total amount due and owing, pluspenalty and/or interest due. Page 34 of 40 • A lien can be filed against you. This would affect your credit rating. This lien could beplaced against your real property and be a matter of public record. • All future Bills will be sent by regular mail.Be Advised :Interest and other incurred costs shall be added to future billings. Interest shall be added to the balance due until full payment is received. The interest will be charged at 1.5% per month until full payment is received. Any future billings regarding this account will be sent regular mail. Thanks for your immediate attention regarding this matter. ______________________________ _______________________________ Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper In Summary It is an axiom of law and American justice that a natural person is innocent until proven guilty. In a Court-of-Law, we would not have to prove that we were not exceeding our natural and unalienable rights;the burden of proof would be upon the Plaintiff. Moreover, in a Court-of-Law, the complainant and his/itscohorts would be liable for their criminal actions if frivolous and fraudulent. When an overzealous corporation and its officers arbitrarily decide to deny all the Substantive Rights fought and died for in our great Republic, such tyranny must be disciplined. We suggest that by statutory construction and complacency, a conditioned reflexology has manifested the observation of our fellow human beings as corporate chattel and not free-living human beings. Thus, the corporate government finds itself consumed in a web that demands the property and Rights of the people as a tribute for its leadership. History recognizes that, with noble conviction, the law community assumed a role to champion the Rights of the people, but in the process, Unalienable Rights were lost to contractual (civil/statute) rights granted by man. Hence, instead of profound Rights from the Heavenly Father-Yahuah, secured by Amendments 1-10 of the Constitution for the United States of America, we now have arbitrary rights from man. Instead of a Constitutional "Republic 1," protecting the Rights of each human being, we now have acreditor (Federal Reserve) democracy promulgating "the good of our (international bankers) majority outweighsthe good of humanity." This beloved country called America now has the largest prison, probation, and parole population in the world. Since the BAR Association took over our government, and their avalanche of anti-law-statutes swept over our liberty and justice, burying it under the well over sixty-million (60,000,000 ++) statutes, the once great patriotic and noble collective sovereignty known as “We the People” has now become a nation of slaves. The BAR Association’s International Criminal Court is the crescendo to the take-over of the world1 Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution for the United States, "The United States shall guarantee to Every Statein the Union a Republican Form of government." Page 35 of 40 by the Banking-Cartel into a one-world-government, and completes the final extirpation of the Rights, Liberty and Freedom “We the People” once held sacrosanct. Please remember, however noble the gestures, personal bias and prejudice still cloud human judgment. Wherefore, a. We, Austin Gary Cooper, Martha E. Cooper and/or Taking Back America, a Pure-Trust, do not grant jurisdiction of our natural person, person and/or res to this tribunal or the corporate entities known as the “BAR Association,” the “UNITED STATES,” the “FEDERAL RESERVE” or the “Internal Revenue.” If you are unaware of this conspiracy, and these crimes perpetrated against us this Notice will serve to illuminate the facts. b. That this tribunal-order the Accused to cease and desist their unlawful actions. c. If this tribunal causes us or any one of us further injury, this “Third Addendum and Amendment To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with additional charges of felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-L, witness tampering, and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice.” shall serve as evidence that all have been forewarned and, therefore, have assumed the posture of accessories after the fact. Further, that willfully and knowingly this tribunal and judges have conspired with the Plaintiff to injure me. d. We demand our Right to appear before a proper grand jury to present this evidenceenumerated and articulated herein against the Accused. It should be understood that thus far we have been denied the information needed to address a grand jury on this issue. Additionally, notwithstanding the treason, the BAR Association’s officers of the court secretlyimpanel grand juries and plead their causes for indictment. Such embracery is published as felonies in theFederal statutes, itself a false conveyance of language (see Title 18 “United States Code Annotated” §1503 [Tampering with a juror generally] and § 1504 [Tampering with a juror by writing]), yet your officersof the court are not prosecuted (selective prosecution, racketeering, conspiracy). Further, there is nothingPage 36 of 40 published stating that an American Citizen or “citizen of the United States” cannot appear personally, without interference or accompaniment by the BAR Association’s officer of the court , before a grand jury,but information regarding this course of action is unavailable to the general public. e. That this tribunal-order the Accused, the people that they do have jurisdiction over, to pay the amount specified in the Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt section afore shown in the money of account or, if tendered in “Federal Reserve Notes” we shall “receive” the notes “without prejudice.” f. This “Third Addendum and Amendment To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with additional charges of felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-L, witness tampering, and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice.” is to be filed into “Account number”: 03-B-1127(PAC) _________________________________ __________________________________ Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper Affirmation I, Austin Gary Cooper, and I, Martha E. Cooper, do hereby affirm that the foregoing “Third Addendum and Amendment To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with additional charges of felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-L, witness tampering, and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice.” is true, accurate and correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief. Page 37 of 40 _________________________________ __________________________________ Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper Colorado-State : Larimer-County : ss/asv Loveland-City : Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of January 2004 C.E. My Commission Expires: _____________________________________ Notary-Public Seal Certificate of Service and Interested Parties We Hereby Certify that the foregoing “Third Addendum and Amendment To: Special Appearance; Third Civil Complaint for damages; and Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times 31 Counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times 31 Counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Bank fraud, Fraud by deception, Witness tampering, Obstruction of justice. Further, we hereby charge the Accused with additional charges of felony false conveyances of language, see Exhibit-L, witness tampering, and additional charges of Obstruction of Justice” was served by hand to be filed into the account-number supra to the following on this the ____ day of January, 2004 C.E.: 1. Clerk, Gregory C. Langham C/o Clerk's Office Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse Room A-105 901 19th Street Denver, Colorado 80294-3589 Cert.-Mail-#7003 1010 0002 5773 1450. Page 38 of 40 2. Lewis T. Babcock, Chief Judge C/o Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse 901 19th Street Denver, Colorado 80294-3589 Cert.-Mail-#7003 1010 0002 5773 1467. 3. William M. Hoeveler, merchant-judge c/o 301 N. Miami Ave., 9th Floor Miami, FL 33128 Cert.-Mail-#7003 1010 0002 5773 1474. and by regular mail to the following on this the ____ day of January, 2004 C.E., to: 4. Chief Executive Officer of the Norbel Credit Union c/o Norbel Credit Union, Attn: Ms. Chris Crisman 1531 N. Lincoln, D Loveland, Colorado 80538 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3113. 5. Chris Crisman, Vice President c/o 1531 N. Lincoln, D Loveland, Colorado 80538 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3120. 6. George W. Bush EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20500 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3137. 7. “Attorney’s General” John Ashcroft “U.S. Department of Justice” 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3182. 8. The Congress through their principal the BAR Association and the Federal Reserve. Notice to principal is notice to agent. 9. Chief Justice Rehnquist, Supreme Tribunal/court of the United States c/o U. S. Supreme Court Building 1 First Street N.E. Washington D.C. 20543 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3144. 10. Commissioner of Internal Revenue C/o 1111 Constitution Ave. N.W. Washington D.C., 20224 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3151. 11. Merchant Dennis Montgomery c/o 208 N. 5 th Street, Suite BNorfolk, NE 68701 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3168. 12. The BAR ASSOCIATION a subsidiary of the Templar BAR c/o 740 15 th Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20005-1019 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3175. Page 39 of 40 13. Merchant-Martin Shoemaker P.-O.-Box 7238 555 4 th Street, N.W., Room 8921Washington, DC 20044 Delivery Confirmation-#0303 1290 0000 1546 3199.________________________________ __________________________________ Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper Page 1 of 55 Austin Gary and Martha E. Cooper Without prejudice c/o 861 W CR 66 E Fort Collins, Colorado [80524] *The Plaintiffs file its case in:* THE STATE OF COLORADO LARIMER COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LARIMER *The Accusers file their case in:* The Colorado-State In the Court of the County known as Larimer STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; ) Account-No’s 03T201008 and 03T200131 COUNTY OF LARIMER, a Corporation; ) and other numbers randomly or with purpose CITY OF LOVELAND, a Corporation; ) included in this action and numerous (alleged) BAR ASSOCIATION; Police Chief Tom ) “arrest warrants” Wagoner; Officer Hofkamp; et al. ) ) Special-Appearance; Plaintiffs, ) ) Civil Complaint for Damages; Formal and v. ) Constructive Notice; and, ) AUSTIN G. COOPER, a fiction ) Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and ) an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Austin Gary Cooper, a natural person; ) Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non- Martha E. Cooper, a natural person ) British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association ) Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Accusers ) Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the ) Accused herein listed. v. ) ) We hereby charge and support the crimes by the State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of ) Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit Larimer, a Corporation; City of Loveland, ) treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart ) Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, VanMeveren and his deputies; merchant- ) Conspiracy to prosecute the American people judges-Christine A. Carney, James H. Hiatt, ) through Bills of Pains and Penalties, Conspiracy Terence A. Gilmore, Dave Williams, Daniel J. ) against rights, Mail- fraud, Racketeering, Kaup, Jolene C.Blair, Peter E. Schoon Jr., ) Racketeering through false conveyances of Ronald I. Schultz, C. Edward Stirman; unknown ) language, Felony false conveyances of language, Magistrates 1-5; Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; ) Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five unknown deputy-clerks of tribunal 1-5; Sheriff- ) counts, False imprisonment times five counts, James A. Alderden and 20, some known and ) Assault and Battery times five counts, some unknown, Sheriff’s-deputies; Loveland- ) Kidnapping for ransom times five counts, Police-Chief-Tom Wagoner and 15, Some known ) simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, and some unknown Loveland “Police Officers”; ) Willful and knowing false representation of Fort Collins-Police-Chief Dennis V. Harrison ) Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, and Officer Jeff O’Brien; et al. ) Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and ) Fraud by deception. Accused. ) For the Record :Page 2 of 55 Comes Now Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, Sui Juris, Appearing both Specially, NOT Generally OR Voluntarily, both In propria persona (our natural person), disputing jurisdiction of this tribunal, and filing this “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five counts, False imprisonment times five counts, Assault and Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for ransom times five counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception” In support, we state the following: I appeared Specially, not generally or voluntarily, at the merchant-tribunal known as the “Larimer County Court” in Fort Collins-City and in Loveland-City “under protest, menace and duress” as a co-Accuser with my wife, Martha E. Cooper, through documentation or in my natural person, and that I have been the victim of flagrant obstruction of justice, witness tampering, treason, conspiracy to commit treason and conspiracy against my rights by the merchant-judges, merchantprosecutors and merchant-police. That on December 11, 2003 C.E. at the merchant-tribunal in Loveland-City merchant-Kimberly A. Robbins declared that the “DUR” charges were dropped and merchant-Christine A. Carney then announced that the “DUR” charges had been dropped, and continuing she then set a date for a “Court Trial” on January 20, 2004 C.E. That I had addressed the flag being a military flag and, therefore, the hearing was a court-martial. No one denied the charge. That I filed a notarized affidavit supporting these facts on January 6, 2004C.E. to this tribunal and the parties listed as Accused supra. That I lawfully served the parties addressed herein; and, that no denial or objection addressing the issues has ever been filed. That, to my surprise, on January 20, 2004 C.E. at the merchant-tribunal in Loveland-City I was the victim of a Kangaroo-Court conducted by merchant-Carney wherein no prosecutor was present and she, again, obstructed justice, tampered with a witness, committed treason, denied me my right to assistance of counsel, conspired to commit treason and conspired against my rights with flagrant indifference to the law and the Constitution for the United States of America. That when I addressed that a “jury trial” meant “makeshift trial” merchant-Carney concurred but continued her treason. Page 3 of 55 Merchant-Stirman, wrote a proposed order “ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENTS/ PLEADINGS” writing, “In essence, these documents constitute unintelligible gobbledygook and should be stricken from the record and Court file.” The reason I use the word proposed is that none of the documents ever sent out by the fictitious entity called “Larimer County Court” or the merchant-judges, prosecutors, clerk or deputy-clerks have had the “Court-Seal” on them. Through experience I have learned that the corporate government requires a seal on documentation in order to make it official, therefore, I concluded that having no seal, none of the documents are official. Further, the language-“Court file” is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the word-Court is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-file, there is no such language. Further, in merchant-Striman’s “ORDER” he has thirty- (30) felony false conveyances of language and nine- (9) conclusions of statute. In addition, merchant-Stirman had filed other documents entitled: 1 – “ AMENDED PRE-TRIAL ORDER REGARDING JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 10,2004,” 2 - “CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL PROCEDURES FOR DEFENDANTS NOT REPRESENTED BY ATTORNEYS COURTROOM 3B”, and 3 - “ORDER GRANTING THE PEOPLE’S MOTION TO ENDORSE ADDITIONAL CHARGES IN PART AND DENYING THE MOTION IN PART.” These documents have, combined, One hundred nineteen- (119) felony false conveyances of language and forty five- (45) conclusions of statute in an attempt to usurp jurisdiction into this court-martial. Merchant-Stirman also avers that I “pleaded not guilty,” and that he is acting as my Attorney and pleading and accepting a plea of not guilty for the new “charges” by he and his cohorts. I am sure that merchant-Stirman can prove that I pleaded not guilty to anything and I hereby demand that he do or be charged with criminal fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Furthermore, I demand to see any contract or agreement whereby he was hired as my attorney in order to enter any plea for me. In merchant-Stirman’s document entitled “ORDER GRANTING THE PEOPLE’S MOTION TO ENDORSE ADDITIONAL CHARGES IN PART AND DENYING THE MOTION IN PART,” he writes, “The Defendant has not filed any response or objection to the motion,” meaning that the opposing party is required to respond or object when something is filed. The merchant-“District Attorney” has never responded of objected to any facts and charges we have filed; yet no action was taken to protect our rights. Instead, merchants-Carney and Stirman placed on the hat of senior “Prosecutor” and obstructed justice many times. Perusing merchant-Stirman’s-documents I noticed that the words-merchant-Stirman used are, “unintelligible gobbledygook.” The word “gobbledygook” was coined in 1944. Defined in “Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition” this phraseology is, unintelligible – “un” – the reverse of, and the word “intelligible” is 1: apprehensible by the intellect only, 2: capable of being understood or comprehended.” The word “gobbledygook” is defined as, “wordy and generally unintelligible jargon.” Thus, when used together it would be, “unintelligible unintelligible jargon.” Page 4 of 55 Hence, the language “unintelligible gobbledygook” is redundant jargon and a double negative; therefore, the word unintelligible cancels itself out. Thus, “unintelligible gobbledygook” actually means “intelligible jargon.” Therefore, merchant-Stirman admits, in his carefully and cleverly and cleverly chosen language used to attempt to deceive, that our facts, charges and Bill of Particulars have merit. I also noticed that neither merchants-Stirman, Carney, VanMeveren, Robbins, nor any other merchant-judges, prosecutors and police have denied or objected to the facts and charges served upon them, therefore, they admit them to be true. In addition, Merchant-Stirman’s-statements are demonstrative that either he lacks the basic understanding and precepts of law, justice and simple English-grammar, or he is willfully and knowingly obstructing justice and tampering with witnesses to his acts of treason and conspiracy to commit treason. The law requires two witnesses to the capital crime of treason, four witnesses and me have filed their charges and a demand for a proper grand jury is in effect. A proper grand jury is one that has not been stacked by the Accused, merchant- Stirman, et al. Moreover, in merchant-Stirman’s proposed document entitled “AMENDED PRETRIAL ORDER REGARDING JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 10, 2004” he wrote in #8, “DEADLINE FOR PLEA AGREEMENTS. On or before the Pretrial Conference, the parties are Ordered to notify the Clerk of Courtroom 3B whether the case has been resolved by a plea agreement or will proceed to jury trial. If the Clerk is not so notified, then the parties should be prepared to proceed to jury trial. In the absence of good cause shown, no plea agreement will be accepted on the morning of trial. See People v. Jasper, 17 P.3rd 807 (Colo. 2001). Either the Defendant will then pleadguilty or the District Attorney will dismiss the case. In the event a plea is accepted, then both the District Attorney and Defendant’s counsel (or Defendant) will meet with the Court and the jury panel to explain why a plea agreement was not reached earlier. If a plea agreement is reached by the deadline set forth in this paragraph, then the matter will be set for a disposition hearing as soon as possible.” By merchant-judge-Stirman’s own declaration “Either the Defendant will then plead guilty or the District Attorney will dismiss the case;” therefore, merchant-Stirman admits he, his siblingmerchant- Attorney-judges, the “District Attorney,” his sibling-merchant-Attorney-prosecutors and the police have no case. This entire façade is geared towards terrorizing me into pleading guilty in their court-martial, see Title 4 “United States Code Services, Lawyers Edition,” § 1 INTERPRETIVE NOTES AND DECISIONS “Placing of fringe on national flag...within discretion of President as Commander-In-Chief of Army and Navy. (1925) 34 Op Atty Gen 483,” by threatening me with jail if I do not appear in order to attempt to gain jurisdiction over me and make moot the lawful treason, conspiracy to commit treason and the extraordinary number of felonies committed against my wife, me, the American People and the American form of government. Moreover, the documentation we previously filed that merchant-Stirman addresses as “unintelligible gobbledygook” has listed verbatim, in part: the Constitution for the United States of Page 5 of 55 America; the Law, 11 AmJur §329, 52 AmJur Treason; the corporate State of Colorado’s-anti-law known as statutes, though the statutes are, in fact, gobbledygook; the corporate United States-anti-law known as statues; Congressional quotes and bills; direct quotes from “Shorter’s Oxford English American Dictionary, Fifth Edition;” clear and precise criminal charges each with a Bill of Particulars; Affidavits that were written in simple English-language and notarized; documentation sent me by the fictitious entity addressed by the Accused as the “LARIMER COUNTY COURT”; the facts of the case written in simple English-language and notarized, which facts have never been denied or objected to; and, clarification of the false conveyances of language (legalese) used by merchant- Stirman and his cronies and merchant-VanMeveren and his cronies, with the description of precisely why the language is false conveyance. False conveyance of language used to injure someone is itself a felony under the law, fraud, and the anti-law, see Title 18 “United States Code” § 1001, Statements or entries generally.” We used simple English-language in the Affidavits, criminal charges and Bill of Particulars so that even though the present quasi-judiciary portrays that they are intellectually handicapped there is no reason why they could not understand the language used. The corporate State of Colorado’s-anti-law known as statutes, other than the ones we previously filed, merchant-Stirman asserts, are not gobbledygook; anyone can understand them, that is why one has to “hire” a statute-merchant a/k/a Attorney, who purportedly understands the legalese, to represent him or her. In other words, “law for hire.” However, given the opportunity, I can prove that the merchant-Attorneys have no idea what the anti-law states. They have to look each statute up every time they imprison, place on probation or parole, steal the property or monies or murder the American People. The powers that be, merchant-judges and merchant-prosecutors, have to search the charges and language of the anti-law consistently, never remembering what the statutes say, yet they dole out prison-sentences and steal the American People’s-wealth daily for not knowing and obeying these statutes. “We the People” are required to memorize the well-over Sixty million (60,000,000 ++) statutes and the very “Inquisitors” do not know them at all. It is noted here that the main reason the merchant-judges will not inform the Accused of the “nature and cause of the accusation” is because they do not understand the statutes themselves, they just bluff, insult and threaten with contempt the American People when “We” do not understand this unlawful legalese. That Merchant-Stirman, in his proposed “ORDER GRANTING THE PEOPLE’S MOTION TO ENDORSE ADDITIONAL CHARGES IN PART AND DENYING THE MOTION IN PART” has thirty six- (36) felony false conveyances of language, sixteen- (16) conclusion of anti-law [statute], and forty five- (45) patently fraudulent statements. Yet he purports, that is if one did not know English-grammar, meaning that his use of a double negative would not create a positive, that his documentation is “intelligible jargon.” I have discovered that the 2003 C.E.-edition of the “Colorado Revised Statutes” has: 14 Page 6 of 55 Volumes identified as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7A, 7B, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13; 43 titles; 1 volume entitled “Court Rules” (A false conveyance of language.); and, 1 volume entitled “Index.” The aforementioned books have 19,077 pages (excluding the index-volume and certain introductory pages); 22,914 statutes; 757 rules; and 192 forms, which statutes, rules and forms are replete with false conveyances of language. Mind you that this list does not include the County, City and Municipality statutes, ordinances, regulations, rules and customs. The corporate State-statutes also allow the merchant-judge to amend the “Court rules” as he or she sees fit, see merchant-Stirman’s “Amended Pre-Trial Order Regarding Jury Trial Scheduled for March 10, 2004”; therefore, there could be myriad rules espoused by any judge permitting any degree of chaos against any one brought before these merchant-judges. Additionally, included in Volume 12 of the “Colorado Revised Statutes” is “Appendix To Chapter 24, Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct” Canon 3, which states, “A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF HIS OR HER OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY. The judicial duties of a judge take precedence over all his or her other activities. A judge’s judicial duties include all the duties of his or her office prescribed by law. In the performance of these duties, the following standards apply: A. Adjudicative Responsibilities. (1) A judge should be faithful to the law andmaintain professional competence in it . A judge should be unswayed by partisan interest, publicclamor, or fear of criticism.” (Emphasis added.) I hereby challenge and can prove that not a single Attorney, whether he or she is a judge, prosecutor, legislator, executive officer, in private practice or an educator has even a minimal knowledge of these statutes; thus, this evinces incompetency by the present quasi-judiciary governing this country. Now we come to the real reason merchant-Stirman purports that he can dismiss charges of treason and conspiracy to commit treason filed against him and his comrades; we have been passing out a “Public Notice” informing the American People that we have filed thirty- (30) (now thirty-one) counts of treason and thirty- (30) (now thirty-one) counts of conspiracy to commit treason with the account-numbers of the cases, and merchant-Stirman, et al. are afraid the people will discover the truth. Then, merchant-Stirman, et al. will be looking at life in prison or death for their crimes. Hence, merchant-Stirman purports to have the power to obstruct justice in an attempt to thwart attention away from himself and his Attorney-siblings. Further, the merchant-judges get a pay-off, in that, a percentage of the traffic-fines (blood-money) go to their retirement funds. Merchant-Carney declared in the court-martial on January 20, 2004 C.E. that merchant- Hofkamp had placed the wrong statute on the ticket declaring that merchant-Hofkamp had used the section for a “75 m.p.h. zone.” Merchant-Carney was reading directly from a book that appeared to be a volume of the “Colorado Revised Statutes.” Neither merchant-VanMeveren nor any of his cronies titled “Deputy District Attorneys” were there, meaning that merchant-Carney was Page 7 of 55 representing the opposing side and the merchant-judge at the time. Furthermore, merchant-Carney declared that the hearing was a “Civil case” yet no contract was presented nor declared supporting that I had granted jurisdiction. The fact of merchant-Hofkamp using the wrong section of the statute should have been recognized by merchant-Hofkamp’s-superiors and by the merchant-“district attorney,” the alleged law-professionals. Thus, this entire vicious criminal charade was and is a product of malicious prosecution by the “Loveland Police Department,” the “Larimer County Sheriff’s Department,” the “Larimer County District Attorney’s Office,” the “Eighth (8 th) JudicialDistrict,” the corporate “City of Loveland,” the corporate “County of Larimer,” the corporate “State of Colorado,” and the natural persons who constitute and bear the titles known as the officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries of the aforementioned. In addition, the charge of “DUR” is a result of having an alleged driving privilege suspended, revoked or whatever, assuming the corporations had that authority to have annexed me and mine, due to my having challenged jurisdiction, which jurisdiction was never proven. This is an act of malicious prosecution, conspiracy in malicious prosecution, treason and conspiracy to commit treason. Furthermore, knowing that the original unlawful summons was in error bringing about this vicious criminal charade, merchant-Stuart VanMeveren by and through his sibling-merchant- Attorney and crony-Kimberly A. Robbins conspires to continue this vicious criminal charade inasmuch as he has filed a document entitled “MOTION TO ENDORSE 3 ADDITIONAL COUNTS TO SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT.” All “bond papers” I have signed were signed with the language “Under protest, menace and duress.” No jurisdiction has ever been granted to this courtmartial, the merchant-B ritish Accredited Registry [BAR] Association-judges, prosecutors, and theircorporate-security-guards known as police usurped jurisdiction through terrorist tactics. I did not physically attend your treasonous court-martial because jurisdiction was challenged and never proven. Moreover, the “bond papers” are replete with false conveyances of language, a condition of felonious activity by the Attorneys and their cronies, the police. The language-“bond papers” is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the word-bond is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-papers, there is no such language. Properly read according to Englishgrammar, the language “bond papers” would be “non-existent papers.” The British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association, by their own decree and arrogance have declared that they have overthrown the American People as a collective sovereignty and the American form of government by enforcing the anti-law that one needs a “license to practice law” to be a judge or prosecuting attorney in the legal arena. The requirement of a license makes the Attorneys merchants defined under the Uniform Commercial Code § 1-103:6, and, thereby makes the judiciary a business and not a subbranch of government under “We the People.” The prosecutor is an alleged “judicial officer” making the Page 8 of 55 judiciary self-initiating and is the basis for the extirpation of the lawful judiciary into the unlawful Admiralty quasi-judiciary now enforced by the British Accredited Registry and their corporate security-guards known as police. The following will witness the overthrow of the American People and the American form of government through the act of treason and conspiracy to commit treason by the Accused and the Legislative, Executive and Judicial sub-branches of government as written in the Constitution for the United States of America. The Preamble and the first Ten-Amendments sandwich in the three sub-branches of government supporting that “We the People” are the collective-sovereignty and the government, the proper government that is, are public servants, not public masters. The following are the written Facts of this Case. Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper See the Criminal Complaint supra with its list of included documentation and accompanying Affidavits. Criminal Complaint For every criminal count we hereby adopt and incorporate the following paragraphsletters- A through J as if fully set forth at length: Due to the conservation of our natural resources I shall not include the filed documentation as Exhibits inasmuch as they have all been served to the tribunal and to the interested parties. A. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO; COUNTY OF LARIMER; TOWNOF WELLINGTON / TIMNATH; the BAR ASSOCIATION; SHERIFF JAMES A. ALDERDEN; OFFICER SANDERSON; et al. v. Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, Account number: 02R101815 and summons disguised as a traffic ticket no. 24156 with its attachments sent registered-mailnumber RR579291133US, as if fully set forth at length. B. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO; COUNTY OF LARIMER; CITY OFLOVELAND; the BAR ASSOCIATION; POLICE CHIEF TOM WAGONER; OFFICER C.J. HOFKAMP; et al. v. Austin Gary Cooper, Martha E. Cooper and :Paul-Robert: Kappel, Account number: No accountnumber available (later discovered to be 03-77635) and summons disguised as a traffic-ticket-no. 212906sent registered-mail-number RR579207524US, as if fully set forth at length. C. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO; COUNTY OF LARIMER; CITY OFLOVELAND; the BAR ASSOCIATION; POLICE CHIEF TOM WAGONER; OFFICER C.J. HOFKAMP; et al. v. Austin Gary Cooper, Martha E. Cooper and :Paul-Robert: Kappel, Account number: No accountnumber available and summons disguised as a traffic-ticket-no. 212906, Addendum To: Special-Appearance; and, Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and, Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Page 9 of 55 Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member. with its attachments sent registeredmail- number RR579207665US, as if fully set forth at length. D. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO; COUNTY OF LARIMER; CITYOF FORT COLLINS; the BAR ASSOCIATION; POLICE CHIEF Dennis V. Harrison; OFFICER Jeff O’Brien; et al. v. Martha E. Cooper and Austin Gary Cooper, Account number: P0350407 sent registeredmail- number RR579207895US, as if fully set forth at length. E. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; COUNTY OFLARIMER, a Corporation; the BAR ASSOCIATION; SHERIFF James A. Alderden; OFFICER Sanderson; OFFICER Brian Thomas; et al. v. Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, Account number: Undisclosed, summons disguised as a traffic ticket #78575, entitled, “Special-Appearance; and, Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and, Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member” as if fully set forth at length. F. We hereby adopt and incorporate STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; COUNTY OFLARIMER, a Corporation; CITY OF LOVELAND, a Corporation; the BAR ASSOCIATION; POLICE CHIEF Tom Wagoner; OFFICER Hofkamp; et al. v. AUSTIN G. COOPER, a fiction / Austin Gary Cooper, a natural person; Martha E. Cooper, a natural person v. State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of Larimer, a Corporation; City of Loveland, a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren; Police-Chief-Tom Wagoner; Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; Merchants: officer-sergeant-Rabson; Chisum and Mendoza; unknown judges 1-5; unknown merchant-police-officers 1-5; unknown Prosecuting-Attorneys 1-5; et al., the Accused, “Account number”: 03-3181, “warrant number” C0352003T and “summons disguised as a traffic ticket” no. 212906, “Special-Appearance; and, Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and, Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused,” as if fully set forth at length. G. We hereby adopt and incorporate “Professional Finance Company, Inc. v. TBA FOUNDATIONAKA AUSTIN AUSTIN GARY COOPER / Austin Gary Cooper; Austin Gary Cooper, Trustee v. Professional Finance Company, Inc; PROFESSIONAL FINANCE COMPANY, INC.; John Mauro; et al / Austin Gary Cooper; Austin Gary Cooper, Trustee v. merchant-judges-Christine A. Carney, James H. Hiatt, Terence A. Gilmore, Dave Williams, Daniel J. Kaup, Jolene C. Blair, Peter E. Schoon Jr, Ronald I. Schultz, C. Edward Stirman; unknown magistrates 1-5; Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; unknown deputyclerks of tribunal 1-5; Sheriff Alderden and 20, some known and some unknown, Sheriff’s-deputies; et al., Account-No. 2002C201925,” "Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Page 10 of 55 Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. I hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason, Conspiracy to commit Treason, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False imprisonment, Assault and Battery, Kidnapping for ransom, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, and Fraud by deception” as if fully set forth at length. It is noted here that the merchant-Accused have never denied or objected to the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit enumerated and articulated therein. H. We hereby adopt and incorporate “STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; COUNTY OFLARIMER, a Corporation; CITY OF LOVELAND, a Corporation; BAR ASSOCIATION; Police Chief Tom Wagoner; Officer Hofkamp; et al. v. AUSTIN G. COOPER, a fiction / Austin Gary Cooper, a natural person; Martha E. Cooper, a natural person v. State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of Larimer, a Corporation; City of Loveland, a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren and his deputies; merchant-judges-Christine A. Carney, James H. Hiatt, Terence A. Gilmore, Dave Williams, Daniel J. Kaup, Jolene C.Blair, Peter E. Schoon Jr., Ronald I. Schultz,C. Edward Stirman; unknown Magistrates 1- 5;Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; unknown deputy-clerks of tribunal 1-5; Sheriff-James A. Alderden and 20, some known and some unknown, Sheriff’s-deputies; Loveland-Police-Chief-Tom Wagoner and 5, Some known and some unknown Loveland “Police Officers”; Fort Collins-Police-Chief Dennis V. Harrison and Officer Jeff O’Brien; et al., Account-No’s 03T201008 and 03T200131,” “Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. I hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times eighteen counts, Conspiracy to commit Treason times eighteen counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times three counts, False imprisonment times three counts, Assault and Battery times three counts, Kidnapping for ransom times three counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception” as if fully set forth at length. It is noted here that the merchant-Accused have never denied or objected to the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit enumerated and articulated therein. Page 11 of 55 I. We hereby adopt and incorporate “STATE OF COLORADO, a Corporation; COUNTY OFLARIMER, a Corporation; CITY OF LOVELAND, a Corporation; BAR ASSOCIATION; Police Chief Tom Wagoner; Officer Hofkamp; et al. v. AUSTIN G. COOPER, a fiction / Austin Gary Cooper, a natural person; Martha E. Cooper, a natural person v. State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of Larimer, a Corporation; City of Loveland, a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren and his deputies; merchant-judges-Christine A. Carney, James H. Hiatt, Terence A. Gilmore, Dave Williams, Daniel J. Kaup, Jolene C.Blair, Peter E. Schoon Jr., Ronald I. Schultz,C. Edward Stirman; unknown Magistrates 1- 5;Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; unknown deputy-clerks of tribunal 1-5; Sheriff-James A. Alderden and 20, some known and some unknown, Sheriff’s-deputies; Loveland-Police-Chief-Tom Wagoner and 5, Some known and some unknown Loveland “Police Officers”; Fort Collins-Police-Chief Dennis V. Harrison and Officer Jeff O’Brien; et al., Account-No’s 03T201008 and 03T200131,” “Special-Appearance; Civil Complaint for Damages; Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member; and, A Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason times thirty counts, Conspiracy to commit treason times thirty counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and Penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times three counts, False imprisonment times three counts, Assault and Battery times three counts, Kidnapping for ransom times three counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception” as if fully set forth at length. It is noted here that the merchant- Accused have never denied or objected to the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit enumerated and articulated therein. J. 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, page 1135, § 329 2. Liberty, which states,“Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” Page 12 of 55 K. We hereby adopt and incorporate the Judicial, Executive and Legislative Notice, supra, as iffully set forth at length. L. We hereby adopt and incorporate the facts, supra, articulated and enumerated herein as if fullyset forth at length. M. We hereby adopt and incorporate all documentation I have previously filed into this case andthe Affidavits accompanying this complaint as if fully set forth at length. Counts I through LXII. Treason - Counts I, III, V, VII, IX, XI, XIII, XV, XVII, XIX, XXI, XXIII, XXV, XXVII, XXIX, XXXI, XXXIII, XXXV, XXXVII, XXXIX, XLI, XLIII, XLV, XLVII, XLIX, LI, LIII, LV, LVII, LIX and LXI. And Conspiracy to commit Treason - Counts II, IV, VI, VIII, X, XII, XIV, XVI, XVIII, XX, XXII, XXIV, XXVI, XXVIII, XXX, XXXII, XXXIV, XXXVI, XXXVIII, XL, XLII, XLIV, XLVI, XLVIII, L, LII, LIV, LVI, LVIII, LX and LXII. I and II - As written in my filed documents to the corporate chief officers, the tribunals display theFederal military flag as its jurisdiction. Under “Title 4 U.S.C.S. Lawyers Edition, § 1 INTERPRETIVE NOTES AND DECISIONS “Placing of fringe on national flag...within discretion of President as Commander-In-Chief of Army and Navy. (1925) 34 Op Atty Gen 483.” In addition, “Pursuant to U.S.C. Chapter 1, 2, and 3; Executive Order No. 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE, bordered on three sides. The President of the United states designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Armed forces.” Moreover, the Congress willfully and knowingly overstepped its power, to wit: in 1845 Congress passed an act saying Admiraltylaw could come on land. The bill may be traced in Cong. Globe, 28th Cong., 2d. Sess. 43, 320, 328, 337, 345(1844-45), no opposition to the Act is reported. Congress held a committee on this subject in 1850 and they said: “The committee also alluded to ‘the great force’ of ‘the great constitutional question as to the power of Congress to extend maritime jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption of the Constitution....’” - H.R. Rep. No. 72 31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850).” Thus, this tribunal is an Administrative court-martial and the British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association-Attorneys haveoverthrown the American people and the American form of government by extirpating the civil authority and removing the Judiciary in favor of their military quasi-judiciary [Something that appears to be a proper judiciary but is not.]. III and IV - The judges are members and swear allegiance to a private corporation known as the BritishAccredited Registry [BAR]-Association. The BAR-Association is owned by the Templar BAR, whichTemplar BAR is located and owned by “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” is owned by the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel and the Rothschild-family. Further, the Page 13 of 55 Rothschild’s are known to have the position of “Guardian of the Vatican’s-Treasury,” thus, the Rothschild-family represents the interests of the Vatican. Hence, the judge is a foreign agent conspiring with other merchant-Attorney-judges commandeering the judiciary of the United States of America and the Colorado-State to overthrow the American people and the American form of government. Furthermore, The word-Attorney is taken from the words: Attorn / v. Me. [Origin French. atorner, aturner assign, appoint, f. a-torner turn v.] 1. v.t. Turn; change,transform; deck out. 2. v.t. Turn over (goods, service, allegiance, etc.) to another; transfer, assign. 3. v.i. Transfer one’s tenancy, or (arch.) homage or allegiance, to another; formally acknowledge such transfer. Attorn tenant (to) Law formally transfer one’s tenancy (to), make legal acknowledgment of tenancy (to a new landlord). – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.Attorn , v.i. [Latin ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lordto another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation or the estate. – Webster’s 1828 Dictionary .Attornment , n. The act of a feudatory vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of anestate, to receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service. – Webster’s1828 Dictionary .Attornment n. the transference of bailor status, tenancy, or (arch.) allegiance, service, etc., to another;formal acknowledgment of such transfer: lme. – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.Thus, it is clear that an Attorney is one who transfers or assigns, within the BAR, another’s rights andproperty, acting on behalf of the ruling crown (“The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England; in other words this countries de facto government). In other words, when Attorneys call themselves officersof the court, they are correct in that they are all government agents; however, they serve a foreign government. The American people are deceived into believing that they [the BAR] are neutral and working on behalf of justice, not serving their British Accredited Registry -Association.Moreover, The “IRS” is not a United States-Government-Agency, it is an Agency of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE “U.S.D.C.D.I.,” Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391. The language “International Monetary Fund” is defined as, “Agency of the United Nations established to stabilize international exchange and promote balanced international trade,” Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, page 733. V and VI – The federal and State-tribunals use felony false conveyances of language as its vehicles ofjurisdiction over the American People. The British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association-Attorneyshave dubbed this tribunal the “Larimer County Court.” The word-Larimer is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-County; the word-County is a noun that has been Page 14 of 55 converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Court, there is no such place; therefore, this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. Properly read according to English-grammar, this language would be, “non-existent Court.” Thus, in order to perform their dastardly deeds, the BAR-Association has created non-existent Courts to pillage and plunder the wealth and rights of the American people and to overthrow the American form of government. In addition, the statutes are written in false conveyances of language in order to usurp jurisdiction over the American People and trap the American People under a language that does not exist. This falsification of language opens a Pandora’s-Box against the American People with the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association and its principal, the Vatican and Rothschild-Bank-Cartel, as a totalitarian government, rather like a sophisticated and contemporary Spanish-Inquisition. A false language, where justice has no stronghold, where charges have no meaning according to the language; thus, the corporate government assumes the authority to plunder and pillage the American People. Through corruption and false language “We the People” are charged with the anti-law called statutes and commanded to answer to the charges; however, it is difficult to answer when one does not understand the question. Hence, the BAR-Association, through its opinions, have exercised the “Humpty-Dumpty” methodology of control, wherein they have ruled the people under the now quasi-judiciary with the dictates that “everything means exactly and precisely what I [the BAR-Attorneys] say it means at the time.” VII and VIII - The judge has everyone “rise” when proceeding to his/her thrown. History recognizesthat the judge would carry in the Bible with him and that the people would rise in reverence to the word of the Heavenly Father-Yahuah, not the judge. Further, the Bible would render the hearing one under the common law, said Bible containing the Law burned into stone by the Heavenly Father, wherein the unalienable rights of the accused would naturally be protected. It was not known at the time that the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association was covertly planning and implementing its take over ofthe American form of government. However, when the judge stopped carrying in the Bible the hearing became a “Royal court” inasmuch as the judge is dubbed “Esquire,” an English title just under nobility meaning “shield-bearer.” Now, the “common law”-Court of Law has been overthrown in favor of the British Accredited Registry- Association’s-sovereignty known as “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” inLondon, England and proceeding under the “Royal court” of “The Crown.” Thus, through this treason and conspiracy to commit treason the American people have become subjects in their own country and their own land. IX and X - The Attorneys of the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association have willfully andknowingly sold out their country to serve “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. Then, they Page 15 of 55 have, with treason in mind and deed, removed the Flag of the Republic in favor of their Admiralty-flag to remove the “Courts of Law” and replace them with “Military tribunals” under an Admiralty-flag and a foreign government. The corporate government through the BAR-Association then created a sub-status citizenship found in the questionably ratified Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America and written as “citizen of the United States.” Further, they then quote cases stating their jurisdiction is based on the American People being “United States citizens.” The phrase “United States” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-citizen, there is no such creature; therefore this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. When properly read, this phrase would be “non-existent citizen.” Through this sub-status and/or non-existent citizenship the “BAR” and its corporate government made the American Citizens property of the corporate state and assumed a dictatorial position over the people and the American form of government. XI and XII - Under their feudal-system, the BAR-Association has annexed the property and naturalpersons of the American People through the reprehensible language known as “eminent domain.” In addition, the following treasonous statement by the Senate, written in 1933 witnesses the coup against the American form of government and the American People, to wit: “The ultimate ownership of all property is in the state; individual so-called `ownership' is only by virtue of government, i.e., law, amounting to a mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” - Senate Document No. 43, “Contracts payable in Gold.” With this principal of feudal, nazi, fascist, communist, dictatorship, totalitarian and other such governments the ruling elite control the people through the threat that the corporate government can, and often times do, take the properties of the People if they question or resist the tyranny. Thus, through this concept the Accused can maintain control over any who would speak out against their tyranny. XIII and XIV - With this principal of “eminent domain” well established in systems of governmentknown as feudal, nazi, fascist, communist, dictatorship, totalitarian and other such governments the ruling elite control the people through the concept that if the people own nothing they have nothing to bargain with and, therefore, have no legitimate position of voting-rights to elect a proper lawful government. Thus, the alleged right to vote becomes a privilege requiring an act of registration. Hence, the people are no more than subjects presenting their wishes and granting the existing de facto government permission by accepting and performing according to the privileges they, the American people, have been granted by the now de facto government. Further, when the corporate government grants someone the privilege to vote by exercising a control of registration, the corporate government becomes the parent-corporation, which means that the human-person seeking permission becomes the child and through an unbeknownst “tacit agreement” loses his/her rights and then agrees through implied-contract to be bound by the Page 16 of 55 corporation and/or foreign government, not by law. In addition, if one attempts to counter the tyranny of the now de facto government he/she would be threatened with the loss of his/her property, or the corporate government would simply take the humans property in order to frighten others into submission for fear of losing their properties. Thus, the Accused through the BAR-Association has perpetrated treason and conspired to commit treason through their deliberate actions aforementioned. XV and XVI - The Seventh-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states, “InSuits at common-law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trail by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common-law.” There is no place where a “jury trial” is authorized in the Constitution, ibid. In the language “jury trial,” the word-jury is an adjective modifying the noun-trial. Jury as an adjective means “makeshift.” Thus, “jury trial,” means a “makeshift trial.” The sinister BAR-Association-Attorneys have overthrown the American form of government and the American People by covertly replacing a lawful “trial by jury” in favor of the dictatorial “makeshift trial” in order for them to systematically destroy the liberties of the American people through “Bills of Pains and penalties” and make subjects of the American people. XVII and XVIII – The present day quasi-Judiciary places on the jury-pools of the grand and petit juries,agents working for the corporate government in order to tamper with the jury. The American People when tried whether civilly or criminally do not get a jury of their peers. The corporate government stacks the juries with “postal workers,” agents of the corporation known as “Internal Revenue,” police officers, people receiving welfare-payments and, therefore, sensitive to the corporate demands. Hence, through treason and conspiracy to commit treason the Accused tampers with the juries in order to overthrow the American form of government and the American People. XIX and XX – Statutes are an abrogation of the American “common-law,” see Uniform CommercialCode § 1-103:6. The Unalienable Rights of the American People come from the Law. Since statutes abrogate the law, they then, in turn, extirpate the rights of the American People. The British AccreditedRegistry [BAR]-Association-Attorneys do not allow law in “their” tribunals which they call courtroomsand, thus, have commandeered the Article III Courts of the Constitution for the United States of America in favor of their Admiralty-tribunals. Furthermore, all federal tribunals are Administrative tribunals, Article I Section 8 [9], “To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;” under Admiraltyjurisdiction. Congress through unconstitutional means extended maritime-jurisdiction onto the land in order to overthrow the Constitution for the United States of America, “The committee also alluded to ‘the great force’ of ‘the great constitutional question as to the power of Congress to extend maritime Page 17 of 55 jurisdiction beyond the ground occupied by it at the adoption of the Constitution....’” - H.R. Rep. No. 72 31st Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1850).” The judges, prosecutors and defense Attorneys know this but keep it a secret in order to assume absolute power and control over the American People for their [BAR-Attorneys] evil gain. Thus, the Accused has willfully and knowingly overthrown the American form of government and the American People. XXI and XXII - Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution for the United States of America states, “NoState shall …make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts…” The merchant- Attorneys and other government officials send out documents demanding $, which is a symbol that indicates, “no-silver,” from the American People. The now defunct S with two slightly separated parallelvertical- lines at or near the center of the S means, “silver-bar.” I, on the other hand, file(d) for the money of account and wrote/write, “I require the payment to be in the money of account; however, if the Accused does not have the money of account, then payment may be made in Federal Reserve-Notes; however, such payment will be ‘received without prejudice.’” Thus, a reservation of rights and the “Doctrine of Estopple” is exercised inasmuch as “Federal Reserve Notes” are promissory notes and not payment; and few, if any, have gold and silver-Coin in order to pay a debt. Furthermore, the language “Federal Reserve Notes” not hyphenated is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the phrase “Federal Reserve” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Notes; according to English-grammar there is no such creature. When properly read, the language “Federal Reserve Notes” would be, “Federal non-existent Notes.” However, “receiving” the notes “without prejudice” converts the notes into money. Through treason and conspiracy, the Congress of the United States removed our proper money, thereby conspiring to place each and every human person under the regulations of bankruptcy and covertly seize their properties. Now monies and human persons acting for the corporate State that accept these notes accept the debt attached to them; however, by receiving them I do not agree to the unlawful obligation attached thereto. Since the corporate government uses the symbol-$ and the Constitution for the United States of America commands that only gold or silver-Coin is tender in payment of debts to the States, any “payment” demanded in the form of taxation, fines, etc. using the symbol-$ to the corporate government could be made in wooden-nickels or grains of sand, etc. Hence, the corporate United States or State enforcing any “payment” for any alleged debt or debt in fact in other than the money of account for its coffers, as it were, is an act of treason and an overthrow of the American form of government and of the American people. The body-politic “We the People” can, on the other hand, receive “Federal Reserve Notes” or Federal Reserve-Notes “without prejudice” and protect our rights by so doing. The government controlled schools, however, do not teach the people to protect their rights but instead forcibly teach them to surrender their rights to the de facto government presently in control. Page 18 of 55 XXIII and XXIV - In order to rob the America people of their “Courts of Law” the British AccreditedRegistry [BAR]-Association established a bogus “license” to practice law. This action monopolizes thebranch of government known as the judiciary and creates a quasi-judiciary taking its place. Through this bogus licensing the BAR-Association regulates and controls any one who would enter its domain granting it absolute despotism over the system of government it conspires to overtake. Moreover, since the Attorneys say they are licensed, then they admit that they are merchants, Uniform Commercial Code § 2- 104(1). This position witnesses a monopoly inasmuch as the BAR-Association enforces that one has to be licensed through its merchant-Attorney-Association in order to “practice law,” however, the truth be known, they [the BAR-Attorneys] do not function or operate within the law, only the anti-law known as statutes. The statistics support the tyranny of the BAR-Association-Attorneys in that one-out-of-everythirty Americans are in prison, on probation or on parole presently in this country and many more have their monies and properties stolen from them by the infamous British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association-Attorneys in the role of judges, prosecutors and defense-attorneys. This action places the weasels in charge of the hen-house, as it were, and is patently treasonous in a land of “free-enterprise” and liberty and justice for all. This “license to practice law” is nothing more than membership in the private corporation known as the BAR-Association and its principal “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England. The Preamble and the first Ten Amendments sandwich in the three sub-branches of government supporting that “We the People” are the collective sovereignty and the government, the proper government that is, are public servants, not public masters. XXV and XXVI - The corporate State and corporate state have its own religion and, through treason isforcing its religion upon the children of America. The corporate state teaches the children evolution; that humans evolved from apes, and so on and so forth. There has never been evidence proving such nonsense, however, the corporate state demands that the children in their impressionable years go to the corporate government-schools and influences them unduly anent this bunk. Since the evolutionhypothesis has never been proven, which makes the hypothesis questionable at best, and, therefore, is based on a science of conjecture and belief, it is a religion. Moreover, when presented the question of “Where then did our eyes come from(?),” the evolution worshipers are at a loss for words. The corporate state then bastardized Amendment I of the Constitution for the United States of America wherein it states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; …” to abolish the free exercise of religion in favor of their, the corporate, state-religion. The purpose for this deception is to place humans in the category of the animals and, thereby, extirpate the unalienable rights through the corporate hypothesis that if we came from one-celled animals we are no different than any animal, with the exception that we are simply more advanced. Thus, we would not be Page 19 of 55 stewards on this planet as “The Scriptures” point out, just advanced and sophisticated animals and our unalienable rights would be no more than privileges granted by other humans thinking they are the superiors, as in “rule by the fittest,” that meaning the most evil as pointed out so eloquently by Lord Acton wherein he stated, “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.” XXVII and XXVIII – When “We the People” buy an automobile, truck, van, motorcycle or the like[hereafter vehicle] we do not receive the “Manufacturers Certificate of Origin” [hereafter MCO]. The one who has the MCO is the owner of the vehicle. The corporate state, a subsidiary of the federal corporation, has ordered the dealerships to surrender the MCO’s to it and it issues a “Certificate of Title” [hereafter CT]. Since the corporate state possesses the MCO it has annexed the vehicle and issues a CT in order to commandeer ownership of the vehicle so that the corporate state may effectively lease the vehicle to the human who thought he/she had bought it originally. Thus, the human purchasing the vehicle is not told that the corporate state has unlawfully commandeered the vehicle and fraudulently and through treason has stolen the vehicle that the human is paying for and that the corporate state now owns the vehicle, consequently requiring registration for the human to use or travel in. Hence, through treason, criminal fraud and racketeering the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association has unlawfullycommandeered the property of the American people in order to overthrow the American people and the American form of government. XXIX and XXX - The Fourth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,“The right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…” In violation of the Constitution ibid, the corporation, known as Internal Revenue and police of the State of: e.g., Colorado, search the American People’s papers and effects minute by minute in this country. The agents of the false entity known as “Internal Revenue Service” and police write unlawful summonses against the American People. The “IRS” file notices of levies and liens without verification of any debt. The corporation known as Internal Revenue is a private corporation working in conjunction with the Federal Reserve, a private corporation controlled by the Vatican through the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel. The aforementioned private corporation [Internal Revenue] is protected under an auspices of authority usurped by another corporation owned by the Vatican and the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel, which corporation is known as the BAR-Association. Then, the corporation known as the Internal Revenue has its own tribunal, which it calls the “United States Tax Court.” In addition, the corporate states rely on the “IRS” and serve the “IRS” anent their “State income taxes.” The language “United States Tax Court” is false conveyance of language inasmuch as the phrase “United States” is a noun-phrase that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Tax; the word-Tax is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-Court, there is no such Page 20 of 55 language; therefore, when properly read it would be “United non-existent Court.” Moreover, it is a common practice for the merchant federal and State “police officers” to search the American Peoples person, houses, papers and effects without lawful authorization, and their co-conspirators, the quasijudiciary British Accredited Registry- Association, support such action against the American People andthe American form of government on an hourly basis in violation of Amendment IV of the Constitution for the United States of America. XXXI and XXXII – The corporate United States and the corporate States commit Treason and conspireto commit treason against the American People and the American form of government through the crime of malicious prosecution. The facts of treason, conspiracy to commit treason, kidnapping for ransom, murder, conspiracy to commit murder, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, jury tampering, criminal fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, mail-fraud, false conveyance of language, grand theft, and so on and so forth, have been filed and acquiesced to by the Chief Officers of the corporations aforementioned and this tribunal. The Prosecutorial staff denied not a single fact filed against them articulating these charges; therefore, the people of the corporate government admit their crimes but claim impunity. Instead of denying with opposing facts, the prosecutor remains silent and the merchant-judges proceed playing the role of chief merchant-prosecutor and merchant-judge to continue their ruse and cover-up legitimate charges filed by the American People against the judiciary and other sub-branches of government. It is hereby noted that if merchants-judges-Christine A. Carney and C. Edward Stirman, et al. were of proper moral and judicial character and people of justice they would have ordered a proper grand jury empanelled for presentment for indictment against the criminal parties. When merchant-VanMeveren and the merchant-police did not deny and qualify a denial with the “law,” the merchant-judge should have ordered the immediate arrest of merchant-VanMeveren and the police;” however, they did not. Furthermore, the judge would have ordered the corporate state to cease and desist its unlawful actions against the American People. However, nothing has changed; instead the merchant-judges continue their treason and conspiracy to commit treason in an attempt to usurp jurisdiction using the fictitious entity known as the “Larimer County Court” as their vehicle. The moment the merchant-judges did not order the corporations [State of Colorado, County of Larimer, City of Loveland] to cease and desist the actions against us and the American People, they proclaimed their active participation in the conspiracy against us, the American People and the American form of government. Furthermore, merchant-Stirman wrote in his “AMENDED PRE-TRIAL ORDER REGARDING JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 10,2004” he wrote in #8, “DEADLINE FOR PLEA AGREEMENTS.” That, “Either the Defendant will then plead guilty or the District Attorney will dismiss the case.” This evinces that there is no case and that the corporate states and its officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries are harassing and threatening me in order to usurp jurisdiction through malicious prosecution over me. Thus, through treason and Page 21 of 55 conspiracy to commit treason the corporate government engages in malicious prosecution in order to overthrow the American People and the American form of government. XXXIII and XXXIV - The Fifth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,“…nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; not shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” The corporations of the BAR-Association, the United States, the Federal Reserve, the Internal Revenue and the States of: e.g., Colorado, seize the American Peoples property, for private use under the auspices of authority granted under the Constitution for the United States of America, hour by hour. In reality the corporations, supra have commandeered the courts through Admiralty-jurisdiction and extirpated the Common Law; thus, the merchant-officers violated our rights and the rights of the American People as a whole aforementioned written in the Fifth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America. Americans are deprived of their life, liberty and property without law, much less due process of law. Furthermore, the American People are compelled to be witnesses against themselves under the anti-law known as statutes by many organizations claiming to be legitimate government agencies (e.g., FAA, FCC, IRS, State Highway Patrol, Sheriff, City Police, etc.). These criminals are given their authority and protection from the British Accredited Registry [BAR]-Association, the government behind the scenes. Many, if not all, situations aforementioned were/are done while the corporate agents were/are armed and dangerous. This unlawful practice is conducted hourly by the corporate security-guards called police, or agents of policing agencies, against the American People and the American form of government, which witnesses the overthrow of the American government and the American People. “We the People” are commanded and threatened to give information to the corporate security-guards under threat of further charges and violence, which corporate security-guards are protected by the BAR-Association-Attorney’s quasi-judiciary when these cases go before them. Thus, the corporate de facto government has taken the American public’s properties without just compensation and forced the American People to be a witness against himself or herself when being charged with antilaw statutes. The People are deprived of their life, liberty and property and have now become prisoners, bankrupt [no gold and silver-coins to pay a debt], homeless [eminent domain] and debtors in their own country. XXXV and XXXVI - The First-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America states,“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Since the corporate state, by and through the British Accredited Registry-Association-Attorneys and their corporate security-guardsPage 22 of 55 known as police and agents of policing agencies, declare they own the highways then they can and do force the American People to get a document entitled “driver’s license.” The language-“driver’s license” is a false conveyance of language inasmuch as the word-driver’s is a possessive noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-license; there is no such creature. When properly read this language would be “non-existent license.” Furthermore, the “Federal Aviation Administration” (FAA) has commandeered the public transportation facilities where they require identification in the form of a “driver’s license” from a corporate state in order for the American People to travel. Not only is the language-“driver’s license” a felony-false conveyance of language but it also confers upon the person that status of being property of the corporate government seeking a privilege. If the corporate government chooses not to grant the permission one could and probably would be restricted from going to the assembly or church of his/her choice and from congregating with people of his/her faith in order to counter the state’s-religion of evolution for their children. If the corporate government owns the highway then there would be no freedom of religion. One would have to satisfy the corporate government in order to be allowed access, which would grant the corporate government the authority to determine which religions they consider appropriate. In other words, one could and most likely be restricted to “Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3)” government corporate churches. In addition, one could not petition the Government for redress of grievances if one does not have the right of locomotion and movement inasmuch as one could not, without permission from the corporate state, get to a location where they could present the petition. Just getting to a place where one could present his/her petition one would be in jeopardy of arrest and imprisonment for using the “public highways” without permission. Thus, the corporate state controls the ability of any human to petition by controlling their access to the thoroughfares. Hence, the corporate state has overthrown the Constitution for the United States of America in favor of its totalitarian form of government. XXXVII and XXXVIII - The Sixth-Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of Americastates, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, … and informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence [sic].” The Sixth-Amendment ibid, does not have in writing any thing about either an Attorney (a merchant) or a license. The BAR-Association, serving a foreign nation, instead overthrew the Constitution for the United States of America’s-Sixth Amendment in order to strip the American People of Assistance of Counsel, impartial jury, to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, and compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, wherein the British Accredited RegistryPage 23 of 55 [BAR]-Association-Attorneys under Admiralty-authority would not have commandeered jurisdiction. The “Royal Courts” controlled and owned by the BAR-Association have determined that one has to use an Attorney or appear pro se (as your own Attorney) thus, granting jurisdiction to a merchant-tribunal where no law or “rights” under law exist. XXXIX and XL - The corporate United States and state’s-witnesses, the police and other governmentagents, are protected from charges of perjury under the unlawful Supreme Tribunal’s-case “Briscoe Et. al. v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Furthermore, the police and policing agencies have become corporate security-guards working for the corporate government and no longer for the American People, and have a vested interest to give false information as testimony. This unlawful protection has grown to encompass virtually every government officer, agent, broker or intermediary the prosecutor calls to give testimony against the American Public. Thus, the America’s-People’s-right to face their accuser has been stripped from them so that the British Accredited Registry-Association and corporate merchant-police can maturetheir conspiracy to overthrow the American People and the American form of government. XLI and XLII – The American People are required to obtain a document called a “Driver’s License”before they can use their own highway, thus, making the natural person a highway-merchant. As a merchant, the natural person allegedly falls under the Uniform Commercial Code through commerce and the corporate government presumes ownership and control of the natural person. Thus, the person is annexed and unwittingly dragged into commerce wherein the corporate government usurps jurisdiction. Since the natural person is not informed of this conspiracy and criminal act in order that he/she may make a choice, and since the corporate government writes, prosecutes and enforces Common Law criminal sanctions against the people for not complying with this anti-law (statutes), the BAR-Association and corporate police not only commit the crimes of treason and conspiracy to commit treason, an overthrow of the American form of government and the American People, but also racketeering, criminal fraud, conspiracy in Bills of Pains and penalties, theft, robbery while armed and dangerous, assault and battery, false arrest, false imprisonment, and many other crimes against the America’s-People. XLIII and XLIV – The Banks, operating under the authority of the Federal Reserve, a principal of theBAR-Association, are given permission to create monies out of thin air. Then interest is charged on the use of the mere electronic entries, which would present a false debt and expand into a false national debt. The Federal and state judges and their sibling-merchants in the British Accredited Registry-[BAR]-Association, along with the other government officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries, support and encourage this Bank-Fraud against the American People. The Congress is given permission to borrow on the credit of the United States, whatever the United States is, not on the credit of the American People or Page 24 of 55 the States of the Union. Thus the Legislature cabal, joined by the Executive sub-branch and, since 1933, this quasi-Judiciary, succeeded into bankrupting the American People in an attempt to overthrow the American form of government and the American People. This conspiracy makes debtors of the American People to a discreet cabal headed by the Vatican, and it’s Guardian of the Vatican’s Treasury: the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel. XLV and XLVI – The sub-branches of government known as the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary[now quasi-judiciary] willfully and knowingly side track the Law and the Rights of the American People in order to fulfill the agenda of a foreign nation and country, namely the Vatican and “The Crown” a/k/a “The City” controlled by the “Guardians of the Vatican’s Treasury,” the Rothschild-Bank-Cartel. Through criminal actions of the Attorneys, America is being taken into a one-world-government where we will have lost our collective-sovereignty of “We the People” and will become world-subjects under a political arena and force known for its cruelty and inhumanity, the Vatican. This creature murdered between fifty and sixty million people in the dark-ages, had concentration-camps in Croatia where the Serbs were tortured and many murdered heinously because they refused to join the Vatican “church” before and during “World War II” (see “The Vatican’s Holocaust” written by Avro Manhattan.), supported for election two of the most evil people in history, those being Hitler and Mussolini and has an army of Jesuits whose job it is to seize the world for the “mother church.” This is not to say that Catholics are cognizant of the agenda of the Vatican, nor, for that matter, that many people involved with groups are necessarily cognizant of the agenda of the hierarchy of their organization or religion; however, the facts are there and acquiesced to by the Chief Officers addressed herein. With eyes wide open the British Accredited Registry- Association and its filial creations such as the “FAA,” “FCC,” “IRS,” etc.are desperately manipulating the American People into a one-world-government so that they will have the ultimate power and control for their principal. The borders of America are being methodically and systematically shattered for one-world conquest, “The world will follow after the beast.” XLVII and XLVIII – The Constitution for the United States of America, Article I, Section 8 [3] states,“The Congress shall have Power…To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;”. The corporate government has misused this authority to seize absolute power in commerce over the nation. The intent of the founding-fathers was that the several States would be regulated against tariffs, price-gouging, taxes and other such criminal actions against the People from other States or within the same State selling their goods or attempting to sell their goods. This was not intended to regulate the American People by extirpating their rights of locomotion and movement. By requiring specific identification, that identification being a corporate government identifying card such as a “Driver’s License” “Pilot’s Certificate” and licensing over watercrafts, the Page 25 of 55 corporate government has covertly crippled the rights of the American People. The Law, written in 11 Am Jur § 329, 2. Liberty states: “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” Though this paragraph is not entirely accurate, inasmuch as it addresses the noun-citizen and not the proper noun-Citizen as written in the Constitution for the United States of America thirteen times before the infamous Amendment XIV, it still indicates a natural right of locomotion and movement by the American People. The Federal Corporation and state- Corporations are willfully and knowingly confining the American People to the will of the corporate state by attempting to control the staple right of locomotion and movement, without such right no other rights exist or can be exercised. XLIX and L – Through prior information (a questionnaire sent to prospective jurors) the Prosecutorsknow the socio-economic level and status of the Grand Jurors and petit jurors they empanel, and with that information he/she impanels the Grand Jury and petit jurors which would be antagonistic to the people whose cases are brought before them for consideration. The judiciary relies on the “voter registration,” a false conveyance of language, in order to comprise their lists. It is understood that the “voter’s registration” witnesses that the body politic “ We the People” lost our right to vote long ago. Therequirement to register-to-vote demonstrates that voting has become a privilege one can only exercise if he/she seeks permission through a process of registration. Furthermore, in order for a natural person to register to vote the natural person has to declare themselves a “United States citizen” and a resident of the state. The word-resident is used to trap the American into a jurisdiction under the corporate state and not as a free American. To register means to get a license to vote. License: page 231, English Synonyms, Antonymsand Prepositions copyright 1896: “A permission or privilege granted by an adequate authority, abounded liberty. In the wider sense, license is an ignoring and defiance of all that should restrain, and a reckless doing of all that individual caprice or passion may choose to do - a base and dangerous counterfeit of freedom.” Page 26 of 55 LI and LII – The Prosecutor directs and controls the purported investigation of the facts by the GrandJury in order to control the outcome and usurp jurisdiction over the accused. The Prosecutor embraces the Grand Jury, presents his/her government witnesses and cordons off the Grand Jury so that any investigation is limited to the alleged facts the Prosecutor and his/her witnesses testify to. As shown earlier, the prosecutor’s-witnesses are protected from charges of perjury under the unlawful case Briscoe Et. al. v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S. 325 (1983). Furthermore, the Prosecutor does not inform the Grand Jury that he/she is acting as a judicial officer; officer of the court, and, therefore, the case would be a judicial self-initiating case, which is un-Constitutional. In other words, the judiciary, through the Prosecutor, could indict a hamburger. This is an overthrow of the American form of government and of the American People. LIII and LIV – In the case “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AUSTIN GARY COOPER, 89-109-Cr-Hoeveler the judge and prosecutor declared that we have dual Citizenship, those being “American Citizen” and “citizen of the United States.” The prosecutor in her final argument to the jury declared that “He pays Social Security, he uses the Postal Service; therefore, Mr. Cooper is a United States citizen.” I filed lawful documentation to President-George Bush, to Chief Justice William Rehnquist, to the Governor and Chief Justice of Colorado, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue proving the specified contracts to be fraudulent. No one denied the facts enumerated and articulated therein. Further, I proved that the corporate United States and the corporate States use felony-false conveyances of language to gain jurisdiction over the American People unlawfully. I was imprisoned for not paying protection monies to the corporations usurping jurisdiction. Now, this tribunal working for the corporate United States is attempting to disregard its own declaration in order to usurp jurisdiction where none exist. After the corporate officers were served and upon the declaration by the officers of sub-status citizenship, that being “citizen of the United States” being contracts trapping the American Citizens under Admiraltyjurisdiction, the officers, through their own declarations, proclaimed knowledge of their overthrow and conspiracy to overthrow the American form of government and the American People. LV and LVI – Amendment II of the Constitution for the United States of America states, “A wellregulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The corporate United States, Federal Reserve, BAR-Association, Internal Revenue and sub-corporations known as the “States of: e.g., Colorado” have written, prosecuted and enforced statutes, the abrogation of law, restricting and licensing the keeping and bearing of arms. The corporate security-guards do, however, keep and bear arms, and through their possession of arms do rob and pillage the American People. The unalienable Right to keep and bear arms was and is intended to create security and a threat to invasion from within the country or abroad. The four corporations and Page 27 of 55 numerous sub-corporations have overthrown and conspired to overthrow the American form of government and the American People by willfully and knowingly and with malice aforethought prosecuting the American People for exercising their unalienable Rights such as Amendment II, ibid. LVII and LVIII – The human persons of the corporate state are abducting our children under the guiseof protection and the auspices of statutes, the anti-law, and engaging in the business of selling human persons for their own gain. The gain the corporate state is receiving is to charge the “taxpayer” for taking the child and placing the child in a state-institution or under foster care. Then the state charges the parent for the care, double dipping. The business is augmented by the anti-laws wherein the parent is charged with child-abuse if he/she/they discipline(s) his/her/their child and child-neglect if he/she/they do(es) not discipline his/her/their child. The child has been annexed at birth whereat the humans of the corporate state force a contract known as a birth-certificate under the authority of the corporate state and the nefarious “Social Security Administration” requiring the child to have a “Social Security Number” with are both felonies-false conveyances of language in and of themselves. In hearings the judge espouses that the child is his/hers, thus, witnessing that the child has been annexed. Further, the corporate state conditions the human People that they have to have a “marriage license” before getting married, and that a proper marriage under the law is either not recognized or frowned upon. The language-“marriage license” is defined in “Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition” as, “A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry usually addressed to the minister or magistrate who is to perform the ceremony, or, in general terms, to any one authorized to solemnize marriages. By statute in most jurisdictions, it is made an essential prerequisite to the lawful solemnization of the marriage.” The word-intermarry is defined as “see Miscegenation.” The word-miscegenation is defined as, “Mixture of races; marriage between persons of different races, as between a white person and a Negro.” Liberty informs us that we have the right to marry. It is an established condition of equity and law that if someone has to seek a license that the alleged entity granting the “license” presumes the authority and parent-ownership over the licensed venture or action. Thus, the corporate state assumes ownership over any human seeking a “marriage license” as a corporate “Parens patriæ” a/k/a corporate “Surrogate parent,” which standing is used to deprive a human person of liberty and freedom guaranteed under the law and in the Constitution for the United States of America. This would then perpetuate a belief and authority that any one seeking a “marriage license” would then grant ownership of the fruits of their marriage, e.g., their children, to the corporate state; hence, this is treason and a conspiracy to commit treason against the American People and the America form of government. LIX and LX – The corporate government forces the introduction of fluoride, a dangerous nerve-poison,into the water-systems supplying water to hundreds of millions of American People. Fluoride is a severe Page 28 of 55 nerve-poison, it kills nerve-cells as it proceeds to release to the next cell. Further, the intensely small negative fluoride-ion coordinates with iron and destroys hemoglobin. There are hundreds of documented studies proving that fluoride is of great harm to individual health and of no use in dentistry. Fluoride has a de-scaling action; it removes fungus spot, rust, and every other contaminant that has been collecting for decades in the pipes. It doubles the rate of corrosion in iron-pipes. The Nuremberg-court, set to try Naziwar- criminals, executed many of the criminals for experimenting on single or multiple human-subjects without their permission. The Attorneys and other government officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries, past and present, along with our chemical industry, have been and are implementing human-experimentation in the place known as the body-politic called these United States of America minute by minute. The corporate government strives to, amongst other heinous activities, diminish the health of the American People so that the one-world-government-regime can more easily overpower the American People and force same under its tyrannical regime. LXI and LXII – It has recently come to our attention that another way the corporate tribunals usurpjurisdiction over the American People is through the Supreme Tribunal-case entitled Davis vs. Elmira Savings, 161 U.S. 275 (1896), wherein it was declared that banks are instrumentalities of the Congress. In other words, the interstate system of banks is the private property of the corporate United States acting as King over the American People in an attempt to overthrow the American People and the American form of government. The documentation the bank presents to be signed generally has the language, “The undersigned hereby agrees to abide by all of the Rules of this Bank.” In the banks-rules rules it has language that contracts a natural person that he/she/they agree to abide by all of the administrative rulings of the Secretary of the Treasury, among other things, thus, attempting to create a contract between “We the People” and the banks alleged principal, the corporate United States. The Supreme Tribunal committed treason and conspired to commit treason in the case herein referenced, inasmuch as the Congress is a product of “We the People,” just as the Executive and Judicial Branches are. These are subbranches of government, which is why the natural persons filling the positions of government are called “public servants.” This means that the banks are only instrumentalities of Congress in relation to the other two sub-branches of the sub-government, not in relation to the principal [We the People, a collective sovereignty] of the three sub-branches. Hence, for the Supreme Tribunal to take the government of “We the People” and nefariously claim that their [We the People] creation [Congress] can covertly create a sub-creation [banks], which sub-creation could and has bound “We the People” under the creation [Congress] by contract with the sub-creation [banks] and into the jurisdiction of the Executive branch under the Secretary of the Treasury is patently treasonous and criminal fraud. Furthermore, when the corporate state tribunal addressing itself as “Larimer County Court” sent us back the “bond monies” it was attempting to usurp jurisdiction inasmuch as the state-tribunals are subsidiaries Page 29 of 55 of the federal tribunals and not “Courts of Law,” but court-martials demonstrative of the federal military flag and the state-military flag prominently displayed next to the merchant-judges-throne. It is understood, based upon this new information, that this was a conspiracy to grant jurisdiction to the tribunal aforementioned by the signing of the cards and/or checks without the reservation of rights, which the merchant-judge then uses to usurp jurisdiction without disclosure. Therefore, this is not only a situation of the commission of treason and conspiracy to commit treason, but is also criminal fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Counts LXIII and LXIV Count LXIII A, B, C and D. Assault and Battery times 4; Count LXIV A, B, C and D. Criminal negligence times 4 A. On April 25, 2003 C.E., merchant Chief of Police of Loveland’s-officers pulled me over,assaulted and battered me, committed criminal negligence against me, kidnapped me for ransom under the auspices of authority of a “arrest warrant” that was not signed by a judge or magistrate. These facts have been lawfully filed and no oppositional argument has ever been filed. Furthermore, the officers charged me with “Failure to Appear” for a hearing for the alleged crime of “speeding.” The officers then charged me with something known as “DUR” and wrote me another summons disguised as a “traffic ticket” for “DUR.” I was held for ransom of $300.00. I had, in fact, appeared for the hearings by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and, in the documentation I had filed referenced the law under 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law. Thus, the merchant-police-officers had no probable cause for the violence and other criminal actions. B. On June 1, 2003 C.E. merchant-deputies of the “Larimer County Sheriff’s Office” came to myproperty, entered said property and said they had a warrant for my arrest. We, Martha and I, asked to see the alleged “arrest warrant” and was told, “No.” I was acting in good-faith when talking to the deputies. The merchant-deputies then proceeded to grab me and twist my arms in an awkward position causing great pain and held me there while one of the deputies placed handcuffs around my wrists. In spite of the fact that the deputies had no valid “arrest warrant” I did not resist, therefore, the deputies had no cause for their sadism in twisting my arms and wrist in an unnatural position causing me great pain in my wrist and shoulders. After many threats of violence I was taken to the “Larimer County Detention Center” where more threats were espoused against me. I was “booked” for alleged “Failure to Appear” anent and unlawful “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “Speeding” and for another “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “DUR.” I was held for ransom of $1,500.00. I had, in fact, appeared by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and no oppositional argument was ever filed. Thus, through “tacit agreement” the Accused concurred that their jurisdiction was unlawful and through Admiralty, not the Common-Law. In good faith, I had supported my position by informing the Accused Page 30 of 55 of the Law, to wit: “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law. Thus, the merchant-police-officers had no probable cause for the violence and other criminal actions. C. On August 7, 2003 C.E. merchant-deputies of the “Larimer County Sheriff’s Office” came tomy property, entered said property and said they had a warrant for my arrest. Again, like the past, We, Martha and I, asked to see the alleged “arrest warrant” and was told, “No.” I was acting in good-faith when talking to the deputies. Merchant-deputy Harrison and I had a discussion and after approximately ten to fifteen minutes of us, my wife and me, demanding to see the alleged “arrest warrant” he suggested that if he went and got the signed “arrest warrant” would I go with him peaceably. I said, “Yes.” The deputies then left the premises. Then approximately one and one/half (1½) hours later they came back in greater force. Deputy Harrison told us, my wife and me, that they could not find a judge that was awake to sign the “arrest warrant,” but that he had seen a copy of the signed “arrest warrant,” a contradiction, and, therefore, was placing me under arrest. Thus, he admitted there was no signed arrest warrant and then said he saw a copy. History supports that several documents entitled “arrest warrants” have been enforced upon me and not a single one has been signed. The merchant-deputies then proceeded to grab me and twist my arms in an awkward position causing great pain and held me there while one of the deputies placed handcuffs around my wrists. In spite of the fact that the deputies had no valid “arrest warrant” I did not resist, therefore, the deputies had no cause for their sadism in twisting my arms and wrist in an unnatural position causing me great pain in my wrist and shoulders. After many threats of violence I was taken to the “Larimer County Detention Center” where more threats were espoused against me. I was “booked” for alleged “Failure to Appear” anent an unlawful “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “Speeding,” and for another “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “DUR,” and FTA/Civil. I was held for ransom of $2,000.00 with a “PR”-bond for $1,500.00. I had, in fact, appeared by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and no oppositional argument was ever filed. Thus, through “tacit agreement” the Accused concurred that their jurisdiction was unlawful and through Admiralty, not the Common-Law. In good faith, I had supported my position by informing the Accused of the Law, to wit: “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law. Thus, the merchantpolice- officers had no probable cause for the violence and other criminal actions. I was held in the concentration-camp known as the “Larimer County Detention Center” for five days. It is public record that Martha and I have filed criminal complaints against the Accused and that considering that there are no courts of law in this Country a “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt” [hereafter BOD] was served on the principal officers listed herein. Only after the criminal charges were filed and the BOD was served upon the Accused did the Accused appear at my home and complete their dastardly deeds. D. See accompanying Affidavits.Page 31 of 55 Counts LXV and LXVIII. Count LXV. Falsification of legal documents; Count LXVI. Tampering with a witness and victim; Count LXVII. Criminal trespass; Count LXVIII. Commission of crimes while armed and dangerous. Through the other Accused, merchant-police-officers did willfully and knowingly assault and batter me, engaged in criminal negligence, ransacked my vehicle, kidnapped me for ransom, falsely arrest me and falsely imprison me in violation of the law using as their authority a document they called an “arrest warrant” which was fatally flawed and substantially defective. Through the other Accused, merchant-deputies did, on two separate occasions, willfully and knowingly trespass upon my property while armed and dangerous and assaulted and battered me, assaulted me verbally, and did kidnap me for ransom using as their authority documents they called “arrest warrants” which was fatally flawed and substantially defective. The Accused did verbally falsify that the document they referred to as an “arrest warrant” was in fact a legitimate “arrest warrant;” however, at the time of the assault upon me they purposefully refused Martha or me a visual inspection of the documentation. We later discovered that the “arrest warrants” were not issued by a judge or magistrate as required. It is public record that Martha and I have filed criminal complaints against the Accused and that considering that there are no courts of law in this Country a “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt” [hereafter BOD] was served on the principal officers listed herein. Only after the criminal charges were filed and the BOD was served upon the Accused did the Accused appear at my home and complete their dastardly deeds. Merchant-officers and deputies did willfully and knowingly and with malice aforethought place excessive pressure upon my shin while engaging in the crime of kidnapping for ransom. Furthermore, merchant-deputies did threaten me that he would break my legs if I did not do the impossible by turning my body to face the front of the cruiser when it is physically impossible for me at 6”8” tall and 300 pounds to do so. Further, the merchant-deputies did willfully and knowingly threaten me that if I did not “cooperate” with them by giving them personal information they would place me back in solitary confinement in the small cold-cell they had locked me in. The merchant-deputies knew that the “arrest warrant” was not signed and, therefore, not a lawful document. When I asked them if the “arrest warrant” was signed merchant-Sims and another merchant-officer said “No.” Then the other merchant-officer said, “It does not have to be signed by a judge, they will sign it over there.” In other words, the merchantofficers make an arrest on a fatally flawed and substantially defective warrant and then send it to the judge or magistrate to sign it. Counts LXIX and LXXI. Count LXIX. Conspiracy against rights; Count LXX. Unlawful search; Count LXXI. Conspiracy against rights while armed and dangerous. Page 32 of 55 The Accused, State of Colorado, a Corporation; County of Larimer, a Corporation; City of Loveland, a Corporation; District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren; Police-Chief-Tom Wagoner; Clerk-Sherlyn K. Sampson; Merchants: officer-sergeant-Rabson; Chisum and Mendoza; unknown judges 1-5; unknown merchant-police-officers 1-5; unknown Prosecuting-Attorneys 1-5; et al., had first-hand-knowledge that I had appeared, inasmuch as they were served either by process-server or by certified mail the complaint sent in for filing entitled, “Special-Appearance; and, Formal and Constructive Notice; and, Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case; and, Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member.” Therefore, both parties did willfully and knowingly conspired to commit fraud, assault and batter me, commit criminal negligence against me, unlawfully search and ransack my automobile, a truck, and kidnap me for a ransom of $300.00, and did violate my rights by executing a substantially defective and fatally flawed document entitled “WARRANT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR.” The Accused committed these crimes while armed with handguns and dangerous. The parties knew or should have known that the anti-law known as the “Colorado Revised Statutes,” in § “16-1-104. Definitions” it states, “(18) A "warrant" is a written order issued by a judge of a court of record directed to any peace officer commanding the arrest of the person named or described in the order.” Moreover, the language “peace officer” is a false conveyance of language, inasmuch as the word-peace is a noun that has been converted into an adjective modifying the noun-officer, there is no such creature; therefore this is a false conveyance of language and a felony. When properly read according to English-grammar this language would be, “non-existent-officer.” It is public record that Martha and I have filed criminal complaints against the Accused and that considering that there are no courts of law in this Country a “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt” [hereafter BOD] was served on the principal officers listed herein. Only after the criminal charges were filed and the BOD was served upon the Accused did the Accused appear at my home and complete their dastardly deeds. Since the Sheriff is the Chief Peace-Officer in the County, when his agent was served, namely Police-Chief Tom Wagoner, he was served, inasmuch as “Notice to principal is notice to agent and notice to agent is notice to principal.” The Accused, Sheriff James A. Alderden, should have arrested the parties involved, instead he acted in concert and through conspiracy considering that he had already been charged criminally by both Martha and me and has not refuted the charges. While I was held by the Accused-Shellhaas and Alderden by and through Alderden’s other deputies and agents I was searched twice, delving into my pockets under a fatally flawed and substantially defective “arrest warrant,” which “fatally flawed and substantially defective” “arrest warrant” was enforced through a treasonous violation of Constitutional Law under 11 AmJur § 329 and other cases where I have the right of locomotion and movement. Page 33 of 55 See accompanying affidavits. Counts LXXII through LXXIV. Count LXXII. Theft; Count LXXIII. Conspiracy to commit theft; Count LXXIV. Malfeasance of office by the governing officials. Physically and through written threats, the Accused did willfully and knowingly conspire to deny our unalienable Right of locomotion and movement, protection against government assault and battery and criminal negligence perpetrated by the governmental authorities. Through diligent research we have unearthed the facts wherein the corporate BAR Association, U.S., STATE, COUNTY, CITY and/or TOWN enforces its statutes and ordinances, which are abrogation’s of the law, on the American Citizens use of their own and collective properties; the public highways. Fraudulently we are informed that we have to register our automobiles and apply for a “driver’s license,” This phraseology is a false conveyance of language, before we can travel on the highways to exercise our rights. We have grown to understand that through the infamous BAR Association’s Attorneys at law, that all of our rights have become privileges called civil rights. Information is withheld that if we do submit to the statutes we give the governing entity permission to annex our property and lease it back to us in the form of “vehicle registration,” another false conveyance of language. Evidence of fraud anent the usurpations of our natural-rights has been served upon Governor Owens and Chief Justice Mullarkey of the corporate State of Colorado and they have acquiesced to the facts enumerated and articulated therein. Thus, we have irrefutable evidence of treason, conspiracy to commit treason, criminal fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy against our rights, and deprivation of rights under color of law, malfeasance of office by the governing officials, criminal trespass and unlawful seizure. Furthermore, since ignorance of the law is no excuse, the merchants herein were fully aware of their criminal behavior before and during their actions. Counts LXXV and LXXVI. Count LXXV. Willfully and knowingly making false statements and misrepresentations, “Statements or entries generally” Title 18, U.S.C.A. § 1001; Count LXXVI. Fictitious plaintiff (contempt of court). The BAR Association, UNITED STATES, STATE, COUNTY, CITY and TOWN have represented no one as an injured party. It has, however, represented itself as a principal. This tribunal, judge and prosecutor have represented themselves as a Court-of-Law. The judge and prosecutor are Attorneys at law. The word Attorney is taken from the words: Attorn / v. Me. [Origin French. atorner, aturner assign, appoint, f. a-torner turn v.] 1. v.t. Turn; change, transform; deckout. 2. v.t. Turn over (goods, service, allegiance, etc.) to another; transfer, assign. 3. v.i. Transfer one’s tenancy, or (arch.) homage or allegiance, to another; formally acknowledge such transfer. Attorn tenant (to) Law formally transfer one’s tenancy (to), make legal acknowledgment of tenancy (to a new landlord). – OxfordEnglish Dictionary 1999 .Attorn , v.i. [Latin ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another.This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation or the estate. – Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.Page 34 of 55 Attornment , n. The act of a feudatory vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of an estate, toreceive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service. – Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.Attornment n. the transference of bailor status, tenancy, or (arch.) allegiance, service, etc., to another; formalacknowledgment of such transfer: lme. – Oxford English Dictionary 1999.Thus, it is clear that an Attorney is one who transfers or assigns, within the BAR, another’s rights and property, acting on behalf of the ruling crown (“The Crown” a/k/a “The City” in London, England). In other words, when Attorneys call themselves officers of the court, they are correct in that they are all government agents; however, they serve a foreign government. The American people are deceived into believing that they are neutral and working on behalf of justice, not serving their BAR Association. Moreover, in Law (common-law) the accused has the right to face his/her/their accuser to determine the relationship of responsibility and, if responsibility exist, the extent of injury. There has been no publication stating precisely who the injured party is in this cause. Hence, under the common-law, UCC § 1-103:6 and Colorado CRS 1973 § 4-1-103 (The Code cannot be read to preclude a common-law action.), we demand publication of the specific name and title of the alleged injured party initiating this cause, and documentation of the alleged injury suffered by this alleged injured party. Count LXXVII. Conspiracy in a Bill of Pains and Penalties and criminal fraud. Clearly, the law supports the Right of natural-persons to locomotion and movement without interference from government, as long as these people do not injure another's: person, property, or rights. Even more so, the natural right to venture out on one’s own property, such as the public highways, without interference from government agents bent on breaking the laws. Amendment V of the Constitution for the United States of America, securing unalienable rights for the American Citizens, states that “…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” When the corporate BAR Associations, TOWNS, CITIES, COUNTIES or STATE unlawfully annexed our property (our automobile) and us, we neither agreed nor did we receive just compensation. For this tribunal to demand compliance to government statutes anent private property, in the form of property tax (vehicle registration), etc., our property would have had to be annexed for government use in the form of leased property. These statutes are then by construction and in practice “Bills of Pains and Penalties” and, furthermore, this tribunal is an Administrative hearing. The facts bear out that this Administrative (proprietary) hearing would not have jurisdiction because it is not a Court-of-Law. Therefore, the colorable law this administrative hearing enforces is a Bill of Pains and Penalties. Count LXXVIII. Racketeering Through a threat of imprisonment and/or fines, the BAR Association, TOWN, CITY, COUNTY and STATE attempts to force us, specifically Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, and collectively, Page 35 of 55 the American public , into submission in order to use our collective, personal, and private property. Since wehave the Right to use our collective property and to protection under the law, any interference of these natural rights is a violation of the law. The corporate government makes a practice of the unlawful actions demonstrated in this case in order to press upon the people their colorable law written and enforced by BAR Attorneys to feed their pocketbooks and secure their dominion over the unsuspecting and the innocent. The BAR Association, and its soldiers, the corporate TOWN, CITY, COUNTY and STATE have embarked on missions that are both criminal conspiracies to racketeer and active racketeering against “We the People.” Count LXXIX. Admiralty quasi-judicial merchant tribunal and/or Star Chamber (court) fraudulently being represented as a Court of Law. This LARIMER COUNTY court, Larimer, Colorado is proceeding as an Administrative (proprietary) Admiralty quasi-judicial tribunal and/or Star Chamber hearing. Points of fact: a. There is no injured party presented to give evidence to determine the extent of injury. Fraudulently, the CITY, COUNTY and STATE are appearing as an injured party, however, they can not appear, they are fictions; b. Merchants: BAR Association, (e.g., judge, prosecutor) TOWN, COUNTY and STATE, et al., without evidence, have made conclusions of law that we had either contracted, or made an agreement with the BAR Association, STATE and/or LARIMER to give up our Rights: 1. governing freedom from extortion; 2. freedom in enjoyment and use of all of one’s powers, faculties and property; 3. our right to use property according to owner’s will; 4. to contract or not to contract; 5. to locomotion and movement; 6. of freedom of religion; 7. to earn a livelihood in any lawful calling; 8. against self incrimination; 9. to face our accuser; 10. to protection from Bill's of Pains and Penalties; c. This tribunal displays the Federal military flag. The flag of the union is not displayed in this tribunal, therefore, Admiralty jurisdiction governs, NOT Law; d. The BAR Association, TOWN, COUNTY, STATE, and, their officers, employees, elected officials, and certain agents, brokers and intermediaries have vested interests in this cause, inasmuch as they collect considerable revenue through fines levied upon the people; e. The "witness" is protected from charges of perjury under Briscoe Et. al. v. LaHue Et. al., 460 U.S. 325 (1983). In other words, the unconstitutional Supreme Tribunal of the UNITED STATES has opened the door for government agents to lie at their leisure and will, in order to unlawfully imprison, fine or otherwise punish the American Citizens; and, f. Alleged jurisdiction was/is usurped over us through fraud perpetrated by the BAR Association, TOWN, COUNTY and STATE obstructing our Unalienable/Substantive Rights. Counts LXXX through LXXXIV. Count LXXX. Treason, Count LXXXI. Conspiracy to commit fraud; Count LXXXII. Criminal Fraud; Count LXXXIII. Conflict of interest; Count LXXXIV. Collusion. This tribunal is a self-initiating business entity servicing its esoteric soldiers, to wit: Page 36 of 55 a. Attorneys at law are considered by statute and the judiciary to be "officers of the court." Both the Judge and Prosecutor are Attorneys at law. The Prosecutor initiated this proceeding. The Prosecutors are suppose to be executive-officers, but as evidence supports, are in fact judicial officers. Moreover, agents of the BAR Association (judges, prosecutors, tribunal, Plaintiffs, STATE, and LARIMER) conspire to force the accused to appear with an Attorney or Pro se (as one's own attorney). As an Attorney (officer of the court), one would unwittingly be declaring a status of statute merchant [UCC § 2-104(1); Colorado CRS 1973 § 4-1-201], and jurisdiction is thereby granted in an action between merchants [UCC § 2-104(3)]. Thus, one's unalienable Rights are seriously compromised. b. Attorneys at law are statute "merchants," as defined in the Federal and STATE corporate business codes [code means secret], supra. They hold membership and swear allegiance to corporate business entities known as BAR Associations (e.g., American BAR Association) while representing that they are working on behalf of the American public (fraud; conflict of interest). Disclosure of these facts is not published for the general public (treason). Counts LXXXV through LXXXVII. Count LXXXV. Conspiracy to commit fraud; Count LXXXVI. Criminal Fraud; Count LXXXVII. Bills of: Attainder; Pains and Penalties The law (common-law), supra, secures our referenced unalienable Rights. Your tribunals, represented as “Courts of Law,” only service statutes, ordinances, regulations, etc. Statutes are not law, UCC § 1-103:6, Colorado CRS 1973 § 4-1-103, but "A statute should be construed in harmony with the common-law unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the common-law." An abrogation of the law would mean that the statutes are written and enforced out-side of the law by outlaws. Statutes do not secure unalienable Rights, but create civil rights/remedies. Civil rights/remedies are merely a condition of politics and are at best whimsical, abstruse, ambiguous and abstract. Further, there are over 3 million- (3,000,000) Statute and law-books in the Library of Congress and well-over 60 million-(60,000,000) statutes written therein. Moreover, statutes are written by the BAR Association and are both ambiguous and abstruse in construction. To attempt an understanding of this colorable law, one has to employ one of the BAR Association’s officers of the court (Attorneys at law). The judicial prerequisites for Attorneys at law on the Federal level and in most States are: to earn a baccalaureate degree from an approved university; take and pass an entrance exam to an approved law school; pass the scrutiny of the admissions officer; attend and graduate from the approved law school; take and pass the BAR Association exam proffered and graded by law professionals; join the BAR Association (a private corporation); and, serve an informal internship. Mind you, after all that, most Attorneys lose more than half their cases. Thus, the "experts" do notunderstand the statutes. Yet the responsibility and punishment doled out by the judiciary burdens solely Page 37 of 55 the natural person and res of the public. Therefore, if it takes such education to attempt an understanding of the statutes, then it is reasonable that neither the average American Citizen nor corporate U.S. citizens could comprehend such ambiguities and complexities. These facts support that in most cases, as applied to the American public, statutes, and their filial relations, are Bills of: Attainder; and Pains and penalties supported by fraud (constructive and actual); menace; duress; and undue influence. Logically, neither “American Citizens” nor “citizens of the United States” are informed as to the “Nature and cause of the accusations;” a prerequisite under Amendment VI, Constitution for the United States of America. These facts bear that even the majority of the officers of the court do not understand these colorable laws, yet hourly, many Americans and U.S. citizens are murdered, assaulted, imprisoned, fined, and have their property seized/ impounded/stolen through enforcement of this colorable law (statutes). Furthermore, the land of the free and home of the brave now has the largest prison, probation and parole population in the world. Count LXXXVIII. The STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF LARIMER, CITY OF FORT COLLINS, CITY OF LOVELAND being represented as the Plaintiff. As a collective sovereignty the body politic (American Citizens) known as the Colorado-State, exercising its jurisdiction as a member of the Republic of the several States, enjoys immunity from prosecution. The State of Colorado, as its name implies, is a corporation called STATE within the Colorado- State and found in the geographical area known as Colorado. To our knowledge, other than beguiled through fraud and undue influence, we have engaged in NO contracts or agreements with the corporations known as the BAR Association or its franchisee’s (State of Colorado, County of Larimer, City of Fort Collins, City of Loveland, etc.) relinquishing our natural Rights. Moreover, as the officers of the court know, it is a published fact that to move in the name of a fiction is a contempt of court. The BAR Association, STATE, COUNTY and CITY are fictitious plaintiffs. Therefore, in a Court-of-Law, the moving party (BAR Association), through its agents the Prosecutor and judge, and its co-conspirators (e.g., State of Colorado, County of Larimer) initiating this case would be charged with contempt of court. Count LXXXIX. Criminal impersonation of peace-officer. To reiterate, the U.S., STATE, COUNTY and CITY police officers have become glorified corporate security-guards impersonating peace-officers. Once we had a proper government of “We the People;” however, when the corporate governments took over and voluntarily became sub-status subsidiary corporations under the Federal corporation through bankruptcy, their function as government was lost. The aforementioned became corporate businesses devouring (annexing) property and people, leaving in their wake subjects and denizens bound by corporate tyranny. These corporations nefariously embraced the Uniform Commercial Code and codified it into their own contractual tyranny based Page 38 of 55 totalitarian governments usurping power and authority over the American people. The corporate interest was then proliferated and the natural Rights of the people were extirpated. These conspiracies evinced the birth of the corporate “law enforcement officer,” or corporate security-guard. The corporations supra did not inform the American people that they had fraudulently usurped authority and that the American people had lost their police powers under the individual and several Constitutions; and, that the new job of the corporate security-guards was to process people and feed the socialistic behemoth totalitarian government through colorable law a/k/a statutes. Law enforcement officers do not enforce law but enforce colorable law, which in turn leaves the American people with no police-power to offset the tyranny of the corporate government, the BAR Association and the corporate security-guards, and to protect the interest, person and res of the body politic “We the People.” Count XC and Count XCII. Count XC. Criminal Impersonation of a Judicial Officer; Count XCI. Criminal Conspiracy to impersonate a judicial officer; Count XCII. Conspiracy against rights Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 241. Merchant-officers-Chisum, Mendoza and Rabson and merchant-deputies-Shellhaas, Anderson, Harrison and many others did willfully and knowingly each impersonate a judicial officer by representing that an “arrest warrant” had been lawfully issued; however, since a judge or magistrate had not signed the “arrest warrant” merchants-Chisum, Mendoza, Rabson, Shellhaas, Anderson, Harrison and many others, by and through their principals did represent that they then were judicial officers and qualified to create and execute an “arrest warrant.” Only a judge or magistrate can issue an “arrest warrant,” and merchants- Chisum, Mendoza, Rabson, Shellhaas, Anderson, Harrison and many others, if they were a “peace-officers,” would be under the Executive branch of government. However, since they are not “peace-officers,” but “law enforcement officers” one questions precisely what position merchants- Chisum, Mendoza, Rabson, Shellhaas, Anderson, Harrison and many others play in the corporate government. Merchant-deputies-Sims and Cory Huff did willfully and knowingly threaten me ordering me to give personal information based on a fatally flawed and substantially defective arrest warrant, knowing that the “arrest warrant” was not signed and, therefore, not enforceable. In addition, the Prosecutor and the judiciary have conspired with merchants- Chisum, Mendoza, Rabson, Shellhaas, Anderson, Harrison and many others, inasmuch as the foregoing have supported the mega-myriad “Statute Enforcement Officers” in their obvious disguise on the highway with is a violation of Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 241, Conspiracy against rights. Count XCIII. Racketeering through false conveyance of language. The corporation known as the State of Colorado operates under the “Uniform Commercial Code § 10-103,” wherein it states that any act or part of an act inconsistent with this act is hereby repealed. Thus, Page 39 of 55 the rights of the American people have been repealed. This language opened the door for the corporate State, County and City to write statutes replete with false conveyances of language in order to over throw the American form of government. The statutes referenced by the defective warrant are 42-4-1101(1) and 42-2- 101(1). These statutes are replete with false language and are thus felonious under the law and the anti-law known as “Title 18 United States Code § 1001, Statements or entries generally.” For clarification see the Addendum referenced supra. Through willful and knowing deception the British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association and Rothschild Bank-Cartel [hereafter Bank-Cartel] United States totalitarian government has usurped allrights and powers over the American people through felonious false conveyance of language, herein listing but a few: Adjective~Noun Adjective~Noun Adjective~Noun Driver’s License Sales Tax District Attorney Marriage License Income Tax Police Officer Business License Vehicle Registration Court Clerk Occupational License Building Permit Case Number Property Tax Attorney General County Sheriff Adjective~Adjective~Noun Social Security Number District Court Judge Larimer County Court Municipal Court Judge Circuit Court Judge Colorado Driver License As the professionals, the legislative, executive and judicial branch-people, well know, these phrases begin with a noun and end with a noun in their proper sense. However, when placed together the first noun modifies the second noun, which thereby converts the first noun into an adjective. Thus, Driver, Marriage, Business, Occupational, Property, Sales, Income, Vehicle, Building, Attorney, District, Police, Court, Case and County have all been relegated to the role of adjective used to modify the nouns: License, Tax, Registration, Permit, General, Attorney, Officer, Clerk, Number and Sheriff, respectively. Additionally, the language Social, Municipal, District, Circuit, Larimer and Colorado become adjectives inasmuch as they modify the nouns Security, Court, County and Driver; and, Security, Court, County and Driver become adjectives inasmuch as they modify the nouns Number, Judge, Court and License, respectively. The corporate government has placed one out of every thirty Americans in prison, on probation or parole. Large sums of funds are taken in hourly through these false conveyances of language to the destruction of the American people and the feed the socialistic behemoth totalitarian government created through these usurpations of power and authority perpetrated by the BAR and its cohorts. While calling top officials of the STATE, the COUNTY, the CITY and the TOWN we have supported that the officials do not know their own statutes and ordinances, yet they imprison, place on probation or parole, steal the monies or murder the American people minute-by-minute. Page 40 of 55 Counts XCIV and XCV. Count XCIV. Obstruction of justice; Count XCV. Denial of due process of law. We have filed facts of treason, conspiracy to commit treason, assault and battery, criminal negligence, falsification of legal documents, criminal fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, false arrest, the commission of crimes while armed and dangerous, armed robbery, theft by armed robbery, conspiracy in enforcing Bills of Pains and penalties, collusion, criminal impersonation of a peace-officer, criminal impersonation of a judicial officer, racketeering, racketeering through false conveyance of language, and other crimes perpetrated against us and demanded the impaneling of a proper grand jury against the Accused listed in the documents we filed listed supra. However, no action is taken with the exception that we are tampered with to attempt to terrify us into not proceeding against the nefarious entities perpetrating these crimes. The judiciary and executive department’s-officers, agents, brokers and intermediaries are attempting every thing in their power to obstruct justice for their own evil gain. Counts XCVI and C. Count XCVI. Obstruction of justice; Count XCVII. Tampering with a witness, victim; Count XCVIII. Conspiracy against rights; Count XCIX. Assault and battery; Count C. Criminal negligence. I, Martha E. Cooper, along with Austin filed criminal charges against the Accused for shooting us with radar, lidar and laser and we have proven the crimes of assault and battery, criminal negligence, conspiracy against our rights, treason, conspiracy to commit treason, conspiracy in a Bill of Pains and penalties, criminal fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, obstruction of justice, armed robbery, and other crimes against us. No one has disputed the facts enumerated or articulated therein. However, two times the County merchant-police have kidnapped for ransom my husband without a properly issued “arrest warrant.” The facts bear that the County and State ‘storm-troopers’ are attempting to frighten us into submission of their tyranny. Count CI. Tampering with a witness, victim. The unknown merchant-deputy with the blond-Marine-Corps-haircut threatened me that if I do not appear at the “court” that my wife Martha would be arrested because she signed the bond-papers. Counts CII, CIV and CVI False arrest, Counts CIII, CV and CVII false imprisonment. CII and CIII – On April 25, 2003 C.E., merchant Chief of Police of Loveland’s-officers pulled me over,assaulted and battered me, committed criminal negligence against me, kidnapped me for ransom under the auspices of authority of a “arrest warrant” that was not signed by a judge or magistrate. Furthermore, the officers charged me with “Failure to Appear” for a hearing for the alleged crime of “speeding.” The Page 41 of 55 officers then charged me with something known as “DUR.” I was held for ransom of $300.00. I had, in fact, appeared for the hearings by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and, in the documentation I had filed referenced the law under “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law,” page 1135, “§ 329 2. Liberty,” which states, “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” CIV and CV – On June 1, 2003 C.E. merchant-deputies of the “Larimer County Sheriff’s Office” came tomy property, entered said property and said they had a warrant for my arrest. We, Martha and I, asked to see the alleged “arrest warrant” and was told, “No.” I was acting in good-faith when talking to the deputies. The merchant-deputies then proceeded to grab me and twist my arms in an awkward position causing great pain and held me there while one of the deputies placed handcuffs around my wrists. In spite of the fact that the deputies had no valid “arrest warrant” I did not resist, therefore, the deputies had no cause for their sadism in twisting my arms and wrist in an unnatural position causing me great pain in my wrist and shoulders. After many threats of violence I was taken to the “Larimer County Detention Center” where more threats were espoused against me. I was “booked” for alleged “Failure to Appear” anent and unlawful “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “Speeding” and for another “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “DUR.” I was held for ransom of $1,500.00. I had, in fact, appeared by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and no oppositional argument was ever filed. Thus, through “tacit agreement” the Accused concurred that their jurisdiction was unlawful and through Admiralty, not the Common-Law. In good faith, I had supported my position by informing the Accused of the Law, to wit: “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law,” page 1135, “§ 329 2. Liberty,” which states, “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an Page 42 of 55 orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” Thus, the Accused had no probable cause for their willful and knowing criminal acts perpetrated against me and us. CVI and CVII – On August 7, 2003 C.E. merchant-deputies of the “Larimer County Sheriff’s Office”came to my property, entered said property and said they had a warrant for my arrest. Again, like the past, We, Martha and I, asked to see the alleged “arrest warrant” and was told, “No.” I was acting in good-faith when talking to the deputies. Merchant-deputy Harrison and I had a discussion and after approximately ten to fifteen minutes of us, my wife and me, demanding to see the alleged “arrest warrant” he suggested that if he went and got the signed “arrest warrant” would I go with him peaceably. I said, “Yes.” The deputies then left the premises. Then approximately one and one/half (1½) hours later they came back in greater force. Deputy Harrison told us, my wife and me, that they could not find a judge that was awake to sign the “arrest warrant,” but that he had seen a copy of the signed “arrest warrant,” a contradiction, and, therefore, was placing me under arrest. Thus, he admitted there was no signed arrest warrant and then said he saw a copy. History supports that several documents entitled “arrest warrants” have been enforced upon me and not a single one has been signed. The merchant-deputies then proceeded to grab me and twist my arms in an awkward position causing great pain and held me there while one of the deputies placed handcuffs around my wrists. In spite of the fact that the deputies had no valid “arrest warrant” I did not resist, therefore, the deputies had no cause for their sadism in twisting my arms and wrist in an unnatural position causing me great pain in my wrist and shoulders. After many threats of violence I was taken to the “Larimer County Detention Center” where more threats were espoused against me. I was “booked” for alleged “Failure to Appear” anent an unlawful “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “Speeding,” and for another “traffic ticket” issued through the alleged action of “DUR,” and FTA/Civil. I was held for ransom of $2,000.00 with a “PR”-bond for $1,500.00. I had, in fact, appeared by paper challenging jurisdiction of the Admiralty-tribunal and no oppositional argument was ever filed. Thus, through “tacit agreement” the Accused concurred that their jurisdiction was unlawful and through Admiralty, not the Common-Law. In good faith, I had supported my position by informing the Accused of the Law, to wit: “11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law,” page 1135, “§ 329 2. Liberty,” which states, “Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion – to go where and when one pleases – only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an Page 43 of 55 orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another’s rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.” I was held in the concentration-camp known as the “Larimer County Detention Center” for five days. Thus, the Accused had no probable cause for their willful and knowing criminal acts perpetrated against me and us. Count CVIII. Theft of ransomed monies. The Accused did, willfully and knowingly, take ransom monies from me, to wit: 1. $300.00, 2. $1,500.00 and 3. $2,000.00 and have held onto the ransomed monies in spite of the fact that under Constitution Law as stated in 11 AmJur § 329 I have the right to travel in my automobile on the public highways. F or the crimes committed against us, in addition to a demand for criminal prosecution, we hereby servethis “Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt” on the parties listed as the Interested Parties infra, listed numbers 1 through 27, to be paid jointly or severally, forthwith: Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt Itemized Bill (1 st notice)Item Cost Jointly and severally Interest at 1.5 % / Month after first month Sub-total Total Treason $100,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 31 = $3,100,000.00 $3,100,000.00 Conspiracy to commit treason $100,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $100,000.00 x 31 = $3,100,000.00 $3,100,000.00 Assault and Battery $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 3 = $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Extortion $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 3 = $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Criminal negligence $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 3 = $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Falsification of documents $10,000.00 per warrant No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 3 = $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Criminal trespass while armed and dangerous $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 2 = $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Page 44 of 55 Commission of crimes while armed and dangerous $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 16 = $160,000.00 $160,000.00 Obstruction of justice $20,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $20,000.00 x 8 = $160,000.00 $160,000.00 Criminal fraud $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 6 = $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Conspiracy to commit fraud $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 6 = $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Racketeering $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Racketeering through false conveyance of language $10,000.00No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Witness and victim tampering $20,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $20,000.00 x 10 = $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Willful and knowingly making false statement or entries $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 8 = $80,000.00 $80,000.00 Fictitious Plaintiff $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Conspiracy to commit fraud $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 7 = $20,000.00 $140,000.00 Kidnapping for ransom $50,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $50,000.00 x 3 = $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Conspiracy against our rights $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 14 = $140,000.00 $140,000.00 Criminal impersonation of a peace-officer $10,000.00 per person No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 29 = $290,000.00 $290,000.00 Criminal impersonation of a judicial officer $10,000.00No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 15 = $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Unlawful search $10,000.00No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Enforcement of a Bill of Pains and penalties $10,000.00No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 8 = $80,000.00 $80,000.00 Conspiracy in a Bill of Pains and $10,000.00No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 8 = $80,000.00 Page 45 of 55 penalties $80,000.00Theft of ransomed monies $300.00 + $1,500.00 + $2,000.00 No Interest Applied at this time $3,800.00 $3,800.00 Wear and Tear on Automobile As of this date = 350.00 No Interest Applied $350.00 $350.00 Photocopying 2,326 pages @ .25 / pg As of this date = $581.50 No Interest Applied $581.50 $581.50 Gasoline for Automobile As of this date = $500.00 No Interest Applied $500.00 $500.00 Research Material Anderson on UCC Black’s Law Dictionary $687.00 $120.00 No Interest Applied $687.00 $120.00 $687.00 $120.00 SUB-TOTAL - - - $8,136,038.50Addendum - Kidnapping $50,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Addendum - Assault $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Addendum – Witness and victim tampering $20,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $20,000.00 x 1 count $20,000.00 Addendum – Criminal negligence $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Addendum – Cruel and unusual punishment $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Addendum – Obstruction of justice $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Addendum – Conspiracy against our rights $10,000.00 per count per person No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 6 = $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Addendum – Criminal trespass while armed and dangerous $10,000.00 per count per merchantdeputy No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 2 = $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Addendum – Commission of crimes while armed and dangerous $10,000.00 per count per merchantdeputy No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 2 = $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Additional Wear and Tear on Automobile As of this date = 50.00 No Interest Applied $50.00 $50.00 Additional Photocopying 1,015 pages @ .25 / pg As of this date = $253.75 No Interest Applied $253.75 $253.75 Additional Gasoline As of this date No Interest $40.00 $40.00Page 46 of 55 for Automobile = $40.00 AppliedSUB-TOTAL - - - $8,346,382.25Second Addendum – Kidnapping $50,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Second Addendum – Assault $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Second Addendum – Witness and victim tampering $20,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $20,000.00 x 1 count $20,000.00 Second Addendum – Cruel and unusual punishment $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Second Addendum – Obstruction of justice $10,000.00 per count No Interest Applied $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Second Addendum – Conspiracy against our rights $10,000.00 per count per person No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 3 = $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Second Addendum – Commission of crimes while armed and dangerous $10,000.00 per count per merchantofficer No Interest Applied $10,000.00 x 5 = $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Second Additional Wear and Tear on Automobile 50.00No Interest Applied $50.00 $50.00 Additional Photocopying 3,610 pages @ .25 / pg As of this date = $902.50 No Interest Applied $902.50 $902.50 Additional Gasoline for Automobile As of this date = $40.00 No Interest Applied $40.00 $40.00 SUB-TOTAL - - - $8,527,374.75Punitive Damage $1,000,000.00No Interest Applied $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 Addendum – Punitive Damage As of this date = $1,000,000.00 No Interest Applied $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 Second Addendum – Punitive Damage As of this date = $1,000,000.00 No Interest Applied $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 TOTAL - - - $11,527,374.75Monthly Late Fee 1.5% Interest As of this date =0 No Interest Applied 0 0 GRAND TOTAL - - - $11,527,374.75To Avoid Collection Enforcement Actions, You Must Immediately :• Pay $11,527,374.75 within 30 days.Page 47 of 55 • This money is to be paid in the money of account, gold or silver-coin; however, if the Accuseddoes not have the money of account the debt can be paid in promissory notes [e.g., Federal Reserve-Notes], by check or money-order, and it is understood that we “receive” said payment “without prejudice.” • Return this bill with your certified check or money-order.If You Do Not Respond To This Bill :• Enforcement-actions will be taken against you for the total amount due and owing, plus penaltyand/or interest due. • A lien can be filed against you. This would affect your credit-rating. This lien could be placedagainst your real property and be a matter of public record. • All future Bills will be sent by regular mail.Be Advised :• Interest and other incurred costs shall be added to future billings.• Interest shall be added to the balance due until full payment is received.• The interest will be charged at 1.5% per month until full payment is received.Thanks for your immediate attention regarding this matter. ______________________________ _______________________________ Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper In Summary It is an axiom of law and American justice that a natural person is innocent until proven guilty. In a Court-of-Law, we would not have to prove that we were not exceeding our natural and unalienable rights; the burden of proof would be upon the Plaintiff. Moreover, in a Court-of-Law, the complainant and his/its cohorts would be liable for their criminal actions if frivolous and fraudulent. When an overzealous corporation and its officers arbitrarily decide to deny all the Substantive Rights fought and died for in our great Republic, such tyranny must be disciplined. We suggest that by statutory construction and complacency, a conditioned reflexology has manifested the observation of our fellow human beings as corporate chattel and not free-living human beings. Thus, the corporate government finds itself consumed in a web that demands the property and Rights of the people as a tribute for its leadership. History recognizes that, with noble conviction, the law community assumed a role to champion the Rights of the people, but in the process, Unalienable Rights were lost to contractual (civil/statute) rights granted by man. Hence, instead of profound Rights from the Heavenly Father-Yahuah, secured by Amendments 1-10 of the Constitution for the United States of America, we now have arbitrary rights from man. Instead of a Constitutional "Republic1," protecting the Rights of each human being, we now have a 1 Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution for the United States, "The United States shall guarantee to Every Statein the Union a Republican Form of government." Page 48 of 55 creditor (Federal Reserve) democracy promulgating "the good of our (international bankers) majority outweighs the good of humanity." This beloved country called America now has the largest prison, probation, and parole population in the world. Since the BAR Association took over our government, and their avalanche of anti-law-statutes swept over our liberty and justice, burying it under the well over 60,000,000 statutes, the once great patriotic and noble collective sovereignty known as “We the People” has now become a nation of slaves. The BAR Association’s International Criminal Court is the crescendo to the take-over of the world by the Banking- Cartel into a one-world-government; and completes the final extirpation of the Rights, Liberty and Freedom “We the People” once held sacrosanct. Please remember, however noble the gestures, personal bias and prejudice still cloud human judgment. Wherefore, a. We do not grant jurisdiction of our natural person and/or res to this tribunal or the corporate entities known as the “BAR-Association,” the “County of Larimer,” the “State of Colorado,” the “City of Loveland,” nor the “City of Fort Collins.” b. We demand that the Accused pay compensatory damage for the crimes committed against me, Austin Gary Cooper, and me, Martha E. Cooper, of Eight-million five hundred twenty seventhousand- three hundred seventy four-dollars and seventy five cents ($8,527,374.75), jointly or severally, in the money of account, see Article I, Section 10 in the Constitution for the United States of America, which, if not tendered in the money of account, that being gold or silver-coin, but paid in “Federal Reserve Notes” or bank-draft, will be received by us without prejudice. c. We demand that the Accused pay punitive damage for the crimes committed against us, Austin Gary Cooper and Martha E. Cooper, of Three-million-dollars ($3,000,000.00) jointly or severally, in the money of account, see Article I, Section 10 in the Constitution for the United States of America, which, if not tendered in the money of account, that being gold or silver-coin, but paid in “Federal Reserve Notes” or bank-draft, will be received by us without prejudice. d. If this tribunal causes us further injury, this “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false Page 49 of 55 conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five counts, False imprisonment times five counts, Assault and Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for ransom times five counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception” shall serve as evidence that all have been forewarned and, therefore, have assumed the posture of accessories after the fact. Further, that willfully and knowingly this tribunal and judges have conspired with the Plaintiff to injure me. e. We demand our Right to appear before a grand jury to present this evidence enumerated and articulated herein against the Accused. It should be understood that thus far we have been denied the information needed to address a grand jury on this issue. Additionally, notwithstanding the treason, the BAR Association’s officers of the court secretly impanel grand juries and plead their causes for indictment. Such embracery is published as felonies in the Federal statutes (see Title 18 United States Code Annotated § 1503 [Tampering with a juror generally] and § 1504 [Tampering with a juror by writing]), yet your officers of the court are not prosecuted (selective prosecution, racketeering, conspiracy). Further, there is nothing published stating that an American Citizen or U.S. citizen cannot appear personally, without interference or accompaniment by the BAR Association’s officer of the court, before a grand jury, but information regarding this course of action is unavailable to the general public. f. This “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five counts, False imprisonment times five counts, Assault and Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for ransom times five counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception, “Account number”: 03T201008 and 03T200131, and other numbers randomly or with purpose included in this action, and numerous alleged “arrest warrants.” _________________________________ __________________________________ Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper Page 50 of 55 Affirmation I, Austin Gary Cooper, and I, Martha E. Cooper, do hereby affirm that the foregoing “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five counts, False imprisonment times five counts, Assault and Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for ransom times five counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception” is true, accurate and correct to the best of our knowledge, information and belief. _________________________________ __________________________________ Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper Colorado-State : : ss/asv Larimer-County : Subscribed and sworn to before me this ____ day of February 2004 C.E. My Commission Expires: _____________________________________ Notary-Public Seal Certificate of Service and Interested Parties We Hereby Certify that the foregoing “Second Addendum To: Special Appearance, and Formal and Constructive Notice, and Criminal Complaint with Bill of Particulars, and an Information in a Criminal Case, and Demand Criminal Prosecution Against Plaintiffs and Accused by a Non-British Accredited Registry [BAR] Association Judicial Sibling and Member, and a Bill for the Debt, Payment Due Upon Receipt against all of the Accused herein listed. We hereby charge and support the crimes by the Accused of: Treason and conspiracy to commit treason each times thirty-one (31) counts, Criminal Page 51 of 55 fraud, Conspiracy to commit fraud, Conspiracy to prosecute the American people through Bills of Pains and penalties, Conspiracy against rights, Mail-fraud, Racketeering, Racketeering through false conveyance of language, Felony false conveyance of language, Collusion, Menace, False arrest times five counts, False imprisonment times five counts, Assault and Battery times five counts, Kidnapping for ransom times five counts, simple Assault, Continual Criminal Enterprise, Willful and knowing false representation of Article I Tribunals as Article III Courts, Conversion, Extortion times three counts, and Fraud by deception” was presented to a process server for service to the following and certified mail, return receipt requested where designated, to be filed into the account-number supra, on this the ____ day of February, 2004 C.E., to: 1. Merchant Sherlyn K. Sampson, Clerk Larimer County Justice Center c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2431 5146. 2. Bill Owens Governor of the State of Colorado c/o 136 State Capitol Denver, CO 80203-1792 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8140. 3. Merchant-Judge Mary Mullarkey Chief Justice of the Supreme Tribunal/court of the State of Colorado c/o 435 Judicial Building Denver, CO 80203 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8157. 4. Merchant-Judge Christine A. Carney Larimer County (Loveland) c/o 810 East 10th Street, Suite 110 Loveland, CO 80537-4942 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8164. 5. Merchant-Judge James H. Hiatt Larimer County Justice Center c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8171. 6. Merchant-Judge Terence A. Gilmore Larimer County Justice Center c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8188. 7. Merchant-Judge Dave Williams Larimer County Justice Center c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8195. Page 52 of 55 8. Merchant-Judge Daniel J. Kaup Larimer County Justice Center c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8201. 9. Merchant-Judge Jolene C. Blair Larimer County Justice Center c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8218. 10. Merchant-Judge Peter E. Schoon, Jr. Larimer County Justice Center c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8225. 11. Merchant-Judge Ronald I. Schultz Larimer County Justice Center c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8232. 12. Merchant-Judge C. Edward Stirman Larimer County Justice Center c/o 201 LaPorte Avenue, Suite 100 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2761 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8249. 13. Merchant-District-Attorney-Stuart VanMeveren 201 La Porte Avenue #200 Fort Collins, CO 80521-2763 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8256. 14. Merchant-Sheriff Alderden c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Cert.-mail-number 7002 2410 0000 2445 8263. 15. Merchant-Police Chief-Tom Wagoner c/o 810 E. 10th Street Loveland, Colorado 80537 Cert.-mail-number 7002 0510 0001 8675 1108. 16. Merchant-Police Chief-Dennis V. Harrison c/o 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 Cert.-mail-number 7002 0510 0001 8675 1115. 17. Merchant-Deputy Sanderson c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden. 18. Merchant-Deputy Harrison c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden. Page 53 of 55 19. Merchant-Sergeant Rabson c/o 810 E. 10th Street Loveland, Colorado 80537 Served through his principle, merchant-Wagoner. 20. Merchant-Officer Chisum c/o 810 E. 10th Street Loveland, Colorado 80537 Served through his principle, merchant- Wagoner. 21. Merchant-Officer Albert Mendoza c/o 810 E. 10th Street Loveland, Colorado 80537 Served through his principle, merchant- Wagoner. 22. Merchant-Corporal-Shellhaas c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden. 23. Merchant-Deputy Anderson c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden. 24. Merchant-Deputy Sims, badge-# 0138 c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden. 25. Merchant-Deputy Cory Huff c/o 2501 Midpoint Drive Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 Served through his principle, merchant-Alderden. 26. Merchant-Officer Hofkamp c/o 810 E. 10th Street Loveland, Colorado 80537 Served through his principle, merchant-Wagoner. 27. Merchant-Officer Jeff O’Brien c/o 300 LaPorte Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80521 Served through his principle, merchant- Harrison. ________________________________ __________________________________ Austin Gary Cooper Martha E. Cooper
|