logo top

bubbles

logo bottom
 


 
dot


 

           Welcome to Call to Decision 

 


Subject: Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth-Control Drugs?
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:37:14 -0600

Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth-Control Drugs?

About 15 years ago, my husband and I were having a discussion regarding the globalists and how they planned to rid the world of the "useless eaters". At the time, my husband still clung to the notion governments were, for the most part, benevolent necessities --albeit a royal pain in the posterior. He could not believe some of the things I told him then, but has since seen the errors in his thinking, thankfully. I told him of the various verified horror stories involving the United Nations' World Health Organization's vaccination program and remarked the day would come when vaccinations for disease would clandestinely be used for birth control in third world nations. My husband scoffed at such an idea. But the United Nations, the various leftist foundations supporting it and their allies, the Deep Ecology EcoNuts, are relentless in their goals to subjugate man to nature. "Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth-Control Drugs?" is an eye-opening article. Some researchers think it likely that the various WHO-sponsored vaccine programs (particularly the smallpox program) in Africa in the 1970s are responsible for unleashing AIDS in Africa in the 1980s.

 

An astonishing journal paper: 1 November, 1993. FASEB Journal, volume 7, pp.1381-1385. Authors-Stephan Dirnhofer et al. Dirnhofer is from the Institute for Biomedical Aging Research of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. A quote from the paper: "Our study provides insights into possible modes of action of the birth control vaccine promoted by the Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO (World Health Organization)."A birth control vaccine? What? Yes. A vaccine whose purpose is to achieve non-pregnancy where it ordinarily could occur. Sterilization? This particular vaccine is apparently just one of several anti-fertility vaccines the Task Force is promoting. Yes. There is a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines at WHO. This journal paper focuses on a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin B (hCG). There is a heading in the paper (p.1382) called "Ability of antibodies to neutralize the biological activity of hCG." The authors are trying to discover whether a state of no-fertility can be achieved by blocking the normal activity of hCG. They state, "We conclude from our results that both the efficacy and safety of the WHO vaccine are not yet ensured."

 

Another journal paper. The British Medical Bulletin, volume 49,1993. "Contraceptive Vaccines" is the title of the paper. The authors-RJ Aitken et al. From the MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK: "Three major approaches to contraceptive vaccine development are being pursued at the present time. The most advanced approach, which has already reached the stage of phase 2 clinical trials [human trials testing efficacy], involves the induction of immunity against human chorionic gonadotro-phin (hCG). Vaccines are being engineered ... incorporating tetanus or diptheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides... Clinical trials have revealed that such preparations are capable of stimulating the production of anti-hCG antibodies. However, the long-term consequences of such immunity in terms of safety or efficacy are, as yet, unknown..." The authors are talking about creating an immune response against a female hormone. The authors state, "The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone mat signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system."

 

Dr. Alan Cantwell Jr., M.D. wrote: "Using kids as guinea pigs in potentially harmful vaccine experiments is every parents' worst nightmare. This actually happened in 1989-1991 when Kaiser Permanente of Southern California and the US Cententer for Disease Control (CDC) jointly conducted a measles vaccine experiment. Without proper parental disclosure, the Yugoslavian-made 'high titre' Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine was tested on 1,500 poor, primarily black and Latino, inner city children in Los Angeles. Highly recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO), the high-potency experimental vaccine was previously injected into infants in Mexico, Haiti, and Africa. It was discontinued in these countries when it was discovered that the children were dying in large numbers.

 

"Unbelievably, the measles vaccine caused long-term suppression of the children's immune system for six months up to three years. As a result, the immunodepressed children died from other diseases in greater numbers than children who had never received the vaccine. Tragically, African girl babies in the experiment were given twice the dose of boys, and therefore suffered a higher death rate. The WHO pulled the vaccine off the market in 1992.

 

"Ironically, the E-Z measles vaccine tested by Kaiser on minority babies was supposed to increase immunity in younger infants. Instead, the vaccine produced the opposite effect. A Los Angeles Times editorial (June 20, 1996) assured readers that "none of the 1,500 was injured by the unlicensed vaccine" and called upon the CDC to ensure that experiments like the E-Z measles vaccine could never occur again.

 

"One wonders how many secret vaccine experiments are conducted by health authorities that never come to the attention of the public. During the two-year measles experiment I was employed by Kaiser and I never knew anything about it until I read the report in The Times five years later, in 1996.

 

"In the poor inner cities across the United States the number of asthma cases is exploding and health officials don't know why. According to the CDC, 5000 asthma deaths occur annually; and it is estimated that 17.3 million people (4.8 million are children) suffer from the disease, up from 6.7 million in 1980. Asthma usually begins before age 6, and blacks are two to three times more likely to die from asthma than whites. In the Bronx and Harlem sections of New York City, the hospitalisation rate for asthma is 21 times higher than in the more affluent areas of the city.

 

"Could the sharp rise in asthma in poor children be connected with immunosuppression caused by a barrage of vaccines, as well as a lack of quality medical care and insurance, poor diet, and environmental factors? The possible connection of immunosuppressive vaccines to diseases like asthma has never been raised by health officials.

 

"With vaccine experiments frequently performed in Africa and now on black Americans, no wonder one out of every four African-Americans believes AIDS was developed as a genocide program by the US government to exterminate the black population."

 

Dr. Guylaine Lanctot, M.D. wrote, "Vaccination decimates populations. Drastically in Third World countries. Chronically in industrialized countries. In this regard, the former President of the World Bank, former Secretary of State in the United States, who ordered massive bombing of Vietnam, and member of the Expanded Program on Immunization, Robert McNamara, made some very interesting remarks. As reported by a French publication, "j'ai tout compris", he was quoted as stating: 'One must take draconian measures of demographic reduction against the will of the populations. Reducing the birth rate has proved to be impossible or insufficient. One must therefore increase the mortality rate. How? By natural means. Famine and sickness.' (Translation)

 

"Vaccination enables the selection of populations to be decimated. It facilitates targeted genocide. It permits one to kill people of a certain race, a certain group, a certain country. And to leave others untouched. In the name of health and well-being, of course.

 

"At a CIA hearing, Dr. [Sidney] Gottlieb, a cancerologist, admitted having dispersed, in 1960, a large quantity of viruses in the Congo River (in Zaire) to pollute it and contaminate all the people who used the river as their source of water. Dr. Gotlieb was named to head up the National Cancer Institute!"

 

In fact, with Gottlieb's death, America has lost its prime poisoner. For many years, most notably in the 1950s and 1960s, Gottlieb presided over the CIA's technical services division and supervised preparation of lethal poisons, experiments in mind control and administration of LSD and other psycho-active drugs to unwitting subjects. Gottlieb's passing came at a convenient time for the CIA, just as several new trials involving victims of its experiments were being brought.

 

In April 1953 Sidney Gottlieb headed the secret project MK-ULTRA, which was started on the order of CIA director Allen Dulles (another Rockefeller man). Many people had their lives destroyed in this research financed by Gottlieb and the Rockefeller Foundation.

 

By the early 1960s Gottlieb's techniques and potions were being fully deployed in the field. Well-known is Gottlieb's journey to the Congo, where his little black bag held an Agency-developed biotoxin scheduled for Patrice Lumumba's toothbrush. He also tried to manage Iraq's general Kassim with a handkerchief doctored with botulinum and there were the endless poisons directed at Fidel Castro, from the LSD the Agency wanted to spray in his radio booth to the poisonous fountain pen intended for Castro that was handed by a CIA man to Rolando Cubela on November 22, 1963.

 

The Rockefeller Foundation is the prime sponsor of public relations for the United Nations' drastic depopulation program. Planned Parenthood is a major United Nations NGO. From its inception, the Rockefeller Foundation was at the vanguard of the birth control movement. One of the Foundation's first official acts was to take over and expand the Bureau of Social Hygiene. In 1913, the Foundation formally took charge of the Bureau and gave it the task of conducting "research and education on birth control, maternal health, and sex education." The Rockefeller Foundation, to this day, continues to provide significant support to Planned Parenthood. The International PP Medical Bulletin, for example, is primarily underwritten by the Foundation and is even linked to the Rockefeller Foundation website. The Rockefellers also developed a keen interest in birth control. The Ludlow massacre experience in, Colorado had taught the Rockefellers that growing numbers of discontented, underpaid workers posed an imminent danger to wealthy industrialists such as themselves. Then, in 1913, the year of the bloodbath in Colorado, the Rockefeller Foundation was launched with $50 million worth of Standard Oil assets. The Rockefeller Foundation made its first grant for birth control studies to the Social Science Research Council in 1923. Thirteen years later, the Foundation created an Office of Population Research at Princeton University to address the political aspects of population change. In 1952, John D. Rockefeller III established the New York-based Population Council. He was later to recall that the center was founded on the basis of his belief that "the mounting tempo of growth among the world's poorest people represented a major threat to social-economic development and to political stability."

 

Two years after the Population Council was inaugurated, the China Family Planning Association was formed, based on preliminary work done by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Rockefeller-funded population outfit at Princeton. Similar birth control organizations were established in other countries, such as Kenya, where "advisors" dispatched by the Population Council worked with former colonial administrators to introduce the idea of birth-prevention on a small scale. By the mid 1960s, such "planned parenthood" societies had been set up in almost every developing country.

 

In 1968, just three years after the U.S. government began openly financing those same birth control centers as part of its foreign economic assistance program, a Presidential Committee on Population and Family Planning was organized. Under the leadership of John D. Rockefeller III, the panel recommended that foreign population program be expanded "as rapidly as funds can be properly allocated by the U.S." Yet another commission of a similar nature was formed in 1969 by President Nixon to continue the old group's advisory task -- and it, too, was headed by John D. Rockefeller III.

 

Foundation money and other assets controlled by the Rockefeller family were instrumental in making population control an issue at the United Nations, as well. Indeed, the very ground on which UN headquarters in New York was built was a gift of the Rockefeller family. And the first director of UN's Population Division -- Frank Notestein - - came from the Rockefeller-created population office at Princeton University and later succeeded John D. III as president of the Population Council. The Rockefellers funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany, when eugenicists were preparing the way ideologically for what eventually became the world's most infamous slaughter, the Nazi holocaust. The Rockefeller Institute supported Alexis Carrel, who advocated the use of gas to get rid of the unwanted.

 

The UN wants to:

 

- Advance an aggressive "family" agenda to reduce the world's population - the UN brand of "family planning" always includes abortion on demand. All of this would be in order to solve the real problem behind the imagined worldwide food shortage, which in reality does not exist. The world does not have a food production problem - it has a food distribution problem.

 

- Encourage all nations to follow a China-like program of "Family planning" to control population levels so that there are fewer mouths to feed. A recent UN conference document praises China's population control policies, which include abortion, infanticide, and forced sterilization.

 

- Require every country, including the U.S., to monitor and control population growth to make sure there is enough agricultural land to sustain the population.

 

- Redistribute wealth from prosperous nations like the United States to impoverished countries in places like Africa, South America, and Asia.

 

Jameson Taylor writes, "As many prolifers may already know, some of America's richest men are ardent supporters of Planned Parenthood and its allies. George Soros, worth a measly $4 billion, established the Program on Reproductive Health and Rights, which has given millions to proabort causes. Ellen Chesler, author of Woman of Valor: Margaret Sanger and the Birth Control Movement in America, is director of the Soros-backed program. Bill Gates, valued at $76 billion, has given $57 million to the United Nations Population Fund; almost $14 million to International Planned Parenthood; $4 million to the Population Council and millions more to other related causes. Ted Turner, valued at $79 billion, earmarked $1 billion from 1997 to 2007 for UN health and population control efforts and is reportedly "close to creating a new film and television production company committed to making documentaries about…ecological responsibility and population control."

 

"The David and Lucille Packard Foundation, possessing assets of $13 billion, is almost exclusively concerned with population control and similar issues. And finally, Warren Buffet, currently worth $28 billion, plans to dedicate almost his entire fortune, once he and his wife die, to-you guessed it-"population control." Already, the Buffet Foundation has committed $20 million to IPAS (International Project Assistance Services), makers of the handheld abortive suction pump; $2 million to Family Health International; and an additional $1.4 million to Planned Parenthood. The Foundation also has intimate ties with the Population Council, inventors of NORPLANT and holders of the U.S. patent rights to RU486."

 

Jacques Yves Cousteau said, "However fragmented the world, however intense the national rivalries, it is an inexorable fact that we become more interdependent every day. I believe that national sovereignties will shrink in the face of universal interdependence. If we go on the way we have, the fault is our greed and if we are not willing to change, we will disappear from the face of the globe, to be replaced by the insect. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 per day."

 

"I suspect that eradicating smallpox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems." wrote John Davis, editor of Earth First Journal, "Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs."

 

Global Sustainability requires: "the deliberate quest of poverty ... reduced resource consumption ... and set levels of mortality control," said Professor Maurice King.

 

"The collective needs of non-human species must take precedence over the needs and desires of humans." said Dr. Reed F. Noss of The Wildlands Project.

 

Cannibalism is a "radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation," Lyall Watson, The Financial Times, 15 July 1995.

 

"...the only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States: We can't let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they don't suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them," Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund.

 

"One-fourth of humanity must be eliminated from the social body. We are in charge of God's selection process for planet earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death." Psychologist Barbara Marx Hubbard - member and futurist/strategist of Task Force Delta; a United States Army think tank.

 

". . . as radical environmentalists, we can see AIDS not as a problem, but as a necessary solution." Miss Ann Thropy (pseudonym), Earth First! Journal

 

"The extinction of the human species may not only be inevitable but a good thing . . . This is not to say that the rise of human civilization is insignificant, but there is no way of showing that it will be much help to the world in the long run." Economist editorial.

 

"If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels." Prince Phillip, World Wildlife Fund.

 

"The world has cancer, and the cancer is man." A. Gregg, Mankind at the Turning Point.

 

"People are the cause of all the problems; we have too many of them; we need to get rid of some of them, and this (ban of DDT) is as good a way as any." Charles Wurster, Environmental Defense Fund.

 

The interests of the financial elite in the United States soon became indistinguishable from the interests of the government. Indeed, the Rockefeller family has been a major funder of such influential associations as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Overseas Development Council, and dozens of "world affairs" study centers at American colleges and universities from which the nation's political leaders are drawn. In fact, 23 of the scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project to develop nuclear weapons were graduates of Rockefeller study programs.

 

Globalist social engineers and their elite masters have always felt they know what is best for humanity, regarding people as nothing but human capital. This was quite evident when the huge transnational corporations changed the name of the personnel department to the Department of Human Resources. According to Webster's Dictionary: Etymology: French ressource, from Old French ressourse relief, resource, from resourdre to relieve, literally, to rise again, from Latin resurgere -- more at RESURRECTION

1 a : a source of supply or support : an available means -- usually used in plural b : a natural source of wealth or revenue -- often used in plural c : computable wealth -- usually used in plural d : a source of information or expertise. People are merely a renewable commodity.

 

Their prime objective has always been the destruction of the middle class and absolute control over the lower class. To achieve this objective, it was first necessary to dumb-down the general populace and to increase the tuition price of the few worth-while learning institutions so as to be beyond the reach of average middle class families. The second step was to remove the American manufacturing base to nations having abundant labor available. The third step was to promote abortion, birth control and homosexuality to decimate the numbers of the middle class. The fourth step was to allow vast numbers of both illegal and legal immigrants from third world nations, most of whom do not speak english and are uneducated. Do the Chinese Coolies and immigrants from other nations used by the Robber Barons to build America's first railroads come to mind? They should, as should the sweat shops in the northeast and the steel mills of the midwest. These Robber Barons built the foundational fortunes of today's elite families. For that matter, why do you suppose it was illegal to teach slaves to read in the south? It is called control.

 

The International Money Fund's and other financial institutions such as the World Bank's "generous" interest-on-interest loans (ie. usury) are granted to developing third world nations on the condition that privatization of government assets at fire-sale prices continues, while at the same time bonding them to a debt they'll never be able to cancel. In many instances, a nation's natural resources are demanded as collateral to secure the huge debts. When the inevitable default occurs, the multinationals swoop in like vultures to pick the flesh from the bones of the carcass.

 

The multinationals can only use so many warm bodies. Why maintain a large population of "useless eaters"? The answer is, of course, you don't. You reduce the population to a controllable level. If less than ethical means are used, that is merely Robber Baron "business as ususal" operendi.